date. Usually, our faculty would offer a couple of short sessions toprepare the students, and then be available as students had additional questions. These sessionswere not comprehensive reviews, but mainly discussed test logistics, and went over a fewexample problems in each major category.With students continuously taking the test from January through May with no test dates in March2016, we hedged our bets that the students would be able to review as needed and approachfaculty as needed about the exam.However, through discussions with graduating seniors, who had completed the exam, it becameobvious to us that some students had issues with logistics while taking the computer-based exam.First, some did not understand the exam timing, and spent
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 2. Spade End Nail Defect to be Sorted with Nail Drawing. Laminated Object Manufacturing of a FractalNDSU received a large NSF grant to promote the learning of science and math through involvinggraduate students and senior undergraduate students in the K-12 classroom3. Through thisactivity, the faculty learned that a high school math teacher had students spend one weekbuilding a fractal, with sheet paper and tape, as a hands-on complement to fractal theory. Tobring advanced technology into the fractal building experience, three NDSU freshman studentschose to study and propose the use of Laminated
ft/sec.2, for the heights to be considered in this Page 6.752.8paper (i.e. less than 3,000 ft)).“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society of Engineering EducationDp (psi)=14.696 x (1- exp(- h x 32.2 x 28.966/ (32.2 x 1545 x To) Eqn. 3where: To= 520- .5 x 3.6 x h/1000; To= amb. temp. R at bld.g height, h; h= ht. ofthe building (ft.);If a pressure differential (Dp) of this magnitude could be maintained then an air flow willbe induced through such a conduit. This phenomenon has not
required by the occupants or work in tandem with vapor-compression or other comfortcooling system to meet needs.Currently, California Statewide Customized Offering Program offers incentive demand reductionabove and beyond baseline energy performance [15]. Peak demand reduction is evaluated usingthe Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER) peak approach. The DEER peak methodis defined as “an estimated average grid level impact for a measure between 2 p.m. and 5 p.m.during a ‘heat wave’ defined by three consecutive weekdays for weather conditions that areexpected to produce a regional grid peak event.” Figure 3 shows the 1.4-million-gallon ThermalEnergy Storage Tank at the CSU Chico Central Utility Plant. Figure 3: Thermal Energy
minuteslong. After learning about design processes of engineers with various levels of expertise andresponding to questions about what they found to be important information, students were asked‘Will Information from this exercise affect how you will do design in the future? How?’ Throughcoding students’ responses, we discovered that students are thinking metacognitively aboutdesign through articulating plans, efficient use of time, monitoring their steps, and evaluatingtheir design processes. While all students can articulate their design intentions, some studentsexplore a nuanced understanding of their design intentions and subsequent actionable strategiesthat could impact how they design in the future. This practical classroom activity can be used
roughly 200 college students. Two of the threescales have strong internal reliability with Cronbach alpha reliability measures of 0.73 forconstruct 1) and 0.90 for construct 2). The third is weaker with a Cronbach alpha of 0.3, clearlycalling for a closer examination and alteration of the survey questions. Each of the scalesaccounts for 68%, 63% and 51% of the variance, respectively. We present evidence of validityfor the three scales. Construct validity is illustrated through predictable performance on thescales by contrasting groups of students, consistency in the internal structure through factoranalysis and expected correlations across scales. However, we recognize that these instrumentscan be refined and improved; we have deployed them in a
. Similar to any other research, field research also requires to systematic collection ofinformation that contributes to the understanding of the challenge and to organize thoseoutcomes in a cohesive and persuasive fashion that proposes a new insight, answer or solution.Figure 1: Field Research Field Participant Interviews Document Research observation analysis Page 26.753.4III) Case Study: Research conducted by AuthorsStep 1: Researcher first contacted rice millers through formal and informal network from USAby calling rice mill owners in India. This initial group was identified since, as businesses,represented the most
asked questions related to their socio-demographic information.Survey data was collected for the current study through convenience sampling. Participants inthis method were chosen according to their convenience and accessibility. In particular, thosewho took part in the study were registered students for the Fall semester of 2023 in the cross-listed Sustainable Approach to Construction course. This indicates that participants were selectedfrom among the students who decided to enroll in that course for that particular academic year.The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the university reviewed the survey and deemed thesurvey exempt beyond the initial review. All students were informed that the survey wasoptional, and they could choose to
