the Outstanding Industrial Engineering Faculty Award in 2011, 2013, and 2015, the Penn State Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Alumni Faculty Appreciation Award in 2013, and the Outstanding Advising Award in the College of Engineering in 2014 for his work in undergraduate education at Penn State. Dr. Lynch worked as a regional production engineer for Universal Forest Products prior to pursuing his graduate degrees. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering in the School of Engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College.Ms. Cynthia Bober, Penn State University Cynthia Bober is a 2015 graduate of the Penn State University with a M.S. and B.S. Degree in Industrial Engineering and a
for the development of increasingly innovative laboratoryexercises [5]. Accordingly, hands-on laboratories provide great opportunities to satisfy recognizedstudent learning outcomes, such as ABET Outcomes 1, 5, and 6 [7–8]. Laboratory equipment andfacilities require investment of time and money, and a competitive market exists to sell engineeredlaboratory exercises to institutions of higher learning, though some faculty members recognizevalue in development of their own laboratory facilities [9]. In this paper a case is presented wherean innovative laboratory facility is developed with specific aims to inspire and challenge studentswhile putting the onus on them to design good experiments and execute them precisely andaccurately.Course Format
to joining ODU in 2013, Dr. Ayala spent three years as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente in the Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering
Students with poor metacognition can benefit more from metacognitive trainingfor improving their metacognition and academic performance.11Creativity involves the introduction of new variables, significant leaps, and novelconnections; 12 and deals with a ‘‘process’’ which results in a ‘‘novel product.’’ 13 The mostaccepted frameworks on creativity can be categorized with Amablie’s model. 14 This modelincludes three components within the individual: intrinsic motivation, domain knowledge, andcreative skills, as well as a fourth component from environment, e.g. external setting, extrinsicmotivation, rewards, social interactions, and time pressure. Guilford pointed out two mainthinking in the creative process: divergent thinking (concerned with the
issue Moderate New project2 Creating Food support from can only be Minimal city implemented if support from Policy it has a those that are beneficial not directly economic impact impact Aquaponics Children School $20,000 grant using One-time
Studies program at Portland State University (Popular Culture, African Studies, Renaissance Studies, Environmental Sustainability, and Knowledge, Rationality and Understanding), and assisting several other courses in the same program (such as Global Environmental Change and Healthy People, Healthy Places), and 4. As an adjunct in both Applied Math- ematics and Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy at Oregon Tech. Vurkac¸ also served as a rubric and assignment-design specialist for the President’s Assessment Initiative at Portland State University 2002 through 2006, and as assessment coordinator of EERE at Oregon Tech, was the assessment lead for the initial accreditation of the new Bachelor of Science in
AC 2007-1236: DO THEY LIKE WHAT THEY LEARN, DO THEY LEARN WHATTHEY LIKE – AND WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT IT?Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Jaeger, Sue Freeman, and Rich Whalen are members of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience in engineering that endorses the student-centered and professionally-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Susan Freeman, Northeastern UniversityRichard Whalen, Northeastern University
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at ASU. His interests include student pathways and motivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Haolin Zhu is a faculty lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Univer- sity. She received her Ph.D. in Solid Mechanics from Cornell University. Currently she focuses on the freshmen engineering program, as well as designing and teaching mechanical engineering courses.Dr. Chao Wang, Arizona State University Chao Wang received her Ph.D. in Electrical
software on 88 students and faculty from two collegesand students from a high school. Data from standard Reflective Judgment interviews and fromCogitoã have been analyzed in a variety of ways using neural-net software. The better fits showcorrelation coefficients between Cogito ã and interview ratings of 0.5-0.8. Most other fits showcorrelations below 0.4. These results are slightly to significantly better than previous paper-and-pencil instruments for measuring intellectual development. We will discuss what our resultsmean for effective assessment. Are R values in the 0.5-0.6 range good enough? Why is there anapparent ceiling on R values for paper-and-pencil instruments?Keywords ¾ intellectual development, assessment, neural network, Cogito
as a source of information for improving team performance 2,3and accounting for individual contributions to a group project 4. Peer evaluations as a source ofinformation for small self-directed group work have an appeal because the team members are inthe best position to observe the team skills of their fellow team members. Despite thisadvantage, concerns have been levied against the use of peer evaluations. Abson 5, for example,suggested that peer evaluations can be abused and have undesirable effects on individuals in thegroup. Mathews 6 studied peer assessment of small group work in a management studiesprogram. He noted patterns of response included giving all group members the same score,collusion between group members, and potential
itpossible for even small companies to create custom chips without the expense of afabrication facility. Most of these foundries support only CMOS, reinforcing itsdominance in electronic design.We believe that electronics courses in undergraduate Electrical and ComputerEngineering curricula must adapt to this new landscape. Specifically, these courses mustfollow the transition from bipolar to CMOS devices and provide exposure to transistor-level design at the chip level. To do this, the laboratory component of such a course mustprovide students with exposure to design at the integrated circuit level as well as withdiscrete components and high-level building blocks such as operational amplifiers.This paper describes the integration of these issues
