, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. Dr. Pugalee has published works on STEM teaching and learning and on the NSF project Developing a Systemic, Scalable Model to Broaden Participation in Middle School Computer Science that focuses on computational thinking in science and mathematics. He has more than twp decades of classroom teaching experience at both the K-12, including mathematics and science, and higher education levels and has led multi-million dollar grants related to STEM education.Dr. David C. Weggel, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David C. Weggel is a full professor and founder and director of the Infrastructure Security and Emergency Responder Research and
Paper ID #38759Lessons Learned from Offering in-Department Wellness ProgramsDr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Jacquelyn K. Nagel is an engineer, academic, and consultant. At James Madison University she is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering. She earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Oregon State University, and her M.S. and B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering and Electrical Engi- neering, respectively, from Missouri University of Science & Technology. As a multidiscipline engineer her diverse areas of expertise are bio-inspired design (BID), mechatronic systems, and
study of language and cognition for students who experience a cultural and linguistic mismatch between the practices of their communities and those in engineering and sci- ence. In addition to her work on culturally relevant learning through emerging technologies, Greses uses mixed methodologies to investigate the strengths multicompetent individuals, whose lives exist between languages and/or cultures, might be able to contribute to the social fabric. Her mission is to expand who is heard and can contribute to the disciplines as society demands professionals with backgrounds as diverse as the challenges we face. Greses’ scholarship advocates to include the rich trove of insights from multicompetent groups in
as being about experiences in engineering graduate education andincluded a link to a participation survey that included participation information and demographicsurvey items. Pseudonyms are used throughout to protect confidentiality. Participants wereoffered the opportunity to select a pseudonym; for those that declined, the authors randomlyassigned pseudonyms. A social constructivist approach guided the development of the interview protocol andanalysis of interviews [32]. The interview protocol began with day-to-day experiences to allowparticipants to describe their experiences without priming them to discuss discrimination or biasexperiences. Participants described their typical day, and the interviewer asked follow-upquestions to
component isthe one where the student receives the information in real time, this can be face-to-face or virtual[9], [23]. The difference with the asynchronous component is that it imparts knowledge throughvideos or readings without the teacher being in real time with the students. The video presentedby the teacher can be recorded by the teacher or by someone else. The individual and groupassignments are used to reinforce the knowledge learned through tasks in which they are put intopractice.The versatility of the BFL is reflected in how it adapts to different situations that may arise in aclassroom. In the past, if for some reason it was impossible to attend the classroom, it was a lostday of learning. Furthermore, thanks to technological advances
- instructional strategies for engaging this student population inneering education requires a new approach to student learning. technical areas that address cybersecurity issues.Students learn best when they are actively involved in the learningprocess. The concept of gamification is an emerging alternative An effective strategy for engaging minority populationsapproach that adds game elements to traditional instruction, in cyber areas is implementing active learning methods inengaging students in learning engineering concepts. In recent the classroom. Research has shown that minority studentsyears, capture-the-flag competitions is a gamification approach experience huge benefits when instructors incorporate moreto
widelydispersed global teams. Manufacturing likewise is typically multi-locational or outsourced tocountries in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, or all of the above. To stay in business,companies must be prepared to go to the market wherever it is. To remain innovative andcompetitive, they must seek out and cultivate the best talent worldwide to develop andmanufacture the best products at the most efficient cost, regardless of location.iIf American engineers are to be competitive in this global scenario, they must not only beequipped with cutting edge technical skills and knowledge, but also with cutting edge personaland communication skills for collaboration across nations, continents, languages and cultures.They must be informed, flexible, mobile
. S., “Membrane projects with an industrial focus in the curriculum,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 1, 2003.19 Pekula, N., B. Kuritz, J. Hearne, A. J. Marchese, and R. P. Hesketh, "The Effect of Ambient Temperature, Humidity, and Engine Speed on Idling Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks," 2003 Transactions, Vol. 112, Section 4, Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, pages 148-158.20 Newell, J. A., S. H. Farrell, R. P. Hesketh, and C. Stewart Slater, Introducing Emerging Technologies into the Curriculum through a Multidisciplinary Research Experience,” Chemical Engineering Education 35(4) 296 Fall 2001.21 Savelski M. J., Bagajewicz M. "On the Use of Linear Models for the Design of Water Utilization Systems in Refineries and
University of Saint Thomas and his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota.Mr. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University Experienced Systems Engineer with a demonstrated history of working in the electrical and electronic manufacturing field. Highly skilled in Embedded Devices, Software Engineering, and Electronics. Ex- tremely motivated and self-reliant with a great believe in autonomy, new ways to solve problems and ROWE approaches. Team player and devoted to create superb working environments through dedication and team culture. Strong information technology professional with two MSc’s and working on a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Electrical Engineering from North Dakota
