Paper ID #19474Connecting Design Doing to Design LearningProf. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. He holds a BSE from Duke University and an MSME and PhD from Georgia Tech, all in mechanical engineering. His professional interests include engineering design, engineering education, and the environment. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Connecting Design Doing to Design LearningAbstractPrior work shows that doing design does not
helpful. However, none of these studies will help faculty members clearly understand howsubtle, but collectively massive, discrepancies construct environments that lead to imbalances.What is required is a culture change where culture is not a static entity, but a continuouslyevolving phenomenon based upon emerging consensus, derived both explicitly and tacitly fromthe people in the culture as they interact with the environment as described by Seel: Organizational culture is an emergent result of continuing negotiations about values, meanings and properties between the members of that organization and with its environment. In other words, culture is the result of all the daily conversations and negotiations between the members of
: Student Perspectives of the Intervention Related to Ethical DevelopmentLooking across the coded segments, thematic patterns emerged that elucidated connectionsbetween the intervention, learning environment, and understanding of ESI. The most salientpatterns across the three course types related to 1) Facilitating Self-guided and CollaborativeLearning, 2) Understanding Engineering in the Societal Context, and 3) Creating a ComfortableEnvironment.Facilitating Self-guided and Collaborative LearningThis theme from the focus group data was informed by findings related to “autonomy” and“relatedness.” Students in all three focus groups discussed how the format of the interventionfacilitated learning through opportunities to conduct individual research
settings. As noted above,after the initial analysis using the a priori codes, the data were reexamined to extract patterns.This thematic analysis drew connections between the codes and transcripts to better understandhow the 4DDD constructs manifested and interacted in the data. This second phase of theanalysis informed the development of the themes presented in this section.RQ1: Student Perspectives of the Intervention Related to Ethical DevelopmentLooking across the coded segments, thematic patterns emerged that elucidated connectionsbetween the intervention, learning environment, and understanding of ESI. The most salientpatterns across the three course types related to 1) Facilitating Self-guided and CollaborativeLearning, 2) Understanding
Engineering Edu- cation (iFoundry). The mission of iFoundry is to change radically the learning experiences of engineering students. Dr. Price was the Founding Director of the Illinois Leadership Center from 2002-2006. The Center’s mission is to encourage leadership development among Illinois students by providing opportunities to learn and then apply leadership skills. Dr. Price initiated the Technology Entrepreneur Center in 1999 to support scientist and engineering en- trepreneurs in the development and growth of new businesses. Through education, the Center prepares students to start and grow companies. Through a network of support, the Center surrounds entrepreneurs with a success environment that includes
Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she
necessary to support their growing populations.2 The effectivemanagement of the urban infrastructure that supports large cities requires personnel with highlyrefined technical and analytical skills as well as insight into leadership models that can guide andpromote the changes required to implement sound resource management.Five primary challenges to the urban environment are3: • the demographic challenge of a dynamic, rapidly growing population; • the socioeconomic challenge associated with the effects of social and economic inequalities of resource distribution; • the technological challenge associated with the increased complexity associated with both existing and new infrastructure management systems; • the
AC 2011-224: NUE (EEC): INTEGRATING NANODEVICE DESIGN, FAB-RICATION, AND ANALYSIS INTO THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSantosh Devasia, University of Washington Santosh Devasia is the Principal Investigator of a recently funded grant from the NSF Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE) Program, Grant # EEC 1042061; the proposed educational efforts under this NUE grant are described in this paper. Santosh Devasia received the B.Tech. (Hons) from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, in 1988, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara in 1990 and 1993 respectively. He is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Depart- ment
over a period of five semesters. In addition, course enrollment has risen. Retentionof students (including diversity of retained students) will be evaluated when sufficient data areavailable.IntroductionAdvances in chip design and a large community of developers have resulted in relatively cheaphardware platforms with a plethora of software libraries for emerging Internet-of-Things (IoT)technology. Given the market demand and the large application domains that can benefit fromIoT, having skills to implement such systems will be valuable for the Electrical and ComputerEngineers of tomorrow.Many recently developed courses implement smart devices (microcontrollers and single-boardcomputers) that can sense inputs, make decisions, and actuate
