. Without the guidance offered byintroductory courses, engineering students run the risk of either staying one or two years in amajor they will eventually dislike or quickly losing interest in their field of study as a result oftaking all the seemingly unrelated math and physics courses.To help their entering freshmen learn more about engineering in general and its variousdisciplines in particular, some schools offer a common freshman experience through the use offirst-year introduction to engineering program1 while others have taken steps to offerintroductory courses in their respective disciplines.2,3Similar to some of the other aerospace engineering programs in the country before it4, theDepartment of Aerospace Engineering (ASE) at Mississippi
Paper ID #16568The Role of Shared Physical Space in Affording the Creation of Shared Con-ceptual Spaces in Design Project TeamsDr. Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto Penny Kinnear currently works with the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto where she focuses on the development and delivery of Professional Language support for a highly student body. She has a background in applied linguistics, second language and bilingual education and writing education. She is co-author of the book, ”Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An in- troduction through narratives.” Her current research
interviewed indicated that they saw SLICE as a valuableelement in the engineering program, based on their own experience. All saw it as addingimportant dimensions to the learning experience that were not available through traditionalclassroom exercises, and all believed that it was consistent with efforts to broaden students’understanding of both engineering and their role in society. Finally, though all noted challengeswith regard to implementation, they also indicated that the integration of S-L was worth theextra effort that it often involved. One faculty member even said, “It will change the way wethink about engineering. It adds an additional dimension.” One area in which the SLICEexperience itself can be strengthened is through increased
difference being that the listdeveloped in class provides more explicit details. From this exercise, considerations aroundreproducibility were gradually introduced, starting with a new question: “How will you preserveyour progress along each step of the scientific method?” As a class, simple approaches werenoted. For research design and planning steps such as initial observations, research questions andhypotheses, here is an overall summary of the concepts noted: ● Write down ideas in digital documents such as Google Docs, where collaborators can share this information through email, social media, or other online locations, with varying permissions for viewing or editing. ● Write down ideas on physical paper to quickly draw visual
society, instructors have anunprecedented ability to touch their students outside of the classroom through well designed andmaintained web media. Supplemental course websites (websites intended only to supplement –not replace – conventional teaching) are rapidly becoming more the rule than the exception forundergraduate level courses. We should note that we have a student-body that is fairly tech-savvyand definitely well-connected. Each student has a computer with LAN connection to the Internetfrom his room, and beginning this year, entering students will have a wireless PDA and wirelesslaptop computer linked by campus-wide, wireless network coverage. Currently in the Departmentof Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military
discussed. The use of the spatial-numeric tool provided by Excel interms of the plagiarism prevention and equity issues is discussed.KeywordsSpatial-numeric abilities, van Hiele learning model, Excel solverIntroductionThe learning of introductory physics requires spatial abilities with graphic visualization, vectormanipulation, Newtonian force free body diagram, etc. The applications of the van Hielelearning model for geometry with spatial abilities have been documented [1, 2]. One of thereports included the implementation of the van Hiele learning model for Force ConceptInventory with assessment being done through qualitative questions [3]. The spatial-algebraicmethod in analytical geometry has been a standard tool in calculus physics for
Leader, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Claire Leader is an undergraduate architectural engineering student at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She serves as an advisory member for the College of Architecture and Environ- mental Design’s (CAED) Student Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (SDEI) Committee and represents the CAED as a board member for the Student Health Advisory Committee. As a Peer Health Educator, Claire advocates for the wellbeing of university community members. She has worked with elementary, middle school, and high school students through STEM-oriented outreach programs with Cal Poly’s chapter of Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Upon graduation
