ethics. During the winter quarter in 492, thelearning experience transitions to project review meetings, and both informal and formalproject presentations. These were all conducted remotely. Overall, the instructors thoughtthat adding virtual communications enhanced the effectiveness of these activities. It wasparticularly helpful for the teams to have more immediate and direct access to their sponsorsto get answers to their questions and feedback on their ideas. In past years, contact withsponsors as the year progressed was largely via e-mail communications. Responses via e-mail were often significantly delayed. It might just be the novelty of industry starting tobroadly embrace virtual meeting technology, but the experience of the teams as
curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second
the interrelatedness of the concepts in each ofthese domains. The program is undergirded by a strong and comprehensive mathematicsfoundation. Enhanced usage of computing/visualization technology and an academic environmentspecifically structured to encourage and motivate students to learn are also programmatic features.Reported in this paper are results from an on-going evaluation of this program.I. IntroductionAn educated workforce capable of responding to the diverse demands and complex problems inthis time of rapidly changing world conditions is no longer a preference but a necessity. Eventhough a schooled populace is crucial, an alarming percentage of the students who matriculate intoinstitutions of higher education fail to graduate. Over
the interrelatedness of the concepts in each ofthese domains. The program is undergirded by a strong and comprehensive mathematicsfoundation. Enhanced usage of computing/visualization technology and an academic environmentspecifically structured to encourage and motivate students to learn are also programmatic features.Reported in this paper are results from an on-going evaluation of this program.I. IntroductionAn educated workforce capable of responding to the diverse demands and complex problems inthis time of rapidly changing world conditions is no longer a preference but a necessity. Eventhough a schooled populace is crucial, an alarming percentage of the students who matriculate intoinstitutions of higher education fail to graduate. Over
capabilities of understanding nanoscale phenomena. The nanoscalematerials and opportunities are designed to impact national Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) education, therefore allowing an efficient integration into currentscience curricula.Defining NanoThe National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) defines nanotechnology as “the understandingand control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers, where unique phenomenaenable novel applications. Encompassing nanoscale science, engineering and technology,nanotechnology involves imaging, measuring, modeling, and manipulating matter at this lengthscale.”2 The National Science Foundation (NSF) emphasizes many of the special properties thatoccur on the nanoscale and call
, game-based learning, and emergent technologies for STEM or language learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Managing and Assessing Students in Hybrid Software Project ClassesAbstractOne of the authors teaches two courses focused on software engineering and game development.Each of these courses has in-person and asynchronous online students taught as a single courseby the same instructor. Using active learning and authentic assessment techniques, the authorssought to improve the students’ levels of engagement. The students in both courses learn to useagile software engineering practices to deliver incremental software prototypes. Students in bothcourses were given surveys measuring
, team-oriented environments complements their technical expertise. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where they serve as a Graduate Research Assistant. Additionally, he contribute as a visiting professor at Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Minas Gerais (IFMG-Bambu´ı) in Brazil. His research is centered on innovative methodologies for Engineering Education, with a particular focus on the VADERs project: Virtual/Augmented-reality Discipline Exploration Rotations. This initiative seeks to enhance self-efficacy, diversity awareness and engagement in engineering within the AEC (Architecture, Engineering, and Construction) curriculum by integrating
addition,there is a paucity of research focused on the engineering of students with learning disabilities,despite the fact that U.S. classrooms include many students with reading and other learningchallenges. In this study, we focus on a small class of students with language-based learningdisabilities engaged in a literature-based engineering project. Students with LBLD generallyhave difficulty with word recognition and fluency, leading to struggles with readingcomprehension.5 Additionally, these students may also face executive function challenges,including issues with memory, attention, organization of information, and generalization of skillsto new situations.6 As these students proceeded through their engineering unit, we looked forevidence of
professional skills is an integral part of an effective undergraduateABET- accredited engineering program. Engineering programs throughout the country havedeveloped a variety of methods to hone these professional skills and a capstone project experienceis typical. The structure of these courses has evolved to incorporate changes in pedagogy,technology, needs of industry and changes in ABET accreditation requirements. There arenumerous examples in Engineering Education literature of successes in capstone courses includingtips and cases studies of programs running effective capstone projects. For example, Yost and Lane[1] reported the evolution of the civil engineering design capstone experience at a researchuniversity, discussed measures to assess
Information at the University of Arizona. She received her bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from the University of Arizona. She is interested in data visualization, machine learning, human computer interaction, learning analytics and educational data mining.Ameer Slim, University of New Mexico ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Causal Inference Networks: Unraveling the Complex Relationships Between Curricular Complexity, Student Characteristics, and Performance in Higher Education Ahmad Slim† , Gregory L. Heileman† , Ameer Slim‡ , Kristi Manasil† , Melika Akbarsharifi† {ahslim
