specific course without any consideration of how the concepts fit with thoseof other courses. The integrated approach to teaching engineering involves a “systems view” tothe curriculum. In this approach, one or more systems are presented to the students early in theirengineering program. Throughout their courses, the students are reminded of where they are inthe system. A specific example is discussed of how this approach is being used as a test casewith five courses in the electrical engineering curriculum at the United States Air ForceAcademy. The resulting improvement in student performance is also discussed.INTRODUCTIONThe typical undergraduate engineering student sees most of his or her courses as a collection offacts and formulas. Most
-term study abroad course through Mon- tana State University and an introduction to engineering education course at the Central New Mexico Community College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Comparative Approaches to Accessibility Education in the United States and RussiaAbstractDifferences in national contexts have led to uneven global development of transportation systemsthat are accessible to people with disabilities. The World Health Organization promotes theworldwide implementation of education and professional training programs to foster a mindsetsupportive of accessibility [1]. The education of future engineers is an essential component inthis
hasrecognized the need for more policy inclusion in the curriculum. However, it is difficult to addpolicy courses to the engineering and technology curricula firstly because these curricula arealready packed and secondly because there is a large variation in students’ interest in and priorknowledge of policy topics. Therefore, Purdue University has taken a flexible approach,providing students with a diversity of options to introduce policy knowledge. These optionsdiffer in their length, the instructional approaches used, the depth of coverage of the variouspolicy topics, and the range of content covered. This paper will take a case study approach,describing the options and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the various options
recruited over seventy Black and Hispanic graduate students in STEM areas of study to USF, and mentored them with fellowship and internship opportunities.BK Robertson, Alabama State University Associate Professor of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology Dept. of Biological Sciences Page 12.78.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Title of the Paper: A New Hybrid Laboratory Course Christens a Pipeline of Biology Students from Alabama State University to the University of South FloridaAbstractThe University of South Florida (USF) has
earns two degrees (an M.S. in engineering and an M.B.A. inbusiness, for example) in less time in the joint program than would be required if the studentcompleted the programs one at a time. This means engineering courses are taught byengineering faculty, and business courses by business faculty. Thus, in these other programs, itis left up to the student to integrate the subject matter between the two degrees.Our new approach was to design, develop, and deliver an integrated learning experiencewherever the input from our corporate partners suggested that was preferable. This meant thata faculty team consisting of one engineering professor and one business professor would worktogether to design an integrated learning component (course) for the
Paper ID #20953A Project Based Approach To Introduction To EngineeringDr. Rouzbeh Tehrani, Temple University Rouzbeh Tehrani is the graduate coordinator of the civil and environmental engineering department and an assistant professor at Temple University. He also serves as the co-chair of AEESP education committee. He has been involved in teaching and developing labs and teaching materials for several courses such as Introduction to Engineering, science GenEds, Environmental Chemistry and Microbiology, and Water Quality and Treatment since 2013.Dr. Mohammad F. Kiani, Temple UniversityDr. Evangelia Bellas , Temple
at the University of Utah. Current research interests include communication in nonprofit organizations, social support, communication across the curriculum, speaking and writing in the disciplines, and interdisciplinary collaboration.Bryan Stenquist, University of Utah Bryan Stenquist received his BSEE degree from the university of Utah in 2005 and is currently a Research Engineer at the University of Utah in charge of implementing hands-on project-based laboratories across the ECE curriculum. Page 11.777.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Integrated System-Level Design
2004, American Society for Engineering Educationcontrol. A cooperative development of an Automation, Data Acquisition and Control Laboratorywith National Instruments is being initiated to augment the efforts in the Thermodynamics lab.With this effort, WIT faculty hope to spread the technology throughout the lab curriculum andintroduce a new state of the art Laboratory. Table 1. Approximate costs of the Equipment. Equipment Approximate Costs Minilab - Turbo Jet Engine $35,000 Rankine Cycler $24,000 Exhaust System $35,000 10 Computers For Simulations
curriculum in engineeringmanagement at a university in the southeast United States. The program is being offeredprincipally at the graduate level, with some courses being offered at the dual level ofcompetency. The courses within the program are offered using the classroom instruction as wellas the online format of instruction.The program content utilizes the various ingredients of Industrial Engineering as well as basicmanagement science and its application to engineering. The newly developed program also takesadvantage of audio-visual media to facilitate instruction. The novel aspect of this program is thatdue to its basic nature, courses are being offered both in the classroom as well as online. Thisversatile approach makes the program highly
State University (OSU) switched from a quarter-based to semester-based system in2012. As part of this effort, the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)updated its curriculum in Power Electronics, Power Systems, and Motor Control to incorporatethe approaches listed above. The culmination of this effort was the Power Electronics and Motor Page 24.935.4Drives Laboratory, which implemented an alternative style of teaching referred to as an OpenSpace Laboratory. The following paper discusses the equipment that was built and the industrycollaborations that helped make this lab possible. Additionally, details about the “Open Space
