choice of the coordinate system and is the most generalform of the von Mises stress.Using the stress invariants in Eqs. (19) and (20), we write I12 − 3I 2 (σ + σ y + σ z ) − 3 (σ x σ y + σ y σz + σ z σx − τ x y − τ y z − τ z x ) 2 = 2 2 2 x = σ x2 + σ y2 + σ z2 − ( σ x σ y + σ y σ z + σ z σ x ) + 3 (τ x2y + τ y2z + τ z2x ) (33) = 1 (σ x − σ y ) 2 + (σ y − σ z ) 2 + (σ z
Paper ID #30141Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset in a Multidisciplinary Course onEngineering Design and Technical CommunicationDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and
setEnabled:TRUE]; // Since we are closed also disables the close button: [mCloseButton setEnabled:FALSE]; }The following are all of the methods that are called when “things” happen on the Bluetoothconnection. The rfcommChannelOpenComplete method is there to enable the close button oncea successful Bluetooth connection is established. Following the open complete method is themethod that took the longest time to get working. This method is required to tell the RFCOMMchannel which data to send and how long the data is expected to be. In this case one only needsto send one number to the development board so the code was mRFCOMMChannelwriteSync:"1" length:1. This conforms to the method by writing “1” to the current RFCOMMchannel and the data length
available online for member institutions through the LACCEI website. It is alsopresented as a one-day workshop at LACCEI annual conferences, other engineering educationconferences and LACCEI sponsored events. It was recently presented at the 2012 WorldEngineering Education Forum (WEEF, annual international conference of IFEES, theInternational Federation of Engineering Education Societies).25 Each section is self-containedand includes updated information from accrediting agencies. Interactive exercises in eachsection include writing a program mission statement, student evaluations, teaching/learningevaluations and alumni and employer surveys. Module A sections and a description of theircontent are listed below.Section 1. Accreditation Fundamentals
engineering curricular reform. His research areas include vibration and optimization techniques. In 2005 he was the recipient of the Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers.Jennifer Courtney, Rowan University Jennifer Courtney is an Assistant Professor in the Writing Arts department at Rowan University, where she teaches first year writing, College Composition II/Sophomore Clinic, and courses on writing assessment. Her research interests include writing in the disciplines (WID), assessment, and information literacy.Kevin Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He has received the 2002
starts in the classroom.Preparing students to engineer the future through quality courses is the fundamental mission ofmany universities. This study highlights efforts made to equip students for future aircraft designby creating a senior class project that incorporated computer programming and computer-aideddesign tools, while also addressing knowledge gaps through course-supporting modules. Theresearch was prompted by observations of aerospace engineering students at the University ofCalifornia-Irvine (UC Irvine) struggling to integrate design tools into their final projects. It wasnoted that approximately half of the aerospace engineering students in the study had not beenintroduced to fundamental computer-aided design, as it was not included
problem solving, writing, and programming with emphasis on MATLAB and simple hardware interfacing. ● ECE 103 expands the programming, design, and teamwork components by utilizing the C language in projects that re-utilize the LabJack adapter.Based on our initial course assessments, we believe that students are achieving the curriculargoals at the course level, but it is too early to assess the impact of this change on the wholeprogram. Thus far, the integration of both MATLAB and C with hardware interfacing has provento be successful as a tool for reinforcing programming fundamentals at the freshman level.Course syllabi, lab and project descriptions, and other assignments can be made available tocolleagues who are interested in
the new technologies represented - USB, Ethernet, On-chip analog. These represent asmall but typical example of the evolution of embedded microcontrollers.Our program currently uses the 9S12DP512, 9S12DG128, and 9S12C32 microcontrollers in thejunior and senior level courses. The rest of the paper will focus on curriculum based on theseparts.Course OutcomesCourse outcomes should represent the fundamental components that, when combined, build anappropriate skill set in the area. A specific application or technology should not be included inthe outcomes unless it is truly a fundamental requirement. All of our course outcomes aremapped to the ABET program outcomes a-k along with the IEEE program outcomes forElectronics Engineering Technology4,5
, mathematics, technical writing, and oral communication competencies, as well as theSCANS 2000 skills is made easy through the use of case studies. The use of case studies inengineering and technological education, however, has been somewhat limited. Currently,educators are more and more interested in incorporating case studies in their courses. As a result,there are growing needs and interests in industry-based case studies in these fields.The current paper presents examples of industry-based case studies that can be used in coursessuch as DC/AC circuits, engineering fundamentals, thermodynamics, and physics. The paper willfocus, in particular, on two case studies that the author has developed. Field-testing results and asummary of findings will be
), it propagates through the ceramic quickly. Page 9.1372.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationProcedure for Writing a MemorandumDuring the laboratory session, the format and purpose of a memorandum is explained to thestudents. It is discussed that in contrast to laboratory reports, memos are generally written toinform the reader of new information or by persuading the reader to take an action. The mostimportant feature of a memo is that it is concise yet complete and informative, not
fundamentals of facilities design might be addressed in a single course whilequestions of engineering ethics might appear at a number of different places. Recentdevelopment to introduce “writing across the curriculum” pedagogy is an excellent example of adesired skill or capability that can be integrated at a number of different points within theprogram. An “Academic Thread” is suggested as a paradigm for formalizing the integration of atopic across a number of different courses within the curriculum. While the desire forcurriculum integration and the idea of integrating a topic across multiple courses is not new,Academic Threads and the ABET emphasis on program and course learning objectives areproposed as avenues to formalize and better focus these
