in Biology Teaching, The American Biology Teacher, v. 63, no. 1, p. 30-38, 2001.[6] Barkley, E., Cross, P., & Major, C., Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2005.[7] United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Emergency Relief Coordinator’s Key Messages on Haiti. Issue Number 22, January 12, 2012. http://reliefweb.int/node/470107.Vicki V. MayVicki V. May, Ph.D., P.E. is an Instructional Associate Professor of Engineering at Dartmouth College. Her researchfocuses on engineering education and K-12 outreach. Prior to relocating to the east coast, Professor May was anAssociate Professor of Architectural Engineering at the
, and NLP models to enhance human-in-the-loop sustainability solutions. Leading to an impact by implementing new policies for bridging the digital equity gap. I have a unique blend of expertise to build impactful experiences for enhancing education engagement.Peyman Yousefi, Merck Group Peyman is a senior User Experience Researcher at Merck Group. He specializes in using mixed methods to explore human-computer interaction and human-centered artificial intelligence. During his Ph.D. at Purdue University, Peyman adopted an ecological approach that integrates engineering and science concepts to address significant environmental challenges. His research methodology included agent-based modeling, crowdsourced human
the house to see if thestructure is sturdy. The students are then asked why they think the house is so strong. Theimportance of planning is again mentioned. The students are all invited inside the house to seethe interior and look at how all the framing members tie together.The students then return all the tools and materials issued to them prior to leaving the assemblyarea. After all the students have left the assembly area and headed off to another activity theadult volunteers and boss disassemble the house and stack the pieces in areas according to theircolor in preparation for the next group of student builders. The structure is designed to beassembled and disassembled one hundred times before a new kit is required.An independent third
sturdy. The students are then asked why they think the house is so strong. Theimportance of planning is again mentioned. The students are all invited inside the house to seethe interior and look at how all the framing members tie together.The students then return all the tools and materials issued to them prior to leaving the assemblyarea. After all the students have left the assembly area and headed off to another activity theadult volunteers and boss disassemble the house and stack the pieces in areas according to theircolor in preparation for the next group of student builders. The structure is designed to beassembled and disassembled one hundred times before a new kit is required.An independent third-party evaluation of students
previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate of North Carolina A&T State University, where she earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering, in 1988. In 1991 she was awarded the Master of Engineering degree in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. She received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University in 1998. She is the recipient
for prototyping and debugging.Educational platforms currently available are in the form of microcontroller populated boards(hard core processors) or programmable logic device boards. In the later, students can instantiatea configurable, soft core processor comparable to the one provided in the former. This leaveseducators with two distinct options for teaching embedded systems and low level programmingcourses (Note: there can be hard core processors within a programmable logic device, howeverthis paper is referring to a hard core processor as a stand-alone component).This paper is a dialogue between two faculty members, one defending design using hardcomponents, assembly and laboratory testing, and the other using soft components
Session 1566 INVOLVING UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN DESIGN OF AN AFFORDABLE MODEL LABORATORY Bijan Sepahpour The College of New Jersey Department of Engineering Ewing, New Jersey 08628-0718 Tel. 609.771.3463 Sepahpou@tcnj.eduABSTRACTA promising model for involving undergraduate engineering students in design of experiments andfabrication of their associated apparatuses is proposed. It is a proven fact that students learn
include robotics, haptics, and engineering education.Mr. He LiuMr. Cristian H. TharinDr. Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons and Director of the Com- mons Engaged Teaching Hub at the University of California, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and develop- ment, faculty development, qualitative methods of inquiry, and social justice education.Christopher John Cassidy, University of California, San DiegoDr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr. Qi is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
IEEE/ACM Supercomputing Education Program 2006 and was the curriculum director for the Supercomputing Education Program 2005. In January 2008, he was awarded the NSF CAREER for work on transforming engineering education through learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments.Jacob Schroeder, Clemson University Dr. Schroeder is a post-doctoral researcher at Clemson University. His work focuses on cyberinfrastructure in engineering education. He holds a Ph.D. in Chemistry Education from Iowa State University.Hanjun Xian, Clemson University Hanjun Xian is a Ph.D student working on issues of design of cyber-environments in engineering education at Clemson University
engineering prerequisite classes. Many TAs have themselves experienced struggles during their first year or two and are encouraged to share their experiences with our students. Care is taken to have TAs mirror the diversity of the group of students seeking help so as to serve as role models. (6) TA training: At the beginning of each term a TA training session is held to onboard new TAs and remind returning TAs of the mission and key components of the program. Throughout the term bi-weekly meetings are furthermore held during which arising issues are discussed and additional training is provided. (7) Impact on TAs: As mentioned before, many TAs were themselves underprepared upon matriculation and
