given the opportunity to improve thedesigns that won them the internship from the RET design competition with guidance fromgraduate student mentors and professors. The second experience allowed students to advancetheir classroom design, but also included them in existing research activities at the University.Student creativity, interest in engineering, knowledge of engineering fields, and skilldevelopment was assessed through focus groups, evaluation of student journaling, and studentsurveys. Students in the different types of experiences showed different levels of engagement inresearch and differing perceptions related to engineering. Students from the first experience thatfocused on advancing their classroom project showed more resistance to
development of clinical problem-solving skills (6) Newinformation is acquired through self-directed learning. More importantly, the problem-solving approach prepares the students for formulating and solving problems they havenever been exposed to before.The Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity has been using a problem solving approach to teach undergraduatelaboratories4,5. The laboratory interweaves instruction on engineering principles withinstruction on engineering communication. Using this approach, advanced topics hasbeen successfully taught to undergraduate students6. At the Central Connecticut StateUniversity, Prusak applied the problem-solving approach in order to develop and improveimportant
individual and “dependence” of a group, it is a key element forproductive teamwork [31]. Interdependence allows students to express their thoughts and opinions,share individual knowledge, debate, and use argument techniques to change misconceptions [26].It enables students to piece together individual ideas to build new, more comprehensive ideas.Interdependence acts as the glue that binds teams together, building success by aligning the needsand motives of individuals. This alignment ensures that actions taken by one individual canpositively impact the outcomes of others, encouraging a collaborative environment. Studies haveshown that interdependency increases idea generation and collaborative engagement with learningtasks [26,32 33,34]. For
Solutionunderstanding of, and enthusiasm for,engineering and engineering technology Figure 1 Engineering Design Processcareers so that more students choose topursue these types of careers.The working group met regularly in order to have a solution in place for the following schoolyear and to facilitate the robust communication required to allow the process to work well.The collaborators next gathered data both on what was known from the literature regardingaccomplishing the learning goals and on existing approaches. Each collaborator sought toidentify information on schools that had a similar program and on curriculum that was availableto meet the defined goals. Several ideas identified from the
they werebetter able to communicate about the field of BMMB, p<0.04. Seventy-one percent of facultymentors who responded to the survey indicated their student produced data that could beincluded in a future publication. Out of the ten participants four are now enrolled in a graduateprogram, three are currently applying to one of our graduate programs involved in our REU, andanother three are not yet ready to graduate. Therefore, the first four students in our cohort toreceive their BS degrees are now enrolled in a graduate program contributing to an increase inrepresentation of underrepresented students. We will continue to track whether the remainingstudents ultimately apply to or enroll in our or another graduate program and the impact of
computing8. In general these authors report students’ comfort withcomputing is increased after engaging in app development.Several studies have found that women do not go into computing fields due to inaccurateperceptions of life and career prospects in computing and a “nerdy” image of computingprofessionals12, 13. One factor affecting the appeal of a field is its image in the media. A spate offorensic crime investigation shows in which the forensic investigators are portrayed heroicallymakes it easy to aspire to those professions or at least visualize one’s participation in them14.Even much smaller fields like nuclear physics or archeology have the occasional female rolemodel – Denise Richards plays an attractive, smart and successful nuclear
. Specifically, thecourse components that got adversely affected involved group work: group homeworks andgroup presentation. It appears that the lack of in-person meeting for group members affectedthe communication and grouping needed to better accomplish the group tasks. Also, weeklyquizzes were not part of the in-person offering but were done online. Since these quizzes weretimed, frequent and with no due date/time extensions, several students missed one or more ofthem which eventually helped bring their overall grades down. Under this work, no analysis ofretention was performed.Once the COVID-19 pandemic came crashing on the world scene in the early months of 2020,there was a lot of scholarly activity suddenly dealing with the effect of this crisis
