academic performance incollege9.Most studies on homework have investigated the relationship between some aspect ofhomework, such as how much10, or type of assignment11, and performance in the current course.What is lacking in the literature are studies investigating the relationship between homeworkcompletion in high school and performance in college. The current study set out to answerquestions related to long-term benefits of homework completion in high school. Specifically, isthere a relationship between homework completion rates in high school and academicperformance or self-control in engineering school? Due to the interest in retention inengineering, analysis was also completed to look at the relationship between homeworkcompletion in high
similar to those who persist. Instead of GPA, attitudinal differences betweenminority and majority students were discovered that were related to a student’s likelihood ofremaining in the program [16, 17] [18]. Further evidence explained that students who leftengineering did so because of different perceptions of the institutional culture[10]. This studywas confirmed and evident in Tinto [19, 20] as it related to college students in all majors. Morespecific studies showed that female Science and Engineering undergraduates left engineering forthese same reasons [21, 22].Self-efficacy As defined by Bandura (1986), self-efficacy “refers to beliefs in one’s capabilities toorganize and execute the courses of action required to produce given
widevariety of university- and industry-based research topics as students participate in their researchmentorship. The TAR-STEM program aligns itself with the vision of the National ResearchCenter (NRC) Framework and the recommendations of the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS), especially students’ engagement in science and engineering practices. The TAR-STEMstudents have demonstrated a greater appreciation for secondary and post-secondary STEMeducation.I. IntroductionIn the last few decades, researchers, educators, politicians and the general public have voicedserious concerns relating to the U.S. position in today’s high technology world. In response tothese concerns, the 2007 National Academy of Science (NAS) report titled, "Rising above
configurations made toimprove air flow is presented. The perspectives for students and faculty from the University ofGeorgia are presented. The student main engineer took the lead to formulate this paper. Fiveother students that worked on the project were unable to engage in writing the paper.Introduction The Formula SAE activities at the University of Georgia are recognized as a platform thatprovides experiential learning to its undergraduate students. Most of the students in the FormulaSAE program come from engineering disciplines. Students range from Freshmen to Seniors.Freshmen, Sophomores, and Juniors participate as non-capstone members. Senior studentsmostly participate as cap-stone members. Regardless of one’s category, the students design
designed with the objective to enhance students’ hands-on, computational,programming, communication, and problem solving skills. Since 2016, the SEE-STEM programhas been offered during the summer to engineering and engineering technology students as abridge program from freshman to sophomore year. It is offered Monday through Thursday (8:00am to 4:00 pm) with lectures and hands-on classes covering topics related to engineeringcomputation using MATLAB and C++, aerodynamics, bridge truss design & analysis, technicalwriting and presentation. The Friday session of the SEE program is designated for educationalseminars and technical workshops.The development and implementation process of the SEE program was presented to the 2016ASEE annual
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in progress: Freshman year initiative for a cohort of largely engineering minority students Abstract — The type of paper submission that is proposed here represents the category, Workin Progress. A first-year program, titled STRIDE, was developed and piloted at University ofHartford, a private university in the New England region of the United States, with the goal ofsupporting African-American/Black and Hispanic/Latino male students in achieving academicexcellence at the institution. During this time, the demographics of the institution includedbetween 10% and 20% self-identified African-American students, and between 10% and 20%self-identified
Institute and State University Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a Graduate Advising Award in 2015, and won the 2018 Graduate Student Mentor Award for the College of Engineering. Dr. Matusovich has gradu- ated 10 doctoral students since starting her research program in Spring 2009. Dr. Matusovich co-hosts
program is extensive. Engineering Education conferences and journals havenumerous publications related to research on first-year engineering. Kajfez & Mohammadi-Aragh [8] present a literature review of first-year engineering research in four major journals.This article found that research indicates FYE programs are an environment in which research-based innovative classroom practices are commonly implemented in a way that enhances andimproves student learning. While FYE courses are most commonly used to introduce students toengineering principles and teach engineering students design skills, programming, andmathematics [9], this paper will focus on teaching technical writing as a part of a FYE programand how the techniques used to teach
belonging all influence students’ decision to major in engineering and their academic success inengineering programs.8,9,10 The goal of the present study was to contribute to the growing body of literature on FYEprograms by investigating how student perceptions of engineering-based identity and motivation constructs changethroughout the first-year while they are enrolled in a FYE course sequence. In addition, we examined how theseconstructs measured during the first semester may relate to engineering major choice at the end of the year. Weexamined the constructs of domain identification, utility, belonging, and expectancy. These constructs relate to valuesand beliefs held by the student without reference to a particular course and are useful in
students to explore and complete design challenges in afully immersive VR chemical processing plant.The chemical engineering students at Queen's University are required to take a capstone coursein their final year of the program. The goal of this class is to have the students use the skills theyhave learned over the course of their degree to complete a large comprehensive design project.This course assesses the design competency that the students have developed and their ability toapply those skills to an engineering project. Although the students will have seen the technicalconcepts needed to complete the work and have been exposed to design tools in earlier courses,for many, this will be the first time applying their engineering design skills