developed for the Resilient Control Systems class.Dr. Craig G Rieger, Idaho National Laboratory Craig Rieger, PhD, PE, is the Chief Control Systems Research Engineer at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), pioneering multidisciplinary research in the area of next-generation resilient control systems. In addition, he has organized and chaired eight Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) technically co-sponsored symposia and one National Science Foundation workshop in this new research area, and authored more than 40 peer-reviewed publications. Craig received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Montana State University in 1983 and 1985, respectively, and a PhD in Engineering and Applied
that collaborative tools for education are often chosen with thepurpose of supporting prevailing instructional practices rather than transforming instructionalstrategies. Second, they maintain that current research on collaborative technology has focusedon learner achievement while largely ignoring learning theory. This study describes the experiences of mechanical engineering students assigned to aseries of collaborative projects in two semesters of an engineering materials course.Participating students were given two different online collaborative tools, and two differentinstructional scaffolds for each semester. Participants worked in small groups to solve complexopen-ended problems. We interviewed student and faculty participants to
. megaGEMS Grade Levels completed prior to camp 8th 11th 10th 9th Figure 4, megaGEMS Grade Levels completed prior to the start of summer programsThe metric of student success is also understood from the perspective of the instructor. Studentsbegan the camp at various levels. Different grade levels, education levels, backgrounds incoursework, and even interest levels in STEM. Coding Academy provides a level playing fieldfor each student to learn and acquire a new skill. “In Coding Academy, not only did students have different understandings concerning code, but they came from different grades
HURRICANE KATRINA, THE EDUCATION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS LeeRoy Bronner, Ph.D., P.E., Olusola Laniyi Morgan State UniversityBackgroundHurricane Katrina hit the gulf coast in August 2005 with devastating effects along the coastlinesof Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. The city of New Orleans was almost completelyflooded. Katrina is estimated to be responsible for $81.2 billion (2005 US dollars) in damagesmaking it the costliest hurricane in US history, and killed at least 1,836 people, also making it thedeadliest U.S. hurricane since the 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane [1]. The people who remained leftbehind in New Orleans to suffer the brunt of the hurricane's consequences
Courses in Engineering Education During The Pandemic Challenge Steven Dobbs (Faculty), Joel Lee, Justin Ilagan, Barys Khmel, Melody Loi, Nicholas Papp, Eduardo Garcia Rogel Department of Aerospace Engineering Jenny Zhen Yu (Faculty), Connor McGarry, Chandler Duncan, Phillip Frem, Kevin Maldonado, Corey McGinnis, Hang Yong, Salma Bustos, Qiang Gong, Chandler Duncan, Mumen Abbas, Sophoandara Ry, Kaiqi Luo, Peter Ayad Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Martin O’Connell Department of Mechanical
graduates, the relationship between engineering identity and persistence is critical tounderstand how students navigate pathways into engineering [7]. The importance of thisrelationship is reflected in Brickhouse, Lowery, and Schultz’s request for increased research onSTEM identity and persistence [11]. Godwin, Potvin, Hazari, and Lock echoed this concern bypointing out that student beliefs preceding engineering identity formation point to their reasonsfor choosing engineering as well as choosing to leave engineering due to conflicts andalignments between their sense of self and the field of engineering [12]. Less is known about theinfluence of identity on persistence, especially with regard to the potential strength ofengineering identity to
, Department of AutomotiveEngineering, Graz, Austria Emilia Bratschitsch is head of the Department of Vehicle Technologies (Automotive and Railway Engineering) and teaches Electrics, Electronics and Methods of Signal Processing at the University of Applied Sciences Joanneum in Graz (Austria). She is also a visiting lecturer at the Faculty of Transport of the Technical University of Sofia (Bulgaria). She graduated with a degree in Medical Electronics as well as in Technical Journalism from the TU of Sofia and received her PhD from the Technical University of Graz (Austria). She gained industrial experience in automation of control systems, engineering of electronic control systems and software
workforce depends on attractinggreater numbers of scientists and engineers: the current workforce is aging at the same time thatjob skills are becoming increasingly technical3. The shortfall of women in SME fields has at leasttwo implications for this productivity. First, they represent an untapped reservoir of potentialemployees, and second, they may bring new perspectives and ideas to meeting new challenges4-6.Beyond the economic and productivity implications are social and ethical motivations. Scientificliteracy is increasingly important to health and environmental issues. But the understanding ofSME fundamentals by most Americans—particularly women due to their under-representation inSME—is inadequate to fully participate in these issues7
Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. She is the 2016 recipient of Virginia Tech’s College of Engineering Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Assistant Professor and the Black Graduate Student Organization’s Lisa Tabor Award for Community Service. Using deep insights from a fourteen-year industry career and her strengths as a systems
