(with 56students total) followed a traditional course format that focused on different project modules,such as designing and testing water filters, building and testing small-scale wooden bridges, andprogramming a robot. Two sections (with 55 students total) implemented a service-learningproject, as previously mentioned. Pre and post assessments of the participating students wereconducted. Demographic information was also collected to monitor if differences arose betweenstudents grouped by specific demographic factors. The assessment was conducted in accordancewith approved Institutional Review Board procedures and participation by students wasvoluntary.Engineering Design Self Efficacy and Learning OutcomesChanges in student confidence in both
populationcomprised of 12 teachers from Massachusetts schools - seven from public schools, and five fromprivate. The teachers taught in grades from 3 to 8. There were 11 females and 1 male. While thenumber of participants is small, this study was conceived as a pilot study to inform larger scaleinvestigations of professional development in engineering design. The sample in this study isobviously too small to draw many largely generalizable conclusions, however it includes everyparticipant in the workshop so I am able to draw conclusions regarding this specific workshopand group of educators.The study was focused around the workshop with three sessions, allowing for a pre-assessment,intervention, and post-assessment design. During the initial session, I was
communications presentation for the Exxonsponsored Prize. Students are briefed that 1. They must make a group presentation on a marketing topic (generally industry related). 2. There is a prize of $350 for the best group. 3. They must form their own teams reflecting that large teams provide more resources but smaller teams achieve greater individual shares from any win.An interesting outcome on this activity is that males will tend to form small groups of2/3, females will settle on 4 members and mixed groups are generally 5/6 individuals,and to date no small all-male group has won.This activity brings together all the elements of industry specific research, businessand technology issues and are brought together in the core skills of
challenges role of the engineer in in teams. our department and our profession. Learning Building community through first year “families" CommunitiesTo facilitate the creation ofcommunities within the first yearstudents, the class is divided into“family” teams of approximately 10 Students tweet @firstyrengr with their team #students. Each of these teams islead by two upperclass leaders whoserve as mentors for the group. Students work in teams on design challenges Assessment• Formal and Informal assessments (both qualitative and quantitative)• Largely positive impacts on Freshman (motivation/growth
vehicle systems would do well to have some awareness of this topic. Possibly this could be a paper assignment. General Forecast of Assessment Assessment Spring 2013Note: EGEE365 Vehicle Instrumentation in 2013 then changed to EGNR362 Vehicle EnergySystems.General CommentsThis was the second offering of the EGEE365 Vehicle Instrumentation course. A somewhat similarSpecial Topics course was also offered in Spring 2007 that emphasized LabVIEW programming,and Spring 2008 that emphasized CAN programming.The student population consisted of nine senior and junior students. Many of the students werevery well prepared, and had high GPAs.I believe all of the students were
of the aspects of theproject, including programming microchips, controlling servo motors, DC motor control,and serial communication. These lessons were developed to both ease the transition into thefairly complex project and leverage knowledge gained during required coursework. Also, thedevelopment of a basic starter kit is underway. The kit will contain the basic electrical com-ponents needed for a CanSat or Open class entry, including a Basic Stamp micro-controller,DC motor drivers, and serial communication, all on a printed circuit board. This kit shouldalso serve to ease the transition into the project and aid in linking the project to the students’prior knowledge.The assessment of this project has been largely informal and very positive
initially appreciate the specific focus areas in EER that this projectcovered. This led to increasingly complex considerations when designing. For example, thequestion of evaluating students’ response to an intervention is an entire focus area in EER.Validated instruments and assessment were a new research concept to me, a student coming fromsolely an EE focused background. Another issue was considering the teaching activities for alarger classroom setting. Coming from a smaller undergraduate program, I had difficultyconceptualizing such a large introduction class, let alone implementing a specific sociotechnicalmodule at that larger scale.Next Steps We are continuing to refine the EV battery module by expanding the course materials toinclude
, university partners, and high school tech-prep teachers. The current paper describes aninnovative approach to curriculum development and delivery that improve engineering andtechnology education and revive student interests in pursuing these programs. A description ofhow curriculum integration using the case study approach can be used as a promising method forthe enhancement of technology education is also discussed. Finally, a sample case is given andexamined. The authors are members of two of the SEATEC teams, and teach in 4-year electricalengineering technology programs.I. IntroductionIntegrating physics, mathematics, and communication skills in engineering and technologyeducation is very essential in today’s technologically driven world
relate to each other and the group.While reviewing the data by gender and reviewing the summary numbers, trends becameevident. First, there was a difference between the genders and more importantly, there was adifference between the freshman and seniors. While some may believe that this differentiatesstudents and shows growth from the first to last year in the program, it is much more than that.Students in this engineering technology program are unique from others in its composition,specifically due to the presence of a rather large, significantly ranked engineering college on thesame campus.Freshman engineering technology students can be categorized into two different groups: first,those students seeking a hands on program, rather than
