Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the
Safety Engineering and Education. With over 10 years of expertise in training professionals across companies, educational institutions, and industries, they possess strong skills in processing, analyzing, and synthesizing large data sets. Their ability to thrive in collaborative, team-oriented environments complements their technical expertise. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where they serve as a Graduate Research Assistant. Additionally, he contribute as a visiting professor at Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Minas Gerais (IFMG-Bambu´ı) in Brazil. His research is centered on innovative methodologies for Engineering Education, with a
Paper ID #48694Self-efficacy of high school students after an AI-focused pre-college program:A two year impact study (Fundamental)Dr. S. Shailja, Stanford University Shailja is a post-doctoral fellow at Stanford University. She completed her Ph.D. in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department with interdisciplinary emphasis on College and University teaching at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in 2024. She graduated with a bachelor’s degree from the Electrical Engineering Department at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2016. Shailja received the Winifred and Louis
Paper ID #39059Take responsibility to understand engineering (TRUE): A qualitativeinvestigation of student’s engineering self-efficacy as a result ofparticipation in a multi-stakeholder programDr. Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Dr. Wilfrido A. MorenoProf. Jennifer Deboer, Campbell University Jennifer DeBoer is currently Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on international education systems, individual and social development, technology use and STEM learning, and educational environments forDr. Chris S. Ferekides, University of South Florida
underserved by the education and social sectors. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Endeavour S-STEM Program: A Multi-College Collaboration to Increase Engagement & Retention in STEMIntroductionThe United States has long held its position as the global leader in technological innovation andeducation. But that standing has been in jeopardy due to the shortage of domestic studentsgraduating in STEM. This concern has led researchers to investigate why graduation numbers areso low and also to propose ways in which STEM retention and hence graduation can beincreased. The data show that there are
Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006. Following this, he worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow. He joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware as an Assistant Professor in September 2008, leading a lab that researched the effects of composition and nanostructure on ionic conduction and surface exchange in ceramic materials. In 2014, he moved to Northeastern University to focus on teaching and developing curriculum for their First Year Engineering program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Evolution of Cornerstone
aerial robots, flight control of Micro Air Vehicles (MAV), sports science and sports technology. Dr Anderson has worked as an F-16 flight control actuation systems engineer and as a Deputy Division Chief in the Air Force Research Laboratory's Munitions Directorate where he led research in GPS-denied navigation for multi-agent autonomous systems. Dr Anderson is a registered Professional Engineer and an Associate Fellow of the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Work-in-Progress
one end of the paradigm-relatedness construct are paradigm-preserving ideas,which emerge from and operate within existing ways of thinking about a problem. Paradigm-preserving ideas are evolutionary in their nature. On the other end are paradigm-modifying ideas,which are revolutionary in that they emerge from and operate within redefined boundaries orentirely new ways of thinking about a problem. Both paradigm-preserving and paradigm- Page 26.734.4modifying ideas have their own benefits and are equally valuable in an exploration of thesolution space.Paradigm-relatedness is often related to cognitive style9,10 as paradigm-preserving ideas
Standards and Technology.Rezvan Nazempour, The University of Illinois at Chicago American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #34046Rezvan Nazempour is a graduate research assistant at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She is com-pleting her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and operations research at the Mechanical and Industrial En-gineering Department. She received her BSIE and MSIE from Iran University of Science and Technology(IUST) and Alzahra University, respectively. Her research interests include educational data mining,graph mining, and machine learning
, and Ninoslav Scukanec Schmidt. The Impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education: A Review of Emerging Evidence. Analytical Report. ERIC, 2021. [7] Kunal Chaturvedi, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, and Nidhi Singh. Covid-19 and its impact on education, social life and mental health of students: A survey. Children and youth services review, 121:105866, 2021. [8] Olaf Zawacki-Richter. The current state and impact of covid-19 on digital higher education in germany. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1):218–226, 2021. [9] Tommaso Agasisti and Mara Soncin. Higher education in troubled times: on the impact of covid-19 in italy. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1):86–95, 2021.[10] Fernando M Reimers. Learning from a pandemic. the impact
TOYtech project. Through theTOYtech project, students are designing educational children’s toys with universal gender appeal,which simultaneously applies technical knowhow and inclusive consumer consideration [6]. Anadaptation of the Delta Design game is used in a sophomore solid mechanics course at StanfordUniversity to open the conversation to inclusive design [7]. As students participated in the gamethey found that final designs are the combination of team members' expertise, views, and values.The Designing Technology for Girls and Women course at the University of California at Berkeleyincorporated questionnaires, interviews, and a design process assignment to capture studentperceptions of how the design process worked [8]. The results
