Paper ID #14945Seeking New Perspectives: Engineers Experiencing Design through CreativeArtsDr. David M. Beams, University of Texas - Tyler Dr. David Beams first became interested in electrical engineering through a passion for amateur radio in high school. He earned BSEE and MS degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1974 and 1977, respectively, with two years of industrial experience separating the two. He then spent over fourteen additional years in industry before returning to graduate study, receiving a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1997. In 1997, he became one of the
technoscientificdevelopments, particularly Sputnik. The mutual shaping of Soviet and US engineering problemsolving practices clearly illustrates the point that engineering is always political.Engineering education reform. Through the history of the engineering pipeline, students learnhow engineering education reform in the 1980s was a response to an image of Japan as aneconomic threat to the American nation. Students analyze how engineers in policy-makingpositions used engineering-problem solving methodology to respond to the threat and developedthe engineering pipeline to demonstrate the need to educate thousands of engineers for economiccompetitiveness. Students come to realize that K-12 federal-sponsored programs in pre
Resistance to Active Learning Through Instructor Development: Project UpdateIntroduction This work-in-progress paper will provide an update on our research studying instructordevelopment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classrooms. Theoverall aim of this study is to increase the adoption of active learning in STEM classrooms. Wedefine active learning as any time an instructor engages students in the course content in waysthat go beyond simply lecturing to their students while their students are passively taking notes(e.g., think-pair-shares, in-class group projects). Previously, active learning has been shown toimprove student retention rates, grades, and understanding of course material
part of the prediction.This is also a time to extend the learning experience beyond the laboratory setup. Through thisprocess students see that physics applies not only to the ideal case but to all cases. It is a lso achance to motivate the study of future topics. For example, by questioning what will happen tothe motion graphs as the ramp angle approaches a horizontal or vertical inclination, thediscussion moves naturally into free fall. Or, stated in a different way, how is the motion of a Page 7.1255.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
level. Richard also works for the Eastman Kodak Company as a Senior Design Engineer. Richard has received two teaching awards while at RIT. He was the recipient of the 1998 Adjunct Excellence in Teaching Award and the recipient of the 2002 Provost’s Excellence in Teaching Award. Richard is a contributing volunteer in both ABET and IEEE. Page 26.929.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Improving Technical Writing Skills through the Judicious Use of InfographicsMotivationThis paper shares the experiences and outcomes of teaching data visualization techniques withingraduate
continue to develop through their experience aswell? In order to be contributing members of a field, graduate students need to learn and developin areas beyond just the core technical competencies of their field. Opportunities for achievingthis development exist throughout their graduate studies, but students do not always recognize orunderstand how to use these opportunities. To productively steer student development, someresponsibility falls on the student’s academic advisor to guide and support the student growthprocesses. Traditionally, when considering the relationship between student and advisor,researchers have almost exclusively focused on examining the development of the student[1][2][3][4] or assessing the student’s satisfaction with
AC 2008-896: ADDRESSING FRESHMEN RETENTION THROUGH FOCUSEDADVISEMENT AND SEMINAR PROGRAMSKate Baxter, University of Southern California Kate serves as Director, Women in Engineering Programs and Director, Student Support Programs for the Viterbi School of Engineering at the University of Southern California.Louise Yates, University of Southern California Louise serves Associate Dean, Admission & Student Affairs for the Viterbi School of Engineering at University of Southern California. She is also responsible for a freshmen introductory course for undeclared engineering majors. Page 13.155.1
relate to focus areas of existingcourses. In our implementation, we use bioengineering/biotechnology (BME) as themultidisciplinary emerging topic area, and electrical/computer engineering (ECE) as the corecurriculum. Since our initial report two years ago, which was based on a couple of experiments,we have developed several new laboratory exercises, and more importantly followed studentswho went through the four years of integrated BME content. In this paper, we present ourimplementation and assessment details, and some surprising outcomes we have observed sinceour previous preliminary assessment. We discuss many advantages, but also some potentialpitfalls of this approach, along with lessons learned along the way. 1. Introduction Thanks
sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creat- ing curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests, motivation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the com- munity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus on the issues of women and minorities in science/engineering.Eleanor Berke, Boston Public Schools Berke is interested in the ways that role play may cause the body to shift the mind building, empathy and perspective. She has used acting as a tool to cultivate empathy for the immigrant experience, to improve
Paper ID #38060WORK IN PROGRESS: EMPOWERING STUDENTSWITH DISABILITIES THROUGH RESEARCHINVOLVEMENTSarah Corinne Rowlinson Furtney (Instructional Assistant Professor &Undergraduate Coordinator) Instructional Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Coordinator in the J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of FloridaCaroline Doyle I am a recent graduate with my Bachelor's and Master's in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Florida. During my time at UF, I focused my studies on both Biomaterials and Cellular/Regenerative medicine. I have a passion for making voices
