the advisory broad. These relationships will help faculty toidentify a series of industry related problems that exemplify current and cutting-edge trends andrelated workforce preparation needs to be addressed in the classroom.The junior year of the EE program started in the Cheney campus in the Fall 2005 quarter. Thefirst graduating class is scheduled to be in the 2006-2007 academic year. NSCC classes areplanned to begin Fall 2007. Table 1 summarizes the projected full time student enrollments forthe first 5 years. Note that the expected pool of students attending the program at the NSCCcampus is not restricted to current NSCC students, but includes potential students in pre-engineering from other community colleges in the region. The
Section 2071 Effective Teaching Methods in Lower Division Engineering Programs Julie Y.-Z. Wang and Mohammad Saifi Potomac State College of West Virginia UniversityAbstractOur teaching/learning strategy is to develop effective teaching and active learning methods forlower division engineering programs and prepare students for transferring to a four-year schoolsuccessfully. One of the student learning attitudes is described as “Tell me, I will forget; Showme, I may remember; Involve me, I will understand.” It reflects the way whether students canlearn effectively or not. In order to get
Session 3249 Attitude of Students Entering Engineering Technology Programs Daniel Chen1, Albert Peng1, Daniel Jones2 Central Michigan University1/SUNY Institute of Technology2IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to learn more about the attitudes of engineering technology freshmenin terms of their educational backgrounds, orientations and experiences in ET programs. Asurvey was designed and conducted to carry out this study. It was used to measure attitudinaldifferences among engineering technology freshmen in the following areas: • Career goals and elements for career decision
. During the first twoyears the students take engineering technology courses. Business related courses are taken by thestudents during the junior and senior years. Presently, a number of students are successfullypursuing this option. At the end of the 2003 spring semester, a number of engineering technologystudents will graduate with a BSB degree. The feedback received from the students who arepursuing this individual option is very positive. The Penn State Hazleton Industrial AdvisoryCommittee supports the program.The graduates from this individualized, interdisciplinary program will have the skills necessary toseek manufacturing management positions in industry. The multidisciplinary background of thegraduates will allow them to work and
page contained 12 questions that related primarily to the program offered. The second page contained 10 questions that were course specific.2. The programs were investigated through their web pages if available.3. A list of programs was developed from: • ASEE’s 1994-1995 Directory of Engineering Graduate Studies and Research, • A list of engineering management programs provided by Dr. Dundar Kokauglu (Portland State University), • A list of engineering management programs developed by Dr. Daniel Babcock (University of Missouri – Rolla), and Page 3.179.1 • From references provided during the survey process by the
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationcourses that are unique to each program. This leads to a discussion of ABET requirements and tothe types of activities performed in each engineering discipline.Videotape presentations and visits from officers of student organizations are also used to informstudents of the various engineering disciplines. Petroski’s To Engineer is Human9 videotape isused to illustrate the lessons that can be learned from errors made in the engineering designprocess.Ethical issues are introduced in two formats. The team board game, The Ethics Challenge10,provides an opportunity for serious discussion of workplace ethical decision-making. Scenariosfor academic ethics and how they relate to engineering are
Paper ID #20513The Development of a Freshman Engineering Research ProgramMichelle Audrey Pang, Sandia National LaboratoriesDr. Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin Associate Professor of Mechanical EngineeringDr. Sheldon Landsberger, University of Texas, Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FRESHMAN ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROGRAM Abstract Incorporating research opportunities into undergraduate engineering education providesstudents with early hands-on experiences that often influence retention
#prerequisites#since#the#service#academies#generally#require#some#level#of#technical#and#analytical#coursework#regardless#of#the#degree#awarded.#Consequently,#even#though#service#academy#graduates#may#not#have#an#engineering#or#related#technical#degree,#they#typically#have#adequate#background#to#enroll#and#succeed#in#the#program.# Page 23.1128.5 Page 23.1128.6Table&1.&&,V&Program&Elements,&Key&Activities,&and&Outcomes&& Program
, Fundamentals of Space Flight Systems, Astronomy, and Sr. Capstone Sequence. He was Department Chair for six years in the start-up of the Engineering Physics program. He enjoys mentoring undergraduate students in aerospace, sensors, and energy-related research projects. Some of the research areas include spacecraft nano-satellite technologies, satellite payload instrumenta- tion, High Altitude research Platform (HARP) experiments, wave particle interactions in space, space- flight X-ray imagers, construction and renewable energy engineering and architecture, and philosophy of science. Dr. Voss has worked as PI on many NASA, Air Force, Navy, NSF, and DOE research grants and has published over 120 scientific papers. hnvoss
Paper ID #37719Engineering Strong Bridges: Review of College Bridge ProgramsDr. Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Strong Bridges: Review of College Bridge ProgramsAbstractIn an effort to promote the retention and success of undergraduate students, many universitieshave established bridge programs. These programs are intended to help students who are talented,but need extra preparation to transition successfully from high school and perform at a
AC 2010-589: ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS:PLANNING, OPERATING AND GROWINGDonald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Associate Director of the Lear Entrepreneurial Program at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Don is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organization. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Don also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