? • Better storytelling - Learning to write clearly and concisely. • Better methodology - Appreciate the importance of developing a detailed proposal. Look for opportunities to discover the total process, not simply confirm the phenomenon. • Better data collection - Deciphering the critical data points for collection and presentation.This paper will attempt to detail the Foggy Mirror exercise so that the ideas can be adopted in othercurriculum, provide insights into successes and challenges, and how to meaningfully encourage students tobecome disciplined inquisitive engineers.Keywords: Experimentation, ABET, Problem Solving, Teamwork, Active LearningIntroduction Broadly, engineering is perceived as a practical profession
contributors to a student's performance onthe laboratory final exam. The two factors that were found to be significant were (a) the student's gradein the Electric Circuits II lecture course and (b) the student's active participation as a “builder-tester”during the weekly laboratory exercises. The only factor that significantly and independently contributedto the students laboratory skills and knowledge base was the latter. The results of this study indicate thatstudents must be fully engaged in the fundamental laboratory exercises to thoroughly and properly learnthe skill and knowledge required to apply them in basic circuit analysis applications.BackgroundThe Electrical Circuits Lab course at Arkansas Tech University is an introductory laboratory
inthermodynamics and fluid mechanics at the junior level, and heat transfer and energy systems atthe senior level. The Energy Systems Laboratory course is an integrated laboratory experiencewhere students apply fundamental concepts learned in previous courses. There is also an aspectof design incorporated into the laboratory and additional topics in modern computational andexperimental techniques are also addressed. All mechanical engineering students are required totake the four of the Energy Systems thread courses. Because the laboratory course is a seniorlevel integrated experience with a broad range of student learning outcomes and multipleinstructors are involved during all course offerings, it is necessary to develop an effective andefficient
depending on the level of discussion between the questions and during the final analysis.The discussion starts with preparation questions including the following fundamental definitions: 1. Define ethics. 2. Define applied ethics. 3. What is the difference between legality and ethics? 4. Can you think of an example that is legal but unethical? 5. Can you think of an example that is illegal but ethical?The preparation questions serve as a warm-up discussion for the students with their peers and theinstructor. The impact of the questions increases when the students are asked to write theiranswers before the discussion and reflect on their responses afterwards. The list of questions andexamples can be expanded to
AC 2010-1518: REFINING A CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERINGPatricia Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She holds a joint appointment in Engineering Fundamentals and in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved, with other Speed faculty, in educational research on effective use of Tablet PCs in engineering education and the incorporation of critical thinking in engineering education. Her fields of expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Cathy Bays, University of Louisville
the format of the tutorial. External links were provided where the students can learn and explore different applications of such open-source tools. Following that, a detailed background on the CO2 emissions challenge was provided where students will get the motivation and a sense of responsibility towards their planet. CO2 capture was suggested as one of the potential solutions to reach net zero emission targets. Based on the course requirements, the notebook explains the reactor design mathematical modeling and the associated fundamental kinetics for CO2 capture. As explained earlier, Jupyter notebook allows writing Python code with the text. So, the numerical solution is present along with the theory and students can further
different majors, they canchoose the system they are most familiar with. First they need to gather useful information, andthen set up their system model to simulate its behavior. Two or three students can work as agroup, and they can collaborate and improve the model they created. After completing thesimulation and verification, they need to write a project report and present the result to the wholeclass. Besides, students are also required to write four essays on the remaining five kinds ofsystems. In these essays students need to review the concepts and theories, and include at leastone application.II. Course OutlineThe first part of this course is an introduction to the basic concepts of system thinking. First,stock and flow are introduced as
Paper ID #28311A Hands-on Introduction to Embedded Systems & IOTDr. James Peyton Jones, Villanova University James Peyton Jones is a professor of electrical and computer engineering, and a member of the Center for Nonlinear Dynamics and Control at Villanova University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Hands-on Introduction to Embedded Systems & IOT J.C. Peyton Jones Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova PA 19085AbstractTraditional curricula often teach low-level fundamentals of digital
values.3. Write a FORTRAN main program which will read the input data files and outputtables of Shear, Bending Moment, Bending Stress, and deflection vs. position on beam,using 1 inch increments from left end. Your FORTRAN program should isolate maximaand minima from these calculations. Use individual function subprograms or subroutinesubprograms to calculate these values of Shear, Bending Moment, and deflection. Usesubscripted variables (2-D arrays) to store calculated values. Your program is to ask the user if they wish output to the screen (console), theprinter (LPT1) or a data file whose name the user will enter. All output should bepresented clearly and neatly in the appropriate format. The program and subprograms areto be