AC 2009-1793: ENHANCING MACHINE-SAFETY EDUCATION THROUGH THEUSE OF VIRTUAL MACHINERYDarrell Wallace, Youngstown State University Darrell Wallace received his BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University. He received a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Ohio State in 2006. Dr. Wallace has worked actively in a variety of manufacturing industries since 1991 and is currently an Assistant Professor at Youngstown State University in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Darrell R. Wallace, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Youngstown State University One University Plaza Youngstown, Ohio 44555 Email
waste casks.The effectiveness of this collaborative module in promoting cross-disciplinary learning wasassessed through an analysis of student responses to an anonymous survey. The results show thatthe module was effective in (a) teaching students the fundamental principles of diffusion, (b)fostering peer-to-peer teaching and learning, and (c) emphasizing the importance of teamworkand problem-solving across disciplines. The results also indicate that students developed abroader view regarding the applicability of their knowledge beyond their own disciplinaryboundaries. Given its universality, this materials-focused teaching module has the potential toserve as an effective model to foster interdisciplinary teaching and learning between
. This study should have broad-based applications for other educators within the domains of SMET education, particularly thoseinterested in courses designed for Liberal Arts majorsI. Introduction The primary purpose of teaching is to facilitate student learning. However, many traditionalteaching methods have clearly been shown to encourage passive rather than active learning [1],and passive learning hinders comprehension and long-term retention of important concepts.Students in traditional classrooms acquire most of their knowledge through classroom lecturesand textbook reading, but good teaching involves a great deal more than simply pouringinformation into their heads. Students do not enter the classroom with a tabula rasa. They bringtheir
systems and mechatronics; modeling, simulation, vi- sualization, and analysis; intelligent systems/artificial intelligence (knowledge representation, reasoning, machine learning); and CS/engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Experiencing Real-World Multidisciplinary Software Systems Engineering Through Aircraft Carrier Simulation1 IntroductionModern technology is a complex combination of mechanical systems controlled by electricalsystems ultimately controlled by software systems. Mechanical and electrical engineeringstudents generally receive multidisciplinary hands-on exposure to such real-world applications,but those in computer science rarely see
market over a period of time.References[1] J. Jones and J. Schmitt, “A college degree is no guarantee,” Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) 2014.[2] Bernd Schulz, “The Importance of Soft Skills: Education beyond Academic Knowledge,” Journal of Language & Communication, 2008.[3] S. Chikumba, “Development of soft engineering skills for industrial engineering technologists through effective mentoring,” WACE 17th World Conference on Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education, 2011.[4] H. Rao, Workers Can’t Find Jobs, Jobs Can’t Find Workers: Solving the Talent Paradox., Lynn University, 2015.[5] H. Darabi, E. Douzali, F. S. M. Karim, S. T. Harford, and H. Johnson, “Life after university for
insidiousWhiteness is and how it has infiltrated systems and institutions from K-12, through highereducation, and into industry. Hegemony and Whiteness in STEM manifest in many ways but isevident by looking at the demographics within higher education and industry. In fall of 2020,almost three-quarters of faculty in the USA were white (39% white males, 35% white females)[2], [3]. Within the STEM industry, white workers make up two-thirds of workers while inengineering and architects, white workers are overrepresented at 71% [4]. Not only is there anoverrepresentation of Whiteness within STEM, there is a wage disparity that continues to grow.Black full-time and year-round workers from the age of 25 and up only make 78% of their whitecounterparts’ median
at UIUC, Joseph earned an MS degree in Physics from Indiana University in Bloomington and a BS in Engineering Physics at UIUC.Ms. Allyson Jo Barlow, University of Nevada, Reno Ally Barlow graduated with her Doctoral Degree in Civil Engineering from Oregon State University, where she fused her technical background with her passion for education; her doctoral research focused on the exploration of student engagement from multiple methodological standpoints. Now she works as a Postdoctoral Scholar at University of Nevada Reno, expanding her knowledge of the field through work on faculty-faculty mentorship modes. Her research interests include student cognitive engagement and teacher best practices for in-class and
Entrepreneurial Mindset can transform the world and beable to understand the bigger picture, evaluate markets, and learn from mistakes to create valuefor themselves and others.The development of engineering students’ entrepreneurial mindset is critical to better preparethem for entering a global workforce driven by technological solutions and new productdevelopment. Fortunately, the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) has providedresources for higher education engineering programs across the United States to modernize theircurriculum through the integration of the entrepreneurial mindset and the 3C’s (curiosity,connections, and creating value). However, unfortunately, limited literature is available thathighlights the multidisciplinary
Paper ID #47659Engineering Personas Through the Lens of First-Year Engineering StudentsMiranda Brown, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Miranda Brown is a first-year PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include women’s experiences in engineering, how students perceive grades and feedback, and student motivation. Miranda got her MS and BS in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech.Cassie Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Cassie Wallwey is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering
commitment to promoting diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) in the classroom and beyond. Fostering a diverse and inclusive learningenvironment is essential for preparing future engineers to work in a globally connected andculturally diverse world [16]. We recognize that diversity takes many forms, including but notlimited to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, ability, socio-economic status, and culturalbackground. Our course design strived to create an inclusive and welcoming atmosphere for allstudents, regardless of their individual differences. In designing our course, we committed topromoting DEI through the following efforts: • Inclusive Classroom Environment: Creating a safe and supportive classroom environment where all
