the use of designtools, mathematical modeling, and creative engineering problem-solving and (b) practicingstudio learning through peer critique and reflection. The art instructor engaged undergraduatestudents from an origami class to provide an opportunity for collaborative learning experiencesbetween the engineering and art students. This art course involved a capstone project ofinstalling an origami-inspired structure on the premises of a church. Based on initial designpresentations by the art students to their engineering counterparts, six out of 24 engineeringstudents were chosen to collaborate with the art students in the final design and physicalinstallation of the origami-based structure. All other engineering students were required
experiences such as the design spine or design portfolioapproach (these skills should be learned in the context of a structured approach to problemsolving - problem formulation, problem analysis, and solution), 2) Incorporate “GrandChallenges” into the design spine (such as energy, sustainable development, populationgrowth, and health issues), 3) Create a curriculum that inspires innovation and creativity(professional skills such as problem solving, teamwork, leadership, entrepreneurship,innovation, and project management need to be central features of the design spine) and 4)Increase faculty expertise in professional practice.The present engineering education requires some fundamental changes. Particularly,changes that develop dynamic educational
project, trying to boil everything down to that one problem that we need to solve, at least for the class where, in reality, I think it's more, "What would make this cooler? What would make this more appealing?" [...] I got to there because of my discussions with Corey. I was able to get the project problem boiled down with my work in here, but I was able to finally get a project that I could reasonably to do in the amount of time we have from just talking with my mentor. (Kevin; MidsemesterFocusGroup)These problems were often highly topical in nature (i.e., water scarcity in South Africa;spacesuits) without clear design outputs that would be required to lead to a problem frame. Someof this lack of
between product and process is deliberate and designed to roughly follow a generalized“V-model” for systems development [13], figure 1. Figure 1: Representation of the V-model on which the capstone class is loosely based.The V-model has two phases, validation on the left and verification on the right. The validationphase focuses on effectiveness, do the design decisions reflect the right thing to do, while theverification phase focuses on efficiency or whether the planned design is being executed the rightway. The top of the Vee represents broader more contextual elements of design while thebottom of the Vee represents detailed design. In this model as student teams move from left toright through the design course they first represent their
interviews, observation, and evaluation of prototypes without linking aparticular method. Only the article of Karahan and Roehrig [23] used mixed methods using asurvey and observation in parallel. In this same theme, I could see that two studies looked for focusing their attention onteachers or a combination of students and teachers of this educational level. The study ofRodríguez [28], composed by a self-narrative study and the analysis of fifth-grade students inhis math class, described the change of his students' mindsets around racial discriminationawareness and the kind of curricular strategies he had to create to address this topic. Likewise,the investigation of Stromholt and Bell [24] analyzed the impact of training sciences teachers
responses to those surveyquestions. Of those twenty Universities who responded, 7 of them mentioned online learning andflexible class options as a benefit to working professionals. 6 of them cited location as a benefitto their programs, 9 of them stated that their relationships with government organizations andmajor corporations as a benefit and 2 of them stated that the reputation and legacies of theirUniversities as a benefit to students. In general, it seems that the structure of graduate levelprograms in logistics & transportation are focused on working professionals and built around afocused curriculum. This focused curriculum means that most of these programs can becompleted in 2 years or less. Another trend noticed was that most of these
the University of Michigan to incorporate the constraints of global health technologies within engineering design at the undergraduate and graduate levels. She is the recipient of a CAREER Award from the National Science Foundation, a Teaching Innovation Prize from the UM Provost, and a UM Undergraduate Teaching Award. While at MIT, she was a winner of the MIT $50K Entrepreneurship Competition.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for
Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ottawa, where he teaches courses in engineering design. Dr. Dumond strongly believes in experiential learning and is actively involved in the ongoing development of engineering design education and the Centre for Entrepreneurship and Engineering Design (CEED) at the University of Ottawa. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Impact of Integrating Maker Curriculum into Cornerstone Design CoursesAbstractThis study explores how the integration of making activities into cornerstone engineering designcourses affects students’ design skills. A quasi-experimental design was used in the study, where29
- sign and Engineering). His engineering design research focuses on developing computational represen- tation and reasoning support for managing complex system design. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of system representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of system models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions at earlier stages of engineering design. On the engineer- ing education front, Dr. Morkos’ research explores means to integrate innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education through entrepreneurially-minded learning, improve persistence in engineering, address
them would like to include more active learning in their classes. Approximately80% of these same instructors indicated that the active learning approaches as part of previous NSFprojects carried out by the PIs enhance or would enhance their teaching. There is considerable literaturethat addresses the advantages of using active learning in STEM curriculum (Aglan, 1996; Bonwell;Dennis, 2001; Eder, 2001; Hsi, 1995; Holzer, 2000; Linsey, 2006, 2007, 2009; Mayer, 2002; Meyer,1994; Prince, 2004; Stice, 1987; Talley, 2007; Welsh, 2007; Wood, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004; Barr, 2000; Page 25.112.7Bean, 2001). Students’ motivation and learning are
