Paper ID #31448A Systematized Review of the Students’ Upbringing Influence on theirSpatial ReasoningMr. Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hassan Al Yagoub is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to
curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second
, aninvestigation space that was rather different than the concepts of CTSS. I did have a master’sdegree in electrical and computer engineering, but admittedly, I entered the course a bit dauntedat the idea of teaching the subject that had become distant. Consequently, I spent the latter part ofthe summer reacquainting myself with these concepts that had once been so accessible.Yet, in some regard, my ongoing research bore relevance in course preparation. Myinvestigations have highlighted how engineering students exist in our programs and courses aswhole persons that are crystallizing what it means for them to be an engineer in relation to whothey are as persons17. While such students might not have a very informed perspective on what itmeans to be an
Paper ID #28752Redefining Retention in STEM Education: New Perspectives on aStudent-centered Metric of SuccessDr. Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University Prof. Andrew Forney is an Assistant Professor in Computer Science at Loyola Marymount University with research interests broadly at the intersection of cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and experimental design. He has worked with the UCLA Cognitive Systems Laboratory for the past 7 years advancing the theory and practice of causal inference as an emerging set of tools for both the empirical sciences and design of artificial decision-makers. His recent
survey consisted of 42 items that asked students about their reasonsfor choosing engineering, their confidence in their abilities to become engineers, and theiropenness to experiences that would help them become engineers of 2020.Because the goal of this survey was to answer research questions that were specific to this studyand population, it was necessary to create a new instrument, rather than use an existing one8.Some of the steps outlined by Creswell8 and adapted from Benson and Clark9 were followed: 1. The purpose of the instrument and the target population were identified. 2. The literature was reviewed to learn about other studies that had related research questions, and these studies were used to inform the item creation
block for future undergraduate minor / concentration programsin a variety of novel content areas, such as biomedical engineering. In this paper, we present the Page 9.257.1paradigm, its implementation, and some preliminary results on early, yet limited implementation. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposi- tion Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” 1. Introduction Biomedical engineering (or bioengineering – BME) is emerging as one of the fastest grow-ing fields in the US, not only due to its significant impact in the
. According to the National ResearchCouncil7, "Our nation is becoming divided into a technologically knowledgeable elite and adisadvantaged majority" (p. 1), with women representing a disproportionate part of that majority.In 1972, Federal Title IX legislation prohibited sex discrimination in education, yet there isevidence of subtle discriminatory practices in SME culture 8-12.Representation in undergraduate studies is a function of two mechanisms: enrollment andpersistence. Many interventions have advocated strong recruitment efforts to improve women'senrollment in SME, but these have often resulted in disappointing cost/benefit outcomes:enrollments have grown, but only by about 1% per year, and retention of underrepresented groupscontinues to lag
was quickened by the ascendancyof the university research paradigm, pettiness and isolation within the professoriate, and anunwillingness to commit minimal resources for a non-elitist system of higher education. WhilePSI is appropriate for only a small portion of the engineering classes we teach, themarginalization of PSI articulates a much deeper problem concerning our ability to implementeffective educational reform.Conflict between Learning ModelsPSI emerged at a time when educational psychologists were drawing lines in the dirt and firingoff salvoes. Behaviorism had been dominant since the 1930’s, but was seen as excessivelymanipulative. Humanist like Carl Rogers had already begun to call for a more convivialalternative, and Cognitivism
Technology Section 1: Rube Goldberg MachinesSection 3: Assistive Technology Section 4: RoboticsSection 5: Assistive Technology Section 6: Water systemsSection 8: Products for the Local Community Section 7: Green DesignSection 10: Games for Health Section 9: RoboticsParticipantsThe analysis in this report contains survey data information approximately 41% of the 2010incoming freshmen class or 272 FYEP engineering students enrolled in 10 sections of FYEPduring the fall 2010 semester; 20 students were eliminated from the study due to absences duringeither the pre- or post- survey. Participants included 25% females (n= 68) and 75% males(n=204). Most engineering majors
chose to use this timeframe because my initial research indicated that little has been writtenabout this topic, so a 10-year timeframe allows for a collection of literature sufficient to identifyrelevant theories, concepts, methods, and scholarly interests. It is recent enough to reflectcurrent conditions, technological advances, and any changes in work-related happiness thatoccurred during or after the COVID-19 pandemic and associated adjustments to work practices.Also, this 10-year period included periods of economic growth and recession, so results shouldnot be skewed by one prevailing macroeconomic condition.B. First Search, Google Scholar I performed my first search on happiness and engineering on Google Scholar using thekeywords
