to hands-on STEM experiences. Dr. Henderson is the immediate past Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES, pronounced ”promise”), a program aimed at increasing engineering student achievement, engagement, and graduation rates. His research group seeks to understand engineering identity trajectories and success mechanisms throughout lifespans using action-based participatory research and novel methodologies such as photovoice, IPA, and draw-an-engineer and the development of research-informed interventions to improve student success. He was most recently recognized by INSIGHT Into Diversity Magazine as an Inspiring STEM Leader, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with the
attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr
engineering departments and institutions. Her work with FACE lab centered the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, perceptions of engineering In addition, this work investigates the relationship between students’ interests and the engagement with engineering to inform curriculum development and teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators.Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Kayla is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interest includes the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, and the
been involved in, the biggest challenges have never been technical, they’vealways been people problems…The real challenge has been finding ways to work together andwork through disagreements…as engineers, we’re technical people, not people-people, so welike to focus on the technical details and just lead with technology in our solutions. I thinksometimes you actually have to lead with the soft skills and the people side.” Group 1 alsohighlighted the importance of contract law knowledge: “…having a basic understanding of lawand contract law…is really important. And that’s something where I didn’t get that at all in myundergraduate education.” With regards to the major changes in industry g, Group 1 namedvolume of information increased, making
, “Emerging Technologies: E-Textbooks, One Piece of thePuzzle,” Africa Education Review, v.14 no.2 p.15-36, 2017. [Online]. DOI:10.1080/18146627.2016.1271281[5] S.M. Samuel, N.H. Nicholls, L.N. Lalwani, D.S. Carter, and P.F. Grochowski, “Students,Vendor Platforms, and e-Textbooks: Using e-Books as e-Textbooks,” ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, 2013. [Online]. https://peer.asee.org/22494[6] L.A. Cummings, A. Larrivee, and L. Vega, “Comparing Electronic vs. Print BookPreferences between Students in the Social Science, the Arts, and STEM,” Library Hi TechNews, v.32 no.4 p.1-4, 2015. [Online]. DOI: 10.1108/LHTN-10-2014-0088[7] M. Millar and T. Schrier, “Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students Prefer andWhy?” Journal of Teaching in Travel
an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and is the Co-Director of As- sessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) at Purdue University. Dr. Cardella earned a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of Puget Sound and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at the University of Washington. At the University of Washington she worked with the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) and the LIFE Center (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments). She was a CASEE Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher at the Center for Design Research at Stanford before beginning her appointment at Purdue. Her research interests include: learning in
currently serves as his Department's Head, an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Mentor, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Civil Engineering Division Freshman Director.Camilla M. Saviz (Professor and Chair) Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA where she has happily taught since 1999. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis in the area of hydrodynamic and water quality modeling
Interpretations,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 407–441, Sep. 1976, doi: 10.3102/00346543046003407.[2] M. Bong and R. E. Clark, “Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 139–153, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_1.[3] H. W. Marsh and R. Shavelson, “Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 107–123, Jun. 1985, doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1.[4] D. Ifenthaler, Z. Siddique, and F. Mistree, “Designing for Open Innovation: Change of Attitudes, Self-Concept, and Team Dynamics in Engineering Education,” Emerging Technologies for STEAM
are wide and diverse across manyfields and sciences. This extensive list includes agriculture, archaeology, atmospheric studies,biology, conservation, construction, engineering, forestry, geology, geomatics, hydrographicsurveying, mining, object and obstacle detection, etc. Laser scanning technology has been used forvarious civil engineering and construction applications. In 2008, Yen et al. [1] completed atechnical report for Caltrans with copious information on deployment and use of 3D laser scanning.They indicated that Caltrans’ District 4 “has had 2 dedicated surveyors working with 3D laserscanners for over four years”. The next year, the same authors [2] completed the Phase II of theirwork to include additional training and materials. In
AC 2007-1548: IMPLEMENTING A VIDEO GAME TO TEACH PRINCIPLES OFMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGBrianno Coller, Northern Illinois University Dr. Coller is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Northern Illinois University. He received his Ph.D. in Theoretical & Applied Mechanics from Cornell University, and did postdoctoral research at the California Institute of Technology. In addition to research in education, Dr. Coller is interested in nonlinear dynamical systems and control. Page 12.840.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Implementing a video game to teach
