that students are self-guided through partof the instruction. Lastly, class time is organized in such a way that the instructor spends overhalf of the time working directly with individuals and small groups. This gives the students anopportunity to have explanations individually catered to their level of understanding, as well asplenty of time for peer and instructor assistance with debugging.The course initially ran under the new model in Spring, 2013. The course ran for 15 weeks andhad 37 students split into two different sections. There were no teaching assistants. Feedbackfrom the students indicated that they benefitted greatly from the course design. Improvementsfor the second iteration of the new course model, which will occur in Spring
University.10. King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). “Developing Reflective Judgement: Understanding and PromotingIntellectual Growth and Critical Thinking In Adolescents And Adults.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.11. Riley, D. (2008). “Ethics in Context, Ethics in Action: Getting Beyond The Individual Professional inEngineering Ethics Education”. Smith College. American Society for Engineering Education.12. Dyrud, M. A. (2005). “Ethics 101”. Oregon Institute of Technology. Proceedings of the 2005 American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Herkert, J. R. (2000). “Engineering Education in the USA: Content, Pedagogy, and Curriculum.” EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, 25 (4), pp. 303-313.14. Barry B., and
, harnessing the value of developingintervention programs that are deeply integrated in a scale that accommodates diverse student participants,and developing programs that have interdisciplinary scopes with room for inclusivity. It is also ofimportance to note that there are culture gaps in the learning pedagogy of today’s students such that it is ofsignificance to connect the education of the students to the local community and for K-12 education systemto transition to project-based learning.1. IntroductionThe premise of convening a workshop to highlight the strategies to improve student engagement byenhancing the curriculum of engineering education draws on Linus Pauling’s suggestion, that, “To have agood idea you must first have lots of ideas.” [1
Experiments Planinstruction. The first phase involves assessment for all courses through a collective PeerEvaluation of Course Effectiveness at the end of the semester when a class has been offered. Inaddition to course-level assessment, program assessment is incorporated into one or the MEProgram Outcomes: Mechanical Engineering graduates can measure physical quantities and canplan, conduct, analyze and evaluate experiments. This program outcome is measured usingseveral metrics and is reviewed on an annual basis.The integrated structure of the Design of Experiments Plan provides a framework for buildingupon previous lab work, assessing student progress, and adjusting lab coverage based on priorassessments to assure that graduates of the program are
highlighted areas to improve to save students time inimplemented activities. The latter could be due to the course's implementation during theCOVID-19 pandemic, i.e., through synchronous distance education. Finally, the course alsohelped students reflect on their degree choices by making them solve problems they would nothave faced if they did not take the course.Keywords: challenge-based learning, higher education, educational innovation, competency-based education, integrated course.IntroductionAn integrated globalized world, new competencies demanded by the job market, new educationalmodels, and technological advances challenge universities to reflect on the social concerns aboutthe effectiveness of traditional higher education. Our institution, a
when ethics and consideration of the social impactsof engineering are addressed through courses that are distinct from engineering courses “. . . theywill occupy a marginalized position in engineering education and sociotechnical thinking willnot be seen as integral to “real” engineering” [3]. Hess and Fore (2018) state that humanities,ethics, and engineering should be interwoven so they are considered simultaneously during theentire design process by using “micro-insertions” of ethics rather than large units or distinctcourses [4].Riley [5] provided one of the first “roadmaps” for engineers to study the intersection of socialjustice/peace and engineering. Many others are now working to develop curriculum to bridgethese two seemingly
Beginning Designers,” vol. 138, no. 10, p. 101108, 2016, doi: 10.1115/1.4034087.[14] Y.-S. Chang, Y.-H. Chien, K.-C. Yu, Y.-H. Chu, and M. Y. Chen, “Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students,” vol. 19, pp. 112–122, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003.[15] “Chindogu.” https://chindogu.com/ics (accessed Dec. 28, 2023).[16] Biomimicry Institute, “Introduction- What is Biomimicry?,” 2023. https://toolbox.biomimicry.org/introduction/ (accessed Dec. 28, 2023).[17] K. C. Tsai, “Facilitating creativity in adult learners through brainstorming and play,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2013.[18] A. Tero, et al., “Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design,” vol. 327, no. 5964, pp. 439–442, 2010, doi: 10.1126/science