Paper ID #34818WIP: Engineering As a Social Discipline: Shaping First-Year Students’UnderstandingStacie Edington, University of Michigan Stacie Edington is the Director of Honors and Engagement Programs within the University of Michigan, College of Engineering. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Sociology from the University of Michigan and her Master of Science in Executive Leadership from the University of San Diego. In addition to serv- ing on the instructional team for ”Engineering 110: Design Your Engineering Experience”, she teaches the Engineering Honors Seminar, directs the College of Engineering Honors Program
Career Fair and student placement related activities. Creating a link between his courses and industry experts and mentors is one of his signature activities.Dr. Sez Atamturktur Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sez Atamturktur is the Harry and Arlene Schell Professor and Department Head of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. Previously, she served as Associate Vice President for Research Development and Provost’s Distinguished Professor at Clemson University. Dr. Atamturktur’s research, which focuses on uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, has been documented in over 100 peer-reviewed publications in some of the finest engineering science journals and proceedings
AC 2007-1599: ONE-MINUTE ENGINEER, NTH GENERATION: EXPANSION TOA SMALL PRIVATE UNIVERSITYJohn-David Yoder, Ohio Northern University JOHN-DAVID YODER is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU. His Doctorate is from the University of Notre Dame. Research interests include education, controls, robotics, and information processing. Prior to teaching, he ran a small consulting and R&D company and served as proposal engineering supervisor for GROB Systems, Inc.Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Jaeger, PhD is a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of full-time faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern
engineering skills associated with design andcommunication and on personal characteristics associated with good teamwork and effectiveleadership. Small group discussion related to course readings are used to increase studentunderstanding of abstract engineering concepts. Design projects are used to facilitate studenttransfer of their understanding to new contexts.The course sequence has been piloted in the Mechanical Engineering program and was shown tobe quite successful with regard to student achievement and student satisfaction. Plans are beingmade for college-wide implementation of a similar freshman experience emphasizing skill andpersonal characteristic development.1.0 IntroductionThe issues of engineering student engagement and persistence and
Technical College Jill Davishahl is a faculty member in the engineering department at Bellingham Technical College where she teaches courses ranging from Intro to Engineering Design to Engineering Statics. Outside of teach- ing, Jill is working on the development of a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Technology and is currently PI on the NSF funded ATE project grant in renewable energy as well as PI on an NSF funded S-STEM project. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington.Mr. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl is faculty and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include
AC 2007-341: DESIGN OF AN INTRODUCTORY MATLAB COURSE FORFRESHMAN ENGINEERING STUDENTSDarryl Morrell, Arizona State University Page 12.458.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Design of an Introductory MATLAB Course for Freshman Engineering Students1 IntroductionThis paper describes the design and implementation of a one credit-hour MATLAB course forfreshman engineering students in the new multi-disciplinary engineering program at Arizona StateUniversity at the Polytechnic campus. The course was initially offered in the Spring 2006 semester;based on the spring experience, the course was significantly redesigned for the
choose their transfer institution based onits degree programs related to their career goals, two-year transfer students tend to be morenarrowly focused on a specific career path than either transfer students from four-yearinstitutions or first-year students attending college for the first time [19].Research MethodsThis research study involves 61 engineering transfer students in a one-semester foundations ofengineering course, who wrote short essay responses to a series of questions about their learningapproaches and strategies among all of their courses. The study sample consisted ofapproximately 80% men and 20% women. The questions asked students about goals forstudying, planning what to study next, participation in study groups, credibility of
the General Engineering Learning Community at Clemson University,with the ultimate goal of increasing the retention of engineering students entering the universitywith underprepared calculus skills [1], [2]. Two secondary goals of the program that feed into thefirst include providing academic support through on-campus resources and constructing acommunity of learners. The learning strategies course promotes program goals by equippingstudents with effective personal and professional skills related to self-regulatory behaviors,learning strategies, and habits of mind, while simultaneously building their awareness ofavailable academic resources.Peer sharing presentations, the instructional practice that is the focus on this paper, allowstudents
a variety of classes ranging introductory programming and first-year engineering design courses to introductory and advanced courses in electronic circuits. He is a member of ASEE, IEEE, and ACM.Dr. Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati Dr. Kathleen A. Ossman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She teaches primarily freshmen with a focus on programming and problem solving. Dr. Ossman is interested in active learning, flipped classrooms, and other strategies that help students become self-directed learners.Dr. Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati Dr. Jeff Kastner is an Assistant Professor Educator in the Department of Engineering Education
integration into theinstitution’s environment and thus their performance in college. “Given individualcharacteristics, prior experiences, and commitments, … it is the individual’s integration into theacademic and social systems of the college that most directly relates to his continuance in thatcollege” (p. 96).With the support of a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant, the College of Engineering(COE) at Southern Illinois University Carbondale has implemented an Engineering ResidentialCollege (ERC), which consists of a series of academic and non-academic programs to addressaspects of student integration with the goal of improving first- and second-year retention rates
