detailed methodology and implementation strategy along with course outline,objectives of each of the four experiments and typical exam questions. Furthermore, the paperalso includes the student feedback, and long-term evaluation and certain concerns that theinstructor should be aware off when implementing this technique.IntroductionCivil engineering material course at Rowan University is a required 2- credit junior-level coursethat is offered in the fall semester. The course covers civil engineering materials, like wood,aggregates, cement concrete and asphalt concrete. The class of 20 to 25 students is divided intofour groups. There are two time slots allocated for this course in a week, one hour-fifteen minutefor lecture and two hour-forty
Formalisms, submitted Journal forComputing in Small Colleges.12. C.A.R. Hoare, Communicating Sequential Processes, Prentice Hall Internationla Ltd., New York, 1985.13. Failures Divergence Refinement, User Manual and Tutorial, Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd., 1995.Biographical InformationCARL STEIDLEY is a Professor of Computer Science. He earned his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon. Hisinterests are in the applications of artificial intelligence and robotics. Prior to joining the faculty at Southeastern La.Univ. he taught computer science at Central Washington Univ., and Austin Peay State Univ. Before that he was amember of the faculty of mathematics and physics at Oregon Institute of Technology. He has had recent researchand development
once or twice each semester on issues covered onlyperipherally in class such as packaging, environmental, health, and safety, or process integration.The simulated corporate atmosphere compels students to take ownership of their learning and torecognize the mutual dependence between themselves and their team to get the job done. III. Team StructureTeams of students are assembled for both the lecture and the laboratory sessions. In the lecture,cooperative learning techniques3 are used with students randomly arranged in two or three-member groups when needed. There they work on open-ended problems and discuss their resultsin class. Often they must better define the question posed before they can develop an
- ment for her achievements in online learning. She serves as an eMentor for the University of Missouri System and earned a Faculty Achievement Award for teaching.Dr. Dan Cernusca, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Dan Cernusca is Instructional Design Specialist in the Department of Global Learning at the Mis- souri University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in Information Science and Learning Technologies in 2007 from University of Missouri – Columbia. He also holds a BS and a Ph.D. from the University of Sibiu, Romania with a specialization in manufacturing technologies and respec- tively cutting-tools design. His research interests include Design-Based Research in technology
Paper ID #18372Observations of the Application and Success of Leadership Development Toolswith Undergraduate Engineering EducationDr. J. S.. Shelley, California State University, Long Beach J. S. Shelley, Ph.D., P.E. Detailed from the Air Force Research Laboratory on an Intergovernmental Per- sonnel Agreement, Dr Shelley is the Faculty Lead in Mechanical Engineering for CSU Long Beach’s Antelope Valley Engineering Programs, ABET assessment coordinator and Student Success Champion. She has been teaching for CSULB since Fall 2011.Dr. Kenneth Wayne Santarelli P.E., California State University, Long Beach Dr. Santarelli
for testing and feedback.Based on feedback from the teacher, the WMU student team modified the original design toincrease the efficiency of in-class use of the device. After constructing the hands-on model, thestudent team tested the device in a classroom setting. Lesson plans and pre- and post-experimentsurveys were created in order to gain the necessary qualitative and quantitative data that wouldhelp determine if the devices were successful in effectively demonstrating the properties of light,while keeping the middle school students interested in the concepts behind the experiment. Afterdeeming the device successful, the student team decided to investigate the feasibility of large-scale production. Based on advice from faculty mentors, the
. Hochwald, ‘Converting qualitative data into quantitative values using a matched mixed- methods design: A new methodological approach’, J Adv Nurs, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 4398– 4410, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1111/jan.15649.[30] A. J. Magana, A. Jaiswal, T. L. Amuah, M. Z. Bula, M. S. U. Duha, and J. C. Richardson, ‘Characterizing Team Cognition Within Software Engineering Teams in an Undergraduate Course’, IEEE Transactions on Education, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TE.2023.3327059.[31] C. Wilson, ‘General Interviewing Issues’, in Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners, Morgan Kaufmann, 2014, pp. 113–117. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-410393-1.00006-5.[32] L. Gershgoren et al., ‘Expertise in soccer teams: A thematic inquiry into