attitudes of a licensure applicant would be through anassessment by a supervising professional engineer. The state of California requires fourreferences that must rate an engineering applicant’s technical competency, judgment andintegrity among other characteristics.31 In North Carolina references must rate an applicant’sintegrity and ethical behavior32 and in Oklahoma applicants must be technically competent andof good character as attested by at least five references.33Thurstone was one of the pioneers in the measurement of attitudes. He wrote that attitudes are a“complex affair” and one must take care in assessing them.34 Thurstone’s methods formeasuring attitudes used a simple agree/disagree scale. This approach involves two main stages.The
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six phil- anthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education
September 24, 2013.2 https://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/our-board-of-directors/asee-board-of-directors-statements/diversity3 EAGER: Promoting LGBTQ Equality in Engineering through Virtual Communities of Practice.NSF EEC-1539140. S. Farrell, PI; A. Minerick, E. Cech, R. C. Guerra, & T. Waidzunas, co-PIs.4 Stephanie Farrell, “Climate Change: LGBTQ Inclusion in Engineering.” Seminar given at WPI.October 25, 2017. 1to our most pressing social, civic and ethical problems.”5 Although socially progressivescholarship is not new —it dates back to John Dewey’s work in the 1920s— it constitutesa sea change in engineering education, which is
, ABET criteria a ... k. The information thereby generated is used tofurther develop the academic programs.2.3 The Co-op Program in the College of EngineeringAs stated above, the co-op program is mandatory for all undergraduates in the College ofEngineering and College of Applied Science. The co-op program involves approximately 200quarter credit hours of courses and six quarters of work experience distributed over five years.During the winter quarter of 2001, 1165 engineering students participated in the co-op program.Table 1 shows the breakdown of these students by department. Employers were drawn from 32states and 8 foreign countries. These employers included 698 companies from the State of Ohio(74%), 454 companies from other states (25
engineering students were unable to finish their courses due to impacts of the pandemic.The University of California, United States of America, conducted an extensive survey ofengineering students in the Spring of 2020 to assess the impact of online learning through thepandemic. This study looked at access to internet, hardware, software, printer, computer,webcam, study space, instructors and student perceptions of their engagement, disconnection andfatigue [3]. They reported that 7.6 % of undergraduate student expected to delay graduation dueto the pandemic. The national US survey of undergraduate students showed a significantreduction in course satisfaction with 19% of students extremely satisfied with their coursecompared to 51%pre-pandemic [4
: Scribner. 2001.[14] Semiconductor Industry Association. Industry statistics. 2013, http://www.semiconductors.org/[15] E. Marek, C. Cowan, & A. Cavallo. “Students misconceptions about diffusion - how can theybe eliminated,” American Biology Teacher, 56(2), 74-77. 1994.[16] G. M. Sinatra, S. K. Brem and E. M. Evans, "Changing Minds? Implications of Conceptual Change forTeaching and Learning about Biological Evolution," Evolution: Education and Outreach, vol. 1, pp. 189-195, 2008.[17] M. Resnick. Beyond the centralized mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 1-22.1996[18] P. Blikstein and U. Wilensky, "An Atom is Known by the Company it Keeps: A Constructionist LearningEnvironment for Materials Science Using Agent-Based Modeling
outcome of education1,2. Many recent studieshave attempted to clarify how innovation occurs by investigating the personal characteristics3,4,processes5,6, and environments7 that support and align with innovation. While these studies oftensuggest certain core facets, they also describe innovation as a diverse phenomenon with manypotential pathways. For example, Ferguson and colleagues3 identified 20 characteristics ofengineering innovators through an iterative, qualitative approach. They noted that while expertsreached strong consensus on the comprehensive list of characteristics, there is likely substantialvariation in the characteristics among individual engineering innovators. Dyer, Gregersen, andChristensen4 made similar observations in a
Kirton’sadaptor-innovator) more frequently described their CPS process to be non-linear, more complex,random and contiguous. Their process contained more stages and multiple end points. Adaptorswere more likely to go through the process in a linear, orderly, and targeted fashion with fewerstages17.Beyond an observable process, creativity can be described as a multifaceted ability found invarious amounts in everyone20. Herman21 argues that “Each person’s experience of creativity isso unique and individual that no one can formulate a definition that fits everyone.” Therefore,Klukken et al.1 suggest that we should focus on identifying and developing an individual’screative potential. Prof. Carlos Santamarina of Georgia Tech who has written about and
