Paper ID #13394Design and Implementation of an Inexpensive Laboratory for Providing Hands-On Design Prototyping and Manufacturing Experiences to Engineering Stu-dentsMr. Jeremy John Vaillant, University of Massachusetts Lowell department of Mechanical Engineering Ph. D candidate with a Masters in Mechanical Engineering with a Design and Manufacturing Concentra- tion who develops CNC technology for academic research and education. He also designs experimental hardware, electronics and software coding to automate mechanical systems.Dr. Christopher J Hansen, University of Massachusetts, LowellProf. Stephen Johnston, University of
educators and students. Technology changes and new ideas for projectsand course material emerge on a regular basis therefore the spirit of continuous improvementmust be honored in order to keep the course fresh and responsive to the educational needs of thestudents and to changes in contemporary society. This course should be exportable to other institutions that favor student-centered, project-based learning environments with relatively small class enrollments. An initial investment inhardware and software and periodic updating as technology changes are necessary expenses inorder to provide an optimal and efficient teaching and learning environment. There are severalmeans of export that are being actively considered including educator
composition and content creation for pedagogical faculty support. He is immersed in the field of research for innovation in higher education. Likewise, he has participated as a speaker in numerous conferences and events such as 1er. Congreso Internacional de Innovaci´on Educa- tiva at Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM), GESS Mexico, XV Congreso CTI-FIMPES 2015, and the Inter-American Prize – Educational Innovation in Higher Education of the Inter-American Organization for Higher Education (IOHE). Currently, he works as researcher and content developer at the Center for Innovation in Education (CIE), Universidad Panamericana. Between his interests are the learning of languages and the acquisition
initiative strongly supports the efficacy of the QM program and provides evidence thatthe use of Quality Managers has appreciably improved activities in classroom and lab settingsand has enhanced the academic experience of the QM’s themselves.Introduction and BackgroundIn their work on engineering education, Upadhyay et al., state, “Quality consciousness hasbecome a central theme for any human endeavor in today’s competitive world. The system ofhigher education is not devoid of this concept.”9 Baldwin another educational advocate, refers tomeeting the challenges in our current STEM classrooms and considers possible innovativesolutions to such demands: “Today many of the efforts to strengthen undergraduate education inScience, Technology Engineering
that they could learn and reflect on goal setting, planning, self-monitoring,self-evaluating and other self-regulatory strategies successfully within the context of a course[42]. More recently, a study of civil engineering undergraduates showed that includingself-regulated learning and goal setting were vital for cognitive engagement in courses [43].Self-directed learning has also shown useful for engineering majors during the COVID-19pandemic, as a mediator of other external and environmental effects [44].MethodIn this study we utilize an exploratory qualitative approach with thematic analysis and aposteriori coding scheme, informed by literature in wellbeing, belongingness, and self-directedlearning. Although some frameworks exist, such as
the development of this course, careful combinations of pre-stressingfoundational knowledge, with a focus on PT, along with practical examples and applications wereinterwoven with a series of industry leaders in PT on both the design and construction side. This integrateddelivery approach is intended to instill practical aspects of how PT is utilized in building projects. Thispaper discusses the formulation and refinement of the course structure and the technical content, along withhow industry experts are engaged and contribute to the educational experience.Topics for Structural Engineering Programs In the rapidly advancing building and infrastructure environment there is an emergent need forstructural engineering students to know
engineering graduate attrition. To better understand this phenomenon, weconducted N=42 hour-long semi-structured interviews with participants recruited via emailsurvey from the top 50 engineering Ph.D. granting universities in the United States. Usingemergent coding, we analyzed the narratives of students questioning whether to remain in theirPh.D. program and those who decided to depart. Students discussed their conception of graduateschool before they began and what experiences they anticipated. Participants were asked toreflect on their thoughts surrounding graduate school before arrival, how well those thoughtscorresponded with their lived experiences, and what information if known, would have helpedthem earlier. Findings reveal that participants
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Staying in or Getting Out: The Relationship Between Undergraduate Work Exposure and Job Satisfaction after GraduationIntroductionPast research has focused on the ways engineering students talk about the work they hope to doas professional engineers after graduation, which the authors refer to as their ‘images of work.’1These authors found that students’ initial images of work were marked by hopefulness andaspiration; students wanted to design new technologies and engage in innovation. As the studentsmoved through their undergraduate education, however, their images of work became moremundane. Often this mundaneness emerged as a
provided information with regard to curricular content andcapabilities of departmental graduates. In a way, the capstone experience reported on in thispaper, serves as a microcosm of the four year program. Experiences and outputs from the coursecan be used to provide guidance and insights into curricular changes, teaching methods, andexposure to civil engineering practice in the Region; and helps in establishing enduringconnections with the industrial sector.IntroductionDesign is widely considered to be the central and the most distinguishing activity of civilengineering. It has also long been understood that engineering institutions should graduateengineers who could design effectively to meet societal needs. Historically, engineering