per semester to graduation and the rest to be enrolling in one class per semester.[1] Since the start of the MSEM program, 58 applications have been processed, with 48accepted. Thus, the average admission rate was 82%. Of those accepted, 11 never enrolled in acourse. Four students were dismissed from the program due to academic underperformance; twoof these have applied for readmission and have been accepted.The program started the Engineering core courses on schedule for Fall 2020. The enrollmentstart was significantly below original estimates and stayed low, likely due a combination of thepandemic and some issues related to advertising. If the original enrollment predictions wereshifted to start in Fall 2020, then the enrollment history to
Paper ID #36532First-Year-Scholars (FYS) in Engineering Program (WIP)Cyril B Okhio (EngineeringProfessor) Cyril Okhio Ph.D., C. PEng., is a faculty of Engineering in the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Kennesaw State University. He graduated with a Ph.D. from Queen Mary/Imperial College London and was a Post-Doctoral research Fellow of the Science & Engineering Council SERC, United Kingdom UK. He is registered as a Chartered Professional Engineer with the Council of Registered Engineers, UK; a Member of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers UK, a Trustee of the Georgia
“draft of a survey related to the faculty issues at non-traditional engineering programs."The meeting was actually listed as Session 1732 Forum for Non-traditional EngineeringPrograms, with Dr. Gosink and Dr. Jones as Moderators (and the ECE Division, again, asSponsor). The published advance description of the session read, “ABET recognizes non-traditional engineering programs with titles such a general engineering, engineering science, engineering physics, or engineering systems. This forum will provide an opportunity for department heads/chairs and others interested in non- traditional engineering programs to discuss the problems, issues, opportunities, and unique Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual
, American Society for Engineering EducationCriterion 3 states that engineering degree programs must define a set of program outcomes,promote those outcomes to all constituents, and have in place a mechanism to continuouslyassess the achievement of these outcomes. Although ABET was reluctant at first to define whatwas meant by program outcomes, recent agreement has resulted in the following definition:Program Outcomes are statements that describe what students are expected to know and be ableto do by the time of graduation. These outcomes relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviorsthat students acquire in their matriculation through the program.Program OutcomesABET has published a list of eleven outcomes that they offer for general use by
Architects, Long Island Chapter Educator Award, 2019. She is currently serving as Chair of the Department of Architecture and Construction Management. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessment of an Architectural Engineering Technology ProgramAbstract:Reviewing degree programs periodically beyond ABET accreditation self-studies or collegeassessment report requirements can yield valuable insights. Course offerings of similar programsatother institutions can be compared, feedback from students and recent graduates assessed and thejob market for graduates re-examined. In 2019 the author of this paper was awarded a campusTitle III Students First
6distance education and online learning techniques are adapted more, the reach of EMGTprograms increases resulting in an increase in enrollment.The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Systems Engineering and EngineeringManagement Program, has decided to jump on the online bandwagon. Online deliveryhas been selected as a strategic initiative, which resulted in the establishment of anOnline MS in Engineering Management that will be starting during the Fall of 2009.As future research, it is recommended to benchmark each of the leading universities intheir offerings, program structures, faculty profiles and industry relations. Thisbenchmark information will be very important for engineering programs that are aimingto grow further.References[1
, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Fully Online Accredited Undergraduate Electrical Engineering ProgramAbstract:We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program ata large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for theprogram, its implementation and an assessment of student performance.The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program areidentical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily toextend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Ourenrolment statistics show that this
Paper ID #29262Master Educator Program in Engineering Technology EducationDr. Jikai Du, SUNY College at Buffalo Dr. Jikai Du is an associate professor at the Engineering Technology Department at the State University of New York College at Buffalo. His professional expertise includes undergraduate research experience, theoretical simulation and analysis of acoustic waves, ultrasound phased array technique simulations and applications, and various microscopy techniques. Dr. Du earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Science and Mechanics at the Pennsylvania State University. c American Society for
programs also face other difficulties. Students in theseprograms typically have lower SAT scores, and many of them were originally engineeringapplicants who did not meet the entrance requirements. In other cases, well-qualified ET studentsopt to either transfer to an engineering program within the College or leave to attend anotherinstitution. Since ET programs and their engineering counterparts are administered by the sameset of departments and are closely related, there is a constant need to maintain distinctiveness.We discovered that one way of doing this was to use the curriculum flexibility inherent in the PEand TS course bundles resident within all ET programs.Improving the Educational Outcomes of GraduatesUntil recently, the systematic use