of importantconcepts. Students in traditional classrooms acquire most of their ―knowledge‖ throughclassroom lectures, textbook reading, and the internet. A troubling fact is, after instruction,students often emerge from our classes with serious misconceptions [2 - 6]. Rebello [7] suggests that the essential goal of education is the transfer of learning.Research in the field of Physics Education continues to provide educators with a window throughwhich an understanding of how students learn physics can be developed. Beichner [8] suggeststhat Physics Education Research (PER) is ―… focused inquiry into what happens as studentsstruggle to grasp and use the concepts of physics.‖ Focused inquiry involves the use of a numberof strategies
more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been toform “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects. Page 24.948.2The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial support. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some flavor of what engineers actually do; and also, could learn the basic elements
comprehensive review of this literature here, wecite and discuss selected works that have influenced our thinking.A large body of research evidence suggests that active learning techniques – broadlytaken here to mean any form of instruction that engages students beyond passivelyreceiving information – promote learning10,11. A particularly convincing study conductedby Hake in the 1990’s demonstrated that physics students exposed to some form of“interactive engagement” developed higher levels of conceptual understanding than thosein “traditional” instructional settings12. Active learning grounds the SCALE-UP projectat North Carolina State University13, many of the integrated engineering curricula thatemerged in the 1990’s14, and some of the emerging
students and for their fellow students. However, thesereturning students also face certain challenges that direct-pathway students do not. While thepublished literature on returning students has discussed some of their special skills andparticular challenges, there are many unanswered questions, particularly in regard to returningstudents in engineering and other STEM fields.IntroductionWhile many graduate students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)fields begin their graduate program immediately after completing a bachelor’s degree, there arealso many who enter the workforce and later pursue a graduate degree. In the larger populationof graduate students, statistics show that many are older; in 2001, only 43.4% of
2006 he was tenured and promoted to the rank of Associate Professor. Mike gained 10 years of industrial and academic research lab experience at 3M, FMC, and the University of Minnesota prior to embarking on an academic career at Rochester Institute of Technology (3 years) and Minnesota State University, Mankato (2 years). Mike holds a Bachelor of Mathematics from the University of Minnesota (with distinction), an MS in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. He is also a member of ASME, SIAM, and ASEE. Page 22.1046.1
the Department of Technology Leadership & Inno- vation at Purdue University. Her research examines organizational communication, particularly in the contexts of destructive workplace behaviors, leadership, teams, and workforce development. Notably, Dr. Linvill is a Co-Principal Investigator on the SCalable Asymmetric Lifestyle Engagement (SCALE) production proposal, funded by the Department of Defense, with colleagues in Purdue’s College of En- gineering. The project focuses on developing a scalable and sustainable workforce development program for microelectronics that will serve as a model for other workforce development efforts (i.e., artificial intelligence, hypersonics). In this role, she examines
late as the senior yearsuch as senior design and unit operations lab. (2) Faculty teaching courses are not trained inmultiple areas of chemical engineering. They develop expertise in their research areas; however,they do not develop knowledge and skills in different areas of chemical engineering nor updatethemselves in up-to-date practices. (3) It has been shown that traditional lecture-based instructionis ineffective at promoting engineering problem-solving, self-learning, and high-level skilldevelopment [5-7]. An emerging paradigm in engineering education is design thinking includingintegrated or inductive-learning models and abductive-thinking [8-13]. Inductive learning is aneeds-based or problem-based learning (PBL) instructional model
improve the different areas of the experience. To gather information from students whodecided to dropout, meetings with the students or with the advisors (when meeting the studentwas not advisable) occurred. This step provided a benchmark to start ideating about crafting thecourse.The second step was to conduct charrette meetings with professors from all fields of knowledgein the civil engineering department to develop the course objectives, the course content, and thedesired student experience. Eleven professors (6 are Alumni and 5 are not Alumni) participatedin the charrette meetings. The professors’ areas of expertise were construction materials,structures and seismic analysis, environment, and water resources, geotechnic and soilsmechanics
lab progresses as follows:Figure 1 Three print orientations investigated by the classWeek 1 • Lecture: Introduction to additive manufacturing technology in general, in-depth discussion of fused deposition modeling (FDM), project goals and milestones. • Activities: In groups, students are given an engineering drawing of a c-clip (Figure 2A). They use SolidWorks to create a 3D solid model from the engineering drawing. They then prepare the model to be 3D printed and initiate their prints with assigned print orientation and infill percentage. Each team is required to print 5-7 clips in different orientations. Finally, groups are asked to use finite element analysis (FEA) to determine force and location at which
Video Length for Studying Machine Learning in a Flipped ClassroomAbstractIn recent years, the flipped classroom has emerged as an increasingly popular teaching method inhigher education, as it is seen as an effective way to promote active learning among students.Nevertheless, a crucial factor that has not been studied in-depth is students' preference for thelength of videos in the flipped classroom. Although a few studies have considered the designprocess of videos and students' preferences for video length in a flipped classroom, there arevarying recommendations and a lack of data-driven analysis on how many and how long the videosshould be. In this study, we investigated students' preference for video length in