algebra), and CME106 or equivalent (for probability theory).The HU undergraduate students were very excited and shows strong interest during the learningprocess, even with their knowledge background, the course content is too hard for them. In July2021, the first author was awarded the NSF EIR grant “Integrated Sensor-Robot Networks forReal-time Environmental Monitoring and Marine Ecosystem Restoration in the Hampton River”,for which the team of the undergraduate students were expected to conduct research on MachineLearning-based path planning, navigation and control for autonomous Underwater vehicle andunscrewed surface vehicle for water quality data collection. To provide the team with acomprehensive understanding of the fundamentals of machine
you understand each of its component parts and the way that they relate to each other.C Unless your organization hires an assessment specialist or consultant, someone in your organization needs to understand the full scope of the variety of activities that make up outcomes assessment, and writing your own process is one way to acquire this understanding.2.1. Suggestions for Writing Your Assessment ProcessWe have several recommendations to make if you plan to develop your own process.C Study the processes that others have published, being careful of the way that you interpret them and the assumptions you make of their intentions.C Develop an outcomes assessment plan that falls between the extremes
Processing Technical Committee for the IEEE Circuits and Systems society. His research interests are in digital signal processing, speech processing, biometrics, pattern recognition and filter design.Nidhal Carla BouaynayaDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of
Paper ID #10107Personnel Improvement Plan: a professionalism assignment for engineeringstudentsDr. Mohammad Habibi, Minnesota State University, MankatoMr. Ronald R Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering Ron Ulseth, P.E. is Co-Director of IRE as well as an instructor of technical competencies in thermody- namics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer. Ulseth has been teaching engineering fundamentals courses since 1988. He was a lead developer in the Itasca Community College Engineering program. Ulseth led a team of ˜10 engineering educators from around the United States to develop the Iron Range Engineering program. In addition to
and sentially, this is a question of what would happen if space- the bending of light around massive objects, are also pre- time geometry were subject to quantum fuzziness. We dicted to within the limit of experimental accuracy by need to be able to write out Eqn. 4 explicitly for the YMG [5, 7, 8]. “quantum metric tensor” in order for it to help us de- termine the field operators’ algebra. The problem is that, in order to write it out explicitly we need to know the distance between the two fields. To know the distance, we need to know the quantum metric. But we were trying to
in communicating complex and technical ideas. 3. Understand key ideas of how to use Excel as a tool to solve problems and communicate data in science and engineering. 4. Become proficient at using MATLAB, including writing .m files and correcting or modifying existing code. 5. Learn fundamental skills for group collaboration, as well as lab and project execution/documentation/demonstrations. 6. Address the role that artificial intelligence has in engineering. 7. Understand how to utilize a microcontroller to solve certain engineering problems.Therefore, ChatGPT was not introduced into the course until two-thirds of the way through thesemester. The purpose for introducing AI to the latter part of the semester was
engineering and each of the disciplines and subdisciplines. • Distinguish “engineer” from “technician” and “scientist”.Instructions • Read Chapter 1 of "Engineering Fundamentals & Problem Solving" by Eide et. al. (pages 1-36). You may skip Sections 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.6. • As you are reading, summarize each major section (e.g. "1.2.1 Scientist") with handwritten notes. Only write as many notes as you need to accomplish all of the Chapter Objectives (listed on page 1). For example: Pretend someone said to you "Explain the role of an engineer in the world", then imagine yourself verbally providing an answer, and you are allowed to refer to your notes while you give your answer. That is the
variety. That variety is based on the fundamental difference in philosophy as to whetheryear 1 has common content for all branches of engineering or discipline specific programs begin inyear 1. For the former, many imaginative ways have been introduced to allow students to gain an Page 15.658.2understanding of the uniqueness of the disciplines.This summary considers eight options (with the school code in brackets for the school using thisoption): 1. Common year 1 with no engineering exposure through courses; basic math and sciences, 0% of responders 2. Common year 1 with required common engineering course(s) with no explicit
equipment that will be used (strobo-tachometer, dynamometer, power factor meter, etc.).The instructor then wires and operates the equipment on-camera according to the schematic andexperimental procedure provided in the laboratory workbook. Measurements are not made bythe instructor. Instead, each time the procedure calls for a measurement to be made, the camerazooms to the instruments and the students record the appropriate data in their workbooks. Afterthe video portion ends, the students complete the experiment in the same way as those in theconventional laboratory course; i.e., by making necessary calculations with the collected data,evaluating the results, formulating conclusions, and writing a laboratory report.The fundamental difference
rocket design project.Then, student teams work on a ten-week crane design project. These projects were described byvon Lockette, et al.5 and Dahm, et al.6, respectively. Simultaneously, Students receive instructionin technical writing in small sections. In the spring semester (SEC II), all 120 students are in asingle design lab section, but are allowed to choose between two distinct projects. Thegreenhouse gas reduction project was run from 2003 through 2006, and is described in detail byRiddell, et al.7 The electro-mechanical project was run in 2006 and 2007, and is described indetail by von Lockette, et al. 8 Simultaneously, students receive instruction in public speaking insmall sections. In spring 2007, the greenhouse gas project was