Engineering Technology department will procure a tool to educate theirstudents on cobot operation and programming. The project will help introduce students to theintegration of multiple devices into a single system. One of the main goals of the project is forstudents and faculty to be able to easily operate the system. In addition, the system will implementInternet of Things (IoT) 4.0, allowing students to better understand IoT applications in a simulatedmanufacturing cell. For this project, design team purchased a new 6-axis cobot for the ETdepartment. The design team also planned to use the prototype as a demonstration module for highschool students, which could help stoke interest from prospective students. Due to the modulardesign of the work
among the attitudes, beliefs, motivation, cognitive skills, and engineering skills of K-16 engineering learners; and teaching engineering.Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Kayla is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on creating and sustaining cultures of inclusion in engineering. She investigates normative cultural ideologies produced and reinforced by engineering education structures (e.g. departments, courses, poli- cies) to determine the influence on initiatives to recruit, retain, and support diverse students. Her current work explores the cultural productions of faculty to understand how to improve inclusion in
Faculty as well as faculty from other colleges and universities on STEM related grants, activities, and endeavors. Dr. Fontenot teachers Professional Communications for Engineers: practical applications to written, oral, and Internet communication as well as an introduction to engineering ethics and service learning. She sits on numerous councils and boards, including the Texas Alliance for Minorities in Engineering Board, Texas Tech Teacher Education Council, the Pre College Engineering Council, and the Service Learning Faculty Advisory Council. She publishes in engineering related journals and presents at STEM conferences like ASEE, STEM Best Practices, and Frontiers in Education.Mr. Richard A Burgess, Texas Tech
it is simply plotted at itshistorical expected return and standard deviation. The new efficient frontier of weightedportfolios includes choices that mix T-bills with an approximately 50/50 split between stocks andbonds. This model is elaborated by a table of different portfolios with their expected return andstandard deviation. This linear envelope implies that heavier weighted bond portfolios aredominated. More importantly, it demonstrates the inadequacies and errors contained in commonrules of thumb that link recommended bond/stock weights to an individual’s age. These applyboth to young students and to faculty nearing retirement. We also use this step to illustrate howGOAL SEEK can be used to improve on the minimum variance portfolio.This
laboratory manuals maybe distributed to all engineering programs. Engineering faculty at other institutions may consideradopting this model and joining forces to create a large "Data Bank" for compilation of theresults of their valuable efforts.To implement such a model, in September of 1997, the author proposed to the administration ofThe College of New Jersey (TCNJ) a two-phase plan for creation of the State of the ArtLaboratories for the Mechanical Engineering Specialty of the engineering programs. Phase one,targeting the generation of the apparatuses required for conducting precision experimentation inthe area of Mechanics of Materials and phase two focusing on the design and fabrication of theapparatuses for experiments in the area of Dynamics
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Enhancing Engineering Curricula Through Laboratory-based Learning: Pedagogical Approaches, Challenges, and Innovations Marvin Gayle, Danny Mangra Queensborough Community College The City University of New York [CUNY] Queens New York, USA Abstract—Laboratory-based instruction is a critical underscore ways to evaluate the effect of laboratory education oncomponent of engineering education. It
the Georgia Institute of Technology, with a focus on engineering education. She earned her doctoral degree in computer science from the KFSCIS at FIU, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees. She also holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in neuroscience from the University of Miami. Her research interests span the fields of computing and engineering education, human-computer interaction, data science, and machine learning.Dr. Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is a Lecturer and Director of Faculty and Student Training in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University where she is in- volved in teaching and engineering
assessed for K-12 or university student attitude changes. We address these issuesin this paper.The Drexel K-12 Program at the Philadelphia Creative and Performing Arts High School The aim of the DK-12 project is to teach K-12 students about the principles of STEMthrough current technology and inspire them to pursue STEM careers. The project plans toimplement this through the use of highly interactive laboratories, designed for students in highschool, whose designated major of study include those in the arts and humanities. Through thecollaboration of Drexel Universities students and faculties, as well as the teaching faculties at theCreative Arts and Performing High School (CAPA), DK-12 implements laboratory exercises thatteach the
