information sources.The aim of this study was to make library resource instruction an integral portion of a requiredundergraduate engineering communication class to determine if this targeted instructionimproved students' understanding of alternative information sources. Specifically, this studyintegrated standards and the ASTM Compass database into the course through 1) case studyassignments, 2) targeted instruction by the engineering librarian, and 3) the integration ofstandards as information and research sources into both.The authors presented students in select class sections with a case study lesson dependent onstandards. Students were then visited by the Engineering Librarian on two occasions; bothsessions were tied directly to the assignment
no industrial experience. In both courses, emphasis is put on the useand application of skills rather than on the acquisition of knowledge. Most of the learning isachieved through doing and a large percentage of the course content is therefore allowed to vary.In both courses, appropriate feedback and support are given to the students during their designjourney but no “recipes” are provided. Students are encouraged to explore and make mistakes.In summary, the differences between courses can be found in the level of homogeneity in the twostudent bodies, the more restrictive time constraints imposed on the Japanese course (The KITacademic year is composed of three ten-week “quarters” while the UH has two thirteen-weeksemesters.), the population
. Graphicalrepresentation of the effect of changing system parameters, topology, boundary and initialconditions provides a dramatic reinforcement to the analytical system knowledge acquired in theclassroom. Good engineering education reaches beyond textbook delivery, clever presentation ofrelevant equations, homework assignments or utilization of innovative grading procedures. It caninfluence and favorably change student intellectual, analytical, innovative and integrativeabilities and motivations, helping to develop critical thinking on issues underlying a problem orsolutions. It is in this spirit that many engineering educators have felt the value of usingcomputational tools to complement analytical procedures, enhance subject interests and booststudent concept
ENGINEERING EDUCATION You Be the Judge: When Competitions Employ an Engineering Design Rubricassessment of writing (Yancy, 1999). Over subsequent decades, the use of rubrics to inform evalua-tive judgments about student performance extended to virtually every content area, particularly asopen-ended constructed response items and portfolios were added to the K-12 assessment toolkit.Ironically, the classroom use of rubrics to inform teaching and learning that was widely promotedin the 1990s and early 2000s grew, even as the use of these tools by high-stakes assessment pro-grams diminished when the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 prompted nearly all states toreduce or eliminate direct assessment. Rubrics were—and continue to be—celebrated as a
survey that each student in the course had theoption of completing.A brief summary of the results show that students identified a lack of time and poor time-management as key barriers to their learning. Furthermore, students viewed that immediatefeedback, and having repeated attempts of similar but different questions (akin to gamifiedlearning through trial and error) were very helpful in their learning. However, students alsoindicated that the game-like elements, on average, were minimally helpful towards theirmotivation. This is likely due, in part, to the limited amount of gamification that wasincorporated into the courses at this time. The results also show that the combination of gainingexperience points and “leveling up” (nor the two
to today’s basic undergraduate civilengineering programs, the outcomes prescribe significantly more technical and professionalpractice content. The 21st Century civil engineer must demonstrate:1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. (ABET a) Commentary: A technical core of knowledge and breadth of coverage in mathematics, science and civil engineering topics is stressed in this outcome. Underlying the professional role of the civil engineer as the master integrator and technical leader are most of the following: mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, biology, chemistry, ecology
college introduced a sophomorelevel program on liberal learning. It required a radically different paradigm. The Indian K-12 education systemdoes not prepare students for such a program and the Indian engineering education system does not require sucha program. The college initiated the program with a careful crafting of a comprehensive framework and executedit successfully. The framework requires students learning liberal areas of their choices, which were analyzed tobetter understand students.This paper discusses background of liberal learning and explains the framework. Its process consists of define,harvest, synthesize and share phases; and its data consists of student, area, faculty, sub-area, and cluster entities.The paper also discusses