10connected to the consideration of feasibility. This motivation focused more on identifying aproblem that would be appropriate to a course project at an early stage, while the motivationrelated to feasibility is more about generating a design concept that might be realized in acapstone design project. In this junior design course, they usually had started a specific scopeand felt the need for narrowing or broadening the scope and specify their direction at some point. “We originally were looking at the entire hip replacement but decided that was beyond the scope of this class.” “He said our current diagnosing capabilities are too narrow, and we had to broaden our diagnosing capabilities.”Furthermore, 5% of the students
from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research focuses on idea gen- eration, design strategies, design ethnography, creativity instruction, and engineering practitioners who return to graduate school. She teaches design and entrepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her work is often cross-disciplinary, collaborating with colleagues from engineering, education, psychology, and industrial design.Dr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr
Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and entrepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Prof. Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan Colleen M. Seifert is an Arthur F. Thurnau Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Michigan, where she has taught since 1988. She received her Ph.D. in
first year, a course in the second year focusing on measurement andfabrication, a course in the third year to frame technical problems in societal challenges, andculminates with our two-semester, client-driven fourth-year capstone design sequence.The impetus to create a design thread arose from preparation for an ABET visit where weidentified a need for more “systems thinking” within the curriculum. Here systems thinkingrefers to understanding abstraction and its relation to system decomposition and modularity;students having difficulty making engineering evaluations of systems based on data; andstudents’ difficulty transferring skills in testing, measurement, and evaluation from in-class labscenarios to more independent work on projects. We
foster design learning in middle school students and to support entrepreneurship at primarily undergraduate institutions. Her background is in civil engineering with a focus on structural materials. She holds a B.S.E. degree from Princeton, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees from Cornell.Prof. Robin Ott, Virginia Tech In 1995 Robin received a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech and has since gained 20 years industry experience. Early job experience included working as a design engineer for a Naval Sea Systems Command contractor where she designed a Countermeasure Washdown System for the MHC-51 Coastal Minehunter ships. She also spent time as an Application Engineer at Parametric Tech- nology
differentdisciplines, in most cases the courses are a special section that is offered for a semester or tworather than an integrated part of the curricula. These courses are often abandoned as one or moreof the faculty members is tasked with additional responsibilities or due to a shift in priorities.Because it has largely been the focused efforts of the individuals rather than at the department orcollege level, their role is not backfilled, and the course goes away.Capstones for Each DisciplineFor the pilot run of the capstone class being studied, four colleges were involved. Faculty fromthe colleges of Industrial Design, Engineering, English, and Entrepreneurship collaborated todesign the process. At the initiation of this process, faculty from each
also required to take a broad range of technical classes that prepare them to develop expertise in manydifferent fields. These field include aerospace engineering, automotive engineering, biomechanicalengineering, naval engineering, and many more. Beyond the technical curriculum, engineers in the modern eraare also often taught lessons on teamwork, entrepreneurship, empathy and creativity, all lessons that helpstudents succeed in a myriad of careers.A common definition used for engineering is “the creative application of scientific principles to design anddevelop structures, apparatus, or manufacturing processes, or work utilizing (scientific principles) singly or incombination….” (Engineers’ Council for Professional Development, 1947). This
design. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of system representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of system models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions at earlier stages of engineering design. On the engineer- ing education front, Dr. Morkos’ research explores means to integrate innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education through entrepreneurially-minded learning, improve persistence in engineering, address challenges in senior design education, and promote engineering education in international teams and settings. Dr. Morkos’ research is currently supported by the
. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in building the capstone design community; she is a leader in the biannual Capstone Design Conferences and the Capstone Design Hub initiative. She is also involved with efforts to foster design learning in middle school students and to support entrepreneurship at primarily undergraduate institutions. Her background is in civil engineering with a focus on structural materials. She holds a
, short of enrolling in Accounting 101, appears to be difficult atbest. Fortunately, there are materials which can convey the concepts required tounderstanding accounting principles, processes and underlying concepts at a level thatwill enable engineers to work productively with the bankers, investors and accountantswho will play a huge role in any new venture. These materials can accomplish that in afinite numbers of class sessions through the use of case materials. Cases based upon anentrepreneurial scenario both motivate and energize class discussions. This paper willreview the materials available to develop financial literacy and explain their use in athree-session module which could be included in an entrepreneurship course or a seniordesign
