identity constructs (e.g., being similar to others). Past literature has shown thatbelongingness and identity may be related, and created by each other, while findings in this studyshow that identity and belongingness are interrelated and give the research community furtherinsight for upper level FG engineering students.IntroductionThis research paper showcases first generation (FG) upper level undergraduate engineeringstudents’ engineering experiences and how their experiences affect feelings of engineeringbelongingness. The rigor of engineering is often what unites engineers from around the world1–3,but the background of these individuals allows for diverse thinking and idea generation. Throughdiverse thinking, the engineering workforce can
Session 2003-1892 Evolving Models of Curricular Change: The Experience of the Foundation Coalition M. Carolyn Clark, Jeff Froyd, Prudence Merton, and Jim Richardson Texas A&M University / Texas A&M University/ Texas A&M University/ University of AlabamaAbstractThis paper examines one aspect of the curricular change process undertaken by the FoundationCoalition, namely how the understandings about change held by the FC leaders evolved as theymoved through the process of developing and implementing a new curriculum. We show howthose change models became more
computationalthinking skills needed to excel in the digital economy. One program that was created as part ofthe President’s initiative was the Research-Practitioner Partnership (RPP) grants issued by theNational Science Foundation. The program has four objectives: 1) develop a connectedcommunity of practice; 2) develop and manage a participant-driven and multi-site researchagenda; 3) convene a researcher evaluator working group to develop a process for advancing theshared-research agenda; and 4) collect qualitative and quantitative data about RPP’simplementation and common impact data. However, there has been no detailed reports or studiesof these funded RPP projects thus making their impacts difficult to observe. Thus, this researchentailed a systematic
solid but not outstanding academic records, and a range ofprior experiences in technical and higher education.3 Program marketing materials wereredesigned to highlight current Hillman Entrepreneurs and descriptions of the opportunity forentrepreneurial thinkers. Additionally, members of the first cohort were encouraged to spreadthe word and invite prospective applicants to weekly informal meetings of HillmanEntrepreneurs. This is an on-going challenge and will need additional attention as a moreextensive marketing/recruiting program is developed.Retention - Three students left the program during its first semester. Two of the three havecontinued to pursue their studies at Prince George’s Community College; however, one hasdropped out of school
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in
socialize new students to the field, share norms andexpectations, and distribute resources. Domain expertise was largely downplayed, while moreintangible qualities such as curiosity and perseverance were amplified. Participants describedtheir groups as sites of application and significantly, sites of learning the culture of practice thatis expected. Implications of these findings are discussed, including theoretical and practical, andpotential insights for engineering educators are surfaced.3 Introduction There is a great need to understand how novice engineers collaborate in interdisciplinarysettings to accomplish STEM work. Teamwork, leadership, and other “social” elements ofengineering are
Session 2330 Eight-Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking About the Case and Ethics of the Mount Graham, Large Binocular Telescope Project Submitted by:Rosalyn W. Berne, Division of Technology, Culture and Communication,University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Thornton Road, Charlottesville, Va. 22904.434-924-6098. rwb@virginia.eduAnd,Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University, Electrical Engineering Department, FloridaAtlantic University, Boca Raton Florida, 33431. 561-297-2773. ravivd@fau.eduAbstract Case analysis is a common method for
Kappa Phi, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon. Dr. Estell is active in the assessment community with his work in streamlining and standardizing the outcomes assessment process, and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium. He is also active within the engineering education community, having served ASEE as an officer in the Computers in Education and First-Year Programs Divisions; he and his co-authors have received multiple Best Paper awards at the ASEE Annual Conference. His current research includes examining the nature of constraints in engineering design and providing service learning opportunities for first-year programming students through various K-12 educational activities. Dr. Estell is a Member-at-Large of
Paper ID #33126Assessing the Influence of an Online Video Tutorial Library onUndergraduate Mechanical Engineering StudentsProf. Juliana Lynn Fuqua, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Juliana Fuqua, Ph.D., is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at California State University Poly- technic, Pomona, who completed her doctoral degree at the University of California, Irvine. Dr. Fuqua’s dissertation at the University of California, Irvine, was an evaluation of transdisciplinary scientific collab- oration, which was part of a large National Institutes of Health Initiative. Dr. Fuqua is a quantitative and
California Science Center, and New York Hall of Science. She is a member of the UM College of Engineering’s Diversity and Outreach Council, and since July, 2007 serves as full time director of the College’s new Office of Engineering Outreach and Engagement [(OE)2], http://www.engin.umich.edu/outreach/. About (OE)2 (OE)2 focuses on three areas of effort: 1) to promote diversity within the College of Engineering (CoE), 2) to serve as a resource for educators, potential students and parents, and 3) to contribute to the community at large. (OE)2 encourages and facilitates efforts of CoE faculty, scholars, students and staff to motivate, prepare, educate, and support outstanding
Session 2793 Enhancing U.S. Technology Development Through Lifelong Education of Engineers and Technologists as Creative Professionals D. A. Keating, 1 T. G. Stanford, 1 D. D. Dunlap, 2 M. J. Aherne, 3 M. I. Mendelson 4 University of South Carolina 1/ Purdue University 2/ University of Alberta 3 Loyola Marymount University 4AbstractThere is growing recognition worldwide that traditional graduate engineering education neitherfits the engineering innovation process necessary for competitiveness in the global economy norreflects the way that graduate engineers and technologists learn and develop as
ofexamples and assignments respectful of a diversity of student learning styles; makingconnections between technical and scientific problems and their social contexts; the use of thecurve (or alternative bases for grading); the weighting of lab work; the role of critical thinking;reduction of student's sense of anonymity; and the style of feedback in the classroom. Facultyalso affect the pedagogical techniques of graduate assistants, in labs, grading, and other activitiesthey may be assigned. It will be faculty, if anyone, who will reconfigure courses to improvelearning5, or reconfigure curriculum to make engineering more real and more engaging duringthe first semesters of coursework (when attrition rates are highest).Method I conducted semi
AC 2009-1429: A CASE STUDY OF REENGNINEERINGGene Dixon, East Carolina University Page 14.8.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A CASE STUDY OF REENGNINEERING Gene Dixon East Carolina UniversityAbstractOrganizations undertake reengineering in a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons mostly centeredon improving productivity and profitability. Reengineering has been implemented on a variety of scalesincluding a department, a division, a company a business unit or a corporation typically with variedimpact and effectiveness. This paper presents a continuing