progresses in three stages: Preliminary Analysis,Investigation, and Presentation. Each stage can be as broad or as in-depth as desired with somecustomization. These stages provide students with hands-on experience including, but notlimited to, data collection/analysis, service life estimation, observation/critical thinking, andtechnical presentations.The first stage is focused upon receiving the “intel” (scenario prompt) of the staged scenario.Depending upon the customization, this includes, but is not limited to, an equipment overview,assembly and component geometries, product information, loading and usage, production scale,etc. Students perform an initial analysis upon the equipment assembly and determine if thereported design information adheres
the Learning Back into Learning Technology. Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching, 2006: p. 67-76.28. A. Cheville, C. Co, and B. Turner. Improving Team Performance in a Capstone Design Course Using the Jigsaw Technique and Electronic Peer Evaluation. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Expo. 2007. Honolulu, Hawaii.29. A. Cheville, C. Co, and B. Turner. Communication as a Proxy Measure for Student Design Ability in Capstone Design Courses. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Expo. 2007. Honolulu, Hawaii.30. A. Dong, A.W. Hill, and A.M. Agogino, A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team
questionnaire to getfeedback on participants' previous experience with social justice themes in the civil engineeringprogram and their conception of social justice. Respondents completed the questionnairevoluntarily. We expect that the results of this work will inform the following stages of the study,in particular guiding the identification of learning objectives for a pilot curriculum to bedelivered in Spring 2023 and serving as a baseline to measure future pedagogical interventionsrelated to this topic.IntroductionCivil engineering and human societies are inextricably linked. Civil engineering deals with theplanning, design, construction, and maintenance of civil infrastructures that enable publicservices essential to society such as transportation
molecular biotechnology. Current research foci include developing micro- biome engineering approaches for the built environment and bioremediation, investigating the ecological impacts of emerging contaminants on environmental microbiomes, studying microbial evolution follow- ing exposure to anthropogenic contaminants and developing innovative water treatment technologies. Dr. Gunsch was named ASCE Environmental & Water Resources Institute Fellow in 2022. She currently serves as Editor in Chief for Biodegradation and is a member of the Editorial Board for npj Clean Water and Industrial Biotechnology.Dr. Joseph L. Graves Jr., North Carolina A&T State University Joseph L Graves, Jr. received his Ph.D. in
connect and how to connect is to create anexcitement around working together [1]. We all have a story about this process and a timewhen working with another classmate or group made the kind of impact that changed thetrajectory of our life, turning a possibility into reality [2, 3, 4, 5]. Collaborative work is acreative endeavor [6] that takes into account both the individual and the context of theentrepreneurial interaction, and it involves making choices about how to start, who toapproach, what information to include, what to leave out, and whether to move forward withthe idea. Many of us expanded entrepreneurial class work to include cultures outside of onecampus classroom to national and international classroom’s [7,8]. Here we study actions
-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial & Operations Engineering Department and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan. She earned her Ph.D. in En- gineering Education and an M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University; an M.B.A. degree from Governors State University; and a B.S. degree in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to her graduate studies, she worked as a professional in the areas of manufacturing, operations, technical sales, and publishing for ten years. She also served as an adjunct faculty in the Engineering Technology Program at Triton College in
teaches sustainability principles in civil and environmental engineering design, from first-year classes through capstone classes. Her primary research focus is advanced treatment methods for removal of emerging contaminants during water and wastewater treatment. At CalPoly, she works with both civil and environmental engineering undergraduate students to to expand her research into application of sustainable reuse of wastewater reuse, as well as effective storm water management via Low Impact Development techniques. She contributes to Sustainability Across the Curriculum efforts on campus as well.Ms. Tessa Gail Gallagher, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tessa is a fourth-year environmental
% are AfricanAmerican, with 86% of the student body receiving reduced price or free lunch.Assessment of DREAM is carried out through several mechanisms, including Perception andEnvironment Surveys (P.E.S.), Intuition Inventories (I.I.) and Physics Concepts Inventories(P.C.I.). P.E.S. provide information related to the college application and admission processes,and introduce concepts such as long-term earning potential. Data is collected from bothDREAM mentees and a control group (over 300 AHS students in 2007-2008). The invitedmentees are further divided into i) those who consistently participated (over 70% attendance), ii)those who did not participate, and iii) those with inconsistent participation. Attendance atDREAM Day at Rice University
University Reginald DesRoches is the Karen and John Huff School Chair and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. As School Chair, he provides leadership to a top- ranked program with 100 faculty and staff and 1,100 stProf. Stephen P. Mattingly, University of Texas at Arlington STEPHEN MATTINGLY is a Professor in Civil Engineering and the Director of the Center for Trans- portation Studies at the University of Texas at Arlington. Previously, he worked at the Institute of Trans- portation Studies, University of California, Irvine and University of Alaska, Fairbanks. His most recent research projects address a variety of interdisciplinary topics including developing an app
NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017.Steven Weiner, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Steven Weiner is a PhD student in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology at the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. His interests include STEM education reform, innovative learning frameworks, and the future of schooling. His previous research focused on how young adults develop identities centered on the Maker