(2001). 1 Althoughthe ADVANCE program has contributed to the development of a more diverse science andengineering workforce, much remains to be done. Women face deep-seated challenges fromwhen they enter academia as students and these challenges continue through the faculty ranks[34, 39]. As undergraduate students, women encounter differential treatment within theclassroom, contributing to a different and inferior experience than men. Women’s contributionsto classroom discussions tend to be ignored or trivialized by men [40]. Women cope with thismarginalization by creating their own networks of support through close bonds with otherwomen and forming all female clubs [27, 34, 35]. Additionally, the inclination for males tooutnumber the females
received an MFA in creative writing from the University of Arizona; her research interests include narrative theory in health communication.April Kedrowicz, University of Utah Dr. April A. Kedrowicz is the Director of the CLEAR (Communication, Leadership, Ethics, And Research) Program at the University of Utah, a collaboration between the College of Humanities and College of Engineering. The program was developed in 2003 through a grant from the Hewlett Foundation, with the goal of integrating communication (speaking and writing), teamwork, and ethics into the curriculum of every department in the College of Engineering. Dr. Kedrowicz’s work with Engineering began during her tenure as a
, 2]. Training students to develop design thinking and skills will allow them to enterprofessional practice ready to participate in the challenge of infrastructure re-design. Indeed,ABET requires that students have “an ability to apply engineering design to producesolutions…” upon graduation [3]. Perhaps the most effective way to guide students indeveloping design skills is through engagement in real-world projects. Furthermore, providingauthentic design experiences in a supportive educational environment that encourages successcan build self-efficacy (one’s beliefs in their ability to achieve specific tasks), which in turn fuelsmotivation to succeed as an engineer [4]. Promoting engineering self-efficacy is a promisingstrategy for retaining
: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.9. Krause, S., Kelly, J., Triplett, J., Eller, A., and Baker, D. (2010). Uncovering and Addressing Some Common Types of Misconceptions in Introductory Materials Science and Engineering Courses. Journal of Materials Education, 32(5- 6), 255-272.10. Kelly, J., Graham, A., Eller, A, Baker, D., Tasooji, A., and Krause, S. (2010). Supporting student learning, attitude, and retention through critical class reflections. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.11. Ericsson, K. A., Cramped, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.12. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E
. Her current research interests include the effect of instructional technology on student learning and performance, effective teaching strategies for new graduate student instructors, and the impact of GSI mentoring programs on the mentors and mentees.Chris Groscurth , University of Michigan Christopher R. Groscurth is an instructional consultant in the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) at the University of Michigan. At CRLT Chris promotes excellence in teaching and learning through individual consultation, professional development programs, and applied research. He has a Ph.D. from the Department of Speech Communication at the University of Georgia, and his research
population of CSSE students andwe received about a 12% (n = 154, n = 122) response rate. The surveys were conducted throughGoogle Forms and sent through email to all students, and advertised through clubs, professors,and various social media sites related to Cal Poly Computing. A sample of the surveys can befound in Appendix 1. An analysis of results is presented in Chapter 3. Similar to Rainey et al., we grouped students’ racial and ethnic categories by White andminoritized students as an initial lens for equity-minded assessment of our student experience.We acknowledge that intersubsectional identities and fine-grained data dis-aggregation are a par-ticularly important future consideration. We also acknowledge that we received 6 and 3
results from the experimental testing group.Analytical Calculation GroupFinally, the analytical calculation group struggled through various variable definitions and uniterrors to arrive at results with which they were confident (see Figure 10), even as other teamswere producing results to which they could compare. Surprisingly, it was this group that seemedmost challenged by their task and required the most interaction with the instructor. This wouldfall into the category of a desirable difficulty, as this group was the best versed in the theoreticalrelationships involved in natural frequency and ultimately was able to explain reasons for theresults of the other groups. The modal frequencies determined by each of the groups are providedin Table 1
learning components have provided undergraduate engineering students with a broadexposure that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries and is strongly aligned with the ABETlearning outcomes 5 through 7 [9].Most students in the Instrumentation course have indicated they learned a lot from the course andwere pleasantly surprised with the active learning components that were integrated with the remoteimplementation of the course. Although only two students in the class were actively engaged inthe field efforts related to the preliminary test set-up for the wireless soil moisture sensor network,all students got to learn about the set-up details and could see the live data readings of the fieldsensors using the web interface during a class