the standalone technical communication courses in the Departments ofChemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Civil and Environmental Engineering at theUniversity of Texas at Austin [3]. Finally, rather than using a standalone course to teach writing,a number of engineering departments try to interweave the teaching of writing into a sequence ofengineering courses. Such a course sequence occurs with two upper-level laboratory courses inthe Mechanical Engineering Department of Virginia Tech [4]. However, with recent increases in engineering undergraduate enrollments [5], many suchcourses are stretched. Faculty are asked to teach greater loads, often without additional resources.One such example is Pennsylvania State University
. Particularly, faculty perceptions of institutional rewards for productive researchover teaching provide little incentive for course improvement.3Teaching assistants (TAs) can be valuable resources in facilitating the transition of a traditionalengineering course to include active learning techniques; however, prior studies indicate thatpeople tend to teach how they were taught,4 contributing further to this lack of course reform.TA training can help prepare graduate students to teach in this new course structure. Various TAtraining workshops,5 courses,6,7 boot-camps,8 and certificates9 have been successful at preparinggraduate students to teach; however, few papers have outlined ways in which TAs can worktogether with instructors to transition a
, at Black Hills State University, and her Master of Business Administration at Chadron State College. Working mainly with women’s issues at the university, Ms. Carlson established a women’s mentoring program for first year students at the university, and just recently established a women’s center at SD Mines - the first to exist on any South Dakota university campus.Mr. Eric Jon Holmgren Originally graduating with a BA in Studio Art from St. John’s University in 2004, Eric Holmgren relo- cated to Minneapolis, MN and found work in the publishing industry. For several years he worked as a bindery and press operator until a junior software developer position opened. With his self-taught techni- cal background
discusses some options for more accurately portraying the success of students who initiallyenroll in transfer programs. Page 6.1062.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationI. IntroductionPublic demand that education address assessment and accountability issues has set into motion inquiriesinto educational attainment at every level. From kindergarten to Ph.D. degree, from course todiscipline, educators, administrators and researchers are probing inputs, through-puts and outputs todetermine rates
Paper ID #16413Comparison of a Partially Flipped vs. Fully-Flipped Introductory Probabil-ity and Statistics Course for Engineers: Lessons LearnedDr. Natasa S. Vidic, University of Pittsburgh Natasa Vidic is an assistant professor in the department of industrial engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where she received a Ph.D. in industrial engineering in 2008. She has an M.S. in operations research from the University of Delaware (1992) and a B.S. in civil/transportation engineering from the University of Belgrade in Serbia (1987). Before joining the faculty in 2010, Dr. Vidic was a visiting assistant professor. She
Teachers (RET) program sponsored by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) at a multi-university Engineering Research Center (ERC). The RET programselects up to twenty K-12 teachers from minority-serving schools who teach STEM courses.Those selected engaged in research with civil engineering faculty at a large Research I universityin the Southwest United States. This summer program ran for five weeks including the labresearch component, as well as a requirement to develop an engineering lesson plan andimplement it in the classroom the following semester. RETs received professional developmenttraining in PBL and were invited to incorporate PBL in their engineering-focused lesson plans.Additionally, a PBL-focused lesson plan template was provided to
technology professions • Enjoyment of math and science • Perceptions regarding the rewards versus the level of effort to become an engineer or engineering technologistSurvey DesignA previously validated survey developed by the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)Center for Pre-College Programs was adapted for use in this study.19 Forty of the original 50items comprising the NJIT survey were included in the end-of-year NCJETS survey.Collectively, these 40 items evaluated students’ attitudes about and interest in the engineeringprofession; career issues such as equal opportunity and leisure time; beliefs about their math,science, and other engineering-related skills such as problem-solving and creative thinking;confidence in their
