series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development.Ms. Galyna Melnychuk, Mississippi State University Galyna Melnychuk completed her undergraduate education in Optical Engineering at Kiev Polytechnic University. In addition, she holds two engineering masters degrees - M.S. in Optical Engineering from Kiev Polytechnic University and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Mississippi State University. Subse- quent involvement in technology commercialization and small business development at MSU stimulated her interest in finances, accounting and business taxations, and she received her third graduate degree - Master of Taxation from the College of Accounting at MSU
mechanical engineering, civil engineering, architecture, cognitive science, and computer science at MIT, UC-Berkeley, UCLA, Columbia and CMU in the USA, at Strathclyde and Loughborough in the UK, at INSA-Lyon and Provence in France and at EPFL in Switzerland.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering
in the computer science department. He is currently an assistant professor at Washington State University in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and is a recipient of the National Science Foundation CAREER award. Current research interests include intelligent agents, multi-agent systems, reinforcement learning, transfer learning, and robotics.Anne Anderson, Washington State University Anne Anderson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Design + Construction at Washington State Uni- versity. Her research focuses on improving construction coordination efforts through the use of building information modeling (BIM) and emerging collaboration technologies. c
Paper ID #17026Engineering Together Sustainable Communities: Sustainability Engineeringin ActionDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativ- ity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Heidi A. Taboada is an Associate Professor in the
-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and
toexperience the concepts they have been taught in class. Traditional labs require direct contactbetween the students and the laboratory setup in a physical location called a laboratory. Thissystem however poses some limitations well captured by a number of questions put forward byNational Instruments1. Remote labs emerged as an answer to these questions. Hence, remote labsmake it possible to do lab work at any time of any day, from the comfort of one's bedroom orduring a live lecture in class. They also make it possible to share laboratories across students andresearchers at great distances from each other. This means that remote labs inherently have thecapacity to foster collaboration between students and researchers of different demographics,across
Detailed course descriptions of curriculum progressionThis paper shows how model-based system design, as has been described, is integrated inselected courses in all four years of the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate curriculum. Thecourses where this has been implemented are presented in Table 1 and are required courses forall students working toward a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering. This approachis the model-based design counterpart to the “Design Spine” discussed by Sheppard et al.6 whorethought the curriculum at Stevens Institute of Technology to emphasize design throughout allfour years. An initial cohort of freshman engineering students started the proposed model-baseddesign sequence in the fall 2015 semester. Assessment
hasbegun promoting a strong culture of Active Cooperative Learning (ACL). ABET, theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, has recommended this pedagogicalapproach as a method because focusing students on real-world problems can increase theirmotivation. 4 By using the live case study approach in this class, the traditional student group,expanded to include the mentor, can work together to synthesize their understanding of theapplication, through the question and answer process. The students can reinforce the conceptswith each other through the process of writing reflective papers on how their mentor companyapplies the techniques. Finally, the objective of this method is pulled together by the NationalAcademy of Engineering report
. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served as vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, and a member of the Transportation Research Board committees on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Asset Management, and Emerging Technology for Design and Construction. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University.Dr. David S Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. David S. Hurwitz is an assistant professor of transportation
theory of situatedlearning was used to identify and inform the ways in which being research mentors can preparethe mentors for their future careers, specifically in terms of how they are prepared to becomemembers of the communities of practice they aspire to join. The benefits for research mentorswere classified as follows: (1) benefits related to preparation for their future careers, such asstrengthening their technical skills and content knowledge, and developing and improvingvarious professional skills, and (2) benefits related to their current positions asstudents/postdoctoral scholars, such as receiving help with their theses or research projects.This study is part of a longer-term study to determine the effectiveness of this
1993 at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He currently serves as associate department head, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, at the University of Wyoming.Dr. Thad B. Welch, Boise State University Dr. Thad B. Welch, P.E. received the B.E.E., M.S.E.E., E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Naval Postgraduate School, Naval Postgraduate School, and the University of Colorado in 1979, 1989, 1989, and 1997, respectively. He was commissioned in the U.S. Navy in 1979 and has been assigned to three submarines and a submarine repair tender. He has deployed in the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, and Arctic Ocean. From 1994 to 1997 he was an instructor and assistant professor teaching
