1620 Undergraduate Research: Novel Integration of PDAs, GPS and Bar Code Scanner via an Embedded Visual Basic Program for a Utility Asset Management System Peter Mark Jansson, Jeffrey Tisa, Gregory Garwood Rowan UniversityAbstract Undergraduates in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of RowanUniversity have undertaken innovative software research and system integration for the electric utilityclients of its Engineering Clinic Program. In this innovative classroom / laboratory course, theproblem students set out to solve was the development of an integrated
engineering intensive corporationsor departments. The MBA provided at most university business schools did not suffice. 1From the beginning EM programs were designed to prepare any and all graduate engineers fortechnical management positions. Thus the incoming graduate students to these programs camefrom any and all engineering disciplines (mechanical, electrical, civil. chemical, petroleum, etc.).So from the onset, EM programs had and continue to have an interdisciplinary flavor. There arefew EM undergraduate programs in the United States (or the world for that matter).2 EvenUniversities that do have undergraduate programs, accept non-engineering management bachelordegreed applicants. The faculty teaching in most EM programs, also come from a
through both qualitative and quantitative analysis. As thiscourse serves as a prerequisite for future coursework, it plays a crucial role in shaping students' academictrajectories. By analyzing the connection between initial course performance and overall GPA, we seek togain valuable insights to better support graduate students throughout their academic journey.IntroductionGraduate programs in the Engineering Management (EM) program are designed to equip students withthe interdisciplinary knowledge and skills necessary to tackle complex technical and managerialchallenges. To ensure students are adequately prepared, most programs require completion of corecourses in areas such as probability, statistics, mathematics, and operations research. These
-long learning of not only technical skills, but also peopleskills, written and oral communication skills, and teambuilding skills.6Institutions of higher learning have responded to the new demand with a variety of degreeprograms and special centers at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. These educationalopportunities can be classified into several categories: engineering management, systemsengineering, engineering entrepreneurship, and leadership, internship, and other multi-disciplinary programs. Most of these programs are designed to introduce engineers to thebusiness world through courses, project teams, and interaction with business enterprises andbusiness leaders.The overall purpose of this study is to summarize the approaches
offer courses inmany of the above areas. We also conducted a short survey of select UB engineering school graduatealumni, who were in the work force. They strongly supported and re-enforced the findings identified bythe CIBETL board organizations.In our TM program modernization efforts, we wanted to assure that the Master’s Program was designedto develop leaders adept at managing technology dependent organizations, technological change, andskilled in establishing and maintaining superior competitive advantage for their respective enterprises.The UB Technology Management Program was specifically designed to develop inter-disciplinary skillsand competencies in: the management of technology dependent businesses and enterprises, globalmarkets and
offer courses inmany of the above areas. We also conducted a short survey of select UB engineering school graduatealumni, who were in the work force. They strongly supported and re-enforced the findings identified bythe CIBETL board organizations.In our TM program modernization efforts, we wanted to assure that the Master’s Program was designedto develop leaders adept at managing technology dependent organizations, technological change, andskilled in establishing and maintaining superior competitive advantage for their respective enterprises.The UB Technology Management Program was specifically designed to develop inter-disciplinary skillsand competencies in: the management of technology dependent businesses and enterprises, globalmarkets and
, Göteborg, SwedenExamples of CDIO workspacesThe development of workspaces at each of the primary CDIO collaborating schools has takenseveral routes prior to reaching full operational status. The Department of Aeronautics andAstronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA) created their Gelb and SeamansLaboratories through extensive renovation of their Department building first built in the 1930s.The Mechanical Engineering Department at Chalmers University of Technology reclaimed andrefurbished existing university space to create a 2000 m2 facility that is now used to support theirmechanical, automation, and industrial design engineering programs. KTH took a similarapproach to create the Poolen, a capstone engineering work center that
Session #2648 Recruiting and Retaining Faculty and Managing Diverse Majors in Four Year Schools of Engineering Technology Sallie (Lee) Townsend, Howard Canistraro The Ward College of Technology The University of HartfordAbstractWith the proliferation of four engineering technology (ET) degree programs and an increase inthe number of enrolled students1,2, as well as an increase in the number of Baccalaureate Degreesbeing awarded from ET programs3, college administrators are faced with the task of attractingand retaining quality faculty for a diverse range of