Internet totransportation engineering and planning students at PSU. This allows for a unique educationalopportunity whereby students can move beyond the LOS measures and get first hand experienceanalyzing actual transportation data collected throughout the region in which they live. Inaddition, it facilitates an opportunity for students to interact with transportation agency staff, andlearn about how an agency is operated. This close interaction will serve students well as theymove into the job search phase of their university experience. Communication skills developedthrough this means will also serve them well in their careers.This paper is organized as follows. First is a discussion of the educational context, followed by adiscussion of
City, UT, June 2004.[3] Dutson, A. J., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, 1997, pp. 17-28.[4] Todd, R. H., S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorenson, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, 1995, pp. 165-174.[5] Ohland, M. W., H. R. Pomeranz, & H. W. Feinstein, “The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: A new peer evaluation instrument,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Conference, Chicago, IL, June 2006.[6] Lord, S. M. and C. N. Pateros, “Sustainability and
theproper attention and should be reconsidered in light of the current developments.It should be noted that, unlike many American and British programmes, in the Netherlands,the content is not directed through e.g. a professional society like SNAME or IMAREST asrequested by ABET accreditation (ABET 2021). In the Netherlands, this is much more up tothe faculty to ensure relevant education is provided. The government requires independentassessment every 5 years, with internal interim assessments halfway between two officialassessments. Furthermore, an advisory board of professionals meets with the education stafftwice a year to discuss concerns, content, potential updates and support. As a result, morefreedom and responsibility lie with the programme
to being engagedwith design tasks in a WIL setting. The remaining sections of this paper are a background onself-efficacy domains and their development in WIL settings, the research methods employed inthis exploratory study, results, discussion and conclusion.2 Background2.1 Self-efficacy and affect in learningA key factor in skill development is self-efficacy, which refers to a person’s belief in theircapacity to succeed at a task. Self-efficacy beliefs vary across tasks and situations, and canchange over time, for better or for worse. Bandura [5] describes four mechanisms to developone’s self-efficacy beliefs: 1. Mastery experiences – persevering through challenges, completing difficult tasks, learning from failure
Paper ID #11639Perceptions and Misconceptions of Industrial Engineering from First YearEngineering StudentsMr. Eric Specking, University of Arkansas Eric Specking serves as the Director of Undergraduate Recruitment for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He directs the engineering recruitment office, most of the College of Engi- neering’s K-12 outreach programs, and the college’s summer programs. He received a B.S. in Computer Engineering and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas.Ms. Patricia E Kirkwood, University of Arkansas Engineering and Mathematics Librarian. pkirkwo
work toward outward indicators of success, such as grades(Performance Approach), working towards learning and understanding (Mastery Approach), and thepreference for working on academic tasks that can be completed in a short amount of time (Work Avoid).Career outcome expectations describe general attributes of a future career. Grit describes the tendency topersevere through challenges on tasks. Identity has three sub-constructs: Physics Identity, Math Identityand Engineering Identity; these identities pertain to the students’ perceptions of themselves as a “physicsperson,” “math person,” or “engineer,” respectively. Agency beliefs pertain to a student’s beliefs abouthow a career in engineering could make a positive impact in the world. The
other materials areas [1].FMMI at the USF is devoted to interdisciplinary fundamental and manufacturing research andeducation on materials which have the potential to solve significant problems in energy,sustainability, human health, and national security. FMMI achieves this through a collaborativeinstitute with faculty members and researchers from the sciences, engineering, and medicine.Educational activities include an interdisciplinary MS program and a certificate program inMSE. Outreach activities involving K-12 activities, undergraduate research, and teacher-trainingprograms are also integrated into the fabric of FMMI vision.The overall research goals of FMMI are to: • take bottom-up and top-down approaches that exploit interactions
next industrial revolution, the Internet-of-Things, themovement towards embedding everyday objects with intelligence and the ability to wirelesslycommunicate information to the cloud. The Internet-of-Things promises to drastically changeseveral aspects of our lives, from the way business is conducted to how we go about otherwiseroutine day to day activities. This oncoming revolution will create a workforce need that those inSTEM education fields must work now to fill via efforts to broaden participation in electrical andcomputer engineering. In particular, this specialized future workforce will have to be bolsteredthrough K-12 outreach and recruitment of students from traditionally underrepresented groups inengineering.In this paper, we