energy efficiency Improve contextual education in STEM and environmental literacy, especially in K-12 Utilize instructional technology with access to computerized and industry technology Develop energy-related contextual modules for STEM instructor training that target traditionally underrepresented populations Establish best practices and training standards for energy educational programs Create a clear pathway from K-12 through post-secondary educationWith its renewable energy and sustainability focus, this collaborative partnership has thepotential to effectively fulfill many of these recommendations and create a pipeline into theworkforce beginning at the high school level. Moreover, CUSP specifically
Paper ID #15372First-Year Students’ Conceptions of Sustainability as Revealed through Con-cept MapsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the three Bachelor’s degrees in the department. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt
of the 8th grade teachers were contacted by the Page 23.909.4Strength of Materials professor through a campus contact with the Science in Motion program,whichoperates as part of Elizabethtown College’s Center for Community and Civic Engagement.Science in Motion provides a mobile lab with science equipment beyond the budget of mostschools along with science teaching support. At that point, the professor and 8th grade teachersarranged the logistics of the visit, and brought the other 8th grade science teacher on board. This outreach experience was awarded an internal faculty grant of $1000, but the totalcost of the experience was only
its contribution toa more thorough approach to problem definition. This paper explains the concept of tagmemicsand demonstrates its application in solving an engineering problem (the creation of a better crashtest due to deaths and injuries caused by air-bag trauma in front-end crashes) through Page 26.1456.2comprehensive tagmemic analysis.Background on Tagmemics Theory and MethodologyThe beauty of tagmemics for engineering educators is both its simplicity and its complexity. Themethodology provides a framework for classifying phenomena but is far more than a meretaxonomizing device. Within the intersections of the grid (Table 1) are contained
Paper ID #37979Adapting through a Pandemic: Creating a Hands-OnMechatronics Laboratory with Team-Based Collaboration forRemote LearningSilverio LopezNicolas Gonzalo Perticari PesciDavid Quintero (Assistant Professor) Dr. David Quintero received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering with a Minor in Mathematics from Texas A&M University, College Station. He went on to complete his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University. He then spent a few years as a robotics and controls engineer in industry before returning to pursue his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of
representative jobdescriptions, literature reviews, and other reports. This initial list was consolidated through aseries of SIG meetings and events throughout 2008 and 2009; thus, here are the attributes thatemerged through this process: Engineering Science Fundamentals o Mathematics (including statistics) o Physical and Life Sciences o Political and Socio-economic Sciences o Information Technology - Digital Competency Engineering o Understanding of Design and Product Processes o Understanding of Product Life Cycle Development o Effective Teamwork/Common Goals o Possess a Multi-Disciplinary, Systems Perspective o Maintain Focus with Multiple Project Assignments Context in which Engineering
-learning reflection for engineering. In E. Tsang & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.), Projects that matter (pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.6. Reynaud, E., Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., Kazmer, D. O., Tucker, B. G., & Rhoads, J. L. (2012, June). Engineering faculty attitudes towards service-learning. Paper presented at the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.7. Pierrakos, O., Bielefeldt, A. R., Duffy, J. J., Mcvay, S., Paterson, K., Swan, C. W., & Zilberberg, A. (2012, June). Faculty survey on learning through service: Development and initial findings. Paper presented at the
Paper ID #17739Creating Communicative Self-Efficacy through Integrating and InnovatingEngineering Communication InstructionDr. Traci M. Nathans-Kelly, Cornell University Traci Nathans-Kelly, Ph.D., currently teaches full-time at Cornell University in the Engineering Commu- nication Program. She instructs within that program and is seated as a co-instructor for Writing Intensive courses as the engineering communication liaison in ME, BEE, CS, and AEP departments. Outside of Cornell, as a member of IEEE’s Professional Communication Society, she serves as a series editor for the Professional Engineering Communication books
design beyond the context of a particular invention. In doingso, they attempt to “bring the inventive process out of the realm of intuition and into the domainof systematic thought” (p.335). Their purpose of seeking an explanation for the inventivebehavior of humans with the desire to help inventors control their inventive process demonstratesoperationalization of the empirical-analytical paradigm.Article II: The purpose of the interpretive paradigm is to understand human experience throughconversation.6-7 When Shaw seeks to understand the experience of creating a mathematicalmodel through a conversation with 11 well-reputed scientists and engineers about their feelingsduring the creative process,9 his intent is to obtain a comprehensive
answering individual/groupquestions as needed. Throughout the course of the semester, students would complete a project(in teams) and three examinations. Mid-March 2020, however, COVID-19 forced AE 30 to moveto an online modality. A synchronous online class format was adopted for AE 30 for theremainder of the Spring 2020 semester. In the online class format, students joined a synchronousclass meeting for lecture and another one for lab through the videoconferencing software Zoom.Office hours also became an online Zoom meeting. Instead of walking around lab to answerquestions, the instructor and the few students that attended lab would talk through questions as agroup via Zoom. In the online environment, students were able to share their computer