morphological analysis12 using the components and features found inour survey which we thought would appropriately support the seminar’s pedagogic goal is onemethod for reviewing the range of possible implementations. A truncated sample of the resultingmorphological box is given in Table 1, below. This analysis also helped us to meet the mandatethat the seminar provide a learning experience that did not replicate services offered by otherUniversity programs, such as the SEAS Center for Engineering Career Development and UVa’sWomen’s Center. Providing a unique educational opportunity, we believe, will facilitateacceptance of and participation in the seminar.Table 1. Truncated Sample of the Morphological Box Used in the Seminar’s Design Process
Paper ID #15069Video Instruction to Complement All Learning Styles in a First-Year Intro-duction to Engineering CourseDr. Jack Bringardner, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He studied civil engineering and received his B.S. from the Ohio State University and his M.S and Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary focus is developing curriculum and pedagogical techniques for engineering education, particularly in the Introduction to Engineering and Design course at NYU. He has a background in
Entrepreneurship Competition will be launched in the Fall of 2003. EPICS teams from all EPICS sites around the country will be eligible to enter. Prize funds of $25K are expected to be available; funding to run the competition is already in place. The winning EPICS team will be provided with travel funds to enable them to participate in the National Social Venture Competition: http://www.socialvc.net/index.cfm5. Krannert School of Management Programs participating in the EPICS Entrepreneurship InitiativeInnovation Realization LabThe Innovation Realization Lab (IRL) is designed to provide real world business and technologymanagement experience for PhD students in Purdue University's doctoral programs inAgriculture, Engineering, or Science and
Model Curriculum Research—Graduate Degree Specializations in Project Management Vijay Kanabar Director of Project Management Programs, Boston University, 808 Commonwealth Ave, Room 250, Boston, MAOur research introduces a model for colleges or universities designing a graduate curriculum in project management.It is based on our experience with implementing concentrations at Boston University and involvement by faculty innational curriculum standards. The research methodology involved researching several dozen project managementprograms, as well as research papers dealing with standards to create a create a base model of MS PM programs andspecialization. We evaluated seventy-three available
, Power Systems, Probability and Random Signals, and Computer Networks.Prof. Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University & Florida State University Dr. Petru Andrei is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Electri- cal and Computer Engineering at the Florida A&M University and Florida Stat University (FAMU-FSU) College of Engineering. He is the FSU campus education director for the NSF-ERC Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management Systems Center (FREEDM) and has much experience in re- cruiting and advising graduate, undergraduate, REU, and K-12 students, as well as in working with RET teachers. Dr. Andrei has published over 100 articles in computational electronics
Session 2660 Universal Leadership Education And Development for Managers and Engineers (U LEAD ME) Hamid Khan Ball State University Four years of undergraduate engineering education is not a panacea of success forengineers. Evidence suggests that most engineers need to learn the art of management when theyhave become successful as engineers but poor as managers of people, and must move on as moresuccessful managers of technology and people. [Drucker (1991)] But, such characteristics must be developed by programming and intervention and
strategies, spatial visualization abilities in undergraduate students, and best practices in GD&T instruction. He has conducted CAD and GD&T workshops for both industry and education professionals. Dr. Branoff has served in several roles within the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE including Director of Programs, Chair, Vice-Chair, Associate Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal, and Director of Professional & Technical Committees. In 2013, he was elected into the Academy of Fellows of the American Society for Engineering Education, and in 2014 he received the Distinguished Service Award from the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE.Jaby Mohammed (Assistant Professor) Jaby
Paper ID #37134Training Construction Management Students about Sustainable andEquitable Infrastructure through Leveraging an Envision-Rating System ina Hispanic-Serving InstitutionMiss Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University Rubaya Rahat grew up in Bangladesh, where she pursued her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. student at Department of Civil and Environ