people skills”.15 They have clear outcomes, measurable, goal ortask driven, and attained through education or on the job training. This skill perspective is quitegeneral and often dependent on the job at hand or the job position need.The second perspective of IT skills could be considered more general skills required for the ITprofessional. The perspective is not task oriented but focuses on the range of job outcomes and isa function of how to integrate a number of technologies. These core skills are more aboutorganizational skills such as communication and interpersonal than specific IT skills such asprogramming. IT leaders are more apt to require these skills and might vary from organization to
students to rate theirpartners on a scale from 0 (poor) to 20 (superior) for each of five questions concerningcontribution towards completion of the lab. Each students’ lab score was multiplied by thepercentage of points received on this evaluation. Though a majority of students received a 100%on their peer evaluation, low peer evaluation scores sent a strong signal to those who were notputting forth the necessary effort. Differences in ability and desire to contribute were alsoequalized by changing partners three times during the semester. Students were randomly assignedpartners through a web-based program who they then worked with for two to three weeks. If astudent’s partner did not show up after 10 minutes, the student was assigned to another
. 103. Feisel, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., (2005) The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education, J. Engineering Ed., 94(1), pp. 121-130.4. Kline, R., (1994) World War II: A Watershed in Electrical Engineering Education, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 17-23.5. Dutson, A.J., Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P. and Sorensen, C.D., (1997) A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (1), 1997, pp. 17-28.6. Sheppard, S.D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. and Sullivan, W.M. (2008) Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.7. NAE, (2004) The
shocks and RF burns. These can resultfrom the electric currents which flow between a conducting object and a person who comes intocontact with it while they are exposed to RF fields. “Although it was known that RFR couldcause electric shock in the body or burns in tissue under certain circumstances, specific exposurelimits were not included in previous standards for human exposure to RFR…noted that sucheffects were considered in choosing the 300-kHz lower frequency limit of the present ANSI(1982) standard”15.Non-thermal effects, such as alteration of the human body’s circadian rhythms, immune systemand the nature of the electrical and chemical signals communicated through the cell membranehave been demonstrated by a few researchers10. However
approach through exercises that require them to design concurrent services, predict thetiming, implement the services with RM fixed or dynamic priorities and then trace and compareactual timing to predicted for verification of not only correct function and output, but the abilityof their systems to meet timing constraints (deadlines for response). Through a series ofchallenging exercises (six in total), they are introduced to concurrent programming (POSIXthreads for Linux) that must be mapped to specific cores (e.g., with CPU core thread affinity) forAMP. Through work on these exercises, RMA is reinforced and emphasized with more and morechallenging requirements and constraints. The exercises include simple problems at first, withthe use of
: including“specified criteria for success” as they go about defining problems, and planning and carryingout “fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identifyaspects of a model or prototype that can be improved.”6 Another principle for elementary through high school engineering education, accordingto the Committee on K12 Engineering Education, is that it promotes engineering habits of mind.Specifically, the committee referenced the following habits of mind: “systems thinking,collaboration, ethical considerations, creativity, communication and optimism.”7 Optimism“reflects a world view in which possibilities and opportunities can be found in every challengeand an understanding that every technology can
material much faster. 3. The development of narratives through reflection and understanding of the equations and their treatments need to be monitored regularly and fast feedback provided to help them correct their conceptual aspects of the reflections narratives and keep progressing 4. Instructors need to provide the following: A set of key items, upon which to reflect, that we Page 26.226.16 would like them to know, problems that they need to be able to solve, concepts that they need to be able to talk about. This is essential. If we know what they need to accomplish, if it can come into a set of test-like
