of importantconcepts. Students in traditional classrooms acquire most of their ―knowledge‖ throughclassroom lectures, textbook reading, and the internet. A troubling fact is, after instruction,students often emerge from our classes with serious misconceptions [2 - 6]. Rebello [7] suggests that the essential goal of education is the transfer of learning.Research in the field of Physics Education continues to provide educators with a window throughwhich an understanding of how students learn physics can be developed. Beichner [8] suggeststhat Physics Education Research (PER) is ―… focused inquiry into what happens as studentsstruggle to grasp and use the concepts of physics.‖ Focused inquiry involves the use of a numberof strategies
more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been toform “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects. Page 24.948.2The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial support. In fact, design courses, in general, have emerged as a means for students to beexposed to some flavor of what engineers actually do; and also, could learn the basic elements
when engineers appreciate and strive forfairness [4]. Understanding the educational context and the importance of integrating equityissues is crucial to help engineers develop an equity ethic. However, the rigid and technology-focused nature of engineering education, rooted in meritocracy and a lack of political awareness,often prevents engineering students from exploring the social aspects of their field. To promotesocially just engineering practices, we must change how engineering students are taught andequipped to address issues of inequality in the workplace. Like in many other professions,engineering culture and values may be imparted to students through belief systems that arediscussed in more subtle ways rather than just fundamental
students and for their fellow students. However, thesereturning students also face certain challenges that direct-pathway students do not. While thepublished literature on returning students has discussed some of their special skills andparticular challenges, there are many unanswered questions, particularly in regard to returningstudents in engineering and other STEM fields.IntroductionWhile many graduate students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)fields begin their graduate program immediately after completing a bachelor’s degree, there arealso many who enter the workforce and later pursue a graduate degree. In the larger populationof graduate students, statistics show that many are older; in 2001, only 43.4% of
the Department of Technology Leadership & Inno- vation at Purdue University. Her research examines organizational communication, particularly in the contexts of destructive workplace behaviors, leadership, teams, and workforce development. Notably, Dr. Linvill is a Co-Principal Investigator on the SCalable Asymmetric Lifestyle Engagement (SCALE) production proposal, funded by the Department of Defense, with colleagues in Purdue’s College of En- gineering. The project focuses on developing a scalable and sustainable workforce development program for microelectronics that will serve as a model for other workforce development efforts (i.e., artificial intelligence, hypersonics). In this role, she examines
late as the senior yearsuch as senior design and unit operations lab. (2) Faculty teaching courses are not trained inmultiple areas of chemical engineering. They develop expertise in their research areas; however,they do not develop knowledge and skills in different areas of chemical engineering nor updatethemselves in up-to-date practices. (3) It has been shown that traditional lecture-based instructionis ineffective at promoting engineering problem-solving, self-learning, and high-level skilldevelopment [5-7]. An emerging paradigm in engineering education is design thinking includingintegrated or inductive-learning models and abductive-thinking [8-13]. Inductive learning is aneeds-based or problem-based learning (PBL) instructional model
improve the different areas of the experience. To gather information from students whodecided to dropout, meetings with the students or with the advisors (when meeting the studentwas not advisable) occurred. This step provided a benchmark to start ideating about crafting thecourse.The second step was to conduct charrette meetings with professors from all fields of knowledgein the civil engineering department to develop the course objectives, the course content, and thedesired student experience. Eleven professors (6 are Alumni and 5 are not Alumni) participatedin the charrette meetings. The professors’ areas of expertise were construction materials,structures and seismic analysis, environment, and water resources, geotechnic and soilsmechanics
lab progresses as follows:Figure 1 Three print orientations investigated by the classWeek 1 • Lecture: Introduction to additive manufacturing technology in general, in-depth discussion of fused deposition modeling (FDM), project goals and milestones. • Activities: In groups, students are given an engineering drawing of a c-clip (Figure 2A). They use SolidWorks to create a 3D solid model from the engineering drawing. They then prepare the model to be 3D printed and initiate their prints with assigned print orientation and infill percentage. Each team is required to print 5-7 clips in different orientations. Finally, groups are asked to use finite element analysis (FEA) to determine force and location at which
Video Length for Studying Machine Learning in a Flipped ClassroomAbstractIn recent years, the flipped classroom has emerged as an increasingly popular teaching method inhigher education, as it is seen as an effective way to promote active learning among students.Nevertheless, a crucial factor that has not been studied in-depth is students' preference for thelength of videos in the flipped classroom. Although a few studies have considered the designprocess of videos and students' preferences for video length in a flipped classroom, there arevarying recommendations and a lack of data-driven analysis on how many and how long the videosshould be. In this study, we investigated students' preference for video length in