. APPENDIXA1. Survey InformationIntroduction/Consent FormWe are interested in understanding how participation in on-campus engineering studentorganizations/clubs influences student understanding and awareness of engineering ethics.This survey is divided into three parts:- In part one, you will be asked to read 3 stories concerning 3 different social problems. After each story,there will be 3 questions representing different issues that might be raised by the problem. You will beasked to rate and rank the questions in terms of importance.- In part two, you will be asked questions related to your participation in on-campus engineering studentorganizations/ clubs.- In part three, you will be asked questions related to your demographic information.The
/ ePortfolios took more time than I wanted to spend. Boredom (translated on graph) I was bored when doing the mini projects / ePortfolios. Working in a team on the mini projects was boring to me. Comfortable with Ambiguity I feel comfortable interacting with my team members. I felt comfortable sharing my knowledge with my mini project teammates. I feel comfortable asking the team for help when I do not understand something I feel safe discussing tough project issues with my team. I feel comfortable learning new things with my team. I am comfortable working with people who have different perspectives and abilities from mine. Empathy
, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, East Tennessee State University, 2019.[34] M. Veletzos, M. G. Noonan, M. W. Sakakeeny, and C. McGowan, “Implementing national best practices to improve STEM retention in a liberal arts college setting,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Annual ASEE Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 24-27, 2018.[35] A. Chan-Hilton, “Student success and retention from the perspectives of engineering students and faculty,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, 2019.[36] J. Maccariella Jr., S. Pribesh, and M. R. Williams, “An engineering learning community to promote retention and graduation for community college students,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 2019, vol
engineer in the central research division of Bayer AG in Leverkusen before he became full professor of Thermal Pro- cess Engineering in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt in 1995. His research interests are in the field of transport phenomena at fluid interfaces. He has been the chairman of the Working Party on Education in Chemical and Process Engineering of the VDI-Society for Chemical and Process Engineering and member of the European Working Party on Education in Chemical Engineering for many years. He is the vice-chairman of the council of the faculties of mechanical and process engineering in Germany and chairman of 4ING, the German Council of University Faculties in
Paper ID #26115Design for Community: Perspectives from Professors, Students, and Com-munity PartnersDr. Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University Dr. Jes Kuczenski joined the engineering faculty at Santa Clara University in 2014 and currently serves as the Director of General Engineering. She obtained her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and her B.S. from Iowa State University all in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Kuczenski has been teaching since 2007 and focuses on courses which are commonly found in first years of an engineering education (e.g. introduction to engineering, engineering graphics, statics, and
. Develop interest in the content area. Recall course content. Apply course content to new problems. Think about problems in graphical/pictorial or practical ways. 0 1 2 3 4 5Figure 14: Spring post survey question indicating the students’ ratings of the different benefitsthat the hands-on experiment had for them (N=61).Table 2: Aggregated responses from open-ended question on “What would you change in the useof experiments in this class?” Spring 2015. Issue Times Mentioned Have more hands-on experiments 31 Tie the experiments
the text, as well as in the results of the student survey in regards to engagement andenjoyment. When asked what percentage of the source material the students fully read or listenedto, 22% of students reported completing only 20% or less of the novel assigned, and only 11%completed 100% of the novel. Such a low engagement with the material was concerning, andseemed to correlate to a low enjoyment of the source material. Two comments from studentsfurther highlight this issue: • “The main disadvantage was the time spent reading took away from other time learning” • “Taking time to read the book took time away that could have been used learning other things. It was difficult to make an actually useful robot design that related
physics. His dissertation research was on charged-particle spectroscopy for measuring astrophysically important properties of radioactive nuclei. Following his Ph.D., he was a Post-Doctoral Scholar with the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and was later part of the founding faculty of the Khalifa University of Science and Technology, United Arab Emirates, from 2009 to 2016, as a member of their Department of Nuclear Engineering. His teaching interests include engineering design education, engineering mechanics, and nuclear and radiation physics. His research interests focus on problems in radiation transport through matter, with applications to nuclear non-proliferation, detector design, and radiation dosimetry