, focusing on the ways in which industry influence affectsstudent experiential opportunities, student competencies, financial support, and futureopportunities.V. Features of productive industry involvement in engineering technology programsIndustry advisory boards can influence the creation, implementation, and sustainment of anengineering technology program through several factors that promote highly skilled graduatesready to be hired by industry. In the following sections, we analyze the particular ways in whichthe IAB can support students’ career readiness and the educational institution.Experiential learning opportunitiesHigh industry involvement in experiential learning opportunities gives students a chance to seewhat it is like to work in
received his Ph.D. degree from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Page 13.673.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 How to Help Senior Chemical Engineering Students Enhance and Develop Their Leadership CompetenceAbstractChemical engineering students at the University Rovira i Virgili (Tarragona, Spain) have theopportunity to enhance and develop their leadership competence by taking on a team leadershiprole in a first-year integrated design project. All fourth-year students enrolled for the ProjectManagement in Practice (PMP) course go through a comprehensive team leader selectionprocess
to recruit engineeringinstitutions and community colleges into regional hubs, including current regional LouisStokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) networks, and train hundreds of stEmPEERs (Practitioners Enhancing Engineering Regionally) change agents (Fellows) across theUnited States (where the E in stEm is capitalized to emphasize Engineering). To accomplishthis, we seek to accelerate the development and implementation of evidenced-basedinterventions through the initiation and support of a professional learning community of “stEmPEER” Fellows, who will be equipped to design, implement, and assess evidence-based andinclusive practices at their respective institutions. In other words, the stEm PEER Academywas designed to
eight prominent and diverse southeastern colleges ofengineering with a shared vision of creating sustainable engineering education reform havingnational impact. This vision was articulated through the definition of a curriculum model based onthe desired attributes of engineering graduates. It was desired that the graduates of thiscurriculum be technically competent, critical and creative thinkers, life-long learners, effectivecommunicators, team players, and globally aware. They should understand process and systemsdesign and integration, display high ethical standards, and appreciate the social context ofengineering and industry business practices. The curriculum model was designed to develop thesequalities through changes in the curriculum
provinces of the northwest part of the state, bordered by NewMexico to the west and Oklahoma to the north. The largest population centers are Amarillo andWichita Falls, home to roughly half of the Region’s 600,000 people. Outside of these, it is a ruralarea served by widely dispersed small towns.The Region 1 Flood Planning Group expressed a strong interest in understanding contemporaryand historical flooding events to facilitate planning. Through the Panhandle Regional PlanningCommission, the state contracted with Freese and Nichols Inc. (FNI), who constructed a survey(i.e. a research interview) for Amarillo and Wichita Falls. The firm conducted these withknowledgeable professionals (e.g. city managers, planners, and engineers). Following
was at 100%. The graduation rate of these ten studentswho completed all interventions is also expected to be at 100% in a STEM field, with 90% inengineering. Qualitative data through focus groups and essays indicated the importance ofbuilding a strong learning community, and the added impact of international scholarlycollaboration.IntroductionThere are many initiatives that focus on the retention and graduation of underrepresentedpopulations in engineering and other STEM fields. Research literature is often written about agiven set of interventions applied in a single year, perhaps two, or about a single program [1, 2,3, 4]. When this is done, the group of students who completed the intervention are readilyidentified, and if they remain at
. Looking beyond content: skill development for engineers. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 295–307 (2008).4. Prendergast, L. & Etkina, E. Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course. in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings 24.1054.1–24.1054.29 (ASEE Conferences, 2014). doi:10.18260/1-2--229875. Inguva, P. et al. Advancing experiential learning through participatory design. Education for Chemical Engineers 25, 16–21 (2018).6. Dong, J., Chen, P. & Hernandez, A. Designing Effective Project-based Learning Experience Using a Participatory Design Approach. in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings 26.479.1–26.479.12 (ASEE Conferences, 2015). doi:10.18260/p.238177. E. Baran, A. Correia and A. Thompson
Page 7.297.3Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationrepresents the visuo-spatial/psychomotor intelligence factors. The former is normally aleft-brain function and the latter a right-brain activity. See Figure 2. k (spatial) Figure 2Each of the sub-groups has their own sub-factors, and to have satisfactory methods ofdeveloping these, they must be defined and categorised. Some of the sub-factors ofspatial ability identified in the past have been confusing to say the least; for examplewhat Zimmerman (1954) 10, describes as 'spatialising', French (1951) 11 appears to