maintaining a divergent view when conducting research. “I will be more divergent in my AI use, taking note of how convergent it may be." Another student noted "I will be doing research better as I know more options now.4. Overall Satisfaction and Positive Feedback Overall, the participants noted the workshop had an overall positive impact on their AI literacy skill development. The survey showed they were satisfied with the workshop. Below are some of their responses: "The facilitator demonstrated adequate knowledge on the subject matter, and this was the most engaging virtual symposium I'd ever been on, he sure is an instructor to instructors like he said." "Super interactive session. Great job." "Love that it was very interactive
submitted at the end of the semester, followedby a presentation. These chronicled the semester’s experience and highlighted the interns' projectsand the impact on clients and the community. One of the students was invited to the presentationto share his experience with the donor. The student spoke about the components and how theprogram has impacted him. This led to an additional donation from the donor to expand theprogram a year-long beyond the initial three years.Student Assessment and FeedbackThe program director met with each intern in a one-on-one meeting two weeks into the semesterto learn about their initial impression of the program. For the remainder of the semester, collectivestudent feedback was sought after every other lecture series
Science (CS) department got together and proposed a focused10-week long funded summer camp for two local high schools with the following objectives: 1. Provide graduate students to instruct in the areas of` mobile application development, forensics and cyber Security. 2. Provide CS one-on-one mentors for students while conducting their work-based learning experience in Computer Science. 3. Assign hands-on interdisciplinary projects that emphasize the importance of STEM fields when using and developing software applications. 4. Promote and develop soft skills among participants including leadership, communications skills, and teamwork.The proposal was funded, by DOE and the summer camps were conducted in the summer of
criteria, brainstorm ideas, select a solution, and create a cardboard prototype of a solution to the problem. 3. Introduction to the Engineering Profession. In this lesson, students are introduced to the profession of engineering through the people who are engineers. Stories of Navajo engineers and the impact they make are shared, and students are asked to reflect on their own motivations as they explore potential career pathways. 4. Solving a Problem with the Scientific Method and the Diné Engineering Design Process. In this lesson, students learn about and explain differences between the scientific method and the engineering design process, and then conduct hypothetical investigations using the different
, American Society for Engineering EducationThermodynamics. The learning objectives for this assignment were discussed with the studentswhen the assignment was handed out; they were: · Students will practice important skills related to lifelong learning including selecting, locating, and understanding new information. · Students will apply team and communication skills in carrying out a technical task. · Students will discover the relationship of the concepts and principles of thermodynamics to an area of personal interest to them.In the initial part of the task, the students wrote a short essay on the relationship between an areaof personal interest and thermodynamics or energy. Topics of the essays ranged from
course to inspire appliedcreativity and humanity centered design using the concept of flight. The class was conducted in anon-conventional classroom (in an IACT art studio) which had a huge impact on the students’engagement, interest and participation in class activities. Apart from developing students’ skillset inperforming flight related analyses and calculations, the course also focuses on developing students’mindset to use the skillset in creative ways through IDA pedagogy which satisfied the ten maxims ofcreativity in education. A semester long innovation challenge module on “How “flight” can be usedon a day-to-day basis by a common man?” was incorporated using the pedagogy which lead tomultiple ideas and prototypes using the concept of
integrated to address student feedback onboredom, informed by research on cognitive engagement and retention [23, 24]. Strategicpartnerships with Engineering World Health, Engineers Without Borders, and for-profit hospitalswill expand global procedure repositories. Near-peer mentorship programs [25] will enableinternational collaboration on capstone projects addressing unmet clinical needs. Future researchwill assess the educational benefits, intellectual property generation, and formation ofstartups/non-profits, demonstrating global partnerships’ role in healthcare innovation. Ifsuccessful, this initiative will provide key insights into the impact of global collaborations inengineering education and healthcare solutions.Conclusion:The findings
at Urbana-Champaign. As a graduate student, he was a NASA Harriet G. Jenkins Graduate Fellow and mentor for the Summer Research Opportunities Program. Dr. Henderson has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students on pathways to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will impact their lives and academic pursuits. He, along with Rick Greer, co-founded the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention that introduces underrepresented and underserved fourth and fifth-grade students and their families to hands-on STEM experiences. Dr. Henderson is the immediate past Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES, pronounced
