Development Award from the NSF c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25901 as well as a three-time recipient of the Omega Chi Epsilon Outstanding Faculty Award from the North- eastern Student Affiliate of AIChE and the Dick Sioui Teaching Award from Northeastern. He also has led industrial R&D teams at Organogenesis Inc. and Polymerix Corporation developing tissue-engineered medical products and drug- generating biodegradable polymers, respectively, and has co-founded Auto- mated Cell, Inc. In addition to being an inventor on 12 issued US patents, he has published the textbook
kinesthetic active supplemental learning opportunities for this project. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles and the statistical evaluation of assessment instruments. He has received an NSF CAREER award, and served as the 2006 Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering and the Founding Director of the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education. Kay C’s educational research interests include student learning styles, student evaluations of teaching, and faculty development. She served as the 2003 Fellow at the
of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Fitts Faculty Fellow in Health Systems Engineering. She previously spent several years on the faculty of the Stephen M. Ross School of Business a ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Study Design and Assessment Framework for Testing Augmented Reality Tools in Engineering EducationGimantha N. Perera1*, Emily Fang2, Robert Kulasingam2, Laura J. Bottomley3, Karen B. Chen2, Julie S.Ivy4 1 Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Arizona, USA 2 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, North Carolina, USA
Paper ID #29712Departures from the ”norm”: How nontraditional undergraduates definedtheir success in an alternative engineering transfer programDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and inclusivity in engineering education. In particular, she is interested in engineering identity, problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative pathways for adult, nontraditional
outside of the classroom. Reacting tothis emergency, within three weeks, the President of SEC and Professors of the Practice from theengineering entrepreneurship program developed a summer instruction program which focusedon professional skill development through a virtual implementation. All faculty involved hadimplemented internship programs in their companies and were convinced that a program couldbe offered, not to completely replace an internship at a company, but to build the professionalskills students would need in their jobs. Ultimately, the virtual internship program involved over350 students, almost 60 mentors, and seven faculty. It was divided into two 6-week phases – 1)professional skill training and 2) teamwork project
research focuses on methods to improve the teaching and learning of team effectiveness in engineering design courses.Dr. Greg Evans, University of Toronto GREG EVANS is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry and the Director of the Collaborative Program in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. . He is the Director of the Southern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Associate Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead). He has been awarded the 2015 Ontario Conferderation of University faculty Associations Teaching Award, the 2014 Allan Blizzard Award, the 2014 Faculty Teaching Award, the 2013 Northrop Frye Award for Linking Teaching and
present on the first iteration of a multi-semester design-based research (DBR)project. This ongoing project is concerned with the intentional integration of active learning andmetacognitively-focused (ALM) activities within multiple offerings of a foundationalThermodynamics course (THERMO). A DBR framework enables a dual focus on both theiterative improvements of course design and teaching practice as well as research investigationsinto the attendant design and pedagogical concepts. In this paper, we first discuss the literaturesurrounding active learning, metacognition, and the intersection of the two, with specialconsideration to online contexts. We next describe the instructional design of the fully online,qasynchronous THERMO course offered
, physical, and mechanical properties and durability performance of infrastructure materials, with a focus on sustainable concrete materials technology. He also researches new strategies to improve STEM education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Implementation of a laboratory experience in reinforced concrete coursesIntroduction College students enrolled in an engineering curriculum learn in a variety of ways (e.g.,sensory vs. intuitive, visual vs. verbal, inductive vs. deductive, active vs. reflective, or sequentialvs. global). In a reinforced concrete design course, where students learn how to designcomponents of large structures, it can be
. Previously, he conducted research as a Student Summer Fellow in the Hypersonic Sciences Branch at the Air Force Research Laboratory under the direction of Dr. Roger Kimmel. Carson is a Graduate Associate for the Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Notre Dame, where he designs, prepares, and delivers workshops on effective teaching strategies and pedagogy for faculty, postdoctoral students, and graduate students. He is also a Graduate Fellow with the Research and Assessment for Learning (ReAL) Design Lab at the University of Notre Dame, where he conducts research to create predictive learning analytics and dynamic driven admissions criteria to better serve underprepared and underserved engineering
enter and practice within the field ofengineering. There are eight criterion upon which accreditation is based. These criteria includestudents, program educational objectives, program outcomes and assessment, professionalcomponent, faculty, facilities, institutional support and financial resources and program criteria.Beginning in the year 2000, ABET will review all engineering programs under a new set ofcriteria.Under the conventional criteria for engineering accreditation (Section D.) 1, and under the presentEC 2000 criteria, (Section II of the present EC 2000 criteria) 2 Cooperative Education Programshave separate criteria and separate accreditation. However, at the October, 1999 ABET BoardMeeting, the following was adopted, "Approved for