. Plastic Bag Carrier – Permits arthritic persons to carry more than one plastic grocery bag 15. Vent Screen - Filters HVAC air at vent 16. Harley Davidson Tank Logo – Logo for motorcycleWhile a detailed description of each project is beyond the scope of this paper the overall successof each venture will be indicated. Some of the more extreme uses of RP that we have done are: · House Models · Trophies or Plaques · 6” Working Band saw · Jewelry · ProstheticsThese projects were often initiated with the industry person coming in to discuss the project withthe instructor. Then a meeting would be set up where the industry person would meet with adesign and prototyping class. Student volunteers would then apply for either free or
represent devices and processes and may be low or high in terms ofphysical or functional fidelity (p. 318).” In an educational context, Alessi (2002) 4 proposed thatsimulations are “any program which incorporates an interactive model (one which can berepeatedly changed and rerun) and where the learning objective is for students to understand thatmodel, whether through discovery, experimentation, demonstration, or other methods (p. 177).”For our purposes, we define simulations as – A simulation is an interactive computational model with user control of specific variables (inputs) and multiple methods for displaying common relationships of interests (outputs, e.g. graphs) to experts (scientist perfecting the models or
education,” FEBS Open Bio, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.35–47, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13936.[11] A. Burgess, C. Van Diggele, C. Roberts, and C. Mellis, “Team-based learning: design,facilitation and participation,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, no. S2, Dec. 2020, doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.[12] P. Chad, “The use of Team-Based learning as an approach to increased engagement andlearning for marketing students,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 128–139,Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0273475312450388.[13] E. Dane-Staples, “Aligning the classroom and the job through Team-Based learning,” SportManagement Education Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 74–78, Nov. 2022, doi:10.1123/smej.2022-0009.[14] H. Donelan and K. Kear, “Online group
quality of life “The provision of future topics of study in CP management. Further, the public care & support to can gain from this research since it adds on to the available established The Patient Challenges of Patient patients has a pool of information on CP management. Parents, clinic through medical Quality of CP
, complicated solutions. 4. Disrespect for effective Low-Tech solutions. 5. Belief that creation of something new is always better than improvement of an existing one. 6. Lack of design capability. 7. Avoidance of contradictions in problem solving - drive to optimize existing solutions or add Hi-Tech patches. 8. Adoration for analysis and no understanding of synthesis. 9. Unskilled in defining core of a problem and deciding that a solution is ‘good enough’. 10. Weak communication skills through means other than equations and calculations. 11. Weak communication skills through sketches/pictures/drawings. 12. No understanding of quality process beyond SPC. 13. Prefer working as
toa design task. Kilgore et al.[12] refer to the consideration of global and societal implications ofengineering design as “breadth of problem-scoping,” and the “context” of engineering (p. 321).Their conceptualization of contextual competence focuses on broad thinking and problem-scoping activity, a critical part of the design process, in a specific engineering design task.While working through design tasks is one avenue to enhancing one’s contextual competence,research suggests that other activities also influence the development of student’s contextualcompetence. Through analyzing six institutions with exemplary engineering programs in a casestudy format, Lattuca et al. found that these campuses offer a variety of curricular experiences
times a week,including three 50-minute sessions and one 165-minute flexible or “flex” period. The flex periodis the cornerstone of the revised course structure, as it allows for several different teaching andlearning strategies that would not be possible in the shorter periods. These periods arespecifically designed to be active learning sessions, which allow for better integration ofindividual concepts to attain a higher level of application. While the 50-minute sessions involveshort lectures and the solution of multiple stand-alone problems, several of the flex periods areused for combined analytical and laboratory-type experiences that extend far beyond simplesingle-concept problems similar to those found in most textbooks. Other uses of the