Paper ID #17627What does it take? Getting Freshmen to Read the Material Before ClassDr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye started teaching in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Northern Arizona University in 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests in- clude biotechnology for environmental issues, engineering education and
results (particularly Figure 4) support thefinding that even partial implementation of ETT can result in an improved teamwork experiencefor the students in the context of this study, both in terms of their perception of psychologicalsafety and their perception of how well their team embodied good teamwork practices.References[1] K. K. Wobbe and E. A. Stoddard, Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[2] Folk-Williams, John, “How Diversity Improves Collaborative Problem-Solving – Cross Collaborate,” Sep. 01, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220901160838/http://www.crosscollaborate.com/2010/05/div ersity-improves-collaborative-problem-solving/ (accessed Sep. 01, 2022).[3] D
of engineering education. In G. L. Downey & K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA.: Morgan and Claypool.Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Hompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), Article 1, 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1Knight, D., & Sullivan, J., & Louie, B. (2007, June), Expanding Understanding of First Year Engineering Student Retention and Team Effectiveness Through Social Styles Assessment Paper presented at 2007 Annual
, lab, and textbook (For example, Arora, 2018). Third, Python’s versatility andwidespread use beyond the ME academic program is attractive to students as more and more jobpostings list knowledge of Python as a skill that a qualified candidate should have. Fourth, andalso significant for the ‘downstream’ effects on ME 106, there are now options for programmingmicrocontrollers directly in Python (Bell, 2017; Plamauer & Langer, 2017; Tollervey, 2017;George, et. al., 2016; Rembor, n.d.).Making the switch to PythonThe switch to Python in the fall of 2018 in ME 30 was complicated, in part because of theintegration of hardware (the Arduino) in the lab component of the course AND the need toalmost simultaneously make major changes in ME 106 (which
, displaying an investment of the entire family in thesesessions. Relationships through the DREAAM organization seemed to also be related to onlineparticipation decisions. Some student participants seemed more hesitant to interact withuniversity students and staff than with the staff and families of the organization. The role ofrelationships stretched beyond family to also include broader community relationships.Engineering Understanding: In pre-surveys and early session discussions with the students,when asked what an engineer does, students mostly provided a generic description of someonewho builds things like buildings, bridges, and rockets. By the end of the year in interviews andsurveys, the students were able to identify the role of different
not provide opportunities forstudents to work in interdisciplinary teams. As a result, students tend to lack the confidence (atthe end of their bachelor’s degree) that they are capable of tackling the complex problems, whichsociety currently faces. If students are educated in engineering departments, then they also oftenlack the scientific approach to problem solving required that goes far beyond simply applyingexisting equations, but requires acts of creativity10, 11. There is therefore a need to educatestudents on scientific and creative approaches to solve hydrological and environmental problems.Additional issues are relevant if the hydrology education takes place in an engineeringdepartment. In a typical undergraduate class in water
actions. Also, there can be a phenomenological or direct researchmethodology, involving a stronger focus on the individuals’ natural reaction to a situation andespecially with reference to subjective thoughts or actions. The net contention of both methodshere is to describe the situation of the world at hand through either human knowing (direct) orbeing (indirect). As an example, a type of research that would benefit greatly from an indirect orexistential analysis is teaming research in engineering education and beyond. For instance, manyworks on team formation attempt to measure individual team member’s potential for successfulteam integration.(31-32) The underlying assumption behind such teaming research is that there aremetrics that
therefore did not necessarily consider senior design exhaustively. For example,student C only listed a single course for each outcome LOA. Only 2 of 24 outcomes were ratedby one or more students as not being addressed to at least some extent in the senior designcourse: mathematics and humanities. Mathematics was excluded, per the commentary of StudentE, due to the fact that she did not use math through differential equations on her design project.Eight outcomes were achieved to the desired bachelor’s LOA; 12 outcomes may be achieved to aLOA beyond that required for the B.S. degree; and 2 outcomes were achieved to some extent butbelow that which is desired in a B.S. degree. This indicates that a single course can achieve awide range of objectives
