Engineering during 2016-2017. Dr. Leu earned his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees from the Department of Civil Engineering of National Taiwan University in 1987 and 1989, respectively. He joined the faculty of National Taiwan University shortly after receiving his PhD from Cornell University in 1994. His area of research includes optimal design of structures, structural health monitoring, earthquake resistant design, and simulation of architec- tural physics for green buildings. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolutionize PhD Training in Industry-Academia CollaborationFor the past decade, the PhD enrollment rate in
of task roles [12][34][35] Group Role Description Task Roles Initiator- Propose new ideas; determine the team tasks and goals; suggest solution; find contributor a new way of organizing the group for the task aheadInformation Seeker Asks for clarification of suggestions frequently; comply with the authoritative view or facts Opinion Seeker Seek practical cases; classify and summarize values pertinent to group taskInformation Giver offer facts or authoritative information based on personal experience Opinion Giver State own opinions; give suggestions in group's view Elaborator
Institute for Studies in Education and has a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto.Dr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto Serhiy Kovalchuk is a research associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto.Dr. Qin Liu, University of Toronto Dr. Qin Liu is a research associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream, in the Department of Mechanical & Indus- trial Engineering and the Institute for Leadership Education in
his academic career, he worked at the University of Toledo (1997-1999) and the Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly University of Missouri, Rolla) (1999-2006) before joining UTSA in Aug.2006. For more, please visit http://engineering.utsa.edu/˜saygin/ .Dr. Timothy T. Yuen, University of Texas, San Antonio Timothy T. Yuen is an Assistant Professor of instructional technology in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Texas, San Antonio. His research studies tools that mediate conceptual understanding in computer science and engineering. He is a member of IEEE, ACM, AERA, and ISTE and an affiliated faculty member of the Interactive Technology and Experience Center (iTEC
Session 2113 Integrating Chemical Engineering as a Vehicle to Enhance High School Science Instruction Deran Hanesian, Levelle Burr-Alexander, Howard Kimmel, Joseph Kisutcza, Reginald P. T. Tomkins The Otto H. York Department of Chemical Engineering The Center for Pre-College Programs New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, New Jersey 07102AbstractThe National Science Education Standards (NSES) support the teaching of engineering andtechnology principles and design within the traditional
) overcoming imposter syndrome, and (6) valuing mentorship. Participantscollectively discussed their images and related experiences in a final group session. Steps toaddress emergent themes were also identified and presented to the Associate Dean for StudentAffairs, along with a plan to showcase their work.I. IntroductionThe discrepancy between the number of Black students who complete a college degree comparedto their white peers has been of national concern for many years [1], [2]. In engineering, thisproblem persists and has been exacerbated in the last decade by stagnant growth in awardeddegrees for Black students [2], [3]. Factors contributing to this educational gap may result frominstitutional racism in an institution’s policies, values, and
strategies including inquiry-based learning, case-based teaching, problem-based learning,project-based learning, collaborative learning, and integrated curricula are described below.Inquiry-based learning is based on the investigation scientific or engineering questions,scenarios or problems. Those ‘inquiring’ will identify and research issues and questions todevelop their STEM knowledge or solutions, guided by an instructor. Inquiry-based learningactivities are designed for students to investigate, apply prior knowledge, examine, broadenconceptual knowledge, and to assess the growth of developing new knowledge.36,37,38,39 Inquiry-based learning is most effective when students are able to make a connection between theirlearning and real life
academic integrity violation”. For this part, the scenarios arepresented in generic third person: “A student copies...”The second question uses the same list of behaviors but presents a new evaluation scale designedto elicit an indication of the ease with which a student decides to participate in a given behavior.This question attempts to get at the guilt factor or “moral compass” component ofdecision-making. This is a complex question, and a simple two-dimensional slider ranging from“very easily” to “never” is insufficient to capture an important aspect of this issue. A student maychoose to act in a given way easily even though they consider the action to be dishonest, or theymay simply not consider the action dishonest. In addition to the
ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their un- dergraduate student population. She currently serves as the principal evaluator for the Teachers Attracting Girls to Computer Science project which aims to increase and diversify the student population studying computer science in high school. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF- sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, transfers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Department of Sociology and
Velazquez, Montana State University Dr. Velazquez is the Director of Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in the Norm Absjornson College of Engineering at Montana State University. She is also a faculty member at the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department. In her role, she supports underrepresented minority students in STEM fields. Dr. Velazquez has a PhD. in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering from The Pennsylvania State University. She is interested in research related to recruitment, retention, and success of minority students in STEM. She is passionate about topics related to increasing the participation of women in Engineering.Prof. David Claudio, Montana State University David
persuade her undergraduate students to investigate interesting questions in fluid mechanics with her.Heidi Reuter c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Art and Science of Fluid Mechanics as a General Education CourseAbstractA new experimental course on flow visualization (PHOTO 321N) is offered to undergraduatestudents as a General Education (GenEd) course at Penn State University. This course isintended to make integration between two knowledge domains: Art and Science of FluidMechanics. The course is not math oriented and is designed for the students with minimal to nobackground in photography or physics of fluid mechanics. Students explore a
