challenge forcourse design, content, and conduct. Engr310 must provide engineering students specifictechnical rigor defined as prerequisites for upper level courses and simultaneously provide all Page 4.587.2the other students only the subject background needed as future Air Force officers.Student interest and motivation are historically strong factors affecting student learning inEngr310. Content, administration, and student preparedness are issues regularly confronting theinstructors. Approximately one year ago, a faculty panel began to review the course todetermine alternate presentation methods. Guided, in part, by the ABET EC-2000 Criteria2
structures and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UCSD. She incorporates education in- novations into courses (Active Learning, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty through TA Training, serves as advisor to student organizations, and is committed to fostering a supportive en- vironment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16 design-based curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization to support persistence.Dr. Nathan Delson, eGrove Education Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Senior Teaching Professor at the
conventionalmachining [1]. These skills are vital for engineers to communicate design ideas, and a basicunderstanding of manufacturing technology helps enable students to consider how a design onpaper might be turned into a physical prototype. Faculty observations and student and alumnifeedback have indicated that these skills are vital for success in classroom design projects suchas senior design, as well as for careers in industry [2]. Page 15.482.2Within the biomedical engineering curriculum at Bucknell University, a fabrication andexperimental design course is integrated into a four course design sequence where two coursescomprise the senior capstone
students) often neglect the unique needsof underrepresented populations. Although some strategies exist for helping minority studentssucceed in STEM, the present investigation uncovered detailed information about how Blackmale students in engineering and engineering-related fields develop important academic traitssuch as confidence and resilience. To add to the limited body of literature on Black males inSTEM, interview data from 27 Black male students majoring in engineering or engineering-related fields were analyzed through the lens of Strayhorn’s ‘buoyant believers’ framework. Theframework offers practitioners, faculty, and staff – who work with minority engineering students– guidance for addressing challenges students face and creating
Paper ID #29239Aligning the chemical engineering curriculum to a common problem-solvingstrategyProf. Nicolas Hudon, Queen’s University Dr Nicolas Hudon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Queen’s Uni- versity (Canada) since 2016. His teaching activities are mainly concerned with second-year fundamental courses. He is the recipient of the 2019 Carolyn Small Award for teaching innovation from the Faculty of Applied Sciences and Engineering at Queen’s University.Dr. Louise Meunier P.Eng., Queen’s University Dr. Meunier studied mechanical engineering and worked for twenty years as an
. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds., 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.9 Pellegrino, J.W., 2006, “Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction and assessment: Whatcontemporary research and theory suggests.” A paper commissioned by the National Center onEducation and the Economy for the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce.10 Albanese, M. A. and S. Mitchell, 1993, “Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on itsOutcomes and Implementation Issues,” Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, pp. 52-81.11 Prince, M. J. and R. M. Felder, 2006, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions,Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol
calculus” are just acouple examples of the students expressing their struggle to see the relevance of what they arelearning. Likewise, engineering faculty are often frustrated by their students’ apathy toward reallearning. When a machine design student says, “You mean I have to remember Statics?” itbecomes clear the student didn’t see the usefulness of free-body diagrams back in Statics class.When students don’t see a connection between the concepts they learn in Statics and their futureas engineers, they are less motivated to engage and to remember what they learn. There may bemany contributing factors as to why students tend to see Statics as “series of mathematicalmanipulations”1 rather than a way to understand physical systems. Textbook
beneficialfor minority student development. In addition to the value of adding to the base of evidencesupporting the use of this model, the result of this study is significant because of the breadth ofoutcomes and the length of the period studied. The study compares the performance of programparticipants to a control group of minority students from the same cohorts and with a similarmatriculation profile in terms of age and of a predicted grade point ratio based on SAT / ACTscores, high school rank in class, and quality of high school.Black student retention and the Treisman approach to improving itHigh failure rates in introductory college mathematics courses, notably among underrepresentedstudents, have been of concern for many years.1,2 Table 1
Paper ID #7532Teaching Sustainability in an Engineering Graphics Class with Solid Model-ing ToolDr. Ananda Mani Paudel, Colorado State University, PuebloDr. Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is Chair of the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University, Pueblo. She was formerly on the faculty at the Ohio State University and Purdue University. She has a B.A in mathematics from Swarthmore College and a M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering and operations research from the University of California, Berkeley
Paper ID #39193Board 121: Using Tutor-led Support to Enhance Engineering StudentWriting for AllJohanna Bodenhamer, Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisDr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, and engineering education.Ms. Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College Ruth Pflueger has been
