four courses which are classified as writing intensive (WI). The first three are from non-technical general education classes and the fourth being their Capstone class. Upon taking MECH 340, students have taken at least two of these courses. For MECH 340, the formatting guidelines and rigorous standards were made explicitly and abundantly clear. That being said, the majority of students on the first assignment did not follow even the most basic formatting guidelines such as margins and font type. Even after being shown explicitly over Zoom “share-screen” how to adjust word formatting and Excel plots, many turned in results with default settings. In fact, the Zoom sessions were recorded, so all one needed to do was re-watch the video
community (2-year HSIs with grant prospects andawards from the NSF ATE Program), resource dissemination, usage, perceived value to thecommunity, and additional data gathered during the first and second cohorts of HSI ATE Hub,including adjustments based on learnings from year 1. Emphasis will be placed on HSI ATECommunity building and resources. Lessons learned and implications for future research arealso described in the paper.Funded by the NSF ATE Program, the HSI ATE Hub is a three-year collaborative projectimplemented by Florence Darlington Technical College in South Carolina and the ScienceFoundation Arizona Center for STEM at Arizona State University. The NSF ATE Program is aworkforce development program within the National Science Foundation
(Python or C++) to verify that their solution is correct.Table 1 provides a relational table that illustrates how the skills emphasized during thesewhiteboard problem solving assessments are relative to the ones evaluated during a formaltechnical interview session. For instance, the students’ ability implement code and producecorrect solutions are vital components of this whiteboard assessment, which is also employed intechnical interview sessions to evaluate a candidate’s technical skills and programmingproficiency. Moreover, students are required to think aloud during this assessment, which is alsoused during technical interviewers to gauge the candidate’s verbal skills. The group-based aspectof this assessment allows students to develop their
of Technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Socio-technical and culture-inspired projects in freshman engineering design course bring context and emotion to learningAbstractLearning is not an unemotional consideration of facts but emotion is integrally woven into theexperience of learning [1]. Situated cognition model [2] is a theoretical approach to learning thatsupports the idea that learning takes place when an individual is interactively doing somethingthrough situated activity that has social, cultural, and physical contexts. This paper presents post-activity reflections in student design projects with socio-technical and socio-culturalinterventions in a freshman design
around these skills.IntroductionThere appears to be an ever-increasing body of knowledge associated with being a skilledengineer in practice [1-4]. This includes foundational knowledge, technical information relevantto a particular engineering discipline, and professional skills that cut across all engineeringdisciplines. Leadership is one of the professional skills that appears to be gaining increasingrecognition. A search of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference proceedings identified a generally increasing number of leadership-focused paperseach year (Figure 1; regression slope 2.0 papers/year, p .006), based on leadership in the title,conference session name, tagged topics, or tagged divisions [5
from their own nation. In contrast, the national origin of UScitizens’ partners generally did not affect their outcomes. These findings support the use ofmixed-nationality partners in pair programming and potentially other collaborative learningcontexts, which diverges from prior studies that suggest facilitating similarity between partnersin terms of demographics, personality, and prior programming experience.IntroductionScholars have explored the impact of active and collaborative learning on college studentoutcomes for decades. Relative to passive learning approaches, active and collaborative learningstrategies often provide notable benefits for learning, academic achievement, and retention incollege (for reviews, see [1] – [5]). However
experience will reduce anxiety, one of the primary componentsleading to failure when solving whiteboard problems [3]. As more of these initiatives areutilized, the progression of these students during and after college should be recorded in order tobetter understand how to prepare students.Another future work is increasing the general awareness of the technical interview processamongst institutional administrators and faculty. Aforementioned, there are CS courses designedto strictly train students for the technical interview process (referred to as Category 1). Likewise,there is a trend for these courses to be student-taught. This raises the question of how trulyengaged institutions and CS departments are when it comes to their students’ success