: What Do They Promise And How Can They Be Used?IntroductionStudent portfolios have been listed as a possible means of assessment under the basic levelaccreditation criteria for ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)Engineering Criteria 2000. Since then, engineering educators and researchers have started to useportfolios in their teaching and are trying to explore the potentials of portfolios. Various effortshave focused on using portfolios in engineering instruction and the results of those efforts havebeen reported in the engineering education literature. This research provides educators usefulinformation on how to use or adopt portfolios efficiently in their classrooms.However, because of the diversity of the efforts to
) Knowledge of human cultures and the physical and natural world,2) Intellectual and practical skills,3) Personal and social responsibility, and4) Integrative learning [This] vision for student learning places strong emphasis on global and intercultural learning, technological sophistication, collaborative problem solving, transferable skills, and real-world applications—both civic and job-related. In all these emphases, LEAP repositions liberal education, no longer as just an option for the fortunate few, but rather as the most practical and powerful preparation for ‘success’ in all its meanings: economic, societal, civic, and personal.These themes resonate with current movements to prepare engineers for the 21st
the Department of Integrative STEM Educa- tion at The College of New Jersey. In his role, he prepares pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops biotechnology and nanotechnology inspired lessons that naturally integrate the STEM disciplines. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Drexel University and was an NSF Graduate STEM Fellow in K-12 Education (GK-12).Dr. Jamie N. Mikeska, Educational Testing Service Jamie Mikeska is a Research Scientist in the Student and Teacher Research Center at Educational Testing Service (ETS). Jamie completed her Ph.D. in the
, University of Pittsburgh Gerard Dorv`e-Lewis (he/him) is a higher education Ph.D. student and scholar at the University of Pitts- burgh. His broad research interests include emerging adulthood, equity, inclusion, and justice in higher education, first-generation college students, Black students, sense of belonging, and student success. Be- fore beginning his doctoral journey, he worked full-time in student affairs at the University of Florida, informing his research interests. At the University of Florida, he earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in family, youth and community sciences.Kevin Jay Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kevin Jay Kaufman Ortiz is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Engineering Education
Gingerichcontend that critical analysis and reflection are a collective process and dialogue with others iskey to helping students ‘move beyond their own perspectives to new understandings.’ [8]Cultural bias is “the tendency to interpret and judge phenomena in terms of the distinctivevalues, beliefs, and other characteristics of the society or community to which one belongs”. [1]Understanding one’s own biases and prejudices can help one develop skills to enhanceinteractions and engagement with individuals from another culture. Biases begin from ourpersonal backgrounds, e.g. experience and information that we gather early in life and are mademore complex because they intersect with our culture and identity. Critical reflection allows usto identify and
Page 26.1189.2even for a high school, museum, or informal engineering education program.IntroductionConsidering the complexities of today’s society, there is no doubt that colleges and universitieshave a critical role in preparing today’s engineering students to meet the challenges oftomorrow’s global problems through more interdisciplinary strategies, including problemsassociated with booming populations, climate change, lack of clean water, sustainability,transportation logistics, and dwindling energy resources. The current state of engineeringeducation has been under considerable review by educators at all levels of higher education sincethe early 1990s with efforts dedicated to comprehensive initiatives through the National
Reeping is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and was a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. His main research interests include transfer student information asymmetries, threshold concepts, curricular complexity, and advancing quantitative and fully integrated mixed methods.Dr. Siqing Wei, University of Cincinnati Dr. Siqing Wei received a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education program at Purdue University as a triple boiler
received her Doctoral degree in Chemical Engineering from Northeastern University in 2011. In the fall of 2011, she took a position as an Assistant Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in the College of Engineering as a part of the First Year Engineering Faculty with a focus on chemical engineering. She teaches the first year courses where are Engineering Design and Engineering Problem Solving. She also teaches senior Chemical Engineering Process Controls. She runs a faculty led international summer program to Sao Paulo, Brazil which focuses on Alternative Energy Technologies and Brazilian Culture.Dr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University Dr. Richard Whalen is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University
education. It will enumerate the rewards that accrue to both facultyand students through an international exchange and the components that must necessarily beincluded in the program if it is to be successful and live a long and prosperous life. It willinclude such things as: making the initial contact, evaluating the proposed site, developing abudget, generating support, documenting the responsibilities of each institution, planning for thetrip, emergency contingency plans, orientation meetings with the students, language difficulties,academic credit, recruiting, technical projects, and final evaluation.The paper will conclude by reviewing two different exchange programs, one in Europe, which iswell established and has been operating for many years