Adult Intelligence Test across male and female samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 91–104.[15]Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16(11), 841–45.[16] Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A., (2010). Why so few? Women in science, engineering technology and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.[17] Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta- analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–98.[18]Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability
students from the University of Liberia and the University of Michigan in collaboration with the Society of Women Engineers and the University of Michigan. She is also working on an engineering education research project – Towards a global network of women engineers, as part of her endeavors in Liberia.Dr. Aline Cotel, University of MichiganElizabeth Frances Cloos Dreyer, University of Michigan Elizabeth Dreyer is a 4th year Electrical Engineering – Optics doctoral student at the University of Michi- gan in Ann Arbor, MI. She graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering in 2012 from Michigan Technological University in Houghton, MI. She is particularly interested in Optics & Photonics and the
Digital Platforms Editor for the Journal of Engineering Studies. Qin’s research interests include the cultural foundations of engineering ethics, global engineering education, and ethics and policy of emerging technologies such as robotics and nanotechnology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Ethics by the Dose: Medical Treatment Metaphor for Ethics in Engineering EducationAbstractDeveloping effective ethics training for engineers is an important but challenging proposition.When engineering educators teach ethics, we hope we are doing so in ways that will havepowerful effects for our students: not just familiarizing them with tools they can use to
provide 24 volts for ourloads.Providing backup power source In case of an emergency or lack of sufficient solar radiation, the Learning Bargeelectrical design incorporates a 11.5 KW Quiet Diesel model MDKBM AC(alternating current) generator that provides sufficient energy to run two high power bilgepumps as well as supplying power to the system. The MDKBM generator is capable ofdelivering 95.5 Amps of current at 120 Volts at 60 Hz. The AC generator is connected tothe main electrical system via an AC to DC converter. In order to supply enough currentto charge our battery system we used a converter. The VSCP-2K4 is a 2400 Watt AC-DCconverter that accepts 120/240 Volt AC and outputs over a wide range of voltages andcurrents.Final design
Pittsburgh. Dr. Altman specializes in optimization algorithms, formal language theory, complex systems and engineering educationProf. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver Katherine Goodman is an associate teaching professor at the University of Colorado Denver in the College of Engineering, Design, and Computing. She also serves as the University’s Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She has served as program chair and division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) Division.Dr. Heather Lynn Johnson Heather Lynn Johnson is a mathematics educator who
. Finally, the teams focus on the development of an overall vision of the company,describing the company growth goal, and the strategies for achieving this goal (strategies inproduct design, manufacturing, marketing, etc.). They also address product distribution anddelivery methods, use of information technology, and financial issues (best and worst casescenarios in sales vs. expenses projections). The primary challenge faced by the students preparing the outline of business strategies fortheir potential company is the fact that it is a start-up venture. Therefore, even though they maybe fairly familiar on how to design a typical manufacturing facility, development of a strategythat deals with limited resources available for a start-up
alongitudinal study. By understanding the effect of active learning implementation on thisdepartment, we can better understand the potential for curriculum improvement across allengineering disciplines.IntroductionThe field of chemical engineering has consistently transformed and evolved over time to addressthe novel needs presented in society. From its beginnings in the petrochemical industry to currentapplications in nanotechnology, clean energy, and biomolecular engineering, chemicalengineering has emerged as a discipline at the forefront of technological and industrialadvancement [1], [2]. Despite the ease and swiftness at which the field has evolved its contenttowards novel applications, similar evolution in chemical engineering pedagogy is
paper, were assessed in anactivity undertaken as part of the College of Engineering’s Emerging Engineering LeadersDevelopment (EELD) program [12] developed in conjunction with the Fanning Institute forLeadership Development at the University of Georgia.Another input metric analyzed in this study was project preference. Students’ project preferenceswere gathered using a bidding platform where students were able to view project information andbid on projects. The bidding function is included in a web-based project management softwareapplication where teams can also communicate with clients, course instructors, teachingassistants, and each other, log hours, track budgets, share files, and submit project deliverables.After evaluating the projects
about who their customer is, what needs the customerhas, and how to meet them. In other words, they are developing an entrepreneurial mindset [2].In order to meet this shift in societal thinking, the importance of exposure to engineering [3] andentrepreneurship earlier in education increases. In this study, Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) Pre-Service Teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an engineering educationcourse where they completed an entrepreneurial Problem-Based Learning (PBL) unit. ThroughPSTs’ reflections, post-assessments, and lesson plans, we gathered their perceptions regardingthe integration of entrepreneurial mindset within their content and future teaching. The researchquestions we investigated are: 1
1960's for water desalination, reverse osmosis is employed in many industriesfor wastewater treatment and minimization; water reuse and material recovery; and for ultrapurewater production. For more information on the subject the reader is referred to several otherpublications (Rautenbach and Albrecht[12]; Mulder[13]; Ho and Sirkar[14]). Related laboratory andcourse development in membrane technology can be found in Slater and Paccione[15],Slater et al.[16], Hollein et al.[17], Slater [18, 19, 20].Experimental DemonstrationThe experimental demonstration uses either a Survivor® model 06 or 35 reverse osmosis system(Figure 2) manufactured by PUR , adivision of Recovery Engineering, Inc.,Minneapolis, MN. The differencebetween the two units
philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, and women in engineering. Page 23.1201.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Four Pillars of Manufacturing as a Tool for Evaluating Course Content in the Mechanical Concentration of a General Engineering CurriculumAbstractThe four pillars of manufacturing have been developed as a framework to promote understandingof the ideal content of an undergraduate program in manufacturing engineering. It has beenproposed that the four pillars could also provide direction for enhancing the content of
advanced electrochemical, optical, and MEMS devices. A champion of diversity and equity in engineering education, Dr. Yung has designed innovative curricula that integrate project-based learning, hands-on activities, and peer collaboration. He is a strong advocate for incorporating disability perspectives in biomedical engineering, aiming to train a generation of engineers who are equipped to tackle accessibility challenges in healthcare technology. Dr. Yung’s commitment to STEM outreach is evidenced by his extensive work with underrepresented K-12 students in Central New York. Through various programs, including those at La Casita Cultural Center and local schools, he has fostered a love for science and engineering in
students whoself-reported a disability to the study did not report to their instructors or school.Digital note-taking has been increasingly implemented and studied in higher education for itspotential to further develop universal design for learning (UDL) techniques to benefit all students[3]. Accessibility for SWD with such technology is recognized as a best practice [3–6].Engineering education researchers have previously reported that SWD preferred searchablelecture video with transcriptions for the content delivery compared with students withoutdisabilities (SWOD) [4]. Furthermore, reported student interviews in the past showed all studentsin a course benefited from multiple modalities of content delivery in online learning [3–5].However
these institutional barrierscontribute to higher turnover rates among faculty of Color, many of whom leave academia due toa lack of support and the prevalence of exclusionary practices [6]. These experiences andexclusion from informal academic networks contribute to professional burnout and a reducedsense of self-efficacy in enacting institutional change [16]. In order to counter these persistentnegative experiences of faculty of Color, changes in policy and practice are needed to disruptthese inequitable environments.Cluster Hires and Mentorship for Faculty of ColorTo advance DEIB initiatives and increase the representation of underrepresented facultymembers (e.g., ethnicity, race, gender identity), universities have begun implementing
Program, a living-learning commu- nity where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 What’s in a Name? General, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated Engineering ProgramsAbstractThis study explored differences and similarities among undergraduate engineering programsnamed general, engineering, interdisciplinary, and integrated. Benchmarking these non-specialtyprograms was conducted using information from course
Paper ID #38592Strengthening the STEM Pipeline from High School to University forEngineering IntrapreneursDr. Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Texas Tech UniversityDr. Tim Dallas, Texas Tech University Tim Dallas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Dal- lasˆa C™ research includes developing educational technologies for deployment to under-served regions of the world. His research group has developed MEMS-based ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Strengthening the STEM Pipeline from High School to University for Engineering
efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
theirdisciplinary training when making judgments about project selection and research trajectories.This risk and intended payoff was discussed in class, especially in the first few weeks of thesemester, during which time the instructor set the tone of the course around student-led inquiry.Students and Student Feedback: A total of 16 students enrolled in Sustainable Design Politicsand Culture, 10 of whom were engineering and information technology students, 5 architectureand design students, and 1 science student. All students were seniors with the exception of 2sophomores, both of whom were engineering majors. Exactly half of the students were womenand half were men. Only one student was visibly from an under-represented minority group
Engineering and Technology (ABET) EngineeringCriteria 2000, “engineering programs must be designed to prepare graduates for the practice ofengineering at a professional level”1. This statement can be interpreted as requiring more thansimply imparting in students a basic understanding of content knowledge in a particular domain. Astechnology continues to advance rapidly it will become more difficult to equip engineeringundergraduates with the knowledge and skills required in the workplace. Thus, while engineeringprograms must continue to cover as much content knowledge as possible, engineering programsmust also take an active role in developing the abilities of their graduates to successfully apply andextend the content knowledge that they have
national levels. He has served as Chapter Chairman, Public Policy Officer, Membership Chair, and Council Member. He as also served as the Deputy Director of Public Policy for Region II, and as a member of the AIAA’s Technical Commit- tee for Aircraft Design. He is a charter member of the Gulfstream Management Association, a member of the Engineering Advisory Committee for Mississippi State University, a past member of Georgia Institute of Technologies Aerospace System Design Lab Advisory Board, and a past member of Georgia Southern Universities Science and Technology Advisory Board.Dr. Frank Simmons III P.E., Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Frank Simmons III, Ph.D., P.E., is the Structures Staff Scientist - Technical
experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University Cheryl Cass is a teaching assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University where she has served as the Director of Undergraduate Programs since 2011. Her research focuses on the intersection of science and engineering identity in post-secondary and graduate