is course review. Course review is a very valuablecomponent of the assessment plan. Through this process, the EE program faculty discuss eachcourse offered in the curriculum at least once a year. Therefore, continuity in the curriculum iseasier to achieve. All program faculty participate in this process. Also, faculty are aware of whattheir colleagues are covering in classes. The course review process has greatly improved thequality of the WKU EE program. Faculty from UofL teaching into the program have alsoparticipated in the course review process. The results of this interaction has provided valuablefeedback for improving the experience of the students and meeting the program outcomes.Course review is used in the outcome assessment process
longitudinaldata covering sequences of design review phases (from problem formulation to solutionrealization). Data was selected from an existing shared dataset of design review conversations –digital videos with transcripts of conversations between those who gave and those who receivedguidance or critique during a design review (Adams, 2016b). The full dataset includes variationsin review structures (e.g., one-on-one and group critiques, informal and formal reviews), phases(preliminary to final reviews), disciplinary cultures (choreography, entrepreneurship, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, and service learning), design coaches (instructors, peers,external experts, and stakeholders), and student level.3.1 Study participantsAs presented in Table
development, engineering education, product design for developing areas, and the utilization of renewable resources for the production of chemicals.Ms. Terri Christiansen Bateman , Brigham Young University Terri Bateman is adjunct faculty in the Brigham Young University College of Engineering and Technol- ogy where she has worked with Women in Engineering and Technology at BYU, numerous mechanical engineering capstone senior design teams, the Global Engineering Outreach class, and the Compliant Mechanisms Research Group. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing from BYU and also worked at the Ford Motor Company as a manufacturing and design engineer in Automatic Transmission
Entrepreneurship (1) (1) ENG3971 Seven Habits (1) ENG4951 Budgeting (1) ENG 4951 Global Competition ENG2963 Electric Circuit (1) Design & Fab (1) ENG3955 Conceptual Design / ENG3956 Industrial Health and Problem Solving (1) Safety (1) ENG3957 / 3967 Product and Process ENG3958 Engineering Ethics Development (1) in Design (1) ENG3966 Design for ENG3968 Manufacturing Manufacturing (1
creation of a modernteaching laboratory, curriculum design, and growth in faculty and students.The new MS program follows the structure of our existing MSEE and MSCE degrees, andrequires little additional university investment. Specific course offerings will be described, alongwith their laboratory components and the set-up of the Photonics Instructional Laboratory.Curricular overlap with senior electives and with graduate students from other disciplines will alsobe presented. Connections for research and entrepreneurship in photonics have been created,allowing students to undertake MS thesis work, MS projects, or prepare for Ph.D. level study.Recent connections to distance learning will be described.This paper also will describe the
Paper ID #16439Embedding Mathematics in Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Larry G. Richards, University of Virginia Larry G Richards is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia. He leads the Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative, and is active in K 12 outreach and professional development activities locally and nationally. Larry’s research interests include creativity, entrepreneurship, engineering design, innovation, and K-12 engineering education. He is a founding member of the K-12 Division and is a Fellow of ASEE.Prof. Susan K. Donohue
on gestural orverbal communication that would uniquely identify another player, or activities in which order ofinteraction did not matter. These results suggest that the effectiveness of remote learning would beimproved with an interface for teleconferencing that (a) preserves the order of participants across theparticipant’s views of the class session and (b) provides participants with an easy-to-use and easy-to-understand means of pointing to other participants. IntroductionThe University of Texas at El Paso has offered its course in Innovation in Technology annuallysince 2013. The course was inspired by Carnegie Mellon University’s boot camp for enteringstudents in the Entertainment Technology
international consulting projects. While at MIT, his dissertation research and collaborative research with institute colleagues focused on domain-specific self-efficacy in engineering entrepreneurship, and on the impact of project-based pedagogies on persistence in engineering among undergraduate students. He served as Director of Institutional Research at Goshen College for five years before coming to EMU in 2016. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com STEM Scholars Engaging in Local ProblemsAbstract Eastern Mennonite University received a 5-year S-STEM award for their STEM ScholarsEngaging in Local
AC 2007-3093: CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING IN CAPSTONE DESIGNEdward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University Dr. Edward Lumsdaine is currently Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University and Special Professor of Business, Institute for Enterprise and Innovation, University of Nottingham (England). For many years he was management consultant at Ford Motor Company and in the last few years helped to develop and direct a high-tech education and training program in the use of design and data management tools. In 1994 he received the ASEE Chester F. Carlson award for innovation in engineering education. He has co-authored several books and teaches classes and
one component in attractingstudents to the profession, and has been identified as important in increasing the representationof women [16]. Engineering Economics provides an excellent venue for students to learn aboutthe social and economic benefits of technology. Internet enabled microfinance is one example.The concept of a class making microenterprise loans was inspired by university finance classesthe author heard about in which students invested $1000 (many years ago) in the stock marketand managed a portfolio.The initial goal for this project was for the students to gain a good understanding ofmicrofinance, especially as an example of a business activity that alleviates poverty. Ultimately Iwant them to think about how they can use their