InstituteDr. Joshua T. Hewes P.E., Northern Arizona UniversityDr. Robin Tuchscherer, Northern Arizona University Dr. Tuchscherer is a Professor of Structural Engineering and has served at Northern Arizona University since 2011. His teaching and research interests focus on structural engineering, structural concrete, infrastructure, and educational reform.Dr. Rebekah Martin, Virginia Military InstituteDr. Charles D Newhouse P.E., Virginia Military Institute Charles D. ”Chuck” Newhouse received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech after working nine years as a consulting structural engineer for MMM Design Group in Norfolk, Virginia. He spent three years teaching at Texas Tech University before joining the faculty at
worked as an Assistant Pro- fessor (2014 to 2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He is awarded with the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University She teaches courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation
transactional relationships betweenprofessionals and “the public,” it extols the potential of service-centered learning to facilitatecommunity empowerment and transformation in the form of social, institutional, and structuralchange. In engineering, LTS challenges the historical roots of the profession as a tool forcolonialism and domination and strives for a new relationship with society that supports diverse,and especially marginalized, communities to realize their own goals5,6. It places students intosettings where they typically interact directly with non-engineering partners such as non-profitorganizations, schools, and impoverished or marginalized communities, domestically andinternationally, in order to achieve the joint goal of student learning
and has taught primarily physics and also research methodology on three different continents. In addition to research, she has also conducted workshops on using concept mapping methodology for scale development, mixed methods research methodology for standardized patient educators, and standard-setting for physician educators. Dr. Sunny continues to invest her skills in engineering education research through her collaborations. As part of her new undertaking at Baylor University, she is investing her skills as a research methodologist and data analyst to fight human trafficking through the use of Information Technology working alongside the research team there in collaboration with a diverse group of
of Pittsburgh, Karen Bursic, University of Pittsburgh, Sam Spiegel, University of Pittsburgh, Kacey G. Marra, University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Nur Ozge Ozaltin ¨ Nur Ozge ¨ Ozaltin received her master’s degree and Ph.d. in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S. in industrial engineering at Bogazici University in Turkey. She studies improving innovation through modeling the design process. Her methods include Bayesian network modeling, statistical and qualitative data analysis.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial
behavioral control were related to behavioral engagement in math learning andperformance on a standardized math assessment test.In addition to the specific issues related to mathematics, other studies have explored theacademic performance or college success of first-semester students more generally. Stewart [11]found that for male students, self-control was a predictor of academic performance; high schoolGPA and SAT scores were predictive of the first-semester academic performance of both maleand female students; and grit was not related to the academic performance of male or femalefirst-semester students. For students with a first-semester GPA of 2.67 or less, self-control wasthe best and only predictor of academic performance. Honken and Ralston
This category recognizes Indigenous 5) The concepts of culture, knowledge, and power take on new worldviews as legitimate ways of meaning when examined through an Indigenous lens. thinking and doing, even within an engineering context. For inclusion in this category, a study must make explicit Centered 7) Tribal philosophies, beliefs, customs, traditions, and visions for use of Indigenous (or tribal) beliefs, Indigenous the future are central to understanding the lived realities of
investigations. Themechanical design of the energy harvesting system will be redeveloped and placed inside of thehydraulic door closer with the gear train by decreasing the size of the components by the studentsas a later phase of the project. Also the camera module would be placed closer to hydraulic doorcloser to avoid voltage drops across the wires. Moreover, this experimental study also will be apart of new alternative energy course to teach students how to discover ambient energy sourcesstarting Spring 2009. Also, faculty of Technology programs can use this research as a part oftheir courses in various areas such as electro mechanics, electronics etc. This uniqueexperimental study can also transfer technology to the classroom in the form of
trained according to two Peer-Led TeamLearning books: A Guidebook,7 and A Handbook for Team Leaders.8 Their hiring andtraining was done by Prof. Ethan Munson of the Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience Department, who served as the faculty member responsible for this program, andMs. Marissa Jablonski, a Ph.D. student who serves as program coordinator responsiblefor many day-to-day activities. Mentors are taught that peer-led learning can be moreeffective than the traditional lecture format of college courses. Mentors were hired basedon willingness to help, openness to the lecture-free format of the PLTL groups, andsuccess of having earned an average grade of 2.7 or higher in their own College Algebra,Trigonometry, and Calculus classes. The
engineering: 2004, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland
government and contemporary issues in class as opposed to trying to make time for itafter all my engineering homework is done. I plan to work with nonprofit organizations and towork for United Nations reform. In addition, I would really like to play a key role in therebuilding of Afghanistan, Iraq, and whatever other wars that may come about and causedestruction and displacement in this lifetime. If that doesn’t work out I’d be happy doing workanywhere that helps disadvantaged people. CE2Another student voiced concern about the constrained nature of the curriculum for engineering;this turned her away from engineering as opposed to the attributes of an engineering career orhelping people: I have decided that I do not want to be a Civil
, VA: American Counseling Association, v73 n5 p527-34.17. O’Brien, K.M., Dukstein, R.D., Jackson, S.L., Tomlinson, M.J. & Kamatuka, N.A. (1999). Broadening career horizons for students in at-risk environments. The Career Development Quarterly, 47. Alexandria, VA: National Career Development Association. Retrieved October 12, 2009 from http://www.ade.az.gov/cte/CTEDeliverySystem/RationaleCareerExploration10-11-05.pdf.18. Toepfer, C.F., Jr. (1997). Middle Level School Concerns and Rural School-To-Employment Issues: In Search of Better Ways, Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13 (1), 28-36. Retrieved October 12. 2009 from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/v13,n1,p28-36,Toepfer.pdf
, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.3. National Science Foundation (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2004, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from
, favoritemotivational or spiritual quote, most impactful point from the Engineer’s Creed [6] and the mostimpactful of Admiral McRaven’s 10 Lessons [7]. The GELC faculty found student effort onthese two assignments to be low and did not feel the assignments effectively reinforced courseconcepts. The final synthesis project was then created, and first implemented in 2021, requiringstudents to organize the course topics using a systems engineering approach.Systems EngineeringIn Fall 2021, Systems Thinking was integrated into the course content to provide students with afoundational understanding of this approach before starting on the synthesis project. TheUniversity had just added a graduate degree in Systems Engineering, so the basic SystemsEngineering model of
Paper ID #10322When, Why, How, Who – Recruitment Lessons from First Year EngineeringStudents in the Millennial GenerationDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University Jane Lehr is Associate Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s & Gender Studies at California Polytech- nic State University. She is also Faculty Director of the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) in STEM Program at Cal Poly and Co-Director of the Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies Program. She previously served as elected co-chair of the Science & Technology Taskforce of the Na- tional Women’s Studies Association
AC 2008-1564: UTILIZING UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTRESEARCH ASSISTANTS IN FUEL CELL DURABILITY AND RELIABILITYTESTING; ASSESSING THEIR FEASIBILITY, BENEFITS, VALUE ANDCONTRIBUTIONSRobert Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert W. Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Technological University in the summer of 2003, after two decades of continuous industrial research, product development and manufacturing experience. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, Washington, a Master of Engineering in Manufacturing Systems from Lawrence Technological
consulting engineer, he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. He is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry.Dr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto Serhiy Kovalchuk is a research associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto.Mr. Mike Klassen, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is PhD Candidate in Higher Education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. He was a long-time
in flipped classroom methods, the team includes a third-personeducational researcher (Andrea Medina) focusing on high-impact classroom practices. There arethree instructors in the study: Instructor A, Instructor B and Instructor C. Instructor A is the leadinstructional designer and learned FC and active learning from the Transforming STEMTeaching Faculty Learning Program (FLP) hosted virtually by the University of California,Berkley. Instructor A has publications in iterations of the flipped classroom model [20], [21].Instructor C received a grant on diversity-centric learning and project-based learning. InstructorA and C taught years of courses in the flipped classroom modality before the study. Instructor Bhas less training than Instructor
engineeringproblem can restore self-confidence that was lost during the course taking2. This is consistentwith Bandura’s self-efficacy theory where the most influential source of perceived self-efficacyis performance accomplishment.A model of a person’s approach toward and commitment to an endeavor can be represented byAlbert Bandura’s self efficacy model. Self-efficacy theory is concerned with an individual’sbeliefs about his or her personal capabilities to organize and execute a course of action toaccomplish designated goals or performances. Self efficacy beliefs touch almost every aspect ofa person’s life based on whether the person thinks productively, pessimistically or optimistically;how well that person is capable of self-motivation and persevering
AC 2008-906: ACADEMIC PATHWAYS STUDY: PROCESSES AND REALITIESMia Clark, Stanford UniversitySheri Sheppard, Stanford UniversityCynthia Atman, University of WashingtonLorraine Fleming, Howard UniversityRonald Miller, Colorado School of MinesReed Stevens, University of WashingtonRuth Streveler, Purdue UniversityKarl Smith, University of Minnesota Page 13.137.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Academic Pathways Study: Processes and Realities Page 13.137.2AbstractAmid concerns that U.S. educational institutions are not attracting and graduating sufficientnumbers of science, technology, engineering and mathematics