Paper ID #11691Multi-Course Problem-based Learning Module spanning across the Juniorand Senior Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: Mechatronics, Fluid Me-chanic, and Heat TransferDr. James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University James A. Mynderse, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include mechatronics, dynamic systems, and control with applications to piezoelectric actuators, hysteresis, and perception. He serves as the faculty advisor for the LTU Baja SAE team.Dr. Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological
delivered as a project-based learning (PBL) experience. Ineach case, the project has involved HVAC system design and building energy analysis: arenovation analysis for a house in a low-income neighborhood, identifying upgrade and retrofitoptions for an architectural award-winning building, and an analysis of a new constructionbuilding on campus.Around this building analysis project framework, the entire content of the course has beenstructured, and has included: HVAC system design and components including sustainability andefficiency concerns, building envelope U-values, load calculations, psychrometry,instrumentation, design considerations and strategies, alternative energy and geothermal systemoptions, finite difference computational techniques
education [1]–[3] and in engineering [4]. This ismost notably important in students who are minoritized in engineering, specifically women andstudents of color, whose sense of belonging is influenced by the environment around them [4],[5]. It has been shown that extracurricular engagement and faculty support have a positive effecton minoritized students’ sense of belonging [5]. Furthermore, work has shown that instructormindset has a significant factor on relative student success with minoritized students performingbetter in STEM courses in which the instructor has a growth mindset as compared to a fixedmindset [6]. In addition to belonging, systematic factors, such as minority stress and stereotypethreat, affect minoritized students’ overall
studentsface when teaching and learning in the online environment, utilizing emerging technologies andadapting new teaching activities to foster an interactive learning environment online offerspromising opportunities. Institutes play a crucial role in supporting faculty and students inmeeting their objectives of transitioning to online teaching. Instructors and students, withoutproper training, face tremendous challenges in adapting to the new learning technologies in theonline learning space. The online discussion tool presented and discussed in this paper is anexample of successful application of a technology-oriented learning tool to facilitate learning forremote students. The preliminary measurements of the learning outcomes indicated
from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education (active learning techniques) and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM. She has served in the North Central Section Board since 2013.Dr. Lin Zhao, Gannon University Lin Zhao received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada in 2006. She received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical engineering from Shandong University, Jinan, China
has worked in both the private and public sectors. Prior to her current engineering position, she was on the faculty at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education for over 8 years teaching Foundations of Engineering courses to first year engineering students.Prof. Jenny L. Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo is a Senior Instructor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has taught multiple first-year engineering courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Changes in Student Perceptions of Engineering Disciplines through Showcasing of Career PathsAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper describes an instructional
experiences of various populations and it provides an example of how toeffectively analyze and present information in narrative form to detail and garner critical insightsfrom people’s experiences.Bibliography1. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.2. Schuman D. Policy analysis, education, and everyday life: An empirical reevaluation of higher education in America. DC Heath Lexington, MA; 1982.3. Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers college press; 2012.4. Reddick RJ. Intersecting identities: mentoring contributions and challenges for Black faculty
applied in real engineer- ing learning environments to improve student learning and teaching. In this respect her two prominent research contributions are with: 1) artefact-inspired discovery–based pedagogy, i.e., learning activities where students’ exploration of STEM knowledge is self-directed and motivated by interactions or manip- ulations of artefacts; and 2) the development of faculty expertise in outcomes-based course design through the use of the Instructional Module Development (IMOD) system, a self-guided web-based training tool.Dr. Ashraf Gaffar, Arizona State University Ashraf Gaffar received his PhD in computer science with a focus on Human Computer Interaction (HCI), and works at ASU as Assistant
Page 5.457.1another university.Research universities should foster a community of learners. Large universities must findways to create a sense of place and to help students develop small communities withinthe larger whole.1 Learning Communities, at Iowa State, have been established to allowstudents to network with each other, build relationships with Computer Engineeringfaculty, increase student retention, and teach valuable social and team skills. Nonethelessmeeting student expectations to begin their Computer Engineering studies was still anissue that needed to be addressed.It is incumbent upon the faculties of research universities to think carefully andsystematically not only about how to make the most effective use of existing
corequisitecourse, as opposed to a separate precalculus course, to improve retention [15]. Course design cantake a much broader approach, addressing not only broader choices of learning objectives, but alsothe active learning strategies involved in the daily lessons. A complete redesign of Calculus IIcreated new content emphasizing relevant applications and reducing the scope of a traditionalcourse, active learning modules for each class period, and a ‘community of practice’ to offer thisnew course [16].When changing an entire course is not possible or not necessary for a program, an alternative ismodifying specific calculus course content to foster deeper connections between students and theircoursework. Examples of this include having engineering faculty
