what a civil or structural engineer does.ii. An understanding of an engineer as one who “makes,” “creates” or “designs.”iii. Increased enthusiasm for engineering as a discipline.iv. More likelihood of describing engineering professionals as problem solvers, big picture thinkers, innovative, and creative.v. More confidence in their own emerging engineering skills.vi. Appreciation for the engineering principles of self-critique/validation and conservative assumptions.vii. An understanding of the value and importance of drawing diagrams as a Page 23.600.3 fundamental engineering skillSpecifically those teaching methodologies that aimed to
of the disciplines working in the integrative field is also vital to success. The key isenabling individuals from different disciplines to work interactively to solve problems andinnovate within the selected field. An example of a good integration is engineering and businessworking on blockchain and financial technology. This area requires complete integration ofexpertise from these two disciplines to develop new ideas and solutions. One Director describedthe selection of the integrative field as “Emerging and will be impacting (society), almost cuttingacross disciplines. A Big umbrella where people can have flexibility to create their own world.”As seen in Equation 1 the integrative field term is in the exponent. This means the degree
each question was calculated. Results showed 24 responses to whatstudents liked best about the Story Circles and 18 responses to what they liked least. Theresponses were content analyzed first by each member of the four-person research teamindividually. Next, the researchers collectively discussed and decided on emerging themes fromthe student responses.Results indicate that a majority of students (75%) liked “getting to know classmates” best. Asshown in Figure 1, this theme has three specific sub-areas: getting to know classmates in general,getting to know classmates pertaining to teamwork, and getting to know their teammates’ pastexperience and background. The second theme was “communication.”Figure 1: Frequency of themes from “liked best
Education through Industry Immersion and a Focus on Identity.” Her research also includes NOx formation in lean-premixed combustion and electro- mechanical systems for sustainable processing of microalgae. Her work is published in venues including the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, Transactions of ASME, Chemical Engineering Journal, Bioresource Technology, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, and Combustion and Flame. She is a member of the ASEE, ASME, and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division. She received a Dipl. Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from
tissues [8,9].Furthermore, bioadhesives have been developed as delivery vehicles for cells [10,11] and otherbioactive factors [12,13], which may promote more regenerative healing. The current state ofbioadhesives focuses on sealing tissue defects; however, the aim for next-generation bioadhesivesis to promote complete healing, or regeneration [14]. Achieving this goal will require diversescientific teams, which produce higher impact work [15–17].Outreach with K-12 students is an effective way to engage younger students to study science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) at the university level [18,19]. Focusing theseefforts on individuals who are traditionally underrepresented in STEM based on race, ethnicity,gender, sexual
Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab that aspires to elevate the experiences of marginalized populations, dismantle systematic injustices, and transform the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies and methodologies in engineering education. Intrigued by the intersections of engineering education, mental health and social justice, Dr. Coley’s primary research interest focuses on virtual reality as a tool for developing empathetic and in- clusive mindsets among engineering faculty. She is also interested in hidden populations in engineering education and innovation for more inclusive pedagogies.Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic
interpersonal factors that contributed to belongingness or exclusion. At the institutionallevel, four types of factors were identified: 1) professional relationships (withteachers/mentors); 2) pedagogical (which referred to the learning configurations of keycourses); 3) informational (particularly with respect to the types/modes of informationconveyed to students by the institution); and 4) sociopolitical (border-crossing and visaexperiences of Latinx E&CS students). At the individual level, participants related personal andinterpersonal factors, including their own and others’ grades and grade point averages.These institutional and interpersonal factors are interrelated, for instance, when particularlearning configurations impact (or are seen to