with the easeof access to such Gen AI tools have raised a lot of questions about ethics, authorship and academicintegrity [25], [27]. While academics are still exploring the possible applications of Gen AI in education [27], severalresearchers agreed that Gen AI literacy is essential in education [28], [29], [30]. Some educators andresearchers argue that several AI tools like the writing assistance tools may enhance the learningexperience by providing automated assistance [31]. AI has also been explored as a creative collaboratorin various fields, such as game level design and computational tools for creative writing, where it is seenas a potential source of new ideas and support for designers' goals [32], [33], [34]. Providing
offers a valuable framework for investigating various behaviors, it is importantto acknowledge its limitations in capturing the potential influence of power dynamics and otherconfounding elements. For example, power imbalances within a capstone engineering teamcould shape individuals’ behaviors in ways that extend beyond their personal beliefs, which maynot be fully captured by the RAA’s focus on individual beliefs and intentions. Similarly,contextual factors may influence behaviors in ways that are not adequately represented by theRAA. In the capstone engineering example, project complexity or time pressures could be suchfactors. To address these concerns, researchers could incorporate qualitative methods andcontextual factor measures, such as
on campus, which was not a concern pre-pandemic.Important decisions have been made about how to vary assessment measures [1] for exampleby having students give a pre-recorded, non-assessed group presentation, and to then use theconstructive feedback to prepare a live, assessed, group presentation. Similarly, we wereobliged to re-consider how best to support peer-to-peer collaboration [2] with students beingset collective goals, and meeting face-to-face on a group rotational basis once a week withcontribution and attendance being periodically monitored. Furthermore, students wereencouraged to make use of sanitised study space in the department, and to actively conversethrough TEAMS as and when appropriate. Additionally, challenges arose with
arrange students in groups of 3–4 each and have each group engage indeep discussions in class without each group disrupting other groups’ discussions. Third, faculty,even those who may buy in, at a conceptual level, to the value of collaborative learning, tend tobe reluctant about devoting class time to such activities since they are concerned about the likelynegative impact on topic coverage. Our approach not only addresses these issues, it also has anumber of other important advantages over in-person collaborative learning.The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review background theories related to learningdriven by cognitive conflict; we also briefly review a number of approaches in the broader area ofcollaborative learning
sketches and examples helpful in discussing seismic issues with their architecturalcolleagues [31].Moreover, in the faculties of architecture of universities located in earthquake-prone countries, itis recommended that, referring to the current infrastructure, even if they were or not intentionallybuilt to minimize damages produced by an earthquake, a variety of natural selection of theeffective designs that have frequently proven to withstand earthquakes have most likelyhappened [32]. If something has become old-fashioned is because it has been efficient inresisting past seismic events, moreover, it can resist seismic incidents in the time to come. As aresult, a cohesion in the use of specific seismic resistant features can be observed in
Paper ID #36804The Effect of a Collaborative Environment on Engineering Students’Social NetworksHannah CorbinNoor Aulakh, Rowan UniversityAlex Herrman, Rowan UniversityConor PetersonShahir Shariful MollahDarby Rose Riley, Rowan University Darby Riley is a student of engineering education at Rowan University. She has a special interest in issues of diversity and inclusion, especially as they relate to disability and accessibility of education. She is a founding member of Rowan University’sDr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University
study focused on learners from three nanoHUB-U courses. NanoHUB-U is an onlineeducation platform established by the National Science Foundation supported project, Networkfor Computational Nanotechnology (NCN).14 The highly dynamic and rapidly evolving natureof the field of nanotechnology quickly renders traditional course textbooks obsolete, 15 and themost up-to-date material is only available through conference proceedings and journalpublications. NanoHUB-U combats this issue by offering short, open-access courses (typically5 weeks in length) developed by a collaboration of experts from across the field ofnanotechnology. One of the major objectives of nanoHUB-U is to significantly decrease thetime between research discovery, to access of new
AC 2009-830: ENGAGING HIGH-SCHOOL STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING,SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY USING VIRTUAL LABORATORIESMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University
“cooperation and partnerships among member institutions in the area of engineeringeducation, research, and technology advancement with emphasis on: • Faculty and student exchange • New and/or higher level academic programs • Dual/joint degree and certificate programs • Distance, continuing and e-education • Laboratory development, including higher degrees • Industry internship, cooperative programs and career development • Joint training and research programs, and solicitation of funds • Development, commercialization and transfer of technology • Dissemination of scholarly achievement and other accomplishments by member institutions”5.The LACCEI’s intensive program serves as a basis for
engineering, IT, and data analysis positions within academia and industry, including ten years of manufacturing experience at Delphi Automotive.Dr. Erin Gross Claypool, University of Pittsburgh Erin G. Claypool, PhD, is a Field Faculty member of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received a Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2011, with a research focus on Design for Supply Chain modeling. She was a National Science Foundation Fellowship holder, and also received B.S.I.E. and M.S.I.E. degrees from the University of Pittsburgh. She worked as a manufacturing engineer in the medical device industry prior to completing her doctoral studies. Her research interests