to develop and implement workable, appropriatesolutions [7], and that failures to do so can have consequences for their technologies [8]. Whileability to reflect on the context of engineering solutions is associated with their success in theprofession [9], training students to do this—and doing so in ways that are well-integrated into therest of a course—is by no means easy. As historian Atushi Akera has pointed out, althoughcurrent ABET criteria would ideally be considered a space for supporting educationalinnovation, these criteria are often just another set of requirements that educators must developstrategies to meet [10]. Indeed, ABET’s shift to focus on students as emerging professionals hasvaluable outcomes [11], but includes many
learn science and engineering theory, self-confidence in ability, andsignificance of teacher interactions. Within each theme there was evidence that the participants’secondary educational experiences both aided and created obstacles in their pursuits. Thefinding from this study speak to the dynamic nature of how educational and environmentalexperiences can strengthen or weaken a woman’s resolve to continue in the field of engineering.Implications for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.Keywords: engineering, women, STEM education, social cognitive career theoryIntroduction The Bureau of Labor predicts that Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) related employment is projected to have a growth of more than
AC 2011-1968: EARLY ACADEMIC EXPERIENCES OF NON-PERSISTINGENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATESTiffany Tseng, Stanford University Tiffany Tseng is a second year mechanical engineering graduate student at Stanford University with re- search interests in design and engineering education. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009.Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a researcher at the Center for Design Research in the School of Engineering and the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL) within the Human-Sciences Technologies Advanced Research Institute at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in
computer, mobile, and information technologies to advance healthy and successful aging in elderly and underserved populations. He has successfully led research projects in the areas of telehealth/mobile health (m-health), home health care technologies, personal health records, and design and development of biomedical instrumentation, including wearable medical devices. He is a recognized biomedical researcher with prior funding from NIH, NSF, FDA, Dept of Commerce, Dept of Education, Dept of Defense, and other organizations. He also serves on grant panels for NIH, NSF, FDA, and the editorial board of several engineering journals. Dean Tran has over 20 years of experience in academic administration, curricular innovation
Paper ID #40139Understanding Students’ Self-regulation in a HyFlex Design Thinking CourseDr. Lakshmy Mohandas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Lakshmy Mohandas received her Ph.D. (2022) in Engineering Technology from Purdue University, In- diana. Her research interests include the HyFlex learning model, student engagement, equitable learning using different modes of participation, student motivation, and achievement goals.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Campbell University Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired
has been involved in outcomes assessment and ABET accreditation for Engineering and Engineering Technology program. Dr. Tahmina joined The Ohio State University in 2016 and taught first- and second-year engineering courses at the Marion campus. She has developed an interest in engineering education and pedagogy including strategies to enhance student learning, first-year engineering experience and K-12 STEM outreach. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Adapting to the changes in the teaching pedagogy post- pandemic in Electrical and Computer Engineering coursesAbstractThis Work in Progress
. David Whittinghill is an Associate Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’s research focuses on gaming, simulation and computer pro- gramming education and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, education, and society. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, Chinese language learning, virtual reality, and games as a tool for improving educational out- comes. Dr. Whittinghill is the director of the Games Innovation Laboratory (www.gamesinnovation.org).Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University at West Lafayette Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and
, with all students being introduced to the key subjectareas associated with the disciplines of: English: maths, science, humanities, design &technology, modern languages, and arts at the age of 11 years. The first three of these arecompulsory subjects, which have to be studied until a child reaches 16 years1 whilst thesubjects encapsulated within the humanities, design & technology, modern languages and artsdisciplines form the basis of ‘GCSE2 Options’ whereby children have to select up to 8additional subjects to study until they are 16 years of age.Having taken their GCSE examinations all of the girls then selected to continue with theireducation at each of their respective Schools. This entailed selecting 3 subjects for study atGCE
. In Fall 2013, he joined the Engineering Innovation Institute. IPPD is an experiential multidisciplinary design program where teams of students complete real projects for sponsoring companies and agencies. Dr. Stanfill has recruited over 300 industry-sponsored projects and directed the efforts of over 1900 senior-level engineering and business students for the IPPD program. In 2003, he helped create the Integrated Technology Ventures (ITV) program and serves as Chair of the ITV Board of Directors. The ITV program exposes students to the realities of technology start-up companies while assisting UF researchers in commercializing their technological innovations. Virtual companies comprised of engineering