promotes motivation and healthy psychological and behavioral functioning.In a virtual environment, technological tools such as Zoom are used to build social and teachingpresence to help students relieve the feeling of isolation they often have in online courses.Whether these tools are sufficient to satisfy student’s basic need of relatedness is unclear.Self-determination theory [19, 20] also suggests individuals typically express multiple forms ofmotivation in any given activity. The different types of motivations may be described on acontinuum ranging from autonomous (internal) to controlled (external) motivations. One extremeis intrinsic motivation, i.e., a deeply internalized state of engagement based on interest,enjoyment, satisfaction and
by anoverview of the context in which this study took place. We then present an analysis of the surveydata we collected that examines how students at our university conceptualize energy.Literature ReviewThe current body of literature in energy education explores not only the pedagogical aspects, butalso the nature of energy education. Energy is a foundational concept and is taught in manydifferent contexts, both within engineering and more broadly in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Math (STEM). As we reviewed this literature, three major questions emerged:how do we define energy? (ontology), how do students conceptualize energy? (epistemology),and how do we teach energy? (pedagogy).An Ontological Question: How do we define energy?Energy
represented in the event. This is a limitation of a diversity, equity,and inclusion event and it cannot substitute for student mentoring and support. Activities such assurveys, interviews, or informal dialogues can be used to engage students who did not feel heardor seen during an event.COVID-19 has provided unique opportunities and challenges. The event created an opportunity toincrease engagement and helped encourage the college to find more ways to do more in the future.However, even in a virtual environment, it was still difficult to meet scheduling needs andaccessibility. Hopefully providing recorded content will help overcome some schedulingchallenges. Many commented in the survey they wished the summit was longer with even morecontent. An
the EA students to anew culture and delve into global awareness and logistic arrangements.2) After Returning from the Guatemala ExperienceDespite having prepared for the experiences by developing preliminary work plans in the fallENGR 98A course, the teams found themselves adapting quickly based on the site conditionsand emerging information. The limited timeframe and resources available in the rural villagemeant that they had to manage the project and timeline carefully. What appeared to be aherculean task was made achievable by dividing the project into sub parts and pairing projects tosmaller teams based on individual interests and strengths. Not only did this pair team memberswith tasks that suited their skills, it ensured that all the
… the For a bridge or components, I use balancing of all forces on an equilibrium to find the reactions to the object. actions. Internal and external forces should balance, or equal zero when summed. Because if they don’t balance, "unbalance" = "collapse" Model A model is … an idealized For bridge or components, I use a model representation of object, with to show given information, my the info needed to do an assumptions
) .76 Engineers are well paid.[1] .74 Engineers make more money than most other professionals.1 .69 An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate.1 .40 2b. Motivation (Family Influence) .85 My parents would disapprove if I chose a major other than .75 engineering.[2] My parents want me to be an engineer.[1] .75 Page 12.94.42c. Motivation (Social Good) .70 Technology plays an
hopes to further advance their intellectual curiosity and problem solving skills.Charles Birdsong, California Polytechnic State University Charles Birdsong has expertise in vibrations, controls, signal processing, instrumentation, real-time control, active noise control, and dynamic system modeling. He received his BSME at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, MS and Ph.D. at Michigan State University where he worked on active noise control applications for the automotive industry. He has worked in the vibration test and measurement industry helping to drive new technologies to market and working with industry to meet their emerging needs. He is currently an Assistant Professor at California Polytechnic
HealthDevelopment (DTHD). Additional information regarding this development can be found at theDTHD web site.1 Active planning for the hospital began in late 2005. The projected cost andtimeline of the hospital is approximately 3 million dollars over a period of 5 years respectively.The majority of this cost is associated with the building materials and power systems. Laborcosts are typically not excessive in Tanzania. To minimize expenditures, the goal is to outfit theDCMC hospital with relatively new equipment obtained from equipment upgrades as they occurat sister hospitals. The Dodoma location of the DCMC hospital is somewhat remote from themain hydro-power generation locations (northern Tanzania) and existing transmission lines in
period? 2. What were the most commonly cited strategies for sustaining the program beyond initial funding? 3. Which unique strategies for sustaining the program beyond initial funding could inform future sustainability efforts? IGERT is the flagship funding program for the U.S. National Science Foundation’sDivision of Graduate Education, and widely regarded as a premiere source of innovation ininterdisciplinary graduate education, particularly across a range of institutions. Although thisstudy is limited to an examination of funded IGERT proposals, our findings suggest strategiesthat may be implemented more generally to institutionalize innovation in engineering education,particularly at the graduate level.Literature Review
and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building communities of engineering faculty, staff, and students engaged in educational
