education include the role of gender and immigration status on student progress in engineering education. Her scientific research interest focus on skeletal biology and mechanics, as well as biological and bioderived materials.Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines HEIDI G. LOSHBAUGH is an Assistant Research Professor in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She is also the Associate Director for CSM's Center for Engineering Education. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM's EPICS program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course and overseas summer field session. She
three countries as a representative of SVSU, which instilled in her a deep love for travel and fostering international partnerships. In the future, Caroline hopes to attend graduate school and seek employment in an industry that will allow her to motivate her knowledge of engineering principles, foreign languages, and cultural competency skills in service of others.Dr. Rajani Muraleedharan, Saginaw Valley State University Dr. Rajani Muraleedharan is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), and the faculty advisor for Society of Women Engineers (SWE) at Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU), Michigan. Dr. Muraleedharan obtained her Ph.D. at Syracuse University, New York. Before joining
Paper ID #38314STEM Identity Development for Under-represented Studentsin a Research Experience for UndergraduatesGillian Roehrig (Professor)Ngawang Gonsar Ngawang Y. Gonsar, PhD. Biology Faculty, Normandale Community College, Minnesota.Alison Haugh Nowariak (Graduate Student STEM Education Researcher) Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate
at the high school level [1]. Beyond the societal fascina-tion with AI, its introduction at the high school level is anticipated to correlate positively with theretention of students from diverse backgrounds in CS and related fields. Research has consistentlyshown that the field of computer science experiences high attrition rates among women and peopleof color. This limits the participation from underrepresented minorities and perpetuates underlyingbiases among decision-makers and leaders. The scarcity of diverse role models in CS remains apersistent concern as well. These issues lead to secondary yet serious consequences. Biased andunder-scrutinized AI models in practical applications such as AI-based law enforcement [2], voterprofiling
recognize the value of better integrating the teaching and learning of STEM fields.It is assumed that students who have learned disciplinary core ideas, practices, and crosscuttingconcepts of science and engineering will be scientifically literate citizens who can engage inpublic discussions on related issues and can be careful consumers of scientific and technologicalinformation, and can pursue careers of their choice, including STEM careers. Engineering designallows teachers to effectively blend disciplines and integrate math and science as a means ofbuilding student understanding of and skills for engaging in both content areas and appreciationfor both content areas (Lehman & Capobianco, 2012). Pre-college engineering education
workplace adjustment for engineers and the corresponding influence on job satisfaction and intentions to persist. Rohini’s other interests include faculty development and engineering pathways of graduating engineers.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering
students for this problem as18.4 points. Next, we calculated the instructor average rating score as follows: (18.4/20)*5=4.6,which is listed below O6 on the third row in Table 3. As we mentioned before, grading thestudent’s projects yielded the instructor average rating score for outcome 8 (O8). The instructoraverage rating scores for assessing the rest of course learning outcomes are included in Table 3.The average rating scores from both the student survey and the instructor assessment can serveas a reference for the faculty to improve the course. For example, any course learning outcomeachieving an average rating score below 3.5 will raise a concern and require an action plan to fixthe issue
physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and implementing innovative cur- riculum, and managing National Science Foundation grants. She is passionate about inspiring the next generation of engineering students to think outside of the box, especially those that are walking along a non-traditional pathway.Dr. Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College Lee Singleton is a professor at Whatcom Community College, in Bellingham, WA. He holds a BS in mathematics from Harding University, a MS in mathematics and PhD in biomedical
University Todd Haskell is a cognitive scientist interested in learning and the development of expertise, especially in STEM fields. He is currently Associate Professor of Psychology at Western Washington University. In previous projects Dr. Haskell has worked on understanding how chemistry novices and experts navi- gate between macroscopic, symbolic, and small particle representations, and how pre-service elementary teachers translate an understanding of energy concepts from physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and
engineering school persistence.” Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 335-338, (2005). Page 26.1338.1517. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving, why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.18. Moller-Wong, C. & Eide, A. “An Engineering Student Retention Study.” Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 7-15, (1997).19. Steele, C. Reducing Identity and Stereotype Threat: A New Hope. Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us. 1st editon. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010. Xii-242. Print. Issues of Our Time (W.W. Norton & Company).20. Cohen, G.L., Garcia, J, Apfel
Paper ID #18222A Rocking/Rolling Half-Disk Vibratory SystemDr. Jeffrey C. Hayen, Oregon Institute of Technology Jeffrey Hayen joined the faculty in the MMET Department at the Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) in 2011. Before arriving at OIT, Jeffrey served as a Professor of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at Southwestern Oregon Community College for 16 years. Prior to that experience, he worked in the aerospace industry as a thermodynamicist and propellant analyst for high-performance upper-stage rock- ets at the Space Systems Division of the General Dynamics Corporation. He also has conducted research