landbased military vehicles. While working there, I managed their mechanical CAD group. Afteronly a short time with them, I accepted a different job at the National Superconducting CyclotronLaboratory in East Lansing, Michigan. There I was the team leader for the mechanical designdepartment’s Analysis & Simulation group. NSCL is a nuclear physics research facility thatproduces continuous beams of rare isotopes used in experiments conducted by researchers that Page 24.324.3come from around the world to use the facility. After serving in that role for a bit over fouryears, my most recent job change emerged which brought me to Hemlock
microelectronics industry but also inthe emerging field of nanoscale materials processing. The lab modules, which provide studentswith hands-on learning as well as more open-ended problem solving experiences, are describedelsewhere.1,2 Another important component to this approach is providing students applications inthe context of their core ChE engineering science classes. The classroom examples providestudents an integrated experience throughout their undergraduate studies and allow students tosynthesize chemical engineering science fundamentals applied toward microelectronics andnanomaterials processes. In this paper, two such examples are presented to illustrate how unitoperations from microelectronics processes are integrated into a core engineering
many physics principles. In addition to using standard classical physicsdemonstrations, i.e. a cart on a ramp or the laser and a diffraction grating, numerous pieces ofactual military hardware are brought into the classroom to stimulate discussion about the physicsconcepts associated with the equipment. For example, during the Reconnaissance of theBattlefield Phase, optics concepts are the main focus. Army equipment such as militarybinoculars and laser aiming sights are used to demonstrate the principles of magnification,photon energy, diffraction, etc. From this discussion emerges a chalkboard example problem inwhich the cadets actually calculate these quantities. In almost every lesson, cadets are exposedto an actual piece of military
, have been 7 of 103 for Fall 2000, 9 of 113 for Fall 2001, and 7 of 106 for Fall 2002.There have been 6 general Engineering graduates from Fall 2000 through Fall 2002, and 4 moreare anticipated for Spring 2003. The program’s flexibility has already allowed individual generalEngineering majors to prepare for engineering careers with “concentrations” in business(management, information systems), computer science, music/acoustics, and pre-med.ConclusionGeneral Engineering programs account for only a small percentage (~2%) of the total number of Page 8.1113.8engineering graduates nationally. This naturally raises the question: What significance
engineeringeducation, very few studies have examined what students themselves think of sustainability.Studies on student perceptions of sustainability-related topics give us some indication of theinterest and motivation students may have in learning about sustainability. Researchers at theUniversity of Washington10 examined engineering students' conceptions of their profession. Thestudent group as a whole had conceptions covering all eleven of the United States AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology graduate attributes11. There was, predictably, a strongfocus on technical concepts and great variation in the range of outcomes included in individualschemas. The study suggests that students' conceptions of what it is to be an engineer varywidely, from
that are present in a number of core educationtheories. The observations of student gaps and repair/remediation issues are the everyday, reallife exemplars of what happens when there is a mismatch between principles of theory andpractice. The learning cycles approach, first articulated in the late 1950’s and 1960’s by RobertKarplus and J. Myron Atkin (physics/elementary science education) and independently Page 25.1160.3developed by Chester Lawson (biology education) (Lawson, 1989), is one of these corephilosophies which informs this research. Karplus and Atkin based their Learning Cyclesapproach on observation and Piaget’s work on
F J P Logical Empathetic Systematic Casual Reasonable Compassionate Planful Open-Ended Questioning Accommodating Early Starting Pressure-Prompted Critical Accepting Scheduled Spontaneous Tough Tender Methodical Emergent Language through reading and reflectionWeekly reflections were based on a set of 15 articles and 14 videos. These were chosen
engineering course Itook. In this course, students were put into groups and had to complete an engineering task (inmy case, build a simple robot); however, the class’s primary learning outcomes focused on non-technical concepts like engineering ethics, which made this course like a mini capstone wherestudents had to find the information themselves to complete their projects. Reflecting on thisproject, I realized that researching and building circuitry for robots was the primary reason forselecting Electrical Engineering. Therefore, when I look at the department’s RED program, I seea similar ideology: an attempt to teach students more about the professional side of engineeringand empower students to take responsibility for learning. I still have not
of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Geoff holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Different Teaching Styles and the Impacts on Test Design for DynamicsThe pedagogical design of a classroom, including the class environment, assessment methods, andlearning outcomes, impacts everything that students do and learn in that course. There are manydifferent methods of teaching that have emerged and been explored in engineering classrooms inrecent years such as flipped classrooms, repeated testing, courses with in-class hands-on activities,and also many
belonging inengineering. The study found that classroom inclusion was the only significant predictor ofbelonging and could predict it positively to a moderate degree. Further, it was found that studentsin revised inclusive courses reported significantly stronger feelings of inclusion and belongingthan their peers in traditional courses. These findings suggest that systematic efforts toimplement neuroinclusive learning practices in engineering education may contribute to a senseof belonging for all students.IntroductionThe concept of neurodiversity, a term coined by sociologist Judy Singer [1], emerged asmembers of the autistic community challenged the predominant disability framing of autism andembraced the notion that diversity of minds is both