. Page 26.508.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Development and Application of the Sustainability Skills and Dispositions Scale to the Wicked Problems in Sustainability InitiativeAbstractThroughout engineering curriculum there has been a growing focus on sustainability-relatedlearning objectives, oftentimes with the ultimate learning goals being instilling dispositions suchas the awareness of the environmental impact of engineering outcomes or concern towards socialjustice issues. Within this paper, we first provide an overview of an instrument we havedeveloped to evaluate students’ attainment of analogous learning objectives. This instrument, theSustainability Skills and Dispositions
climate in a departmentcould cause students of color to be driven from STEM [3], or that a chilly climate could have adisproportionate impact on female students [4]. And while the focus of Diversity, Equity, andInclusion (DEI) efforts tends to be on women and under-represented minorities (URMs, definedas non-white, non-Asian), populations with representation at or above the demographics of thegeneral population (typically Asian) face their own challenges [5]. Additionally, part ofsupporting all students includes mitigating disenfranchisement in majority populations (typicallywhite males) [6]. In this paper, we describe recent efforts in the Mechanical Engineering andApplied Mechanics (MEAM) Department at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) to
measurement system. 1. Mission: To foster an entrepreneurial spirit, create a sense of community and cooperation, and develop ethical leaders. 2. Vision: To unify and invigorate campus entrepreneurial efforts by creating a multidisciplinary environment where students can develop into the business leaders of tomorrow who will infuse the economy through thriving new ventures 3. Goals: To prepare select University of Maryland undergraduates for entry into the entrepreneurial community by developing their entrepreneurial mindsets and functional skill sets to succeed as leaders. 4. Activities: (1) Living – Residence within the Program and community building activities (social & philanthropic) to connect and engage
retention2. In support of these goals, several criteria were developed:• Introduce the EE field with the intent of career choice affirmation3. A possible outcome is thatthe student may decide to change programs. However, it is believed that the majority of studentsfind their decision to be the correct one, and have added enthusiasm for the program.• Acquaint the students with key EE faculty. The course is team-taught by the four EE facultywho are the academic advisors.• Provide a sense of community within the EE program. The new students meet the other EEfreshmen, making them feel more welcome, comfortable, and part of a team during their firstquarter on campus.• Reduce first-quarter stress. The pass/fail type grading system reduces the pressure of
an intentional broad examination andreview of contemporary interventions in the teaching of circuits for undergraduate engineeringstudents. Specifically, we investigated what kinds of interventions were conducted in circuitseducation and what impact these interventions had on students, such as engagement, knowledge,and course grades in the course. To accomplish this, we conducted a systematic review bysearching and filtering American Society for Engineering Education Conference papers from2014 to 2023. Specific keywords search, forward and backward snowballing were used to locate32 papers that included 44 studies overall. Moreover, types of interventions and learningenvironments were categorized to determine their effects on students. This
Engineering Education, 2024 Ethics Case Study Project: Broadening STEM Participation by Normalizing Immersion of Diverse Groups in Peer to Near Peer CollaborationsAbstractTo successfully broaden the participation of underrepresented racially minoritized students inscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), students from all demographic groups mustroutinely work together in STEM as a cohesive community. A Mutual Benefit Approach (MBA)is a way to create longstanding partnerships between members of the community, academia, non-governmental organizations (NGO) to develop equitable opportunities for students from alldemographic groups to engage together in STEM. One of the primary objectives for MBA is toprovide a continuous series of
, teachers felt more confident about beingable to support their students in the acquisition of STEM concepts. This is especially important forhelping teachers ensure their efficacy in teaching STEM concepts is correlated with improvedstudent performance in STEM.To expand the scope of understanding the impacts of the summer programs on teaching self-efficacy in STEM, interview questions will be revised to focus on areas of self-efficacy. This willallow the research team to gather more directed narratives around exactly how participating in theprogram impacted teachers.The Goldberg Gator Engineering Explorers Summer Programs were designed to build studentSTEM identity, skills, and confidence through informal learning in an engaging summer campprogram