behaviors by evoking inthem positively valenced emotions through the provision of personalized feedback andvalidation. Odafe [33], for example, reflecting on his experience with administering oralassessment in an algebra course, observes “when students feel that their contributions are valued,they will start to 'own' and value the subject of mathematics and this could indicate a turningpoint in student attitudes towards the subject.” Boedigheimer and colleagues [34], whoconducted oral exams across multiple courses in the same field, similarly recognize “studentswho performed well appreciate the immediate praise.” In her thermodynamics course, Zhao [35]found that students who volunteered to take the oral exam “tended to feel that the class was
disciplines and in various contexts.In terms of student learning and attitudes, we agreed that many bright students tend to “turn theirbrains off” when in the laboratory. Some students expect to be told (either through a protocol,teaching assistant or instructor) what each step should be rather than to solve problems forthemselves. Because of compartmentalization, students often make the same mistake repeatedly.We surmised that a reason for such an approach to laboratory coursework is the attitude that thepurpose of education is certification (grades, diploma) rather than acquisition of knowledge andskills. Without the ability to generalize, students see the required assignments of a course ashaving no meaning or relevance beyond those particular
[1]. Additionally, through industry and public institutions weknow that engineers do not work in isolation, but in teams [2]. There is a need for a moreauthentic course experiences where engineering students can build content knowledge but alsoknowledge in how to collaborate with peers.Background: Educational researchers Chi and Wylie began to investigate groups of twos andthrees in different learning contexts to better understand what occurs in these group dynamicsand how do these dynamics affect learning [3]. They created the ICAP framework which allowsone to categorize students’ levels of cognitive engagement into one of four modes based on theirovert observable behaviors: Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive (aka ICAP). In general
to new technologies through network simulation.1 – IntroductionIn the design of new systems, modeling and simulation allow us to verify new architecturesbefore their actual implementation. In the analysis of existing networks, modeling and simulationallow us to identify bottlenecks and evaluate the impact of new users, applications or changes tothe network infrastructure. Using OpnetTM as a software tool to simulate and model computernetworks, our course on Communication Networks Modeling, Simulation and Testing, in theTelecommunications Engineering Technology program at Texas A&M, teaches our students toevaluate and identify limitations in network architectures and protocols.Moreover, one of our goals is to teach them to integrate new
a multistory structure as described above.This was done for various combinations of numbers of stories, shores and reshores and resultedin the development of a total of 84 training cases. Another set of 15 cases was not used duringtraining the model. These 15 cases were used during evaluation of the trained model. Thecombinations of number of stories, shores and reshores are designated through out the paperusing alpha-numeric characters, such as, N8S3R1 represents an 8 story building with 3 shoresand 1 reshore construction sequence. The training data included three inputs – the number ofshores to be used, the number of reshores to be used, and the number of stories of the structure –and three outputs – the maximum load on a shore, the
tion session security,” in 2nd Smart Cities Symposiumdetection. (SCS 2019), 2019, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1049/cp.2019.0178. All experiments are run on an ollama model inference with [3] A. O. Salau, E. D. Emmanuel, A. Alemran, C. K. Dixit,NVIDIA RTX A6000 graphic card with a dedicated 48 GB and S. L. Braide, “Exploring large language models forGPU. natural language processing,” in 2024 Second Interna- tional Conference Computational and Characterization
programs such as the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET), many universities around the world have been making major efforts torecognize the challenges faced by engineering educational programs and make changes toachieve what many are calling “Excellence in Engineering Education”. As one example of theprograms developed recently, in 2002, the National Academy of Engineering launched the Page 11.610.2Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) 1. Its purpose isto understand at a deeper level what should be taught in engineering and how to teach thestudents, by recognizing how they learn. Through its
), a review ofbranch specific websites (e.g. search for “Navy education benefits”) for education benefitsrevealed the most common and longstanding programs that are highlighted in this paper.History / BackgroundSince its inception in 2009, the Post-9/11 GI Bill has been a transformative investment of morethan $53 billion to support the post-secondary education of more than 1.4 million servicemembers, veterans, and their families [1]. Prior to World War 1, there was little to none in theprovision for veterans’ participation in higher education. It seems the only compensation was inthe form of pensions for some disabled veterans following the Revolutionary War. Thiscompensation continued into the next century through the Civil War [2]. However