Assessment of Soft Skills and Hard Skills," Journal of Information Technology Education, vol. 11, (1), 2012.[8] L. E. Gueldenzoph and G. L. May, "Collaborative Peer Evaluation: Best Practices for Group Member Assessments," Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 65, (1), pp. 9- 20, 2002.[9] S. Fallows and B. Chandramohan, "Multiple Approaches to Assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment," Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 6, (2), pp. 229246, 2001.[10] A. Erez, J. A. Lepine and H. Elms, "Effects of Rotated Leadership and Peer Evaluation on the Functioning and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Teams: A QuasiExperiment," Person. Psychol., vol. 55,(4), pp. 929-948, 2002.[11] D. F. Baker, "Peer Assessment in
Oklahoma City University in Horn performance and in 2010 was awarded her Doctor of Musical Arts in Music Education degree from Shenandoah Conservatory, Winchester, VA. Holding dual music educator certifications (PreK-12) in two states, Dr. Stutzmann is a member of the Re- search Learning Community (RLC) at her University and is actively involved in presenting and publishing multidisciplinary research studies. In 2012, Dr. Stutzmann received the Georgia Governor’s Teaching Fellowship award. In 2012, she also earned a mini-grant to research information on non-traditional students. In 2013, Dr. Stutzmann earned mini-grants to complete research on Flipped Classroom Pedagogy and another grant to research
the following sentences: 1. An important technological invention is… 2. Something I want to accomplish with this team is… 3. Two of my goals for this team are… 4. Something you should know about working with me is… Students also complete a survey on attitudes toward working on a team. Thisopens avenues for discussion and allows students to put issues on the table. The team-building segment of the course is topped off with an adventure-based[8] exercise in which students in teams solve a simulated problem. For example, in thetoxic waste exercise (which is performed in a gymnasium), two large circles are drawn onthe floor. An empty canister sits at the center of one circle and a canister filled withpopcorn
takes shape based on various life experiences such asformal education and personal relationships. But people generally don‟t think much about theirworldview. They tend to lose sight of the forest for the trees. That is, they get so bogged down inthe details of their lives that they tend to ignore the big questions involving overall worldview.Sometimes they establish a particular worldview early in their lives and try to force-fit any newlylearned information into an old and outdated worldview. Many peoples‟ worldviews areestablished, or significantly modified, during their higher education experience because this iswhen they receive a huge influx of information from diverse fields and meet many new andinteresting people. Thus, the university
newinstructors to make their own informed choice. A major change in the course that was instigatedand then instituted as a team was the change from a written final exam to assigning a finalintegrated project that involves MATLAB and C++. This took all of the resources of a diverseteam to create multiple projects from all facets of engineering. The members were then able tochoose from a repository of projects to disseminate in class (Jaeger, Whalen, & Freeman, 2005). Page 10.1241.5 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for
results may be informative of student learning and student surveysmay show affective gains it is difficult to document and determine how much of the learningtook place as a result of the team Project-Based Learning process that would not have takenplace otherwise.In this paper we present results surrounding the use of a team building instrument which to datehas been limited to use in capstone design courses. This instrument is known as TIDEE and ispart of what is now a web-based instrument known as Transferable Integrated Design Engineer-ing Assessment and Learning System[1]. We applied three key team building and assessmentfeatures from the site namely a Team Contract, Team Member Citizenship and TeamworkAchieved response instruments. The
eliminate intimidationbarriers. It is further suggested that faculty instructors establish a consistent rapport with studentsbefore and after class such that a climate that impacts learning, engagement, and success isfabricated [14]. An additional channel of communication that is proposed in the ECNQ model islearning and referencing student names during or outside the lecture hall to establish a sense ofcommunity and bond with the class. As evidenced by the study, the four communication strategiesminimize traditional classroom power relations, strengthens student-instructor communication,increases student collaboration, and fosters an active learning environment which promotes studentengagement and learning [2].However, since the emergence of COVID
meetings, enhancing the development oftheir self-guided learning [8].As students within the design studio do not necessarily start at phase one or end at phase seven, themilestone model aids not only in ensuring projects move through each phase of the process but also inthe onboarding of new students in the middle of an ongoing project. Asynchronous learning content hasbeen developed for each stage of the design process within our module layout, which establishes aframework for the specified phase, orients new members and facilities project on-boarding. Projectdocumentation of all module assignments provides background information regarding the client, needs,project scope, solution selection, verification and validation plans, engineering analysis
context of this transition. GLAs from the mechanical engineering laboratory courseswere invited to participate in a survey to provide feedback on how they perceived their own rolesand responsibilities as GLAs for in-person labs compared to their roles after the labs hadtransitioned to hybrid/fully-online formats after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Junior-and senior-level undergraduate mechanical engineering students currently enrolled in ahybrid/online lab were also invited to participate in a survey to provide similar feedback on howthey perceived their GLAs pre- and post-transition to hybrid/online lab modality. The analysis of the survey responses then informed the selection of two experiencedGLAs to participate in more in-depth