2006-1732: DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHLY INTERACTIVE, ON-LINE COURSE ONENERGY CONSERVATION: LEARNING STRATEGIES USED ANDEXPERIENCE GAINEDSarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University SARMA V. PISUPATI is an Associate Professor of Energy & Geo-Environmental Engineering Department and a Faculty Fellow of the John A Dutton e-Education Institute of the College of Earth and mineral Sciences. He is Chair of the General Education Program of the EGEE Department and has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses at Penn State University since 1992.Wendy Mahen, PennSylvania State University WENDY L. MAHAN is Instructional Designer in the in the Teaching and Learning with Technology (TLT) wing of
championed more than 20 STEM outreach programs, impacting over 500 K-12 students. His contributions to education have been lauded with awards, including the College Educator of the Year by the Technology Alliance of Central New York (TACNY). A staunch advocate for hybrid teaching, Prof. Yung promotes a holistic learning environment rich in hands-on projects, experiential activities, and peer collaboration, a marked shift from conventional pedagogies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Engineering Capstone Design Preparedness: A Systematic Curriculum ApproachIntroductionEngineering education is pivotal in equipping students with the technical and
the students throughout the semester, which eliminated twomidterm exams given in previous semesters. As mentioned previously, the CBA quizzes had tobe taken on either of two consecutive days at the beginning of the week followed by a remedialquiz given on Fridays of the same week wherein students were given extra credit for the correctanswers on the remediation activity. Several concerns about this format arose. One was: To whatbenefit was it to a student who personally mastered the quiz when he/she was paired with astudent who did not master the quiz? Although there was no formal study of this issue, weobserved that many students who performed well were eager to teach their mastery to those whodid not. The fact that the remediation was extra
treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Tech- nology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork
ML/AI is still rapidly evolving, somestudents are less concerned about masculine cultures, but more concerned about the ethicalchallenges within the field and consider this when choosing a career. We argue for the continuedstudy of persistence by subfields and investigation into new fields as they emerge and evolve.LimitationsThis exploratory study resides in the early stages of the research cycle. Due to the small sample size,we are unable to draw sweeping, generalizable conclusions regarding how social belonginginfluences persistence in ML/AI. However, Lieberman argues that answering difficult questionsrequires moving from exploratory, descriptor studies through to experimental studies, and publishingearly
AC 2007-791: LABORATORY-SCALE STEAM POWER PLANT STUDY —RANKINE CYCLER™ COMPREHENSIVE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSISAndrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU and is the Thermal-Fluids Laboratory Coordinator. He serves on the ASME PTC committee on Air-Cooled Condensers.Philip Gerhart, University of Evansville Philip Gerhart is the Dean of the College of Engineering and
. In addition, she is currently assisting the faculty in the School of Chemical Engineering with the metabolic engineering and flux analysis of photosynthetic organisms.Miss Melissa Loren Ullmer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Melissa Ullmer is a fourth year student at Purdue University pursuing an bachelors of science in Biomedi- cal Engineering. She grew up in Kokomo, IN. Currently she serves as the ”Diversity Chair” of the Purdue Women in Engineering Leadership Team to aid international students during their college careers. Her other activities include serving on the Leadership Team of the Innovation to Reality team which teaches middle school students about engineering, serving as a member of Timmy Global
peerreview has been suggested as an activity that aids transfer of knowledge to new situations, whichhas been identified as a critical issue in engineering education.19 Beyond peer review’s intrinsicpedagogical value, it is seen as highly compatible with the kinds of peer review situations thatprofessional scientists and engineers encounter in the workplace and in academic publishing.20,21Thus, peer review provides both a means to foster long-term improvement in our disciplinarycommunity’s scientific publications,22 as well as a means to add authenticity to writingassignments in order to increase student buy-in and motivation.23Our present work provides a history and case study of an experimental peer review design in aBioengineering capstone course
situations using inquiry, project-based instruction, andincrease opportunities for student collaboration and communication. This paper describes theinnovative use of a motion simulation-based framework to provide active student participation inauthentic engineering experiences for learning about dynamic systems. The project’s theoreticalunderpinnings are based on situated learning where new educational material is presented in anauthentic context, and social interaction and collaboration are required for learning to occur.Through a learner-centered approach, students use physical simulation and large-scalevisualization to discover the impact that design decisions have on a dynamic system, whilegaining hands-on experience in configuring and operating
final project in a senior level class on global industrialmanagement. The course focuses on teaching how the practice of engineering changes in globalindustrial settings. It addresses elements such as political and regulatory constraints (import andexport tariff and quotas), foreign currencies, applicability of foreign legal systems, working inmulticultural environments, resolution of emerging ethical issues, and the impact of internationalstrategies to the practice of engineering. The course had 80 students; approximately 60 studentsmajored in Industrial Engineering and the rest of the students majored in Packaging Design,Biological Systems Engineering, or Mechanical Engineering.Teams. Students were randomly assigned to twelve teams of six or