University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Systematized Literature Review on Problem−Solving in STEMEducation Exploring the Impact of Task Complexity on Cognitive Factors and Student EngagementAbstractThe profound
definitely the INF students’ way of getting information aboutsocietal aspects. As students were not aware of Cambridge Analytica issues at the momentthey were all over in the news and some of them even did not know about Silicon Valley, theapproach should be strongly adapted. Teachers in the USE Basic course should much morepay attention to the different knowledge levels of the different students. Cases that are core tostudents discipline should not be expected to be known and brought in step by step in order tobe activating for students.LimitationsWe indicate some limitations of our research. Initially, the sample sizes in the survey studyare small and might not be representative to the population of the BMT, AM and INFdepartments. The students who
the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
engineeringeducation community to develop more energy harvesting applications and new curriculums forrenewable energy and energy harvesting topics. These days there is an increasing interest toharvest energy at a much smaller scale, for applications such as the ones found in manyembedded systems the power requirements are often small (less than 100 mW). Today,sustaining the power requirement for autonomous wireless and portable devices is an importantresearch and technical issue. However, this progress has not been able to keep up with thedevelopment of micro-processors, memory storage, and wireless technology applications. 2. Projects in Engineering and Technology EducationThe engineering, science, and technology field, at present, is very dynamic due to
Paper ID #19230They Choose to Attend Academic Summer Camps? A Mixed Methods StudyExploring Motivation for, and the Impact of, an Academic Summer Pre-engineering Camp upon Middle School Students in a Latino CommunityDr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University, San Marcos Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD., is Research Associate Professor of Engineering Education in the College of Education at Texas State University. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to issues of curriculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served pop- ulations of students and teachers and in assessing
engineering learning environments.Ms. Emily A Madden, University of MichiganDr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Lecturer in Technical Communication and an Assistant Research Scientist in Engineer- ing Education at the University of Michigan. She loves serving as a ”coach” to engineering students as they engage in communicating their ideas to a range of stakeholders. She studies teamwork and team- based pedagogy, with a focus on inter-team communication and equity. She is one of the Faculty Innova- tors behind Tandem, a Center of Academic Innovation tool for supporting students working in teams. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020AbstractEngineering student project
materials. Ms. Matin has over 3 years of experience of teaching in architecture and interior design field at Azad Islamic University and Eastern Michigan University. She has been LEED Green Associate since 2016.Dr. Ali Eydgahi, Eastern Michigan University Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic In- stitute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA
they encounter gender-based challenges inthe workplace. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates and promotes the strengths of Q methodologywithin engineering education research and provides student researchers actionable steps andknowledge to advance their research skills.IntroductionFor engineering education to continue to grow and evolve, it is important for researchers tocontinue to learn and implement new research methodologies pushing past the typical modes ofdata collection and analysis. Learning new methodologies can help researchers answer newquestions and extend our understanding of education. New methodologies afford researchers newtools and techniques which lead to new answers and insights.Methodologies are chosen by the researcher to
adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award.Prof. Alexander J. Headley, University of Memphis American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Test anxiety and its impact on diverse undergraduate engineering students during remote learningAbstractTest anxiety
and who they want to become, and it is situatedwithin their activity as they seek to jointly solve problems through physical and representationaltools. In Lave and Wenger’s terms, a theory of situated learning emphasizes the relational interdependency of agent and world, activity, meaning, cognition, learning, and knowing. It emphasizes the inherently socially negotiated Page 23.663.7 character of meaning and the interested, concerned character of the thought and action of SOLVING AUTHENTIC PROBLEMS THROUGH DESIGN PROCESSES 7 persons-in-activity [...] Given a relational
accurate way to get those numbers. Othergroups held the specific heats constant and regarded the resulting error negligible. A third, smallerselection of groups chose to look up the equation for determining specific heats based upontemperature and include that in the model. So while the generalizability might be lacking forsome, it helped students to have to decide between accuracy and ease of use. Deciding betweeneither a simple model or an accurate model is something engineers struggle with everyday.Since the numbers in Table 3 are low, it is clear that making the model generalizable was a lowpriority for most groups. The important thing is that the groups recognized the issue and placedinput areas for new data while recalculating work so the