research.Literature reviewWhile there are many factors that contribute to gender and racial inequality in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) settings, the following research focused onsocial marginalization and the intersectionality of women of color in engineering [5]. As womenenter engineering programs in pursuit of degree attainment, they may feel unwelcome, lackprogram support, and encounter negative gender stereotypes. Women of color face additionalchallenges outside of gender such as experiences with prejudice, discrimination, and differencesin cultural values and socialization [3] that may hinder their confidence and effect their pursuit ofan engineering degree [7].Women of color attending predominantly White institutions (PWIs
the graphic entities. Advances in the development of computer hardware made largermemory and greater computational capacities possible, allowing CAD systems to migrate frommainframe computers to minicomputers, then workstations, desktops, and laptops. 3D wireframemodels soon followed the 2D capabilities in the late 1960s. Though this was a noticeableimprovement on 2D CAD systems, it lacked many practical attributes such as surfaces ofphysical objects. Hence 3D surface modeling technologies emerged in the early 1970s. Surfacemodels are essentially wireframe models modified by covering their faces, but with the insideempty. Real objects are solids, though some may have cavities. Being able to create solid modelsthus attracted and still attracts
, believing, with other people and with variousobjects, tools, and technologies, so as to enact specific socially recognizable identities engaged inspecific socially recognizable activities” (p. 155). Thus, Discourse gives students their sense ofself, what they do, and how they must act every day to fit in a particular culture (i.e.,engineering).Discourses are socially situated identities and highly influence the social context in whichknowledge and certain practices materialize. Discourses influence how individuals practice andengage in different activities, including engineering. Based on Gee’s [11] definition ofDiscourse, engineering can be described not only as a cognitive process but also as part of alarger engineering Discourse that is not
Conference, Worcester, MA, March 2006.10) O’Connor, K., “Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a geographically distributed situated learning project,” Linguistics & Education, 12, 285-308, 2001.11) Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M., “The support of autonomy and the control of behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037, 1987.12) Eccles, J.S., “Studying Gender and Ethnic Differences in Participation in Math, Physical Science, and Information Technology,” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 7-14, 2005.13) Seymour, E. and Hewitt, J. Talking about leaving: Why Undergraduates leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1997.14) Hacking, I., Rewriting the Soul
Paper ID #48115Enhancing engineering faculty implementation of inclusive pedagogy throughan inclusive excellence faculty development programDr. Renee M. Desing, University of Washington Dr. Renee Desing is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington. Her research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from The Ohio State University with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in
survey distributed to themembers of the engineering mechanics division, on the contexts in which the flipped classroomsare being implemented, the instructional design choices made by the instructors, the experiencesof the instructors in teaching these courses, and the lessons learned over time. By compiling thisinformation, the authors seek to present a number of different strategies to implement a flippedclassroom and provide advice to aspiring flipped classroom instructors on the design choices thatmay work best for their contexts.Literature Review:The idea of the flipped classroom has been around for many years, first emerging in the 1980’s[6] and gaining popularity in the US throughout the 1990’s and 2000’s [1], [7]. The central aspectof the
. Pseudonym Department Status Gender Previous Teaching Year in PhD Experience program Yan CS IGTA Male TA during Master's First program in the US Caiyu CS IGTA Male TA during Master’s First program in the US Mokbul CS IGTA Male Private tutor First (informal teaching
Session (2003-246) ABET and Engineering Laboratory Learning Objectives: A Study at Virginia Tech Karen R. Most, Michael P. Deisenroth, Ph.D. Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061In light of emerging simulated and remote engineering laboratory courses, the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has taken on the task of assessing whether thesenew courses can truly accomplish the goals of educational laboratories. The
Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, and the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity
) Educational Research team and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, Engagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Analyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Bryan W. Boudouris, Purdue University, West LafayetteProf. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process