, students, at best, can integrate a small fraction of the curriculum in a given projectcontext. Huber and Hutchings [9] have argued that when students pursue learning in a moreintentionally connected way then the intellectual and emotional appeal can catalyze a richerlearning climate. Further, it can be argued that traditionally the burden of integration has fallenon the students to use their wit and grit to “connect the dots” as they progress through thecurriculum [9]. Therefore, our conceptual assessment plan will revolve around the following [9]. • Collaboration among faculty to identify key integration points in the curriculum • Opportunities for integrated learning within and among courses and contexts • Faculty’s approach to
Paper ID #47897TL;DR Students don’t read textbooks: designing online reference pages toenhance student learningJean-Christophe Raymond-Bertrand, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Jean-Christophe Raymond-Bertrand is an undergraduate student in Industrial Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and rising doctoral student at Virginia Tech. His interests are in Operations Research, specifically optimization under uncertainty and Markov decision processes. His current research uses Network Theory and Mixed Integer-Linear Programming (MILP) to determine unintended disparities in the impact of
Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in
, Page 10.1304.2communication and commitment to the profession, service-learning programs may be effective Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationapproaches to encourage women and minority students to remain in engineering. Many service-learning programs report a higher percentage of women in their programs than are enrolled intheir engineering program at large. For example, 33% of the computer science students in thespring 2001 EPICS program were women, compared to 11.5% of the undergraduates in theircomputer science department.3 For these reasons, service learning could potentially contribute
for several reasons. Thedatabase of final exams is readily available. At this institution final exams from previous yearsare posted on a publicly-accessible website so that students can use them as study aids. Also,students are not able to access assistance during an exam, which means that they must rely ontheir a priori vocabulary to make sense of the questions. And as a critical assessment in a course,the exam should be testing the student’s understanding of the course concepts rather than thestudent’s non-discipline-specific vocabulary. Presumably, the instructor has taken this intoaccount when developing the exam. Finally, every exam in this program is the same duration,2.5 hours, which allows for some common basis of comparison (e.g
-text search engine library.”While this is a Java programming language based implementation – we are working on a PHPport to enable ease of distribution when iKNEER code-base will be made open source. Figure 4shows the real-time search within iKNEER. As the user types “Smith” into the search box,iKNEER provides search results to the user in clear categories. The reader will notice thatiKNEER intelligently classifies the results into Authors, Paper Titles, and Tags.Users can also constrain their search results very easily by clicking on a search result.Constraining the search results allows the users to focus on the information they are looking forvery quickly and relieves them of the trouble of sorting through a large amount of data. Userscan
theirdevelopment in both ODE concepts and Python coding skills.Evaluation of students’ learning The instructor graded the students with a focus on their written understanding of the three ODEmodels, their recorded simulation results, and the accuracy and functionality of their Python codeimplementations. Additionally, an anonymous survey assessed the group's knowledge of ODEmodeling and Python programming as a whole. The survey was split into four sections: ● Demographic Information: To understand the backgrounds of the student group, this section focused on questions related to their grade level, gender, and previous experience with Python programming and ODE modeling. Students also shared their level of access to technology, such
placement inmemory. Visualizing data from the CSV file in RISC-V memory, with pointers referencing each entry[Figure 6], underscores the notional machine's focus on data transactions between registers and memory,enhancing understanding for high-level language concepts. This approach underpins the philosophy ofusing assembly education to bolster high-level language skills, mainly pointers.Figure 6: (Top)Visual depiction of csv file data placement in the memory in the RARS Data Segment and(Bottom)pointer reference table to column data after program execution.4 Survey and Results from W23 and S23 quartersTo assess the impact of our notional machine approach in "Computer Systems and Organization"(CSE12), course exit surveys were initially
interface, ultrasonic range sensor control, temperature sensor interface using ADC control, GPScontrol, and DC motor control using a half-H bridge driver IC. Several of these projects will bepresented in this paper. A student assessment will also be provided.IntroductionIn engineering and engineering technology programs, there are many courses that use embeddedsystems to meet the program requirements. C/C++ programming is often used with embeddedhardware and software as a core component to these courses. Examples include the usage of theProgrammable System-on-Chip (PSoC 5LP) and the BeagleBone Black (BBB) [1-3].Alternatively, there is a growing interest in graduates having Python experience. MicroPython is asmall subset of the Python standard
workthat has focused on the general community college population. No research has been doneinvestigating circuit analysis and self-efficacy on the community college student population.MethodsStudy Context and Participant PopulationThis study was conducted at a large community college in the southwestern United States.Students from three introductory circuit analysis courses in the Electronics program werestudied. Participation was voluntary. There was a potential population of 48 students solicitedto participate in the pre-test, of which, 44 (n = 44) subjects participated. Attrition of the courseof the semester resulted in a potential population of 41 for the post-test, of which 37 (n = 37)subjects participated. Table 1 summarizes the three groups
report by the end of the semester. Additional major graded courserequirements include a project web page, a mid-term oral presentation, and a project poster.Problems Encountered in Previous Course Offerings In a national study conducted on capstone design courses and the assessment tools used inthose courses, two themes emerged. One, most engineering schools consider capstone coursesthat feature open-ended, engineering problems to solve as vital to assessing the outcome of mostif not all of the ABET program outcomes. However, the study also revealed that only 40% offaculty members felt that their assessment tools were “detailed in nature”4. The capstone courses offered in the mechanical engineering program were no different thanthose in