overt connections between mathconcepts and engineering by keeping the focus on developing a deeper understanding ofengineering as a field.Throughout the course, student learning objectives pertain to mathematical concepts, thoughtheir presentation to the students emphasizes the role of engineering. This emphasis is intentionaland plays a large role in the decision to have engineering faculty exclusively teach thiscurriculum to students in the GELC program. By the end of the course, students should be ableto: ● identify elements within a mathematical model (i.e., slope, area under the curve, shape of a line) and their relation to physical attributes represented through a graph ● determine graphical solutions to problems ● determine the
the course objectives; thosethat the project is intended to assess are denoted by an asterisk.Course objectives (asterisks indicate objectives addressed in the project) 1. Relate expectations required by engineering curriculum* 2. Differentiate engineering disciplines (electrical, industrial, mechanical, software, etc.)* 3. Apply the engineering design process to a group project* 4. Outline the history and development of engineering and the various disciplines 5. Utilize software tools to improve productivity by creating flowcharts and spreadsheets* 6. Collaborate on a project as a member of a team* 7. Determine reliable sources of information and new knowledge (scientific method)* 8. Evaluate engineering environments to
similar courses.Relevant Literature and Prior WorkA broad range of research has been conducted on students’ identities as engineers and how thataffects their retention in engineering programs. Studies from several fields, ranging from socialsciences to developmental psychology, have suggested that a strong sense of engineering identityis an important factor for students who choose to continue within an engineering program [1].Students’ perceptions of their experiences as they go through an engineering program have alsobeen shown to be important, especially with how those experiences relate to their sense ofidentity as an engineer [2].The future time perspective has also been shown to be useful in determining student motivation.Hilpert et. al
” assignments. Discipline Civil and Environmental Bioengineering Computer Engineering and Computer Engineering SciencePurpose They design and build the nation’s Develop health related products and Focuses on programming languages, data transportation, supply and energy techniques to improve quality of life and information representation, storage and systems and solve problems of Apply engineering to medicine and processing, and algorithms and computability
Paper ID #23019Evaluation of Online Learning in a First-year Engineering Design CourseDr. Liang Li Wu, University of California, Irvine Liang (Lily) Wu is the Director of Academic Innovation, Programs at the Henry Samueli School of En- gineering, University of California, Irvine. Dr. Wu is responsible for implementing, overseeing and assessing the first-year engineering program and international programs to enhance and support the engi- neering education at the School of Engineering. Dr. Wu received her Ph.D. degree in Material Science and Engineering from the University of California, Irvine with primary research
simulations on CAD software.The activity was successfully administered to an introduction to mechanical engineering class of221 students during the Spring semester of 2017. A discussion of the resources and personnelrequired (faculty and graduate teaching assistants) is also presented. The activity is consideredsimple to implement only requiring a computer station with installed CAD software offered bymost engineering programs. Continuous improvements to the activity are made based on facultyobservations as well as a survey administered to the students.1. IntroductionIncorporating team-based design projects into first-year engineering courses is beneficial to first-year engineering students [1]. First-year design projects have been proven to increase
having obtained her PhD in 2007 from the University of Illinois at Chicago under the supervision of Dr. Thomas L. Theis. She has developed a research program in sustainable engineering of bioproducts. Her research ranges from design of systems based on industrial ecology and byproduct synergies, life cycle and sustainability assessments of biopolymers and biofuels, and design and analy- sis of sustainable solutions for healthcare. Since 2007, she has lead seven federal research projects and collaborated on many more, totaling over $7M in research, with over $12M in collaborative research. At ASU, Dr. Landis continues to grow her research activities and collaborations to include multidisciplinary approaches to
and is currently working on several research projects dealing with technology and equity in STEM classrooms.Samiha Momin,Asma Salim Maredia, Texas A&M University Asma Maredia is currently a senior at A&M Consolidated High School in College Station, Texas. She obtained her high school diploma in May 2021 and will be attending the University of Texas at Austin as an Honors Human Development and Family Science Major. This is her first time partaking in engineering- related research and she has thoroughly enjoyed the experience and ability to learn new material with Professor Fidai and her fellow co-authors.Insha Ashirali Umatiya, Insha Umatiya is a graduate from A&M Consolidated High School in College
Paper ID #13593Using Strengths of First-Year Engineering Students to Enhance TeachingDr. Shelley Lorimer P.Eng., MacEwan University Shelley Lorimer is the Chair of the Bachelor of Science in Engineering (BSEN) Transfer Program at Grant MacEwan University. She is an instructor in the introductory engineering courses as well. The BSEN program at MacEwan has grown from forty students since in started almost fifteen years ago, to the current 216 students. The majority of the students in the program transfer to second year engineering at the University of Alberta. Shelley is a graduate of the University of Alberta in
Paper ID #28631Work-In-Progress: Engineering Self-Efficacy in First-Year DesignMegan Gray, Duke University Megan Gray is a Research Analyst in Evaluation and Engagement at Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute (SSRI). She serves as a project manager and researcher for both qualitative and quanti- tative evaluation and research efforts, in partnership with community-based programs as well as campus- based initiatives. Megan came to Duke from the nonprofit field, where she evaluated and monitored implementation of county-wide early childhood programs. Her prior experience includes school-based social work