Canadian universities. She has also taught leadership and teamwork courses at Northwestern University, where she is a Leadership Fellow. Prof. Sheridan holds a BASc and MASc in Mechani- cal Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Leadership Education. She has previously worked on large plant-design teams in industry, and on algorithms to develop co-operative multi-agent systems in robotics.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leading innovation and technology development
is also interested in student and faculty development. Elizabeth received a B.S. in civil engineering from Clemson University (Clemson, SC).Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, PMP, LEED-AP is the Associate Dean for Workforce Development in the Wertheim College of Engineering and a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research answers national calls for construction and civil engineering professionals to develop new competencies to navigate the changes of evolving work- force demographics, technology, and organizational structures. As director of the Simmons Research Lab, she researches
research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning.James D. Lehman, Purdue University Dr. James D. Lehman is a Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and the Director of the Discovery Learning Research Center at Purdue University. He is member of the leadership teams of two current NSF-funded projects, Science Learning through Engineer- ing Design (SLED) and Professional Development for Computer Science (PD4CS). He holds a B.S. and M.S. in biology and
incrementally be adapted bymodifying or designing new CTF challenges while preserving the gradual development of softskills that formulate the hacker mindset. This adaptability ensures that the course remainsvaluable, equipping students with relevant technical proficiency on a platform that is more easilymaintained by university staff. Overall, the modular design of this course prepares students totackle emerging challenges and technologies, ensuring they remain lifelong learners andeffective problem solvers in the field.A Familiar Tempo for Learning: the high-structure breakdown of curricular stagesIn each week of our course, we follow a three-step cycle of skill development designed toincrement the level of challenge while building a familiar tempo
Paper ID #12492Exploring Ethical Validation as a Key Consideration in Interpretive ResearchQualityDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in
engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foun-dation.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, NationalAcademies Press, 2004.2. National Science Board, Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education, National Science Foundation Re-port NSB-07-122, 2007.3. Bill Seil, “Design anywhere, build anywhere, work anywhere”, Boeing Frontiers, June 2005. Online at: (Re-trieved March 30th 2014: http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/june/ts_sf08.html)4. Bart H. M. Gerritsen, “How to Adapt Information Technology Innovations to Industrial Design and Manufactur
introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for a courses on Connecting Mathematics with Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design.Veronica Burrows, Arizona State University Veronica Burrows is Associate Director of the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology and Associate professor in the Department of Chemical & Materials Engineering at Arizona State University. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Drexel University and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Princeton
beneficial analysis stepcommented, “This shows the most information for the amount of work. If you understand thechart it can show (somewhat) most of the other information.” This student found the condensingtower calculation least beneficial and added the comment, “The tower is not very accurate anddoesn’t work well.”Finally a student noted that the equipment should have a method of viewing what is happeninginside the components. The student commented, “need see-through panels or cut-aways of amodel to see what is really happening inside. I would bet most students could not tell you whatthe turbine looks like and how it works. One needs to know how it works to understand theprocess.” It would therefore be useful for Turbine Technologies, Ltd. to
Paper ID #13227An Exploratory Study of the Role of Modeling and Simulation in Supportingor Hindering Engineering Students’ Problem Solving SkillsUzma Shaikh, Purdue University Uzma Shaikh is a Graduate Student in the Department of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. She is currently working as a Research Assistant in the field of Computer and Education Technology. Shaikh’s research focuses on using visual simulations along with scientific inquiry learning for understanding concepts related to unobservable macroscopic phenomena.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West
transferable to thetooling industry with the reverse also being true. However, each tool shop operates under aunique set of business, cultural, and economic circumstances requiring perhaps a customizedsolution. Performance monitoring information derived from this study must be incorporated intothe management courses associated with the engineering and engineering technology curriculum.The findings indicate that American tool shops are using a variety of methods including changein financial indicators, deliveries, and number of customers. Most tool shops used a monthlytimeframe for review and, for the most part, were confident that their measurements wereaccurate. In order to prepare graduates for manufacturing related engineering and