40,000 undergraduate students enrolled inChE that year[1]. Despite these numbers, ChE undergraduate enrollment has been described ascyclic. The projected forecast is a new decline in enrollment for the next couple of years as aconsequence of factors including the dominant industry, job offer and demand, and a processcontrol-related oscillatory response influenced by graduation times, complex curricula, andsalary reward[2].Additionally, ChE freshmen matriculation has declined due to students leaving their major toother perceived “less pollutant” engineering disciplines such as those of civil, biomedical, andenvironmental. This poses a challenge for student retention, and it may be the result ofmisconceptions that chemical engineers will end up
of Kerala and rose to the position of Director of Technical Education. Most of his career, he has served at College of Engineering, Trivandrum as a faculty member in the Department of Civil Engineering. He specializes in Transportation Engineering and is instrumental in establishing a Transportation Engi- neering Division at College of Engineering, Trivandrum. He is a leading consultant and researcher in this area of specialization. He has been active with his involvement with industries. He developed the process of Manufacturing Manufactured Sand ’M Sand’ an alternative to river sand. He was the coordinator of State Technical Agency for PMGSY scheme in Kerala. He has coordinated a large number of training
a sense of accomplishment throughtheir team (15/16). Students felt welcomed and included by participants (11 agreed strongly, 3agreed and 1 neutral) especially Y1 (8/8 strong agreement) and supported by approachableProgram faculty concerned with their success (16/16). Both cohorts felt a sense ofaccomplishment with most (13/16) feeling their academic progress advanced much more or morethan expected, with two feeling neutral and one experiencing less than expected academicgrowth. In terms of overall outcomes, all participants felt very satisfied (13/16) or satisfied(3/16) by their achievements.In addition to quantitative self-evaluation, the PIs measured student research productivity(reports, presentations, and publications). In Y1, student
contributing to student’s perceptions of their competence, autonomy,and relatedness. Implications for mathematics faculty about how to make course structures moremotivationally supportive for calculus students will be discussed.IntroductionCalculus I serves as a gatekeeper course to STEM majors [1],[2]. In addition to having a highfailure rate, students leave this course with a decreased confidence and enjoyment ofmathematics, with students at research universities showing the greatest decrease in these aspectsthroughout the course [3]. This poses a significant challenge since these universities are the mainsource of our future scientists and engineers, and our nation is in need of more STEM majorsentering the workforce in order to sustain our global
and peer feedback grades, and then the result is adjusted up ordown based on qualitative factors for each student. These qualitative factors included the qualityof student contributions to team products, CATME peer comments, input from machine shopstaff, faculty advisors, industry mentors, and direct observation by the instructor. As stated in thecourse syllabus, "In rare cases, serious behavior issues, significant ethical lapses, or non-contribution to the team may result in a zero score for the instructor evaluation."Initial Launch of TimeCards in Senior Design 2 (2016-2017 Capstone Cohort)In spring 2017, team time cards and the instructor evaluation were first implemented in SeniorDesign 2. In Senior Design 2, teams work independently to
-peak hours(after 10 pm) would result in only slight increases in energy draw, but charging after work couldrequire around 160 new power plants 2. Of importance, taking a sustainable approach towardsthese vehicles can act to lower greenhouse-gas emissions, improve urban air quality, saveconsumers money, bolster power-grid reliability and reduce oil imports 3. Toward this objective,the University of Kansas EcoHawks senior design program focuses on investigating the linkageof the vehicle to the grid for improved efficiencies in both arenas. In the next few paragraphs,the background the EcoHawks is given in order to provide the proper context how the authorscame to construct a sustainable scale Smart Grid
faculty. Theseare being addressed as on-going and future work.References[1] H. M. Vo, C. Zhu, and N. A. Diep, "The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis," Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 53, pp. 17-28, June 2017.[2] C. D. Dziuban, J. L. Hartman, and P. D. Moskal, "Blended learning," Educause, Centre for Applied Research Bulletin. Vol. 2004, Issue 7, July 2004.[3] C. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, P. D. Moskal, A. Norberg, and N. Sicilia, "Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 3, December 2018.[4] R. F. DeMara, N. Khoshavi, S. Pyle, J. Edison, R
lectures or problem solutions, have becomefairly commonplace in higher education classroom in the past few years. Video authoring toolsand distribution channels are now powerful and seamless, presenting a wide array of newopportunities for faculty to produce sharable educational assets. Video resources, when createdusing pedagogical and multimedia best practices, are known to be valuable learning tools forstudents. A variety of studies have enlisted cognitive load theory and/or the worked exampleeffect to demonstrate efficacy in a variety of settings and disciplines.In this paper, we examine the use of video resources by students in an undergraduate engineeringmechanics (dynamics) class, with a specific focus on how video consumption correlates to
. Approvalfor validation of the flight control module and path could then be sought e.g. to operate the UAVat a maximum height that does not exceed the position of the tip of the turbine blade when it is inan upright vertical position and at a speed no greater than that needed to safely traverse the blade.Such a system would not allow for interactive manual control apart from the use of an overridebutton that causes the UAV to fly to safe location and land. Future work includes an explorationof how the systems outlined above can be fully tested within the prevailing legal constraints. Italso provides opportunities for students to explore legal and ethical issues surrounding the use ofthis technology. Notwithstanding the new regulations, the anticipated