professional developmentprogram positioned the importance of the inclusion of engineering content and encouragedteachers to explore community-based, collaborative activities that identified and spoke to societalneeds and social impacts through engineering integration. Data collected from two of the coursesin this project, Enhancing Mathematics with STEM and Engineering in the K-12 Classroom,included participant reflections, focus groups, microteaching lesson plans, and field notes.Through a case study approach and grounded theory analysis, themes of self-efficacy, activelearning supports, and social justice teaching emerged. The following discussion on teachers’engineering and STEM self-efficacy, teachers’ integration of engineering to address
Paper ID #34736Differences in Perceptions of Instructional Support between U.S. andInternational Students Before and During COVID-19Dr. Ziyan Bai, University of Washington Ziyan Bai holds a Ph.D. in educational leadership and policy studies with foci on higher education and mixed-method education sciences. She has over seven years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a
Paper ID #34399Impact of Course Modality on Student Course EvaluationsDr. Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University Matt Aldeman is an Assistant Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also includes service in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear propulsion
received two hours of classroom support perweek. These paid classroom helpers, undergraduate or masters students in a variety ofdisciplines, were trained in the curriculum and assisted the teachers in many capacities,including one-on-one student assistance, technical support with the constructionmaterials, and lesson preparation work. After the first year, the teachers receivedoptional support for two, one-hour blocks for each unit they enacted. For all years,graduate student researchers served as liaisons for the teachers, checking in regularly byphone, email, or through classroom visits. In this way, teachers had many levels ofsupport for enacting the curriculum and learning the new technology associated with it.Data collection and analysis
of scaffolding in a classroom or during group work has also producedanalyses that focus on interactions among students as well as between students and teachers.These interactions do not usually follow the predictable I-R-F pattern but make use of moreopen-ended questions and prompts. There has also been considerable research that examines theinteractions in computer- or technology- mediated classrooms.20 Much of this research hasfocused on classrooms at an elementary school level. More recent work has focused on howstudents and teachers make meaning and solve problems,21 develop concepts,22-24 or performdynamic assessment.25-29 Wells30 focuses on the role of dialogue between students, betweenstudents and teachers while Swain and others25-29
Paper ID #37959Recognition of Design Failure by Fourth Grade StudentsDuring an Engineering Design Challenge (Fundamental)Ron Kevin Skinner (Research and Evaluation Specialist) Ron Skinner has been involved with science education and research for the past 30 years. He has taught physics, astronomy, and general science in formal settings to audiences from kindergarteners to graduate students in the schools of the Lucia Mar School District, and at Cornell University, University of California, Irvine, and Santa Barbara City College. He has worked in informal STEM education at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History
devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century.Dr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Departments of Organization, Information & Learning Sciences and Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests fo- cus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic education.Dr
, but as Tang and Nieusma’s articlepoints out, their society was not immediately supportive of the whistleblowers’ plight. Rather, ittook the advocacy of two, short-lived, dissident committees—the Committee for SocialResponsibility in Engineering (CSRE) and the Committee on Social Implications of Technology(CSIT)—with membership overlap in IEEE to codify ethical principles in 1977. The archivalresearch conducted for these two articles demonstrates that the inclusion of ethical principles inat least two professional codes was a fairly recent addition driven by the need to protectengineers and their professional societies from damaging public relations events. Given theirorigins, it is important that engineering ethics educators view professional
off of the comparisons made between the in-groupand out-groups that provide favorable comparisons 5. Third, if positive social identity is notreached, a person will seek to leave the in-group and find another group to join that will helpcreate a more positive social identity 5.Nerd Identity The study of nerd identity has become a growing research field in media studies.According to Kendall, nerd identity can be defined by the following criteria: 1) Computers are animportant but complicated type of technology in our society, 2) Nerds are the people whounderstand and enjoy working with computers, 3) The people who understand and enjoy workingwith computers are nerds, 4) Nerds are socially awkward and undesirable to the opposite sex,and 5
university-level technical writing course toteaching ethics in both theory and practice. The course is a core requirement for junior- andsenior-level engineering students at Mississippi State University, with a typical enrollment of 20to 30 students per course section and approximately 15 sections offered per semester. While thecourse focuses primarily on and most heavily weights written assignments, it also reinforcesgood practices of communicating technical information via oral presentations and digitalcommunication platforms. Typically working in multi-disciplinary teams of approximately threeto four students per team formed of undergraduate students from across 12 engineering andcomputing fields, emerging engineers taking the course complete an
outcomes.This paper will explore successful engineering and design pedagogy case studies, taken from courseworkand curricula at Ohio State University and at Columbus College of Art & Design. These stories andchallenges will be explained to highlight what can emerge from creating curricula around open-endeddesign pedagogy, which serves to mimic real world, often ‘wicked’ scenarios. By describing engineeringand design programs doing similar pedagogical activities, the authors will reflect on their own classroomexperiences, discuss lessons learned, and propose a framework that instructors can call upon to encouragestudents to embrace ambiguity, thus becoming more agile and resilient in the future.Each author has taught the case study courses for