promotes motivation and healthy psychological and behavioral functioning.In a virtual environment, technological tools such as Zoom are used to build social and teachingpresence to help students relieve the feeling of isolation they often have in online courses.Whether these tools are sufficient to satisfy student’s basic need of relatedness is unclear.Self-determination theory [19, 20] also suggests individuals typically express multiple forms ofmotivation in any given activity. The different types of motivations may be described on acontinuum ranging from autonomous (internal) to controlled (external) motivations. One extremeis intrinsic motivation, i.e., a deeply internalized state of engagement based on interest,enjoyment, satisfaction and
by anoverview of the context in which this study took place. We then present an analysis of the surveydata we collected that examines how students at our university conceptualize energy.Literature ReviewThe current body of literature in energy education explores not only the pedagogical aspects, butalso the nature of energy education. Energy is a foundational concept and is taught in manydifferent contexts, both within engineering and more broadly in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Math (STEM). As we reviewed this literature, three major questions emerged:how do we define energy? (ontology), how do students conceptualize energy? (epistemology),and how do we teach energy? (pedagogy).An Ontological Question: How do we define energy?Energy
represented in the event. This is a limitation of a diversity, equity,and inclusion event and it cannot substitute for student mentoring and support. Activities such assurveys, interviews, or informal dialogues can be used to engage students who did not feel heardor seen during an event.COVID-19 has provided unique opportunities and challenges. The event created an opportunity toincrease engagement and helped encourage the college to find more ways to do more in the future.However, even in a virtual environment, it was still difficult to meet scheduling needs andaccessibility. Hopefully providing recorded content will help overcome some schedulingchallenges. Many commented in the survey they wished the summit was longer with even morecontent. An
the EA students to anew culture and delve into global awareness and logistic arrangements.2) After Returning from the Guatemala ExperienceDespite having prepared for the experiences by developing preliminary work plans in the fallENGR 98A course, the teams found themselves adapting quickly based on the site conditionsand emerging information. The limited timeframe and resources available in the rural villagemeant that they had to manage the project and timeline carefully. What appeared to be aherculean task was made achievable by dividing the project into sub parts and pairing projects tosmaller teams based on individual interests and strengths. Not only did this pair team memberswith tasks that suited their skills, it ensured that all the
… the For a bridge or components, I use balancing of all forces on an equilibrium to find the reactions to the object. actions. Internal and external forces should balance, or equal zero when summed. Because if they don’t balance, "unbalance" = "collapse" Model A model is … an idealized For bridge or components, I use a model representation of object, with to show given information, my the info needed to do an assumptions
) .76 Engineers are well paid.[1] .74 Engineers make more money than most other professionals.1 .69 An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate.1 .40 2b. Motivation (Family Influence) .85 My parents would disapprove if I chose a major other than .75 engineering.[2] My parents want me to be an engineer.[1] .75 Page 12.94.42c. Motivation (Social Good) .70 Technology plays an
hopes to further advance their intellectual curiosity and problem solving skills.Charles Birdsong, California Polytechnic State University Charles Birdsong has expertise in vibrations, controls, signal processing, instrumentation, real-time control, active noise control, and dynamic system modeling. He received his BSME at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, MS and Ph.D. at Michigan State University where he worked on active noise control applications for the automotive industry. He has worked in the vibration test and measurement industry helping to drive new technologies to market and working with industry to meet their emerging needs. He is currently an Assistant Professor at California Polytechnic
HealthDevelopment (DTHD). Additional information regarding this development can be found at theDTHD web site.1 Active planning for the hospital began in late 2005. The projected cost andtimeline of the hospital is approximately 3 million dollars over a period of 5 years respectively.The majority of this cost is associated with the building materials and power systems. Laborcosts are typically not excessive in Tanzania. To minimize expenditures, the goal is to outfit theDCMC hospital with relatively new equipment obtained from equipment upgrades as they occurat sister hospitals. The Dodoma location of the DCMC hospital is somewhat remote from themain hydro-power generation locations (northern Tanzania) and existing transmission lines in
period? 2. What were the most commonly cited strategies for sustaining the program beyond initial funding? 3. Which unique strategies for sustaining the program beyond initial funding could inform future sustainability efforts? IGERT is the flagship funding program for the U.S. National Science Foundation’sDivision of Graduate Education, and widely regarded as a premiere source of innovation ininterdisciplinary graduate education, particularly across a range of institutions. Although thisstudy is limited to an examination of funded IGERT proposals, our findings suggest strategiesthat may be implemented more generally to institutionalize innovation in engineering education,particularly at the graduate level.Literature Review
and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building communities of engineering faculty, staff, and students engaged in educational