theseinstitutions was charged with developing innovative curricula in an effort to enhance theexperiences of students at the freshman and sophomore levels in an attempt to increase students’interest in the science and engineering fields and improve retention beyond the sophomore year.One of the most reported curricular changes involves the careful integration of several courseswithin the discipline and across several disciplines. This was prompted mainly by the belief thatstudents’ understanding of the subject matters and their interest in engineering are greatlyimproved once they realize why the courses are important and how they are related to each other.The Integrated Engineering program introduced at Southern Utah University is based upon adifferent
Advanced Programming in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum B.D. Coller Department of Mechanical Engineering Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois 601151. IntroductionWe are in the process of developing an advanced computing and programming trackwithin the undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculum at Northern IllinoisUniversity (NIU). We are introducing our mechanical engineering students to conceptssuch as object oriented programming, data structures, complexity analysis, and elementsof software design that are normally taught to computer scientists. Rather than ship ourengineering students to
Session 1120 OMEN: An Online Grader for Engineering Programming Courses T.D.L. Walker, J.K. Goodman Engineering Fundamentals Division1 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAbstractOMEN (Online Materials Education Network) is a system developed within the EngineeringFundamentals (EF) Division at Virginia Tech for the distribution and grading of programmingprojects in courses where programming assignments are made in C++ or Fortran 90. It can beused to distribute and grade programming projects in any language that supports command linecompilation, linking, and
1999/2000 and the present, with four of these 12 going toResearch-Extensive universities). With these two successful programs as a basis, we are currentlyexpanding the PFF initiative to the Engineering College as a whole. Here we describe this college-level program, the resources required to sustain it, and why such a program is a valuable additionto doctoral training in engineering.2. Format of the PFF in Engineering ProgramThe UC PFF in Engineering program consists of three 1-credit seminars and a mentored teachingexperience. In addition each year a distinguished speaker is invited to address the College on atopic related to teaching. The program is arranged as follows:Effective Classroom Teaching, offered in the Winter Quarter, provides an
development. The company plans to begin test marketing in the second quarter of 2002. Articulation Innovations, LLC is a partnership between faculty at the University of Maryland Dental School and two Hinman CEOs. The dentists have developed patented devices for clinical and laboratory procedures in Prosthodontics and related dental specialties and the CEOs have joined the team to improve the engineering of the design and to develop a marketing plan for the product. NCIIA seed funding has provided professional level engineering and business software that is facilitating the team in improving the design and getting the product to market.F. Technology OpportunitiesSome of the CEOs have definite business ideas when they enter the program
deliverables. The faculty advisor for the project is required to identify which Program Outcomes are being met by this project. The student, faculty member, and Engineering Fundamentals department chair all must approve this project before the student is allowed to begin their project work. 5. BSE Core competencies checks. The assessment of competencies in the Engineering Fundamentals Core courses is limited to the common Core courses that all BSE students take: ENG1101, ENG1102, ENG2120, ENG3200, EE3010, and MY2100. This assessment involves the use of exam questions to determine if course learning objectives are being met. In order to relate the assessment to Program Outcomes, each course’s learning
Session 2213 Leadership and Mentoring in Undergraduate Engineering Programs Willie E. (Skip) Rochefort Chemical Engineering Department, Oregon State UniversitySUMMARYAs educators we often ask our Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) which qualities and skills theywould most like to see in new engineering graduates. Of course, good technical skills in the givendiscipline are always a priority and are what we as educators most closely monitor with ourgrading systems. However, following close behind are good oral and written communicationskills, the ability to work in interdisciplinary teams, and leadership skills. In the
more easily see the relevance of what is being taught in the program.There is, however, a down side to internships in the current economy and in the Muskegon areain particular. One of the reasons for starting the program was to fill a need for engineers coupledwith location related recruiting difficulties. The interns drawn from the manufacturingengineering program’s students (who are area residents) appear to be doing well in their positionsthat the employers are increasing their hours per week and in some cases offering the interns fulltime positions as technicians, junior engineers, and, in one case, an engineer (with theunderstanding that they are to continue working to complete their degree).Increased levels of employment result in
AC 2011-120: USING THE PROCESSING PROGRAMMING ENVIRON-MENT IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRyan J Meuth, University of Advancing Technology I graduated from UMR with a B.S. of Computer Engineering in 2005, after which I stayed at UMR (Now Missouri University of Science and Technology) to pursue and complete a Master’s and PhD in computer engineering. I worked for Dr. Donald C. Wunsch at the Applied Computational Intelligence Laboratory in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. There I worked on the Learning Applied to Ground Robotics project, developing a ground vehicle that can not only navigate unknown terrain, but be able to learn from experience with the world. During the summers since 2006 I worked at
Session 3151 A TRACER LABORATORY FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS HOLLY G. PETERSON MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAI. INTRODUCTION Environmental engineers are often involved in field work to assess the impacts ofenvironmental problems. While traditional lectures and problem-solving exercises serve as thebasis of most college-level courses in environmental engineering, “hands-on” projects arenecessary to provide students with additional skills to succeed as professionals after graduation.The purpose of this paper is to