AC 2001-885: The Role of the Lecturer in the New Learning StrategiesBonnie Osif,Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community CollegeMark Maughmer,Renata Engel, Pennsylvania State UniversityRichard Gilbert, Page 6.1035.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2001 Session 2457 The Role of the Lecturer in the New Learning Strategies Marilyn Barger, Renata Engel, Richard Gilbert, Mark Maughmer and Bonnie Osif University of South Florida/ Penn State/ University of South Florida
2016 ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference Mechatronics at BYU: A New Course for Undergraduate Mechanical Engineers Mark B. Colton and Timothy W. McLain Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young UniversityAbstract In Fall 2015 a required mechatronics course was introduced in the Department of MechanicalEngineering at Brigham Young University as part of a broader curriculum redesign. The courseis designed to prepare students to develop smart, microcontroller-enabled products and work ininterdisciplinary teams on projects involving mechanical hardware, electronics, and software.Although mechatronics courses often
student population,students who are with the military, students who have families and all other which are non-traditional students who do not live on campus. In this paper, embedding online based learningstrategies into the classroom efforts in Engineering Technology department at one midsizeinstitution is discussed. Introduction A variety of teaching methods which have been designed and implemented in last centuryare relying on the basic principles of Socratic Method which focused on curriculum directed andteacher directed teaching and learning methodology (Fischer, 2015). Recent development ininstruction methods have led to the implementation of slightly different approach which engagesthe teacher in the conversation with students
AC 2010-2155: HANDS-ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING EDUCATION – ABLENDED APPROACHMarie-Pierre Huguet, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Marie-Pierre Huguet has been a course developer at Rensselaer since 2001. As such, she has been providing support and guidance in instructional design and instructional technologies to Rensselaer faculty who either seek to integrate emerging technologies into their face-to-face classroom, or teach Web-based or blended/hybrid courses. Dr. Huguet received her Ph. D. in Curriculum and Instruction at the University at Albany. For the past eight years, both at Rensselaer and SUNY Albany, she has been involved in several research projects that have looked at the
AC 2012-3740: ENGINEERING IN SUMMER CAMPS: TAPPING THEPOTENTIALDr. Thomas Shepard, University of Saint ThomasMr. Colton Thomas Altobell, Camp Olson YMCA Page 25.550.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Exchange - Engineering in Summer Camps: Tapping the PotentialAbstract: The traditional summer camp provides a rich learning environment in which hands-onlearning activities may be easily incorporated. This paper describes one such activity involvinghand-powered electricity generation which allows users to see, and more importantly feel thedifferences between incandescent, compact fluorescent and LED lights. A
2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Engineering teaching approaches at the time of COVID Pavel Navitski1, Elena Gregg1, Robert Leland1, Viktar Taustyka2, Andrzej Gawlik2 1 Oral Roberts University, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA / 2West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, PolandAbstractIn today's changing educational environment around the world, teaching engineering disciplinesis becoming a challenge for both students and teachers. Universities seek to provide studentswith the knowledge, skills, and experiences that will prepare them to enter directly intoprofessional practice as engineers, advanced studies in engineering
since much of the work that students do is outsideof normal course hours.SummarySchools like the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering and the U.A. Whitaker School ofEngineering at Florida Gulf Coast University had the unusual opportunity to start from a blankslate in terms of curricula, faculty, and facilities. In both cases, new and different ways ofeducating engineers, which were based on published pedagogy and forward-thinking reports,were explored as engineering programs were developed, resulting in many similarities in spite ofthe obvious differences in terms of public and private funding. Both Olin and the WSOEemphasize hands-on learning and provide facilities that support this approach. Both fostercultures of assessment, feedback, and
AC 2011-1096: PREDICTING CONCEPTUAL GAIN IN AN ATOMIC BOND-ING MODULEJacquelyn E. Kelly, Arizona State University Jacquelyn Kelly is doctoral student in Science Education at Arizona State University. Her Master’s de- gree is in Materials Science and Engineering and her undergraduate degree is in Physics and Chemistry. Her principle research interests are situated in engineering education and include conceptual develop- ment, engineering academic language acquisition, and the role of motivation and emotion on these things. She is also invested and passionate about K-12 education as she teaches physics, chemistry, and science foundations at New School for the Arts and Academics, an alternative arts high school.Stephen
have adopted the method forteaching their courses. However, the increased number of exams with the SMART approachcould provide significant stress on students if they are taking several classes that are taught withthe approach. By developing more useful study habits early in their curriculum while taking corecourses, it is hoped that these habits would stick and prove beneficial throughout theirundergraduate career.This paper provides other new instructors with a summary of the basic premise of the SMARTmethod and an example of modifications that allowed it to be successfully adopted in a newcourse.References 1. Prince, M. (2004), “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, 93: 223-231. doi
environment - Understand what is involved in the engineering design process including problem definition, literature research, and design evaluation. - Confront and deal with professional issues including ethics, types of engineering, curriculum requirements for the different engineering majors, use of library and other resources, and use of the Placement Services Office.Virtually all of the ENGR1112 classes use one or more projects to focus the student learning in Page 7.833.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
engineering curriculum. All expressed awillingness to continue to add required tools to the students’ mathematical toolbox if needed intheir specific curricula. If the proposed list of topics proved to be ambitious for the course,engineering faculty members were willing to cover some of the topics in subsequent requiredengineering classes. They felt strongly that the educational benefits provided by this course, asoutlined in the learning outcomes, discussed below, far outweighed the benefits of exposure to afew additional topics. This focus on deep understanding and application of concepts emphasizedthe important role pedagogy must play in the success of the new course. Therefore, theinstructional approach developed for the course was just as