ofreflection and of extending the benefit of the S-L project.Courses and projects include, for example, a first-year introduction to engineering course inwhich 420 students, divided into teams, designed and built moving displays illustrating variousenergy transformation technologies and recycling for 60,000 middle school students thatannually visit a history center that is part of a national park. Another example is a sophomorekinematics course in which student teams visited local playgrounds to assess their safety usingdeceleration, force, and impact equations learned from the course. Junior heat transfer coursesfocused in analyzing heat loss and making suggestions for heating system savings for a localfood pantry, a city hall building, and a
Paper ID #30133Enlightened Education: Solar Engineering Design to Energize SchoolFacilitiesDr. Kenneth A. Walz, Madison Area Technical College Dr. Walz completed his Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin, while conducting electrochemical research on lithium-ion batteries with Argonne National Laboratory and Rayovac. His studies also included re- search with the University of Rochester Center for Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Since 2003, Dr. Walz has taught science and engineering at Madison Area Technical College, where he serves as the director of the Center for Renewable Energy Advanced Technological Education (CREATE
et al. [3] investigated project-based learning activities in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) subjects in high schools. Specifically, STEM activities were deployedat three high schools in urban, low-income communities in Texas in the US, and the effect of theactivities on student mathematics scores over three years on a standardized test were studied.Students participating in the study were 54% Hispanic and 38% African American, with theremainder made up of White and Asian students. Overall, the student body was 49% male. Thus,the student participants were racially and gender diverse. Interestingly, the lowest performingstudents showed the biggest improvement in mathematics scores after having experiencedproject-based
structure and implement acomprehensive, two-semester-long capstone project experience tailored to undergraduatemechatronics engineering students. While discipline-specific capstones in mechanical, electrical,or computer engineering are well-understood, the complexity of integrating these fields in acohesive mechatronics engineering capstone remains relatively unexplored in terms ofimplementing the capstone sequence at scale. The bulk of work in the literature is focusedprimarily on describing a mechatronics sequence within an undergraduate mechanical orelectrical engineering program. In 2006, Muller et al. [1,2] described a mechatronics coursewithin the Penn State Electromechanical Engineering Technology program. This work providesan excellent case
mostly from the areas ofcomputer and information technology, and biomedical technology (U.S. Congress JointEconomic Committee, 2012). Aside from their benefits to the nation’s economy, science andtechnological innovations are also drastically transforming the manner we live, communicate,travel, work, and play in unpredictable, yet welcomed, ways. Nonetheless, to continuouslybenefit from improved quality of life, productivity, economic growth, and globalcompetitiveness, the United States must produce a steady stream of talent and expertise inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines (National ScienceFoundation, 2014; President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2012; U.S.Congress Joint Economic Committee
. Today, safetyregulations require industries to ensure that factory air meets an acceptable safety standard ratherthan relying on individual respirators.In the 1930s, the National Labor Relations Act made it a legal right to unionize. At the time,labor was emerging as a powerful force to uplift health and safety issues. This coincided withWorld War II, which brought safety issues to the forefront and tied it to productivity (Bingham,1980). Slogans such as “save a day to keep working, save a day to keep him flying” helpedemphasize the importance of smooth and safe working conditions for productivity. Still, thesewere voluntary efforts and relied on the goodwill of industries (Ibid).The 1960s were a time when three major movements came to the head
challenges of creating resilient food, energy, and water (FEW) systems in ruralcommunities. Resilience/sustainability problems are complex and often require professionals withdifferent expertise and backgrounds to work as a team to generate an emergent solution; thus, aninterdisciplinary curriculum provides students with the skills needed to work in an interdisciplinaryenvironment.The NRT Capstone Course is a project-based, cross-listed course that has been developed and co-taught by faculty from the Colleges of Engineering, Agriculture, and Arts and Sciences at ouruniversity. The NRT Capstone curriculum builds on knowledge students gained from aprerequisite interdisciplinary course about system thinking, called Integrated FEW Systems. In
, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CUˆa C™s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of
classes in the engineeringprogram.MethodologyRationaleBoth the engineering faculty and TWC faculty sought to assess leadership development acrosscourses in the engineering program and investigated ways to leverage peer-reportedcontributions of effort during team-based project assignments. The goal of improving assessmentmeasures was to improve grading accuracy and also provide interventional feedback to thelearner. As additional rationale, the School of Engineering was required to assess leadership inits capstone courses because the capstone was identified as a course that fulfills some of theleadership requirements at The Citadel. Several courses emerged as viable candidates for thisassessment study. However, the researchers chose two for this
skills from priorcoursework and combine that with new methods of parallel programming introduced in thecourse.The strategy has been a balance of coverage of the three topic areas, with emphasis onapplications that benefit from the combination of the three. Students are shown the value of thisapproach to scientific computing, high performance computing and emergent application areassuch as computer vision. Through a series of challenging exercises (six in total), they areintroduced to combined numerical, parallel problems and methods to speed-up programs. Theexercises include simple problems, but each problem set also has a final problem that is asignificant challenge to implement and realize speed-up. Students are challenged at the end ofthe