the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and Engineering Education to the faculty and greater university community.Dr. Philip Egberts, University of Calgary Philip Egberts obtained his Ph.D. from the McGill University in 2011. Following his PhD studies, he joined the Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics department at the University of Pennsylvania. Currently, he is the Acting Head of the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Calgary. He was also a visiting professor and Humboldt Fellow at the University of Hamburg in the Department of Physics from 2019-2020. His current research interests range atomic and nanoscale investigation of adhesion, friction, and wear, as well
was adequate time given to discuss the questionsin class. Table 3 shows that more than 80% of students agreed or strongly agreed with positivelyworded affective questionnaire items regarding Plickers and their learning experience.Though most of the students, 79.75%, agreed that discussing the questions helped them learn thematerial, only 49.08% stated that they always discussed the question with their group. Investigat-ing strategies to increase participation in group discussion will likely improve the scores on themultiple choice questions.One issue facing group discussion is the desire to adhere to social distancing guidelines. Becauseof the ongoing concern over COVID-19 the latest semester did not use pre-assigned groups, ratherit allowed
. Tooran Emami, United States Coast Guard Academy Tooran Emami is an associate professor of Electrical Engineering at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. She received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Wichita State University in 2006 and 2009, respectively. Dr. Emami was an adjunct faculty member of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Wichita State University for three semesters. Her research interests are Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controllers, robust control, time delay, compensator design, and filter design applications, for continuous-time and discrete-time systems.Mr. David Fournier, United States Coast Guard Academy Holds a BA and MS from Southern New
-2f6bbca45f14.html[10] J. Bossart and B. Neelam, “Women in Engineering: Insight into Why Some EngineeringDepartments Have More Success in Recruiting and Graduating Women.” American Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 8, no. 2, Dec. 2017.[11] A. Siani and C. Dacin. “An Evaluation of Gender Bias and Pupils’ Attitude towards STEMDisciplines in the Transition between Compulsory and Voluntary Schooling.” New Directions inthe Teaching of Physical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.[12] E. Lee. “Effects of South Korean High School Students’ Motivation to Learn Science andTechnology on Their Concern Related to Engineering.” Educational Sciences: Theory andPractice, vol. 17, no. 2, 2017.[13] R. Christensen, G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. “Gender Differences in
a few variables, andfor a model such as the DANVA are only concerned with the accuracy of nonverbal perceptionof emotions summarized in a single EI score [17]. This single score is also the case for theMSCEIT, although it uses four ability areas to model an overall EI score: accurately perceivingemotions, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotions, and managing emotions[21].Trait EI uses 10 to 15 scores derived from several different areas. The EQi-2.0 scales consist of15 scores with five composite scores and a total EI [6]. The scales include factors such asassertiveness, adaptability, and self-regard.The concept of integrating emotional intelligence into engineering is not new. Riemer [22]argues that emotional
, Republic of Korea, MSc. in Civil Engineering from University College London (UCL), United Kingdom, and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Construction Engineering and Management) at Purdue Uni- versity. His current research interest is disaster risk reduction and mitigation strategies development especially by dealing with infrastructure service supply chain issues in post-disaster situation. In addi- tion, he is very active in K-12 educational outreach and devleoping tools and teaching methodologies to encourage young people to excel in Construction Engineering education.Prof. Makarand Hastak P.E., Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Hastak is Professor and Head of the Division of
. Joyce, C.S.C., Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching which recognizes faculty members who have a profound influence on undergraduate students through sustained exemplary teaching. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 EVALUATION OF A FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGNIntroductionAn upper-division structural engineering design course focusing on structural steel design wasreformatted to follow a “flipped” classroom model. Flipped classrooms place greater emphasison self-study for basic concepts to allow for more interactive, example-based learning duringtime spent within the classroom [1]. By spending more time preparing for a
devicessuch as cell phones, tablets, and computers to assist in finding course-related information.While homework problems from textbooks are designed to allow engineering students to practiceproblem solving, easy accessibility of solution manual has created an issue [14, 22]. Besides beingan issue of academic integrity, copying solutions rather than putting effort into learning courseconcepts and developing problem-solving skills could inhibit success [14]. In fact, problem-solving skills has been identified as a major concern for students learning MEB [19].YouTube pedagogy has students actively creating new course content, which falls under the guiseof research-based best practices commonly called active learning [23-25]. The YouTube
. To train a new cadre of graduates who value experimentation as an essential and natural part of solving engineering problems; 4. To expose important measurement techniques and safety concerns in laboratory environment; 5. To develop good experimental skills.Hence, the controls engineering education becomes more attractive and meaningful to thestudents.Student Learning OutcomesThe fundamental student learning outcomes of the control laboratory course are to demonstratethe following: 1. An ability to design, build, or assemble a part or product that configures control systems especially adapted to automation applications; 2. An ability to conduct experiments for measurements and analysis of feedback controls