independent of all other departments. The other approach is tooffer an interdisciplinary freshman engineering course common for all engineering studentsregardless of department. In order to take advantage of the benefits of each approach a newfreshman course has been developed at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). Thedevelopmental process from problem identification to final course description will be discussed.Also discussed will be the advantages of the newly developed course as compared to the otherstructures. Departmental Specific Freshman CoursesThis section discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each department within the Collegeof Engineering (COE) having its own distinct freshman engineering course. One
education to improve itsquality and direction. Former president of the National Academy of Engineering, William A.Wulf, said it best in his statement, “Incorporating a set of "new fundamentals" into theengineering curriculum and encouraging faculty to practice their craft are among the stepsneeded to bring engineering education into the 21st century.” 1The engineering student can nolonger be instructed through “chalk and talk” practices, but rather, there is a need to makeengineering education more dynamic and engaging to produce well-rounded engineeringstudents for the careers of the 21st century1,2. According to the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) Engineer of 2020 Attributes3 report, engineers will be called upon to adapt tonew trends in
degrees are ABET accredited.We recently received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Curriculum (ILI) grant. Themajor thrust of implementation reflects the revolution caused by technology in civilengineering and survey. We give each student not only the theory but also actualexperience with the projects and equipment that are the "bread and butter" of civilengineering practice. Laboratories in cartography, photogrammetry, surveying and civilengineering are designed to integrate experiences in this new technology.In the area of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the merger of information fromdifferent sources, often in different formats, is the norm in civil engineering technologypractice, using GIS-based systems. We must recognize and keep up
TechnologyEntrepreneurship is increasingly being recognized as an important part of engineering education.However, it is also seen that establishing of a traditional business plan that was taught toengineers, is not considered as “the cutting edge” of doing entrepreneurship. Despite the businessplan being a core element of most engineering entrepreneurship curricula, there are new conceptsin entrepreneurship such as “The Lean Startup” which are being increasingly talked about. Alongthese lines, the faculty in The College of Engineering and Computer Science at California StateUniversity, Northridge are working with industry leaders and professionals to continuouslyimprove the entrepreneurship curriculum being taught to the engineers of today & tomorrow.One of
Engineering Curriculum Abstract In addition to providing the technical expertise required to solve 21st century problems, theengineers of 2020 will be expected to adapt to a continuously evolving environment while oper-ating outside the limits of their discipline and remaining ethically grounded. Their undergraduatetraining must therefore be designed to nurture engineers to transcend traditional disciplinaryboundaries, and to communicate, transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries. One approach to this challenge is to incorporate biomimicry or bio-inspireddesign into the engineering curriculum. Our research aims to create instructional resources thatprovide exposure to the abundance of design examples that
overview and a sample of initial findings categorizing equity-centered content.Project overview The goal of the NSF Broadening Participation in Engineering (BPE) grant that includesthis effort is the development of a Teaching Engineering Equity (TEE) Center at the Universityof Michigan. The Center will support existing and new efforts aligned with the College ofEngineering’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) strategic mission and share initiatives withleaders similarly committed to equity-centered engineering education. Currently, the TEE Centerhas three main objectives: (1) designing and validating an evidence-based framework forcreating an equity-centered engineering curriculum; (2) generating and evaluating a collection ofDEI
answer to such a question develop such an approach, this paperfirstly describes e-business trends creating new challenges for the education of engineers andthen discusses the development of a curriculum for an e-business related master course. Thefocus is on both the content of such a masters course and the learning approaches to teachsuch content. Finally, the very first concept for a short course covering essential aspects ofproduction based on digital business are discussed will be discussed.Discussion of e-business trends and challenges in the EU and the USE-Business has been identified as one of the most important factors driving new enterprisestrategies. Many new companies have now successfully started their e-business in the midst ofthe
management, real-time embedded systems, and digital signal processing. Page 14.1182.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Case Study Approach to Engineering EthicsAbstractEngineers are routinely called upon to make decisions that affect the users of the products theydesign, develop, and manufacture. The desired outcome is to produce a product that is withoutdefects and safe for the public to use. However, the potential impact could be very harmful if thewrong decisions are made. The technical aspects behind these decisions are studied in detail asan integral part of the engineer’s undergraduate curriculum
Bringing the Systems Approach to Introductory Engineering DesignAndras Gordon, M. Sc., School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs, College of Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University Kathryn W. Jablokow, Ph. D., School of Graduate Professional Studies The Pennsylvania State University – Great Valley Sven G. Bilén, Ph.D., School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs, College of Engineering, The Pennsylvania State UniversityI. IntroductionSuccessfully addressing the challenges of the 21st century requires a shift in the way that weeducate engineering students. They need to employ the Systems Approach, which