from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine the longitudinal career pathways of engineering PhDs.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
initial hypotheses as well as on the first survey results of a new longitudinalstudy which is intended to provide insight into retention issues, including an investigation of a“filtering effect” of the traditional instruction that the authors hypothesize is taking place and ispartly responsible for high dropout rates, as well as for the reduced diversity of the student bodyas they progress through the technology-focused versus humanities programs. The study will alsoprovide recommendations to improve student engagement and success.IntroductionHigh attrition rates and feelings of alienation are the flip side of student success and satisfaction.They are much higher in junior years of technology-focused programs than in humanities. At theauthors
Graphics, Juniper, R3Logic, Cisco, Qualcomm, MediaTeck, etc.) and the Government (NSF, ARO, MDA, DOD, AFOSR, DOE, etc.). He is a recipient of several best paper awards, the 2009 NSF CAREER award, the 2014 MURI award, the 2008 IEEE Computer Society (CS) Meritorious Service Award, the 2012 IEEE CS Outstanding Contri- bution, the 2010 IEEE CS Most Successful Technical Event for co-founding and chairing HOST Sympo- sium, the 2009 and 2014 UConn ECE Research Excellence Award, and the 2012 UConn SOE Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award. He serves on the program committee of more than a dozen leading conferences and workshops. Prof. Tehranipoor served as the guest editor for JETTA, IEEE Design and Test of Computers, and IEEE
varying levels of programming experience andtraining, ranging from individuals with extensive programming expertise, those with formaltraining in how to teach programming, those who teach programming with little formal trainingin it, and to those new to MATLAB programming. This diversity in programming experienceallowed the team to approach the project from multiple perspectives, ensuring that the WebTAtool was accessible to a broad range of students and effectively integrated into the educationalsetting.The faculty team was responsible for overseeing the project, ensuring ethical standards, andcoordinating data collection and analysis. The CS and Psychology and Human Factors graduatestudents, focused on the technical implementation of WebTA and
Paper ID #42330Board 151: Utilizing African-Centered STEM Education to Inspire African-AmericanParticipation in STEMDr. DeAnna Bailey, Morgan State University Dr. DeAnna Bailey is a faculty member of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University. Dr. Bailey has an academic background in Electrical Engineering (B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Doctor of Engineering). She studies African history, culture, and traditions for the purpose of re-conceptualizing engineering for African/Black people in the 21st Century. Dr. Bailey researches, develops, implements, and examines effective
. Exhibit 6. Content of the Final Report. 1. Project Management 1.1 Project scope 1.2 Schedule 1.3 Staff time 1.4 Additional issues: new members and/or drop outs, conflicts, etc. 1.5 Lessons learned and recommendations for improvement 2. Evaluation 2.1 First-year instructors’ satisfaction 2.2 Team performance 2.3 Individual member performance 2.4 Team leader performance 2.5 Lessons learned and recommendations for improvement 3. Strengths and recommendations for improvement for the PMP course and the first-year integrated project 4. AttachmentsThe first section of the Final Report
Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 751-754.[42] Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Frels, R.K. (2013). Introduction: Toward a new research philosophy for addressing social justice issues: Critical dialectical pluralism. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7(1), 9-26.[43] Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.[44] Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203-213.[45] Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing research, 40(2), 120-123.[46
Report: Charles Riborg Mann as an Influential but Elusive Figure in Engineering Education (A Work in Progress)Engineering schools, like all institutions of learning, are slow to undertake educational experiments. It is sometimes easier to start a new school than to try an educational experiment in an old one. --Henry S. Pritchett, President of the Carnegie Foundation Preface to A Study of Engineering Education (1918)I. Introduction: How a Report Written Over 100 Years Ago Can Promote Change TodayScholars who have studied engineering education on a scale larger
teachers.Subsequently, the College has received two RET Site grants, one for 2006-2008 and the secondone 2009-20111-5. Each year approximately 12 math and science teachers have participated. Thegoals of the RET program have been three fold: 1. To educate, cultivate, and facilitate middle and high school science and mathematics teachers by exploring the scientific method of inquiry and the critical research skills that engineers use to solve open-ended real-world problems. 2. To develop the participating teachers into role models for their schools who apply their research experiences in their classrooms and with colleagues. 3. To enable middle and high school students to directly link their education to events and issues
learn new skills in areas they are unfamiliar.2.0 Background The pronounced gender disparities in engineering and engineering technology disciplinesgive rise to a challenging dilemma and one that has yet to be solved. Achieving a critical massof women in these fields could pave the way for greater representation in both educationalinstitutions and industry and alleviate critical upcoming labor shortages. This, in turn, mighthelp mitigate or eliminate obstacles linked to stereotypes, stereotype threat, and a sense ofbelonging. Stereotyping is a perception that certain groups of individuals possess lesser academicability, a notion that can significantly impact their engagement in educational pursuits. Thistendency is particularly pronounced