and Technology/2Lain Evaluation Research/3New Mexico State University / 4New Mexico Public Interest Research GroupAbstract—The numbers of students pursuing graduate education at the master’s level hasincreased nearly four-fold since 1966. In engineering, the number climbed from 13,705 mastersdegrees and 2,301 doctoral degrees awarded in 1966 to 33,872 masters and 5,776 doctoraldegrees awarded in 2004[2]. Women and under-represented minorities’ (URM) share ofengineering doctoral degrees have increased but members of these groups are stillunderrepresented at the doctoral level. This paper uses draw evidence about 24 facultymembers’ retrospective views of mentoring experiences from semi-structured qualitativeinterviews. Case study
activities promoted greater gains inpositive attitudes toward engineering for the female students than for the male students.Implications from this study can inform teachers’ use of engineering design activities in scienceclassrooms for the purpose of teaching about engineering and also teaching science content at adeep conceptual level. Results may also be of interest to science curriculum developers andengineering educators involved in developing engineering outreach curricula for middle schoolstudents. With many states promoting STEM initiatives to encourage the rigorous teaching ofscience, technology, engineering and mathematics, the results of this study may help strengthenthe results of those efforts.References1. Ferguson, R.L. (2007
required to document the way they will work together (e.g. assign eachmember certain tasks based on current abilities or work cooperatively on everything) as well howto handle conflicts when they arise 17. Each group is expected to submit a weekly memo todocument their progress and identify questions and problems. The memos and the project planare posted to a website created and maintained by the students so that everyone involved,including those in Mexico, can stay informed and assist as necessary18.Logistics of the trip to Mexico are handled in large part by the students during the preparationphase. Each student is assigned some portion of the details of the trip such as finding hotels,arranging transportation to/from the airport and within
professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leading innovation and technology development efforts in a major engineering firm. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1 Perceived Importance and Confidence in Leadership Ability: A National Survey of Final Year Canadian Engineering StudentsIntroductionEngineering leadership as a field of study has grown rapidly in the last two decades (Handley etal., 2018; Klassen et al., 2016), but there is limited understanding of how engineering studentsview the importance of leadership skills
Science at the University of California San Diego.Mr. Paul Andreas Hadjipieris, University of California, San Diego Paul Hadjipieris is an instructional designer at the University of California San Diego. He holds an MA, in history from Edinboro University of Pennsylvania. His research agenda is on emerging educational tech- nologies and their application to the classroom. He is deeply involved in SoTL research at the University of California San Diego and currently working with faculty on course design and manuscript construction.Dr. Sheena Ghanbari SerslevDr. Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali
AC 2011-2358: IMPACTS OF LIVING LEARNING COMMUNITIES ONENGINEERING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND SENSE OF AFFILIA-TIONShannon Ciston, University of New Haven Shannon Ciston is an Assistant Professor of Multidisciplinary Engineering at the University of New Haven in Connecticut. Her background is in Chemical Engineering, with degrees from Northwestern University (Ph.D.) and Illinois Institute of Technology (B.S.). Dr. Ciston’s research interests are in two main ar- eas: Engineering Education (including student experience, attitudes, and perceptions) and Sustainability (including impacts of the Chemical and Energy industries on water resources).Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Ph.D., University of New Haven Assistant Professor of
continuously downloaded. The CCS100 spectrometer costs about $2000 – with the tungsten light source and sample chamber shown in the figure, the cost of a station is about $3000. Four spectrometers were acquired for NECC from the ALERT grant and another four were borrowed from the NU HTT&TL. The CCS100 spectrometers are being developed to be part of the NU freshman HTT&TL experience, but the EST104 course was their first use in an “Intro to Engineering” class. Handouts describing the use of the instruments and projects to be accomplished using the spectral information were created for the EST104 class. The spectrometer provided an excellent vehicle to introduce MATLAB array operations. The spectrometer comes with a Thorlabs proprietary software
leadership.Designing curriculum is one matter; rebuilding an entire program’s educational outcomes(PEOs) is another. The Department of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological Universitydecided to adopt the BOK2 as the new standard for their PEOs just two years before their ABETaccreditation visit in 2010.13 Although this was very progressive, accomplishing this effort waslikened to “a quest to slay the Multi-Headed Hydra.” The department encountered numerouschallenges, including faculty members who were unfamiliar with the BOK2 and Bloom’sTaxonomy, adjunct professors who were suddenly bombarded with educational psychology Page 25.1188.5terminology, debates