series of critical thinking sessions presented by project team ondefining a research problem, literature search, and the research process. Table 4 summarizes thetopics covered in the learning activities and workshops undertaken by the participants. Table 4: Skill mapping of the summer 2018 REU Program Skill Mapping 2018 REU Implementation DW: Energy saving and emission reduction by platooning Technical Skill1 Conceptual Skill2 DA DM ML CP PS TW D-M CT Activity 1: Problem definition X X X X Activity 2: Library Use
educators of K-12 teachers of engineering and their learning needs.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of EngineeringEducation & Centers (ENG/EEC) via grant EEC-1540253. 5 References[1] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, K. G. Malzahn, C. L. Plumley, E. M. Gordon, and M. L. Hayes, “Report of the 2018 NSSM+,” [Online]. Available: http://horizon-research.com/NSSME/wp- content/uploads/2019/06/Report_of_the_2018_NSSME.pdf [accessed January 31, 2020]. [2] NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington: National
University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design, Fabrication, and Testing of LEGO-neered Vertical Flight Dynamic Systems: Using Custom LEGO Models to Inspire the Next Generation of Innovators (Work in Progress)Abstract:Engaging the next generation of technical thinkers is crucial for ensuring our society continues toinnovate into the future. There are many possible methods for engagement that can be used tospark an interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for students inprimary school and middle school. Most of these students are already familiar with LEGObricks. By using custom built LEGO models to demonstrate engineering principles, interest
engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the com- munity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus on the issues of women and minorities in science/engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020An emancipatory teaching practice in a technical course: A layered account of designing circuits laboratory instructions for a diversity of learnersAbstractThis paper is about the liberal education goal of emancipation in the domain of thought.Specifically, liberal education’s aim is, as stated by Ewert, “to achieve freedom from self-imposed constraints, reified social forces and institutions, and conditions of distortedcommunication” [1, p.354]. As middle-aged female engineering faculty, the
.), and recitation (including a group project to design and build an operational windmill). Thecourse for incoming engineers includes interdisciplinary hands-on projects, presentations, andwriting assignments with the goal of developing a sense of cohort, and “leveling the field” forstudents with a wide-range of backgrounds and experience.Electrical Engineering (EE) majors generally take a different introductory course, comingtogether with the other engineering first-year students on Fridays during a recitation session todesign and build the interdisciplinary windmill projects. In Fall 2017, due to sabbaticals, the EEstudents were enrolled in the same lecture section as the CE and ME students. Enrollment inGEN1001: Introduction to Engineering was
effective solutions to technicalchallenges through guided research, development projects, and technology dissemination.Students use their engineering knowledge to address real world problems, while gaining a betterunderstanding of the interface between technology and global society. While traveling, students Page 12.951.6are required to provide weekly electronic status reports to the ETHOS administration. Due to thenature of their living arrangements they are forced to engage in local culture including language,infrastructure, and general lifestyle. During the fall semester, students return to campus write a technical report summarizingtheir
toteach engineering, which is a requirement in the Next Generation Science Standards as well asmany state level standards of learning, and 3) to prepare both groups of students to communicateand collaborate in a multi-disciplinary context, which is a necessary skill in their future places ofwork. This project was implemented in three pairs of classes: 1) an introductory mechanicalengineering class, fulfilling a general education requirement for information literacy and afoundations class in education, 2) fluid mechanics in mechanical engineering technology and ascience methods class in education, and 3) mechanical engineering courses requiringprogramming (e.g., computational methods and robotics) with an educational technology class.All
mentored new freshmen forone year. This paper will describe demographics of each S-STEM cohort, the activities usedduring the peer mentoring, observable differences between direct admit and college-readyfreshmen with respect to peer mentoring, and possible peer mentoring activities that can beimplemented at other institutions.IntroductionIn 2018, 622,502 undergraduates enrolled in Bachelor of Science (BS) engineering programs inuniversities across the U.S. That same year women, African American, Hispanics, NativeAmerican and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders earned 21.9%. 4.2%, 11.4%, 0.3% and 0.2% of theB.S. engineering degrees, respectively [1]. Women are often drawn to engineering disciplineswhere they can ‘help’ or give back [2], therefore, it was