Paper ID #19697A Reflective Analysis on Professional Codes of EthicsMr. Graeme W Troxell, Colorado State University Graeme will soon be completing his master’s degree in philosophy at Colorado State University, where he is a graduate research assistant working with engineers, ethicists, and entrepreneurs to address pressing questions in the ethics of engineering design. He is interested in emerging technologies and technolog- ical entrepreneurship, ethics, epistemology, and design theory. He is also a Venture Capital Analyst for Rockies Venture Club in Denver, Colorado.Dr. Wade O. Troxell, Department of Mechanical
been at Mississippi State since 1989 and served for 6 years as associate dean for the Bagley College of Engineering. She is a senior member of ACM and IEEE and was recently recognized by Tau Beta Pi with the McDonald Mentoring award.Kui Xie, Mississippi State University Kui Xie is an assistant professor of Instructional Technology at Mississippi State University. He received his Ph.D. in Instructional Psychology and Technology in 2006 from University of Oklahoma. His re- search interests include instructional design, computer-supported collaborative learning, motivation and cognition engagement in distance learning.Chris Smith, PhD, PE, Mississippi State University Dr. Smith is the Richard A. Rula Chair in
research and experiences in the Mechanical Engineering Department atOhio University’s Russ College of Engineering and Technology that identified‘professionalizing’ engineering education as an approach worth further investigation tosignificantly change the learning and professional development of engineering students. Ourapproach, which has been branded Pro-op education, involves prioritizing (and leading with)development of Professional Attitudes, Behaviors and Competencies (Pro-ABCs) as foundationalskills, and interweaving traditional coursework with small but significant professionalexperiences designed to emphasize aspects of the U.S Department of Labor’s engineeringcompetency model (primarily personal and workplace effectiveness). The
Paper ID #47717BOARD #143: Shattering the Bamboo Ceiling: Asian American StudentPerceptions of Engineering LeadershipMs. Michelle Choi Ausman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Choi Ausman is a third-year PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received a BS in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, and an MS in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Her research focuses on exploring relationships between Asian American identity, multiracial identity, and belonging in engineering. Her research interests include
Paper ID #15171The inGEAR Program: Recruiting International Graduate Students throughUndergraduate Research InternshipsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
Paper ID #15705Professional Development on Giving Feedback on Design for EngineeringStudents and EducatorsMr. Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette Farshid Marbouti recently earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interest is first-year engineering and specifically how to improve first-year engineering students’ success. He completed his M.A. in the Educational Technology and Learning Design at Simon Fraser University in Canada, and his B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering in Iran.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a
. He has worked in the vibration test and measurement industry helping to drive new technologies to market and working with industry to meet their emerging needs. He is currently a Professor at California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo in the Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching dynamics, vibrations and controls. He is involved in several undergraduate and master’s level multidisciplinary projects and interested in engineer- ing education research. Page 26.798.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 From ‘system modeling’ to
obstructions for women to enter into male dominated fields. It willalso provide opportunity for cross-comparisons of the three professions to identify differing andoverlapping factors that can later be used to form more effective recruitment techniques.Literature ReviewThe 1960s and 1970s had an emergence for social equal rights, which led to a push for diversityin male dominated fields (Beddoes & Borrego, 2011). Despite decades of attempting to rectifythe gender imbalance between males and females in AEC, the bureau of labor statistics cites thatArchitecture and Engineering maintain an employment rate of only 15% female; Construction iscurrently only 4.4% female (U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014). The U.S.enrollment rate
doing so, students can reinforce their emerging identitiesthrough engineering practice. However, as undergraduate students, their engineering identitiesare forming alongside other personal and social identities (i.e., Multiple Identities Theory [20]).Therefore, projects in the department are not limited to helping develop engineering identity,some require a focus on other identities that are meant to build the foundation upon which theirmultiple identities can coexist, be it predominantly engineering or not. Based on the framework,however, engineering identity is likely to develop in the traditional department as well, as thereis a recurrence of some factors in both departments. How the academic and professional factorsof the theoretical
between ambassadors andelementary students. Research for the RMEE project has focused on analysis of survey data onelementary students’ engineering identity, qualitative analysis of interviews with elementarystudents on engineering interest, and close analysis of classroom video to examine productiveinteractions between engineering ambassadors and elementary students. The results and productsof the RMEE project will inform and enable engineering outreach providers in multiple settingsto enhance their programs and impact.IntroductionAs part of nationwide efforts to attract youth to engineering study and careers, many universitiesutilize engineering students as engineering ambassadors and role models to precollege students[1]. However, there is