this class. Of the 18 students in the class, 10 students indicated that based on the material they have seen in thisclass, they are now interested in biomedical fields. Presumably this number was very small or zero beforestudents took this class, since all students came to a program that is fundamentally not biomedically ori-ented. On a list of 19 courses that included 6 courses that are related to biomedical engineering, artificialneural network or machine learning, 14 of the 18 students picked 3 or more such biomedical classes as theelectives that they would like to take. Finally, seven of these 18 students indicated that they now considerbiomedical engineering as a potential career or graduate school option. Again, since all of these
in the first year of their graduate program), (2) Research Progression Skills II (targeted forstudent’s beyond the first year of their graduate program), (3) Research Networking Skills, (4) CareerPreparation and Previews (led by research-leaning corporations and federal labs), and (5) mentoring forresearch identity. The Small Research Groups are groups of three to five faculty who have relatedresearch interests. This initiative seeks to address the vulnerabilities of single faculty research groups, thatare common in small engineering colleges such as NCAT. The Research Engineer Identity (REI)assessment process involves the development and testing of an approach to assess research engineeridentities among graduate students. The assessments
process can be used forboth online and onsite offerings of the program.The paper will also present assessments of the capstone course and evaluations on studentlearning, successes in achieving the program learning outcomes and the usefulness of theprogram in solving real world problems. The paper will also discuss ideas on the potential toexpand this framework for other programs and additional enhancements.Graduate Capstone MethodologiesCapstone projects by definition serves two audiences namely, the academic and the sponsor orthe client. Academic audience look for a well laid out research: formal systematic application ofscientific methods to the study of problems [1, 2]. Project sponsor/client, on the other hand, lookfor well laid pragmatic
STEM careers and fields. He leads a STEM program at USU Eastern Blanding Campus and is the PI of a small STEPuP grant in the State of Utah attempting to infuse STEM into the local school district in South Eastern Utah.Mr. Cedale Sage Armstrong, Utah State University I am a Navajo college student that grew up on the northern rim of the Navajo Nation. Besides living on the reservation, I have also lived in Phoenix, Arizona for a portion of my elementary school years and also lived in San Diego, CA for 6 years. I am a ”Marine Brat” as my father served 5 years in the United States Marine Corps. I am the oldest of 9 children (6 sisters and 2 brothers) and am the leading example for all of them. I am an outdoors and
Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department
.6,7,8To assess the success of the course, feedback was solicited at the end of the course from students,the five faculty at UMass, collaborators at LATDC in Hampshire College, and industrialdesigners at ADS. Overall, comments were very positive. Constructive comments included theneed for more structure and more frequent meetings as a group. This suggestion wasincorporated for the 2000-2001 academic year, reflected previously in Table 1.The 2000-2001 academic year has also seen a remarkable growth in the number of participatingstudents. Twelve projects, some individual and some small groups, are now in progress. In addition,while LATDC and ADS continue to be our primary partners, collaborations are expanding this yearwith additional parties in the
person had developed their own uniqueopinions about how to apply grading procedures to a structural design class.University A University A is a small, public, liberal arts school in the south-Atlantic region (CarnegieClassification, Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus). The school only hasundergraduate engineering programs, approximately one fourth of the student population majorsin engineering, and the civil engineering graduating class averages approximately 60 students peryear. The civil engineering degree is a general degree, which means that all students are requiredto take courses in at least seven different subareas of civil engineering. Within this structure,reinforced concrete design is a required course. The
there was one full-time faculty memberengaged in S-L. As a result of SLICE, a total of 52 courses (35 of them required coreundergraduate courses) taken by engineering students have had S-L integrated into them, with atotal of over 700 student-courses each semester. This group of faculty members is perhaps thelargest associated with a single engineering college using S-L. They were recruited in part bythe principle of “start small rather than not at all.” The program has a combination of grass-rootsinitiative and administration support.As part an ongoing evaluation, in depth interviews with fourteen faculty members who hadtried SLICE were undertaken by experienced assessors of S-L projects from an outsideuniversity. All of the faculty members
Program (teep.tufts.edu).Dr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher in science education at Indiana University. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology specializing in Inquiry Methodology from Indiana University in 2006. She managed a consulting business for 10 years working on evaluations that focused primarily in the areas of education and STEM for middle and high school students, especially women and minority students. Her research interests include student engagement and interest in STEM and STEM careers as well as the development of instruments and evaluation tools to assess these constructs.Dr. Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington Associate
its hiring process. We attempted to validate whetherthat is happening or not by correlating life-long learning between placed and unplaced students.We found that six out of the fourteen characteristics have better rating in the selected (placed)students.While the sample size for the experiment was large enough, the fact remains that it covered onlyone college and one company. We need to repeat the experiment with more colleges andcompanies in the same locale to validate the findings. After that, we plan to repeat theexperiment at different geographical locations to assess the global validity. As more life-longlearning instruments become available, we plan to study them and explore possibility of theirusage in our experiments.AcknowledgmentWe