Paper ID #35070Making College Campus Wheelchair Accessible: Students PerspectiveDr. Molu O Olumolade, Central Michigan University An Associate Professor of Engineering and Technology with Central Michigan university; received first and second degrees from NCA&T and doctorate degree from the University of Calgary. He has been engaged in teaching for more than a decade and has more than 20 years of industrial experience in plant engineering. His research and publications are in the areas of manufacturing scheduling, design for man- ufacturability and assembly (DFM/DFA) and preventive maintenance
Paper ID #35691From Social Distancing to Enhanced Learning in the LaboratoryDr. Alison Rose Kennicutt, York College of Pennsylvania Alison is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering and her M. Eng. and Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY. Her research interests are in drinking water treatment of emerging contaminants and the production of disinfection byproducts. At York College, Alison loves to use hands- on exploration, both in the field and the lab, to trigger curiosity and get students
2006-1043: LESSONS IMPLEMENTED ON AN INTERNATIONAL SERVICELEARNING PROJECTRachel Husfeld, Valparaiso University RACHEL HUSFELD served as the 2005 student president of the Valparaiso University chapter of Engineers Without Borders. Originally from Houston, Texas, she is a senior civil engineering major graduating in May 2006. Rachel plans to pursue a master’s degree in structural engineering beginning in the fall of 2006.Carmine Polito, Valparaiso University CARMINE POLITO is the Frederick F. Jenny, Jr. Professor of Emerging Technology at Valparaiso University, where he has taught civil engineering courses for the last five years. He serves as a faculty advisor to the Valparaiso University
explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an emphasis on understanding hazard recog- nition, competencies, satisfaction, personal resilience, organizational culture, training, informal learning and social considerations. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, produc- tive, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people. The SRL is supported by multiple research grants, including a CAREER award, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Simmons is a former project director of the Summer Transportation Institute (STI) at South Carolina State University and Savannah
Paper ID #22409Creating Faculty Buy-in for Ethics-across-the-curriculum: Year One of De-veloping an Ethics Curriculum in an Undergraduate Biological EngineeringProgramDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Jeffrey M. Catchmark, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Jeffrey Catchmark is currently Professor of Agricultural and
Paper ID #20033Characterizing the Alignment in Faculty and Student BeliefsDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research
[14]. Bishop[15] makes a strong case for the replacement of in person material delivery, which can be replacedwithout a loss in effectiveness by technological delivery of the content, and replacing it withproblem-based learning which is a much more effective approach for meeting instructionalobjectives.Flipping the classroom can lead to several benefits such as freeing class time for interactiveactivities like active and problem-based learning, presenting the educational material in differentformats to cater to students’ various learning styles and preferences, encouraging students tobecome self-learners, and preparing them for how they will need to learn as practicing engineers[8]. Engaging in the flipped format may also discourage breaches
Computer Science (SEECS) program initiated itsfirst cohort of 20 students in fall 2009. Funded through an NSF S-STEM grant, theinterdisciplinary, multi-year, mixed academic-level offering awarded scholarships to studentsbased on academic merit and financial need. SEECS is an opportunity for students in the majorsof computer science, electrical and computer engineering, environmental engineering,information systems, mechanical engineering, and software engineering at Gannon University,Erie, PA, in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. The goals of the scholarshipprogram are (1) to increase the number of academically talented, but financially disadvantagedstudents in the stated majors, (2) to assist students to be successful in their
emerged as a relatively popular pedagogicalapproach due to the increasing emphasis of industry applications in engineering education.Particularly in the case of biomedical engineering (BME), with the increase of biotech companies,a growing majority of BME undergraduate students are entering biotech industries post-graduation[1], [2], [3]. National interest through initiatives such as the Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) have galvanized the increase of curriculum content geared to promotingentrepreneurship [4]. Concomitantly, interest in incorporating more course material gearedtowards industry applications has resulted in the design and delivery of projects permitting studentsto develop and practice entrepreneurship in the classroom
significant revision in the engineering curriculum. The revisedcurriculum was designed to support the student attainment of the ABET Student Outcomes (SOs)and was informed by benchmarking the engineering science program against general engineeringprograms at similar institutions. In particular, the former engineering science curriculum offeredfew laboratory classes, little depth in a student’s selected engineering specialization, and onlyone significant team-based engineering experience. The current engineering curriculumaddresses these deficiencies; the two engineering programs are compared in Table 1. Studentteams participate in projects that are threaded throughout the curriculum, hands-on work hasbeen integrated into many classes, and the
documented various aspects of the program over its first 9 years. The purpose of thispaper is to describe the current state of the integrated teaching and learning strategies that theprogram uses to facilitate engineering design learning with an entrepreneurial mindset in a PBLmodel.Awareness of the IRE program has increased recently with the program being recognized as theABET 2017 Innovation award winner and in the top ten emerging leaders in engineeringeducation in the “Global state of the art in engineering education” report by Dr. Ruth Grahamreleased in 2018 [1].Purpose of researchThe purpose of this paper is to describe how the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program leadsstudent engineers to ”become the engineer they want to be” by working with