, and Fall 2021 semesters. During the part of the semester where flipped modules wereassigned, the class meetings were held remotely in Spring 2020, Spring 2021, and in-person in Fall2021.Students in a learner-centered environment are expected to engage with their learning and practicetheir skills [25], [26]. A holistic view of active learning includes three main components:information and ideas, experience, and reflective dialogue [27]. A successful active learningframework should consider how students (i) encounter new information and ideas, (ii) engage withinformation and ideas, and (iii) reflect on their learning. In our study, our framework considered: i. Students encounter the new material through short videos to present the machine
models and with the discovery / creationprocess by which such models are developed. There is not a required text for this learning unit.Several of the applications and models take from or influenced by material in older books by Coad[ 8,9 ] . Guidelines for GUI design are taken from Coad [9] and Schneiderman [17].Our pattern of presentation is to engage the students in discussion of an initial model, then showand explain an instructor’s solution, and then work through an in-class exercise. The in-classexercises are learning unit number four. The typical in-class exercise is that (except for the firstuse-case model) the class has some prior component models. Then students work in pairs ( a“turn to your partner” mode) to develop a single model
center with proctors. Students were ID’d before taking the exams and were watchedduring the exams. The content, assessments, grading, etc. were all comparable to our course.We were excited to find a possible path for our students to stay or get on track over the summerwith this course, and we told the professor so. He then said they were not going to offer thecourse anymore after that year. Why? In large part because the student success rate was so lowthat it wasn’t worth the time investment, either for the professor or the students. The reason forthis, he explained, was that students would sign up and then not bother to do the work and finishthe course. They had to be highly self-motivated and self-disciplined to work through thematerial on
project, students were able to applythe beginning of a common type of social science analysis by investigating (1) who wasimpacted by, affiliated with, or had a stake in an engineering system, (2) what power or influenceeach of these individuals, groups or organizations had and (3) how their interactions affected thesystem and its ongoing operations. Therefore, integrating theories of power into activities in anengineering design capstone can have multiple benefits for developing as a professionaldesigner. Moreover, beyond the initial activities and associated theories of power explored here,there may be other activities or ways to integrate associated theories that offer additionalperspectives or skills for students.Third, while there were
Macromedia Authorware. Authorware providesan environment in which text, graphics, video and sound can be integrated and organized forconsistent presentation to students. It provides a level of interactivity, structure and recordkeeping capabilities that are very difficult to produce in a website that only uses HTML. Figures1 through 4 display screens captured from Thermo-CD. They are included at the end of thispaper so that the reader can get a feel for the nature of the user interface.The drawback to using Authorware to build a WBT program such as Thermo-CD is that abrowser plug-in is required in order to view the software modules. Fortunately, the plug-in canbe downloaded for free. Authorware modules can also be packaged as executable files
years. To tackle the dwindling enrollment of STEM students andlow quality of STEM graduates, the National Science Board submitted a report to Congress in 2009suggesting all students need to develop their capabilities in STEM to levels much beyond what wasconsidered acceptable in the past with an increased emphasis on technology and engineering at alllevels in the Nation’s education system [Bee01].There is a need to change the perception of STEM education. STEM education cannot be viewed asteaching four unrelated subject matters. STEM education should be treated as an integral education.Mathematics, science, technology and engineering are taught in classes in hope that students willuse these subjects simultaneously to make new discoveries, to
ended. This type of network-based peer mentoring has been shown to beeffective in leadership development in other institutions [19], [20]. Our hope was to seed a team ofaccomplished women who would learn from and support each other as they progressed through the ranksand perhaps into leadership positions on our campus. If this occurred, we would be forming thefoundation of an institutional structure with the potential to change the culture at our institution.Another advantage of limiting participation to UD faculty was that workshop content could focus to someextent on our institution. In early planning meetings a number of prospective participants expressedconfusion about the concept of leadership. They didn’t have a clear picture of what many