classes: is it effective? Chem Educ Res Pract. 2015;16(1):179-186.11. Tomory A, Watson SL. Flipped classrooms for advanced science courses. J Sci Educ Technol. 2015;24(6):875-887.12. Leo J, Puzio K. Flipped instruction in a high school science classroom. J Sci Educ Technol. 2016;25(5):775-781.13. Olakanmi EE. The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. J Sci Educ Technol. 2017;26(1):127-137.14. Roehl A, Reddy SL, Shannon GJ. The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. J Fam Consum Sci. 2013;105(2):44- 49.15. Baepler P, Walker JD, Driessen M. It’s not about seat time: Blending
exist in our day to day lives. If examples are provided, they are commonlyapplications that are still beyond the everyday experience of our students, e.g. bending of beamsin a loaded building versus bending of a skateboard carrying a rider. Educational studies indicatethat learning and understanding are enhanced if the learner can tie new concepts to existingknowledge, especially knowledge they have gained experientially. To promote improved studentperformance and retention, NSF’s Research on Gender in Science and Engineering fundedENGAGE to increase college and university use of three research strategies found to improveoutcomes for all students but particularly for female students. One of these strategies is theincorporation of Everyday
shown in testswith increased scores compared to students who follow traditional text book learning [3]. Gamesappear to be effective teaching tools for concepts that require repetition for proficiency [4], andshould be used as supplements that encourage students to understand and enjoy learning [5].The goal of this research effort is to go beyond the development or use of games in theclassroom. Our objective is to investigate and design a game-aided pedagogy to improvestudents’ learning outcomes and engagement in transportation engineering. We propose a cyclicapproach to design and implement games into the curriculum of several transportation courses,and assess their values. The results of our analysis will be used to enhance the games
environments, Miles notes that creating and utilizing these immersivespaces is “driven by a desire to incorporate as much richness, detail, depth, and subtlety aspossible in order to give an individual experiencing the environment the sensation of beingtotally immersed”.9Incorporating virtually immersive academic workspaces for virtual student teams, especially foran online project management course, can provide significant opportunities for both students andfacilitators.10,11 Beyond the virtual technologies however, it is also important for academics toclearly outline the team structure, processes, and roles, in order to reduce ambiguity and align
cope with rapidlychanging industries [7]. The ability of construction professionals to create or design sustainablebuildings is closely related to the skills, knowledge, and ability students acquire in the subjectduring the education process [13]. There is a growing movement to transform our educationalsystem to prepare students better to live in and address this changing world [12].This study helps to analyze architecture and construction students’ knowledge of sustainabledesign and construction and what role education plays in the perception of sustainableconstruction. The survey is evaluated through quantitative and qualitative data analysis tosupport these aims.MethodologyIn this study, the researchers surveyed architecture and
or EthnicityIntroductionThe lack of diversity and inclusiveness in the engineering workforce and engineering collegeprograms has long been well documented and studied in the engineering education community1.It is not a new problem, and beyond the very real personal and human toll this circumstancetakes on individual members of those underrepresented groups (both Women and minorities),collectively society suffers by losing out on a vast pool of talent that could lead to betterengineered solutions For example, the new Apple Health app tracks a person’s weight, allergies,medications, even the steps they take each day… but not a woman’s period, which is a glaringomission when you consider that the 1st question a woman gets each time she sees a
14.907.2Background of Program For four years, Taylor University’s HARP program has been providing students withthe opportunity apply their technical science and math instruction to interesting and relevantproblems. The unique experience of a high-altitude balloon launch, including team-basedproblem solving, prototyping, construction and testing of experimentation, and the “hard”deadline of a launch, gives students a taste of real-world project experience, and has helpedTaylor students be competitive as they pursue education and career goals beyond theundergraduate level. A student participant in the HARP curriculum component of a 2006Introduction to Electronics class said, “Working on the balloon project was an excellentopportunity to put theory