involve the REU participants in the UAV related cutting-edge researchprojects. The UAV Lab at Cal Poly Pomona provides a suitable research environment for theparticipants [1]. References 1 and 2 provide the details on some of the projects that the participantswere involved in. The participants are provided with an opportunity to gain knowledge on theapplication of engineering and computer science to UAV technologies, acquire skills necessary toconduct meaningful research, understand research process, and learn laboratory techniques. Inmost cases, the participants tested the algorithms they developed in simulation and flight tests. Forexample, Figure 1 shows the concept of operation for the obstacle detection and avoidance usingoptical flow for a
Paper ID #33767Parental Academic Socialization and the Advancement of Black Women inSTEM: A Literature Review (Research)Ms. Amanda Melinda McLeroy, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Amanda McLeroy is a second-year Rehabilitation Counseling Ph.D. student at North Carolina A&T State University. She holds a B.S. in Psychology from George Mason University, and an M.S. in Clinical and Mental Health Counseling from Columbus State University. Although she has been in the mental health field for four years, Amanda has recently integrated her previous knowledge and experiences into the STEM field to
. Thanks to a grant from the Michigan State University Federal Credit Union, CoRe offers sustainability competitions. For the competitions, students are ask ed to investigate various campus departments for wasteful practices and to present their plans for improvement to a panel of professional engineering faculty, staff and Michigan State University Federal Credit Union judges. On the day of the competition, students are asked to submit both a technical and business plan with their general proposal. They are judged on their communication skills, PowerPoint presentation, and their ability to answer questions posed by the judges. Three top teams are awarded cash prizes and their presentations are sent to
Paper ID #26091Intercultural and Interdisiplinary Communication Skills as a Component ofEngineering Education: International Design ProjectsProf. Anna Friesel, Technical University-Copenhagen Anna Friesel is Professor at the Center for Electro-technology, DTU Diplom - Technical University of Denmark, Campus Ballerup. She is also the president of the EAEEIE - European Association for Educa- tion in Electrical and Information Engineering, which is a European non-profit organization, with mem- bers from nearly seventy European Universities, most of them teaching in the area of Electrical and In- formation Engineering (EIE). Anna
retention. Some are difficult for educators to addresssuch as family support, a student’s minority status, socio-economic status, etc [1]. However,other areas such as a student’s engagement in the campus community [2][3], relationships withother students [1], and understanding how to use campus resources[3], are addressable withinintroductory courses. For this project, researchers present preliminary results from a studydesigned to increase student retention in a first-year engineering program by implementingcourse activities that encourage students to become engaged in the campus community and betterunderstand how to use existing campus resources.The pilot study occurred during the fall 2017 semester at a regional university that catersprimarily
-Implementation Phase of the Project followed an existing,recognized Product Development format developed by Karl Ullrich and Steven D. Eppinger ofthe University of Pennsylvania [1]. Additionally, a Communications Professor was brought intothe classroom to present a session on "Effective Oral Presentations" to help the students developtheir presentation skills.project process for studentsStudents followed the following process through the course: 1. Ideate multiple objectives (content and process) 2. Ideate multiple 3-day lessons 3. Share with Peer Learning Communities (PLCs) 4. Develop design considerations, then receive instructor required considerations (Academic merit, safety, budget, population served, time…) 5. Design
projectcompletion, and (4) project finalization where groups made a working prototype and completededucational materials. This paper outlines a detailed structure of the course and presents theresults of Gelmon [1] which suggest that students received a rich project experience with distinctadvantages and disadvantages over 1. Non-service learning first year courses and 2. Thosecourses that are service-learning but pose more complex logistical challenges.Project exampleThe design process used for the course begins with understanding the problem, proceeds toconcept generation and selection, and ends with fabrication and testing. Figures 1-3 provide anexample of this process for a project that was based around a mini-fuel cell technology. Figure 1: individual
Results and ConclusionsThough there were many accomplishments during the summer academies these five are the mostnotable.1. The participant group was diverse, including students from rural and urban schools, with 25% being first generation and 50% being from underrepresented groups (women and minorities).2. During the second CU Engineering and Applied Mathematics Summer Academy the applicant pool grew from 40 in the 2016 to 80 in the 2017.3. The academy’s focus on team building and other soft skills helped the students expand their understanding of the necessary skills for both professional and personal success.4. Every student worked successfully in their assigned group.5. In 2016 every team successfully built and launched a rocket