Society and the American Society for Engineering Education.Cindy Foor, University of Oklahoma Assistant Director/Research Associate at the Research Institute for STEM Education (RISE) at the University of Oklahoma. Cindy received her M.A. in Anthropology from Western Michigan University. As an anthropologist, her research interests include ethnography of marginalized populations, cultural theory, issues of gender and underrepresented populations in STEM education and the cultural/historical construction of women’s cultural identities and roles in past and present societies, with special focus on emerging nationalist projects
fouryear program.The basic features of the Rowan program directly address a number of the institutional factorscited as diminishing persistence in the engineering field, and are considered cutting edge forundergraduate engineering education. The interdisciplinary teamwork and holistic projectexperiences, for example, exemplify the kind of learning experience which Rosser18 andMargolis & Fisher13have suggested as necessary to increase the retention of women in science,engineering, and technological fields--and which the 1995 NSF Workshop on RestructuringEngineering Education recommended for all engineering learning environments15. Theimpersonality of traditional engineering school climates is replaced by a strong faculty-studentmentoring and
as a bottleneck illuminates the ladder of barriers disabled students have to climb tosucceed [6]. We, the authors, typically take a social view of disability in presenting information forengineering instructors to change their practices to be more accessible to all students. A socialperspective of disability defines disability as a consequence of inaccessible environments, ratherthan an inherent problem in individuals. In other words, the environment is disabling, which inthis case is the classroom and administrative system of obtaining accommodations. Instructorscan use the insights gained from these interviews to develop awareness for accessibility in theclassroom beyond formal accommodations and become aware of the ways
Paper ID #42220Impact of Professional Development in Culturally Relevant Engineering Designfor Elementary and Middle School Teachers (RTP, Diversity)Frank Bowman, University of North Dakota Frank Bowman is Thomas C. Owens Endowed Chair, Professor and Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S from Brigham Young UniversityDr. Bethany Jean Klemetsrud P.E., University of North Dakota Beth Klemetsrud is an assistant professor at the University of North Dakota where she studies equity and culturally relevant pedagogy
/geomorphology, engineering economics, mechanics, material properties,systems, geospatial representation, and information technology.” There is an increased emphasison ethics, leadership, social awareness, political understanding, public policy, and businesspractice. The outcome that requires an understanding of asset management suggests the use oftools and techniques that include “design innovations, new construction technologies, materialsimprovements, geo-mapping, database management, value assessment, performance models,web-based communication, and cost accounting.” As program assessments become moredetailed, the commentary will need to be examined carefully. In the USMA assessments, thefaculty team made general judgments, but did not have to define
it’s not always possible to find these people – they-they’re not in your building, like they aren’t in department.Students noted that the advent of digital technology in academia has allowed for convergentresearch collaborations unbounded by geography as well as broader access to interdisciplinarycourses and mentorship, but they also highlighted these technologies designed to combat thelimitations of physical distance between scholars also means that they missed out on “how to besocial and how to interact with people outside of a screen” and on those spontaneousconversations considered essential to idea generation (Students X and W, 2021). Student F(2021) described the dynamic as a need for informal student spaces to talk, collaborate
. 6 Our approach to learning by design included efforts to embody (Lakoff & Nunez, 2001;Barsalou, 2008) and mathematize (Freudenthal, 1973; Kline, 1980) a system of levers (Figure 1),highlighting how a fulcrum disrupts the straight path of a lever. Abrahamson and Sánchez-Gárcia(2016) described a theory of action-based mathematics learning that informed the instruction inthis study. The approach was anchored in a body-syntonic (Papert, 1980) wherein initialmathematical description emerged from bodily activity, which was then re-expressed with theoperation of the physical system of levers. This study’s embodiment was called the Rope Walk (Figure 3). In the Rope Walk, onestudent held one end of the rope and remained in place
. As with other disciplines, engineering typically subsumesethics, appropriating it as its own unique subfield. As a framing, ethics in engineering producesspecialized standards, codes, values, perspectives, and problems distinct to engineering thoughtand practice. These form an engineering education discourse with which engineers engage. It isepistemological in its focus, meaning that this framing constructs knowledge of properdisciplinary conduct. On the other hand, engineering in ethics as a framing device insists thatengineering become a specialized articulation of ethical thought and action. Here, “engineer” and“engineering” are not nouns but verbs, referring to particular processes and technologies fortransformation. One is not an
Development of an Alumni Success Instrument Linking Undergraduate Experiences to Graduate PathwaysAbstractHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have made significant contributionstowards ensuring Black student participation, retention, and success in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and continue to play a critical role in the production ofgraduates within these disciplines. Additionally, the pedagogical approaches, principles, andvalues characteristic of the HBCU experience have led to tremendous gains and success inpromoting student achievement in STEM graduate programs. The dominance of HBCUs in thepreparation of Black students for graduate programs suggests a need to better understand
critical reflections in engineering education effective in assessinglearning outcomes? During this investigation, two additional topics of relevance emerged: c)Factors that contribute to successful implementation of reflection and d) The recognition of theneed for further research on reflection.a) Critical Reflections and Achieving Learning OutcomesThe literature reviewed indicated that educators sought diverse learning outcomes through use ofreflection, with many focusing on the development of skills beyond strict technical abilities, suchas teamwork [9][10]. It is interesting to note, however, that reflection upon these “soft” skills ormore consistent reflection over the duration of the project was, in some cases, associated withresults linked