autonomous? Do they feelcompetent? Do they feel a sense of belonging/relatedness? And of these needs, which require themost attention in workplace culture change? Which are best fulfilled and when? The CAReSstudy seeks to address all of these questions and more. But, first, the study has focused on tooldevelopment to ensure that how the three psychological needs are measured is valid, reliable, andsuitable to the engineering workplace context.MethodsA survey was developed for the engineering CAReS study which contained demographic items,workplace information, several short answer/open-ended questions, and 171 Likert-scale itemsfocused on competence, autonomy, and relatedness as well as barriers to workplace success(including sexual harassment and
merits of engineeringdesign integration. This paper examines the impact of an NSF funded program (DRL-1102990), the CincinnatiEngineering Enhanced Math and Science (CEEMS) Partnership, designed to assist teachers inintegrating engineering design challenges in traditional math and science courses with requiredacademic standards and high stakes tests that measure student mastery of those standards. Usingevaluation and research results from CEEMS, this paper will detail the advantages, as well as thechallenges, of integrating engineering design into these courses. CEEMS targets middle school and high school (grades 6-12) science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM) teachers in 14 regional school districts. Teachers participate inthe grant
Paper ID #13054A Student-developed Rotational Mechanics Laboratory Exercise to Link En-gineering Design and ScienceMr. Jacob Michael Wild, James Madison UniversityDr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Nagel joined the James Madison University after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. He has a B.S. from Trine University and a M.S. from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, both in mechanical engineering. Since joining James Madison University, Nagel has
point-and-click were entering college withalmost no knowledge of the inner workings of the hardware that they were so accustomed tousing. These younger students were becoming master users of technology but had almost noknowledge about how things actually worked. And yet, every one of these students was about tospend a large portion of their next four years of school working on computers and evenprogramming them without knowing much about how their programs translated into operationsand results. That is how the idea was hatched to create a real-world hands-on project that wouldtie software to hardware and provide insight into how voltage and current provide the basis forall computer information processing. The fact that most of the material
inform the director and student leaders within our new makerspace to aid in creating policies and fostering a culture of inclusion while bringing light to exclusionary pressures students feel in other spaces on campus?RQ3) Which of the policies mentioned above, and to what degree, are effective in fostering a community of inclusion within a makerspace? (Not included in this paper and reliant on post intervention data collected in years two and beyond)BACKGROUNDThe Colorado School of Mines is a mid-sized STEM-focused institution in the Western UnitedStates. With approximately 7,500 total students across a variety of engineering and STEMdisciplines, it displays a typical gender ratio for undergraduate engineering programs
Paper ID #21233But How Do You Feel?Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he was the Associate Director of Leadership Programs at Cornell’s College of Engineering from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Zorman received his M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Technology in Vienna. He worked for 23+ years in the telecom industry in Europe and North America as engineer, leader, mentor, coach and leadership development professional. After a long and fulfilling customer-facing career, Mr
, 22 Patrick et al,23 and Johnson24 propose cultural change strategies for engineering educatorsand practitioners. Tonso calls for cultural change in engineering education based on feminist critiquerather than “cosmetic changes,”19 Riley urges us to strengthen cultures of accountability and fidelity tocore public and professional values in the wake of high profile engineering scandals,20 Kim and hercolleagues call for shifts in engineers’ moral formation to foster ethical practice in industry, 22, 25-27Patrick and her colleagues advocate for educational reform to replace technical silos withinterdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and STS (science and technology studies) scholars,23and Johnson urges us to grapple with the inherent