forward. This study has brought to lightseveral questions for further research: 1.) Do engineering students perform better on the EERI than the DIT-2 in general? 2.) How do EERI/DIT-2 scores change as a student progresses through their education? 3.) Can we as instructors devise better, more testable approaches to ethics education for engineers?AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Dr. Cheryl Bodnar for facilitating the focus group and for herencouragement throughout this project. We would also like to thank Dr. Carla Zoltowski for themany helpful conversations about the EERI & DIT-2.This research study was funded by the Experiential Engineering Education Department at RowanUniversity.References[1] L. R. Lattuca, P. T
Strategic Plan: Goal 1: Transform lives through meaningful learning experiences Goal 2: Inspire, nurture and empower scholarship, creativity, discovery, innovation and entrepreneurial initiatives.The Project CollaborationOne challenge faced in the first year of the project collaboration was that the art and engineeringclasses met on different days. This meant that aside from one scheduled meeting outside of classtimes, the students were strongly requested to meet several times over the length of the projectoutside of class times. This did not work as hoped. While some teams did meet, othersencountered difficulty finding times to meet as a full team or reported a breakdown incommunication. There was a general sense of frustration
students. The premise of INQUIRE is that thesestudents lack only mathematic training and the confidence to succeed. INQUIRE acts as astudent peer group, a mentoring group, and colloquium for students during their first year.Women, first generation college students, underrepresented minorities and students from low-income families are most at risk for leaving STEM fields [1]. The INQUIRE program iscomposed of 70% women, 38% first generation students, 48% underrepresented minoritystudents, and 47% of students are of High-Need financially. The experience gained in FDS isalso relevant to several of the stated accreditation goals related to engineering. Specifically,ABET Student Outcomes 3-5: 3 – communicate effectively, 4 – consider the impacts of
Engineering’s 2005 report [7]. Many first-yearelectrical engineering projects involve programmable microcontrollers, but for courses that do notteach programming or require it as a prerequisite, this is not an option. This paper provides anexample of a first-year project aimed at helping students understand electricity, signals, andelectrical engineering without the need for programming. Figure 1: Amplifier circuit schematic Figure 2: Amplifier PCB layout (left=top, right=bottom)Project SetupThe project has two parts: soldering an amplifier board and building a speaker. More detail abouteach of these is given below. The project was conducted in three lab sessions, one-per-week, 75minutes each. • Week 1
, technical report writing skills, presentation skills, and team-working are allessential to succeed as a product design engineer in industry. A successful product designengineer in industry has to be a master of all such skills and more. Learning a new and complexsolid modeling software and building meaningful 3Dimensional concepts is in itself achallenging task for freshmen. Freshmen in general, are unfamiliar with the functionality of themechanical components. Needless to say, that a FED-101 instructor has a challenging task ofcombining this with the challenge of exposing the freshmen to the demands of the industry.Stemming from an industrial background, our instructors resorted to RE. This helped to blendPurpose, Responsibility, Individuality
engineering programs “bookend” design competencies for engineering students, requiringthem to engage with open-ended design principles at the beginning and end of theirundergraduate degree programs. The rationale for most programs to introduce design in the firstyear has been validated by numerous engineering education and engineering design researchers.For example, first-year engineering programs can introduce tools (physical tools, software tools)that students will be required to use in subsequent courses; develop student comfort withreflection [1], [2] creativity [3], [4] and ambiguity in solving ill-structured problems [5], [6];introduce the design process [7], [8]; and serves to socialize engineering students in the habits ofmind and
college algebra take ENG1001, Engineering Analysis,solely or jointly by schools and colleges of engineering”. [1] followed by ENG1100, Engineering Problem Solving, in theThe University of Ottawa has been offering an first year instead of ENG1101. These students completeentrepreneurship course for several years. The class is open ENG1102 in the fall semester of their second year. This paperto any undergraduate or graduate engineering student, but focuses on a pilot study completed in ENG1102 during themost students take it in their final year. The students’ reason Fall 2017 semester.for waiting until their last year, is that that they can better During the Fall 2017 semester, students in two