assignment. The student responses on the ethics homework assignment will becompared and contrasted with the survey responses from these same students at the beginning ofthe semester.The civil engineering seniors (Group 2) were participating in a new Professional Issues course.The majority of these students had transferred into the program at some point, and therefore hadmissed instruction on professional licensure, ethics, and sustainability in the first yearintroduction to civil engineering course. As part of the instruction in the Professional Issuescourse, the students were required to read and discuss the ASCE BOK. As part of thisassignment, they were asked to first map their courses and co-curricular experiences to the 24BOK outcomes and levels
, whether as a for- mally published scientific journal article, a student lab report or a report document pre- Page 4.525.1 pared for the sponsoring agency. 1 Session 3226Most faculty do not recognize these names or terms since they are not standardized. Whethernamed or not, these same steps are always present in any new original work, as will be shown.Most undergraduate work, even if it uses real physical experiments, fails to show students thisessential seven step framework.Both undergraduate and graduate
AC 2008-2537: ASSESSING COGNITIVE REASONING AND LEARNING INMECHANICSChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos earned BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He previously served on the faculty of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, where he is currently a research associate, grant writer, lecturer, and director of educational programs. His research interests include biomechanics, nonlinear structural mechanics, computational mechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics. He is an active member of American Society for
Paper ID #21024Development of a Survey Instrument to Evaluate Student Systems Engineer-ing AbilityDiane Constance Aloisio, Purdue University Diane Aloisio is a PhD candidate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University. Her research concentrates on taking a systems approach to finding the common causes of systems engineering accidents and project failures. Diane received a dual BS degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University at Buffalo in New York.Dr. Karen Marais, Purdue University Dr. Karen Marais’ educational research focuses on improving systems engineering education. She is
Assessment of Belonging among Computing StudentsAbstract Creating a Computer Science and Software Engineering Department that supports stu-dents with diverse identities and backgrounds is essential to creating a computing workforce thatreflects the world at large. Inspired by the work of Metcalf et al.’s survey conducted at the Uni-versity of Illinois [1], we use the same methods to examine the state of our computing depart-ment with respect to issues of inclusive climate and student sense of belonging, which have beenshown to be important for retention in STEM fields [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. We use the four areasthat contribute to belonging based on the work of Rainey et al. [9] along with a fifth category oflearning environment in
positive preferencefor this interactive approach as a supplement to traditional methods emphasizes how today'sstudent population values work created with VR.How it started:In collaboration with Faculty member Dr. Shikha Prasad and Engineering Studio for AdvancedInstruction and Learning (eSail), a dedicated department for enhancing online delivery inengineering education. Dr. Prasad approached our team to revolutionize the laboratoryexperience for Nuclear Engineering students, specifically focusing on the Reactor Pulsephenomenon. Our goal was to create a fully immersive and accessible 3D Virtual Reality (VR)simulation, leveraging the Oculus 2 from Meta and the powerful capabilities of Unreal Engine.Motivated by the goal to offer students an
COVID-19 [1]. By March11, the World Health Organization had declared COVID-19 a pandemic and, by March 13,President Trump had declared COVID-19 a National Emergency [1]. At the University ofArkansas (U of A), faculty training sessions on the use of Blackboard and Collaborate wereoffered on March 11 and 12 because the faculty were told that they might need to move to fullyremote teaching at some point. Within hours, the Dean of Engineering declared that all facultyneeded to be able to teach at least one class remotely by March 19 in preparation for fully remotedelivery on a regular basis by March 30. The clear message to the faculty was to “go fullyremote and do the best you can to finish out the semester.”The following summer demonstrated that
issues of disciplinary formation, marginalization, and enculturation suggest a need toengage with broad questions about the inherent politics of citation.Further, citation politics are now riddled with new technological challenges [27]. Scholars don’tmerely omit or chastise each other in print. Citation databases now aggregate references toforward a new politics of citationality [28]. Ranking systems use mathematical calculations likethe journal impact factor, h-index, or altmetrics to suggest the quality of academic labor. Whilethe sciences make the most use of the evaluation metrics, even the social sciences, humanities,and arts are now increasingly pressured to provide high-quality metrics [29]. Taylor and FrancisGroup, for example, makes
today, and asserts itself through apersistent meritocratic and apolitical climate in STEM environments. This environment serves toeffectively discourage any critical curriculum or discussion that is not centered aroundmathematics, science, or economics, due in part to the apolitical and meritocratic history withinthe STEM institution [5], [6]. Additionally, research that focuses on inclusion and diversityseems to pinpoint ways in which the institution is exclusionary, and often does not proposethorough systemic solutions to the issue [7], [8]. In addition, researchers in the field of STEMeducation have not extensively utilized frameworks useful for critiquing the institution throughan explicitly anti-capitalist lens, instead preferring other
of improvement for future offerings.1 IntroductionThe modern urbanization surge has placed cities at the forefront of global challenges, with morethan half of the world’s population now living in urban areas. These urban areas contributeapproximately 70% of the planet's greenhouse gas emissions [1]. This growth presents a paradoxas cities are crucial for economic development and growth yet significantly negatively impact theenvironment. Related to this issue, Canada faces a severe housing crisis, requiring an additional3.5 million homes by 2030 to meet anticipated demand [2]. This goal far exceeds the current rateof new construction. This situation highlights the urgent need for innovative solutions thatbalance economic growth, societal