held by FC leadership provedproblematic at different stages of the change process. One assumption is that positive assessmentdata is sufficient to persuade the rest of the college that the curriculum should be adopted. Asecond assumption is that the information resulting from the pilot is sufficient in deciding how thecurriculum can be improved for all students. And finally, there is an assumption that once the newcurriculum is institutionalized, the job of effecting “systemic reform of undergraduate engineeringeducation” is complete. This paper is one product from a qualitative study of the FC curricularchange process.IntroductionSince the earliest formal review of engineering education during the first International Congress ofEngineering in
theory then developed to become an essential part of fluid mechanics theory acrossdisciplines in engineering sciences [2]. The theory is described in many textbooks, for example[3, 4], and is briefly summarised in the Appendix A.Learning about boundary layers is challenging. We decompose the problem here into threesequential challenges which provide a kind of ‘problem definition’, to which this paper proposesand evaluates a solution.1.1 Three challenges in learning boundary layer theoryThe first challenge stems from the fact that boundary layers cannot be seen in everyday life.Despite technical information such measured data and theoretical results, the existence of thelayers is often not intuitively clear to students. Education
. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical
among these demandsis the call for outfitting students – the future workforce – with so-called 21st-century skills [3].Most notably, these include skills of abstract thinking, critical reasoning, technicalcommunication, teamwork, lifelong learning, creativity, and leadership. A critical line ofresponse to equipping students with these skills has been pedagogical advances and instructionalinnovation at the course and curriculum levels. Student-centric, active-learning, and experientialeducational practices – such as flipped classes, project-based courses, undergraduate research,and work-integrated learning – have emerged as effective tools for supporting students’professional skill development in line with expectations of the modern workplace [4
Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Thanina Makhlouf, University of MichiganEytan Adar Eytan Adar is an Associate Professor in the School of Information and in Computer Science & Engineer- ing. His research is at the intersection of human computer interaction (HCI), visualization, and large-scale data mining of human behavior. Professor Adar received his PhD in Computer Science from the Univer- sity of Washington. He worked at Xerox PARC and HP Labs as well as helping
acrossboundaries, disciplines, and knowledge domains based on the information and ideas they haverecognized through four discovery behaviors, including: Page 26.338.3 Questioning, or a passionate inquisitiveness of the surrounding world context Observing, or an everyday attentiveness to customers, products, and services Networking, or sharing and gathering ideas from a diverse group of individuals who may be part of an “internal” or “external” group Experimenting, or testing ideas by trying new experiences, disassembling artifacts, or piloting prototypesThe successful innovators Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen studied
College of Engineering at the Univer- sity of Notre Dame. She received her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2009. She also has a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has several years of industry design experience, but has since shifted her focus to engineering education with the first-year engineering program. Contact information: phone (574) 631-0972, fax (574) 631-8007, or email kmeyers1@nd.edu.Rachel Louis, Virginia Tech Rachel is a PhD student studying engineering education at Virginia Tech. She has her B.S. and M.S. degrees from The Ohio State University in civil engineering where she specialized in construction. Cur- rently, Rachel is working on research related to the identity of
able to design components and systems."Program Objective #D : " The electrical engineering curriculum will produce graduates who have broad laboratory skills, including extensive teamwork and hands-on practical abilities."Program Objective #E : " The electrical engineering curriculum will produce graduates who are aware of current and emerging technologies and professional engineering practices." Page 7.131.8“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
determiningconstraints. To this end, SoS engineers use a tool called Model-based Systems Engineering(MBSE). MBSE considers the given system as a whole and utilizes a set of models to representvarious aspects of the system. The trend in SoS is to use MBSE and Authoritative Source ofTruth as core digital engineering strategies to manage a large complex SoS and integratedproduct life cycle and supply chain management [10], [11], [12].In the second phase, the Abstraction phase, the system, project, and/or problem are abstractedinto a solution [13]. To this end, engineers decompose the system into smaller, moremanageable subsystems. In this way, SoS engineers can define the high-level framework (i.e., amodel) that addresses the given system to seek emergent behavior
make informed judgments, which must1 13 states require continuing education devoted to ethics / professional responsibility: Delaware, Florida, Indiana,Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Texas, Wisconsinconsider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societalcontexts.”The process by which individuals take a reasoned approach to making ethical engineeringdecisions have been described via a variety of frameworks including reflexive principlism [12]and a pragmatic approach [13]. In a widely applied model, the multistep process of ethicalreasoning begins with the step of identifying an ethical dilemma, continues through informationgathering, analysis, and
that we present in this paper. First, Students of Color scored higher thanWhite Students on a combined index of survey items measuring the six forms of cultural capital.Second, we discuss how Students of Color, who are more likely to be First-Generation students,use their cultural assets in unique ways. We discuss the important implications of these findingsfor developing and implementing engineering instructional practices and curricula.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation’s (NSF’s) biennial report on the representation of women,minorities, and persons with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) education and employment highlights the continuing progress made in diversifying theengineering workforce