condition that affects asmany as 25% of college students with disabilities. Students with ADHD experience bothstrengths (e.g., creativity, divergent thinking, high energy levels, and the ability to hyper-focuson tasks of interest) and challenges (e.g., executive functioning, time management, organization,and study skills). Many of these challenges might be due to deficit-focused mindset common insome higher education environments. Some scholars have proposed that the teaching methodsemployed in college classrooms can significantly impact the academic achievement of collegestudents with ADHD. Few studies, however, have investigated how students with specificneurodisabilities are influenced by particular science, technology, engineering, and math
well. • Copy of the information letter • Copy of the interview protocol • Pen or pencilWear business casual clothes. After talking over the interview with the interviewee (see notesbelow), start recording and open the interview with some casual questions such as, “How is yourday going?” If they are talking for a bit on these points let them keep going and do not cut themoff. You want them to talk throughout the interview, and it can help to get them going early on atopic that they are comfortable talking about.Avoid bringing in large pieces of technology if possible as they can be distracting/intimidating.Find a space that does not have a formal interview set up (you behind a desk and them on theother side). If the
performance metrics, as well as a constructed House of Quality 5. 2. Weeks 4-6. Students work on a series of conceptual and preliminary designs that are presented via conference call, video conference, or on-site. Conceptual designs are given as block diagrams, explaining different possible project topologies. Preliminary designs are fleshed out from the block diagrams, and offer more concrete feasibility information, including potential vendors for parts, gross dimensions, and rough drawings or solid models of designs. Students pick one option to pursue as a final design from the list of preliminary designs, or a synthesis of the given preliminary designs. This is done conjointly with the project sponsor
materials science and engineering from Stanford University (1991 and 1987) and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University (1985).Dr. Lizabeth T Schlemer P.E., California Polytechnic State University Page 24.1037.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Relational versus transactional community engagement: An experience of the benefits and costsAbstractLearning through community engagement (CE) is widely considered a high-impact practice withthe potential benefit of accelerated cognitive development, deeper
describe each site in moredetail.Mid-Atlantic SiteThe entrepreneurship course was team-taught by four instructors; three of whom had startupexperience. One was simultaneously working as a faculty member and startup co-founder;another had previous startup experience but was currently working as a faculty member leadingan interdisciplinary technology-focused research initiative; and the third was serving as aregional leader in startup and economic development. The fourth, despite having no formalstartup experience, had experience using the start-up development model that formed the basis ofthe course as well as a strong foundation in learning theories and the entrepreneurship educationliterature. In addition, other experienced start-up mentors from
, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USAI. Introduction Students and hobbyists today are met with a plethora of electronics projects that can be easilycompleted with the wide variety of online resources and extensive documentation. Many of theseprojects include the use of high level embedded systems that serve as a “black box” for electroniccontrol of sensors, actuators, motors, wireless communication, and other complex systems [1-6].Recently, a trend has emerged in which these development platforms have become smaller, easier to use,open source, and affordable. This trend has enabled interesting projects that aim to introduce newtechnologies, inspire technological direction, provide capabilities to the underprivileged, and also
Paper ID #36891Say Yes to the Stress: Escape Rooms in Civil Engineering ClassroomsMajor Brett Rocha, United States Military Academy MAJ Brett Rocha is a second year instructor at the US Military Academy in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2012, her M.S. in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2016, and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Central Florida in 2021. She teaches mechanics of materials, design of steel structures, and design of concrete structures.Dr. Kevin Francis McMullen, United States
, Florida International University Malak Elaouinate is a Florida International University student studying electrical engineering. Her re- search aims to investigate the many experiences of LGBTQ+ students at a Hispanic-Serving Institution in order to inform changes within CEC that contribute to students of marginalized identities feeling wel- come, comfortable, and accurately represented.Bailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International University Bailey Bond-Trittipo is an engineering and computing education Ph.D. student in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. Her work centers on understanding how systems of oppression shape the culture of
belonging amidst the engineering culture at her institution?Theoretical Framework: Sense of BelongingSense of belonging is used as a guiding framework for this study. A sense of belongingencompasses both cognitive and affective elements [14]. At the cognitive dimension, theevaluation of belonging is based on one’s collective information about their experiences within agroup (i.e., engineering culture) and with members of the group (i.e., engineering peers, professors,etc.). At the affective dimension, evaluation of belonging is based on feelings that develop fromexperiences within a group or with members of the group [14]. The cognitive and affectivedimensions inform each other as an individuals’ “cognitive processing often results in an