series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development.Ms. Galyna Melnychuk, Mississippi State University Galyna Melnychuk completed her undergraduate education in Optical Engineering at Kiev Polytechnic University. In addition, she holds two engineering masters degrees - M.S. in Optical Engineering from Kiev Polytechnic University and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Mississippi State University. Subse- quent involvement in technology commercialization and small business development at MSU stimulated her interest in finances, accounting and business taxations, and she received her third graduate degree - Master of Taxation from the College of Accounting at MSU
mechanical engineering, civil engineering, architecture, cognitive science, and computer science at MIT, UC-Berkeley, UCLA, Columbia and CMU in the USA, at Strathclyde and Loughborough in the UK, at INSA-Lyon and Provence in France and at EPFL in Switzerland.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering
in the computer science department. He is currently an assistant professor at Washington State University in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and is a recipient of the National Science Foundation CAREER award. Current research interests include intelligent agents, multi-agent systems, reinforcement learning, transfer learning, and robotics.Anne Anderson, Washington State University Anne Anderson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Design + Construction at Washington State Uni- versity. Her research focuses on improving construction coordination efforts through the use of building information modeling (BIM) and emerging collaboration technologies. c
Paper ID #17026Engineering Together Sustainable Communities: Sustainability Engineeringin ActionDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativ- ity levels. He also applies his research to the design of rehabilitation devices (in which he has various patents under process) and design for sustainability.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Heidi A. Taboada is an Associate Professor in the
-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and
toexperience the concepts they have been taught in class. Traditional labs require direct contactbetween the students and the laboratory setup in a physical location called a laboratory. Thissystem however poses some limitations well captured by a number of questions put forward byNational Instruments1. Remote labs emerged as an answer to these questions. Hence, remote labsmake it possible to do lab work at any time of any day, from the comfort of one's bedroom orduring a live lecture in class. They also make it possible to share laboratories across students andresearchers at great distances from each other. This means that remote labs inherently have thecapacity to foster collaboration between students and researchers of different demographics,across
Detailed course descriptions of curriculum progressionThis paper shows how model-based system design, as has been described, is integrated inselected courses in all four years of the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate curriculum. Thecourses where this has been implemented are presented in Table 1 and are required courses forall students working toward a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering. This approachis the model-based design counterpart to the “Design Spine” discussed by Sheppard et al.6 whorethought the curriculum at Stevens Institute of Technology to emphasize design throughout allfour years. An initial cohort of freshman engineering students started the proposed model-baseddesign sequence in the fall 2015 semester. Assessment
hasbegun promoting a strong culture of Active Cooperative Learning (ACL). ABET, theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, has recommended this pedagogicalapproach as a method because focusing students on real-world problems can increase theirmotivation. 4 By using the live case study approach in this class, the traditional student group,expanded to include the mentor, can work together to synthesize their understanding of theapplication, through the question and answer process. The students can reinforce the conceptswith each other through the process of writing reflective papers on how their mentor companyapplies the techniques. Finally, the objective of this method is pulled together by the NationalAcademy of Engineering report
. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served as vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, and a member of the Transportation Research Board committees on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Asset Management, and Emerging Technology for Design and Construction. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University.Dr. David S Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. David S. Hurwitz is an assistant professor of transportation
theory of situatedlearning was used to identify and inform the ways in which being research mentors can preparethe mentors for their future careers, specifically in terms of how they are prepared to becomemembers of the communities of practice they aspire to join. The benefits for research mentorswere classified as follows: (1) benefits related to preparation for their future careers, such asstrengthening their technical skills and content knowledge, and developing and improvingvarious professional skills, and (2) benefits related to their current positions asstudents/postdoctoral scholars, such as receiving help with their theses or research projects.This study is part of a longer-term study to determine the effectiveness of this
1993 at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He currently serves as associate department head, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, at the University of Wyoming.Dr. Thad B. Welch, Boise State University Dr. Thad B. Welch, P.E. received the B.E.E., M.S.E.E., E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Naval Postgraduate School, Naval Postgraduate School, and the University of Colorado in 1979, 1989, 1989, and 1997, respectively. He was commissioned in the U.S. Navy in 1979 and has been assigned to three submarines and a submarine repair tender. He has deployed in the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, and Arctic Ocean. From 1994 to 1997 he was an instructor and assistant professor teaching