option and the Technology Education degree was cancelled due to low enrollment.These five programs, EET, MET, including a CAD/CAM option, PET, ID and IT were the pro-grams that existed when we began to switch the ET programs to engineering.Two of the defining characteristics of the engineering technology programs at WWU were signif-icant experiential learning through labs and projects and strong connections to local industrythrough both sponsored projects and active Industrial Advisory Committees (IACs). The heart ofthe Mission Statement for the Department was, and still is: “developing industry-ready graduatesthrough a combination of creative problem-solving, analytical skills development, and experientiallearning.”[4] All three programs had
licensed Professional Engineer in PA. Ryan is also an advisor for Penn State’s National AEI Student Competition teams. His research interests include: integrated structural design methodologies and processes; Innovative methods for enhancing engineering education; and high performing wall enclosures. These three areas look towards the next generation of building engineering, including how systems are selected, configured and designed.M K Parfitt M. Kevin Parfitt, P.E., F.AEI is an award-winning educator in the Department of Architectural Engineering at Penn State and respected industry consultant. He performs educational practice-based research and teaches a variety of practice- oriented courses including First Year Seminar
improve the outcome of tendon injuries through engineering. As a graduate student, Dr. Dischino became heavily involved in educational outreach work with inner-city public school students in Philadelphia. It was through this work that she realized her passion for teaching technology and engineering concepts at all levels and encouraging students to achieve their full potential in these fields. She is currently a member of the American Society of Engineering Education, the International Technology Education Association and the Association for Science Teacher Education, as well as a Champion Board Member of the Connecticut branch of the National Girls Collaborative Project and Board
the Jigsaw module activities were edited by the instructor to assure they were rigorousand contained content appropriate for the upcoming group learning activity.After return to their Home Groups each “Expert” had a class period to guide the rest of their groupmembers through the exercises they developed. The groups were expected to complete the readingassignment and quiz for whichever module they were going to do prior to class each day. The fill-in-the-blank worksheets used in each class were not turned in as homework but in effect substituted fortraditional note taking in a lecture course. The students then had a practical, but non-trivial homeworkmodule problem involving application of principles surrounding the hands-on modules for any
new initiative at Purdue Polytechnic aimed to redesign undergraduate student experiences through offering a combination of deep liberal arts experiences with student-driven, hands-on project-based learning.Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use of precedent materials, and experienced
whereas Singapore is tight. Similarly,both New Zealand and Germany are countries with individualistic values, although Germany istight and New Zealand is loose. Although interesting theoretical observations, one might wonderabout the practical implications of this work, what differences they would make to design work.At the broadest level, norm-sensitive design would help to facilitate larger-scale humanunderstanding and cooperation, a condition of – and what should be a goal for – globalengineering, through more culturally inclusive and responsive design processes.First, since norms and norm systems are better indicators of cultural groups than values, a norm-sensitive design framework would help to better identify and understand cultural groups
research has been performed as to whether timed exams serve any purpose beyond thelimitation of the class time. The use of time limited exams is broad and includes college entranceexams, graduate school entrance exams, professional and licensing exams and typicalcoursework exams. Entrance and professional exams are achievement tests and also considered“power” tests. Should all tests assume this quality? In engineering fields where professionalexams are frequently required post-graduation, time limited exams may be considered a steppingstone.Previous research has mainly focused on students with disabilities. However, students withoutdisabilities may also suffer from exam anxiety. Exam anxiety may be due to a variety ofpsychometric factors. In order