research, addressing immediate needs helped to generate excitement from the local community and to address the impression that the OU structures program was dead. It also allowed younger students to see the effects of their efforts quickly.These risks were accompanied by significant opportunities, including nearly unlimited access toFears Structural Engineering Laboratory, a fairly large undergraduate student body wanting tofocus on structural engineering, and a very understanding administration. Accepting these risksand taking advantage of these opportunities led to adopting an unusual solution.Development: Page 12.209.3In 2003
delve deeper into actually understanding the business dynamics and tomeet key opinion leaders in their chosen field. Similarly, students investigate the internationalaspects of their intended opportunity, by traveling to one of several international destinations Page 24.867.3chosen for the program each year.Since CLEI is a university-wide resource, the E-Scholars program includes engineering and non-engineering students. This creates opportunities for students to engage in interdisciplinaryprojects and to leverage a variety of skillsets and areas of expertise. Any undergraduate major iseligible to apply to the E-Scholars program. Historically
desired goals of; gaining additional knowledge ina specific Civil Engineering sub-discipline, performing experiments and exercises in a sequencethat illustrate the multi-discipline interaction that typically occur on Civil Engineering projects,developing a better understanding of the role of each sub-discipline in the practice of CivilEngineering and emphasizing the need for communication, collaboration and cooperationbetween Civil Engineering sub-disciplines. This paper addresses the desired student objectivesand an assessment of the achievement of these objectives. The successes of this course arediscussed as well as the “lessons learned” from the first semester.The experiential studio/laboratories are based on a known site and building. At the
activities.A Relational Mentorship Model Implementation An integration of these five dimensions of mentorship (mentor, mentee, functionalrelationship, organization, and community) to relational trust and connections is shown in Figure4. This model can be implemented through various types of mentoring mechanisms. Theeffectiveness of the mentoring plan depends on the trust relationship and the motivation of thementee to willingly engage in the growth opportunities created by the mentor. Implementing RMM as a functional mentoring process involves creating a healthymentoring relationships shown to be critical in preparing graduate students for careers [33].Functional mentoring results in both the success and satisfaction of mentees in
UniversityAbstractTexas State University received an NSF S-STEM award to support two cohorts of talented, low-income engineering majors, with the first cohort starting their freshman year in Fall 2024. Inaddition to the scholarships awarded, this program aims to increase students’ engineering designself-efficacy, engineering identity, and improve persistence to graduation. The program includesunique strategies for achieving these goals, emphasizing mentoring and building a sense ofcommunity among participants. The SEED scholars were paired with a faculty mentor in theirengineering major prior to their arrival on campus for their freshman year. This early contact wasintended to open lines of communication with a faculty member, so the students felt they had
engineeringclasses will be beneficial both from an instructor’s perspective, to provide insight into areas ofmisunderstanding, and for the student’s perspective, to provide them with opportunities to re-examine and deepen their understanding of the material. This paper presents a snapshot of thisendeavor as we attempt to apply this new approach to the education of electrical and computerengineering students. It is clearly a work in progress, but initial results are promising.References 1. Ideas to Action: Using Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement, 2007, https://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/files/finalreport.pdf, accessed on 12-10-2009. 2. E. Cooney, K. Alfrey, and S. Owens, "Critical Thinking in Engineering and
, engaging and relevant. Student post-survey I and II open-ended responses indicated ahigh degree of satisfaction with the program. Students repeatedly expressed gratitude for theprogram and commented on the benefit of participating in a supportive cohort. I have loved this fellowship and the community that has come out of it. My favorite part about the experience is meeting and learning from other student leaders, and the follow up meetings after the summer really help to strengthen these relationships (Fellow, post- survey II) Reflecting on the ILead Summer Fellowship, I've truly come away with a renewed sense of purpose and a deeper understanding of leadership as an ongoing, collaborative journey. The
Underlying Educational InterventionsThe Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at theNational Academy of Engineering has developed a web-based database that summarizes theavailable research on educational interventions designed to enhance student learning, retention,and professional success (see www.PR2OVE-IT.org -- Peer Reviewed Research OfferingValidation of Effective and Innovative Teaching). The website is similar to the U.S. Departmentof Education’s What Works Clearinghouse (http://www.whatworks.ed.gov/>), except thatPR2OVE-IT does not engage in extensive pre-screening of papers for rigor. Rather, we leavejudgments of rigor up to individual users of the system and focus instead on summarizing theresults of