projects.In a nutshell, the pedagogical approach describes engineering design as a three-stage process,and each stage is elaborated as follows. Stage 1: Conceptual design. The purpose of this stage is to understand the given design problems and recognize the available project time and resources. The outcomes include refined problem statements and proposed design solution(s). Stage 2: Design development. The purpose of this stage is to develop and analyze the details of the proposed design solution. Stage 3: Design verification. The purpose of this stage is to provide and analyze the evidence concerning the performance of the proposed design solution.While the articulation of design stages is common in design textbooks, we want to
PhD student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UBC. Her research focuses on equity issues in engineering education, particularly looking at the impacts of engineering outreach programs on historically marginalized groups in STEM.Shouka Farrokh, University of British Columbia Shouka Farrokh is an undergraduate student pursuing Psychology at The University of British Columbia. She contributes as a research assistant in Engineering Education projects focusing on STEM Outreach initiatives.Dr. Katherine Lyon, University of British Columbia Katherine Lyon is Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Sociology at the University of British Columbia. Katherine’s research merges sociology of education
astakeholder who could provide needed information within course time constraints [10], [27].When meeting with stakeholders, students may also struggle to solicit information effectively,for instance because they ask closed-ended questions or use overly technical language [10], [13].At the end of information synthesis, students may struggle to apply stakeholder and contextualinformation to inform their design decisions. At a basic level, Wertz et al. [12] and Loweth et al.[3] have described issues where first year and capstone engineering students, respectively, mayfail to properly document their sources in their design deliverables. In such cases, students’ useof stakeholder and contextual information can be hard to evaluate properly. In terms
societal impact, professional skills, and design. These themes are 2integrated across eight project-based units. Units 1 & 2 introduce engineering as a discipline thatshapes everyday life. Units 3 & 4 introduce students to the engineering design process; the classresearches a local problem, collaborates with stakeholders, and develops prototype solutions.Units 5 & 6 expand to global challenges, guiding students to design, test, and refine prototypesaddressing both global and local issues. Units 7 & 8 encourage students to identify problems intheir daily lives, apply the design process, and reflect on their learning. Throughout the
database and query processing The database is written in Java and SQLite. Using Java and html, we interact with thedatabase using a locally hosted web interface that serves as the GUI. For LS written byindividual students, the tables include one for the assignment, one for the student, and one tablefor the LS. We show the attributes that are stored in each of these tables in Figure 5. Eachstatement that is written must be unique to be placed in the database. This was done to ensurethat students were writing a new statement for each assignment to reflect on their learning. For1 We are keen to share this software with faculty interested in collaborating with us on writing papers andpursuing funded research opportunities
retention of and engage-ment with the course material but not greater enjoyment when compared to students in settingsfocused on content review (Smith & Cardaciotto, 2011). However, other studies have reported no significant differences in student learning betweenthe two approaches, and have suggested investigating the specific active learning elements incourses (e.g., Velegol, Zappe, & Mahoney, 2015). Students’ resistance to new and challenging waysof learning, and cultural resistance manifested in instructor skepticism and the lack of timely andresponsive support (Hutchings & Quinney, 2015), have also been acknowledged as affecting theoutcomes of student-centered approaches. Hao (2016) reported, in a study of 84
of the characteristics of GT include:1. Most students at GT major in some field of engineering, and most faculty are affiliated with its College of Engineering (COE).2. GT is not a comprehensive university. Rather, its focus and renown is in engineering and technology-oriented fields.3. GT is highly selective and all its engineering programs rank in the top 10 in the country (per US News and World report). Many rank in the top 5.4. GT has a very popular, non-mandatory co-op program, which up to 30% of its student body participates in.5. GT has a large, successful study and work abroad program, with significant student participation.6. GT is a large, research 1, state-supported public school located in an urban environment.The
AC 2010-2189: GRADE-BASED CORRELATION METRIC TO IDENTIFYEFFECTIVE STATICS INSTRUCTORSRandall Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio Dr. Randall D. Manteufel is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio where he has taught since 1997. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1991. His teaching and research interests are in the thermal sciences. He is the faculty advisor for ASHRAE at UTSA. Manteufel is a fellow of ASME and a registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the state of Texas.Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical
American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Peer Mentorship and a 3D Printed Design-Build-Test Project: Enhancing the First Year Civil Engineering ExperienceAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to report the impact of a redesigned first-year civil engineeringcourse on student confidence, sense of belonging, and retention. This paper provides an overviewof the course and a peer mentored design project, the student-peer mentoring team structure, andsummarizes the qualitative and quantitative feedback with statistical analysis.Content delivery was changed (traditional to flipped classroom), and 3D CAD/simulation and 3Dprinting, MATLAB, and peer mentorship were also integrated. The new course was designed tointroduce students to i