seen to be a component oflifelong education that begins in the primary (elementary) school and extends through continuingprofessional development until retirement, even beyond. Industrialists have an obligation to Page 25.1334.9participate in the promotion of an individual‟s career path even though it may take them fromAttributes (most frequent ratings of ‘very important’ by employers.Professionalism (punctuality, time management, attitude)Self direction, ability to take initiativeAdaptability, willingness to learnProfessional ethics, integrity.Verbal communication skills.Most frequent ratings of ‘not at all’ or ‘not very important’ Last 5
.” European Journal of EngineeringEducation (2018), (43)3: 344-359. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1410522[12] D. Stone, E.L. Deci, R. M. Ryan. “Beyond talk: creating autonomous motivation through self-determinationtheory.” Journal of General Management (2009), 34(3).[13] M. Hartnett. “Influences that undermine learners’ perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness in anonline context.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (2015), 31(1).[14] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York:Plenum Press, 1985.[15] J. V. Boettcher and R. Conrad. The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and Practical Pedagogical Tips,2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.[16] T. Tobin and K. Behling
include: engineering education and educational assessment and evaluation. Her K-12 outreach activities are organizing a local science fair and a hands on workshop in nanotechnology. Her other research interests are: higher education administration, comparative and international education. Page 15.266.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 CCLI: Model Eliciting Activities: Experiments and Mixed Methods to Assess Student LearningAbstractAs part of a seven university CCLI Type 3 collaborative effort addressing models and modelingas a foundation for undergraduate curriculum
built on quantitative relationships, obeying established physical law, and measured properties of materials, energy, or information. Systems engineering, on the other hand, deals mainly with problems for which there is incomplete knowledge, whose variables do not obey known equations, and where a balance must be made among conflicting objectives involving incommensurate attributes.22 Because we did not expect students to bring specific content knowledge, what we hopedthey would carry away is a deeper understanding of their imagined roles as prospectiveresearchers, builders, and reformers, through observation of their own thought processes andinteractions with their team members. We strongly encouraged them to introduce their
of the Major Groups could interact with the HLPF.There are nine major groups and as mentioned earlier; Science and Technology is one of the major groups and the WFEO represents engineering in this group. Essentially the only way that non governmental organizations and other stakeholders can participate in UN sustainable development activities is through a major group. The UN Division of Sustainable Development 8works directly with the Major Groups through its Stakeholders Engagement Program. Communications with the Major Groups is facilitated by Organizing Partners. Organizing Partners, are comprised of accredited organizations that are
asimilar introductory course in their curriculum to improve engagement and retention of theirmajors. Students from other majors (non-majors) can take these introductory courses but havehistorically been a small percentage of the total enrollment. The author identified an opportunityto educate a wider percentage of undergraduate students about nuclear engineering andredeveloped ENU1000 to better meet the needs of both nuclear engineering majors and non-majors.This redeveloped course is also aligned with many engineering organizations’ goals of increasingthe public’s knowledge of technology and engineering. For example, the National Academy ofEngineering has stressed the need for technology and engineering literacy (TEL) through its listof
and normal operation of existing elevator controlbuttons. For remote operation, the user presses a button on a wheelchair mounted remotecontrol transmitter to select the desired function. The remote receiver senses the infraredsignal and activates the corresponding relay of the receiver/relay board. When the relaycontacts close, the solenoid circuit is completed and the solenoid plunger extends,providing the required force and stroke to depress the existing elevator button. Theindicator light of the existing button provides feedback to the user, indicating when thecorrect button has been selected. Normal operation is possible simply by pressing theouter end of the extension button assembly which extends beyond the outer surface of thehousing
. Feedback TechniquesAs Figure 1 illustrates, there are a number of possible sources of feedback for students. Below,we examine each one individually.Depending on the goals of a given course, instructors may decide to employ certain types ofassignments and respective feedback techniques, and not others. One important factor in thisdecision is the cost of the feedback ideally provided to students for the various assignments.Consequently, our discussion will be structured so as to associate feedback with the specifictypes of assignments we used in our course.3.3.1. Feedback from InstructorsThe class of feedback techniques where instructors are the source and students are the target isfeatured in every course we know of, and in ours too. Beyond this