as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mr. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University Enrique is an experienced Systems Engineer with a demonstrated history of working in the electrical and electronic manufacturing field. Highly skilled in Embedded Devices, Software Engineering, and Electronics. He is a strong information technology professional with two MSc’s and working on a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Electrical Engineering from North Dakota State University.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University Mary is a Ph.D. candidate in biomedical engineering with research focused in the area of
their pathway to HE. When focusing onfamilial capital students were asked questions such as, “When is a time where you found parts ofyour home culture or life to help you in navigating your way in graduate school?” or, “Do youfeel you are able to bring your personal knowledge, experiences, and expertise to your graduateprogram? If so, how?”Audio recordings were transcribed and imported into the qualitative coding software, NVivo. Weinductively coded interviews, allowing common stepping stones to HE, such as a field-basedinfrastructure project, or influential relationships/conversations, to emerge. Field-basedinfrastructure projects were defined as traveling to or living in a community outside of your own,as part of a process of implementing or
necessary for design. Overall, this study aims to inform researchers andeducators about the type of courses that may impact students’ skill development andunderstanding of design to serve as a basis for designing more student-centered engineeringcurricula.MotivationDesign courses serve as a platform for students to exercise and gain the skills necessary toundertake the complex and dynamic challenges they will encounter in their careers. Engineeringdesign is a flexible and creative problem-solving process; it is not an exact science and requiresthe need to empathize, thoroughly define, and creatively ideate for the situation at hand [1], [2].The skills exercised in design, and in these design courses, can be effectively translated to anyrole within
in GMU offering a Graduate Certificate Program in TechnicalEntrepreneurship tailored to meet the needs of USACE. Technological change and the increasein privatization and enterprise development trends within the public sector require a wide varietyof multidisciplinary skills for the successful management of government technical programs andprojects. The graduate level technical entrepreneurship certificate responds to the need for broadtraining in entrepreneurial skills, performance measurement, engineering informationmanagement, systems analysis and leadership.This paper assesses the impact of the GMU certificate program on USACE Headquarters and itsemployees. It attempts to answer the question: Are USACE engineers better leaders
Paper ID #22147Building Your Change-agent Toolkit: The Power of StoryDr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a research professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Prof. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical
experiences to the students, andit aligns with Indiana State Standards for Science, mathematics, English/Language Arts andComputer Science. The curriculum is student-centered and engineering design-based with theobjective of engaging students in planning, building, testing, and redesigning a hamster trail. Thecurriculum has a set of thirteen lessons that state the objectives for each lesson aiming to guideand inform the teacher about the expected outcomes at the end of each class. At the beginning ofthe unit, the students were given a letter from a fictitious client who needed them to design anexercise trail for a hamster that fit onto an existing cage. The initial lessons focused on problemscoping, while the final lessons concentrated on solution
. Thus, they possess high levels of quality conceptualknowledge, i.e., knowledge about interconnected pieces of information and how they relate toeach other. Their well-developed knowledge structure facilitates quick retrieval of pertinentinformation from long-term memory and allows them to process the information in workingmemory more efficiently [8]. In addition to conceptual knowledge, experts also possess a largeamount of procedural knowledge, i.e., knowledge about how to do things, gained from theiryears of practice and experience. In fact, many experts have performed procedures that arecommon in their field so often that they reach a level of automaticity in which they can performthe task quickly with little cognitive effort [12].As noted
Education, 2020 Mini-Project Explorations to Develop Steel and Concrete Gravity System Design SkillsAbstractCore undergraduate steel and concrete courses focus their content on the fundamentals ofanalyzing and designing members. While this builds core knowledge in future structural engineers,many times these examples, homework, and exams approach isolated systems and/or members toconvey topics. It is often up to the capstone to connect members to systems; yet, there is often agap between offerings. If larger picture systems can adopted earlier, then stronger connections tothe topic while also informing students of real project complexity has potential. This paperdiscusses a two offerings of a yearlong piloted