Vignesh Kumar Karuppasamy is a master’s student in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Ottawa. He holds a Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science and Engineering from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham. Prior to his graduate studies, he worked as a Software Engineer at NortonLifeLock Inc. (formerly Symantec) for over three years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Motivation and Learning Strategies - What Can University Engineering Design Courses Do to Help Students and What Must Students Do?AbstractEngineering design courses attempt to teach students how to design products and services thataddress problems
education researchers in that the “story” beingrecounted and analyzed is that of a group of people, not an individual. The “authorial distance” islow and the use of thematic analysis results in an “authoritarian” view [18]. To mitigate thispotential threat to trustworthiness, we have included first-person direct quotes from participantsand provided contextual information about the course setting. Table 2 Final codebook, including adapted a priori codes [3] and emergent codes.Code Description ExamplesMetacognition: Knowledge of Cognition● Persons Knowing about how people process “We get so zoned in on one path that (Others or
, Gulf Coast Center for Addressing Microplastic Pollution (GC-CAM), and the founding faculty advisor for the Society of Sustainable Engineering. He teaches a mixture of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. Dr. Wu is a committee member for Transportation Research Board (TRB) AJE35 and AKM 90, a member of American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and Academy of Pavement Science and Engineering (APSE), as well as an editorial member for Journal of Testing and Evaluation and International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. He serves panel member for several NCHRP and ACRP projects. He is also a registered professional engineer in Alabama and LEED
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in 1982 and 1980, respectively. Page 25.525.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Encouraging Divergent Thinking Daniel Raviv Department of Electrical Engineering Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431 E-mail: ravivd@fau.edu 561 297 2773Abstract An important aspect of innovative problem solving is ideation. Ideation rendersdiverse ideas to emerge, a
Conference, 2011, pp. 131-139: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.[37] W. Stroup, N. Ares, and A. Hurford, "A taxonomy of generative activity design supported by nextgeneration classroom networks," Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of Psychology in Mathematics Education North America, 2004.[38] V. Svihla, "Problem framing," in Instructional Design: An Introduction and Student Guide, J. K. McDonald and R. West, Eds. https://edtechbooks.org/id/problem_framing, 2020.[39] D. H. Jonassen, "Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63-85, 2000.[40] K. Dorst, "Co-evolution and emergence in design," Design Studies, vol. 65, pp. 60-77
students.BackgroundIt is well established that teaching undergraduate students, particularly engineering students, howto work in teams is important [7], [8], difficult [9], and worth doing because students canimprove [10]. Teamwork assessment tools like CATME (a web-based peer evaluation tool foundat catme.org) can help instructors identify teaming problems amongst students [11], [12].Challenges remain, however, for instructors of large courses who want to address such problemsin getting enough of the right kind of information to effectively intervene to help studentsimprove their teamwork skills, and then knowing how best to coach teams exhibiting evidence ofdysfunction.Researchers have established the outsized burden that minoritized teammates carry
. The guiding question emerged from previous work thatquantitatively explored students’ engineering identity, performance/competence, and recognitionperceptions [10], [31]. Data regarding prior engineering experiences were collected through aquestion asking to explain why they chose engineering as a major and was collected indirectly asthis information was often embedded in student answers to other questions. A selection ofquestions relevant to this study are presented in Table 2 in the appendix. The focus groups’open-ended nature allowed for follow-up questions and permitted researchers the opportunity togather rich detail about participants’ experiences. To promote responsiveness across focusgroups, interviewers stressed the value of
Research I institutions. Using a think aloud methodology, the experts solved bothroutine and non-routine problems. The protocols were transcribed and coded in Atlas ti. The firstround of coding followed a grounded theory methodology, yielding interesting findings.Unprompted, the experts revealed a strong belief that the ill-defined problems aredevelopmentally appropriate for PhD students while routine problems are more appropriate forundergraduate students. Additional rounds of coding were informed by previous problem solvingstudies in math and engineering. In general, this study confirmed the 5 Step Problem SolvingMethod used in previous challenged based instruction studies. There were observed differencesbased on problem type and background
, Reno.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016First Generation Students
focus on vibration condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Between 2003 and 2009, he served as a Technical Engineer, Quality Control Engineer and Vibration Analysts at TSA, Pars Khazar, SAPCO and MAPNA Group. Dr. Ghasemloonia received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Memorial University of Newfoundland, graduating with distinction in 2013 with a specialization in structural vibrations. Following the completion of his PhD, he had an Industrial Post-doctoral Fellowship at Subsurface Imaging Technology on the feasibility study of excavating salt caverns in Newfoundland. In 2014, he joined Project neuroArm at the University of Calgary as a Post-doctoral Scholar, where he worked on biomedical engineering