Session 1355 Integrated Engineering-Business Graduate Program Mel I. Mendelson Loyola Marymount UniversityAbstractOur integrated approach to engineering management is innovative because it offers electiveoptions that are tailored to the students’ career goals. It focuses on the broader issues andglobalization, and it has partnerships with local industry. A graduate certificate is also offered.Class projects are assigned that use the course principles to solve "real world" problems in thestudents’ work environment. Students work both individually and in multi-disciplinary
, inclusion of components of the innovation processin engineering technology and business (marketing and management) courses has been atthe discretion of the instructor responsible for the course. The authors believe thatintentional design of courses to include components of the innovation process is in thebest interest of the engineering technology students and are encouraging professors fromengineering technology and management and marketing to integrate components of theinnovation process in their course content where applicable. The following sections ofthe paper will address the authors’ attempts to embed concepts of the innovation processin their courses and their assessment of the utility of these exercises in teaching thenecessary concepts
)Learning Management System (LMS) ModulesABSTRACTFor this work-in-progress (WIP) paper, faculty from Minnesota State University,Mankato’s (MNSU) Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Civil Engineering (CIVE)Programs developed a Learning Management System (LMS) module forFundamentals of Engineering Diagnostic Test (FEDT) and analyzed the preliminarydata obtained from its first run during Fall 2023. The FEDT module is intended to beused for multiple purposes that are explained briefly below.Both ME and CIVE programs have the mission of graduating engineers that willcontribute to their professions, seek leadership positions, and most importantly pursuetheir education with licensure programs. The Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examis the first step that an
Exploring Ways to Give Engineering Cybersecurity Students a Stronger Policy and Management Perspective Lance Hoffman, The George Washington University - lanceh@gwu.edu Rachelle Heller The George Washington University- sheller@gwu.edu Costis Toregas The George Washington University - toregas1@gwu.edu (Primary)Abstract:This paper describes lessons learned teaching cybersecurity classes in a cross-disciplinary cybersecurity scholarship program at the George WashingtonUniversity that has been successfully completed by over six dozen students in tenmajors. The majority of the students have obtained master’s degrees in computerscience, but almost half have been from other disciplines
training must be varied to help determine system performanceaccurately. This is important because system performance results dictate future course of actionin engineering management or DoD decision-making. Such results inform acquisition decisionssuch as further funding and development, program canceling, and fielding decisions.KeywordsTest scenario variation, pretest sensitization, video game, nested factorial design.1. IntroductionAs part of the U.S. Department of Defense acquisition process, a program office develops aproduct per the needs/requirements defined by a service, such as the Army. Within the Army, theArmy Test and Evaluation Command tests and evaluates the product to determine if it fills thecapability gap(s), providing critical
Paper ID #11923Evaluating a Communication Framework for Team Effectiveness in a First-Year Design and Communication CourseMs. Genevieve Hoffart, University of Calgary Genevieve is completing her honours degree under the supervision of Dr. Thomas O’Neill at the Uni- versity of Calgary looking at the influence processes in teams. She has been working with the Schulich School of Engineering for the past three years during which time her focus has been on improving team dynamics and maximizing the student experience. In addition co-developing the communication train- ing framework that has now been applied to over 2500
Session 2793 Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated Curriculum Management R. Bruce Floersheim, Margaret Bailey and Stephen J. Ressler United States Military Academy at West PointAbstractAs we enter the 21st Century in engineering education, a common desire exists toimprove curriculum structure, integration and assessment. Much has been written anddiscussed in workshops and professional journals concerning the top-down process forassessing and/or revising a program curriculum. Institutions are finally realizing theycannot afford to rely solely upon the senior capstone design experience to be theintegrator of all
, University of Toronto Sowrov Talukder is a Computer Engineering student at the University of Toronto helping to improve programming labs in education.Mr. Parth Sindhu, University of TorontoDr. Hamid S. Timorabadi, University of Toronto Hamid Timorabadi received his B.Sc, M.A.Sc, and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the applicati ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Lab Container: An environment to manage a student’s time to complete programming labs while providing effective
oncampus. Each surveying group was paired with a highway design group to complete the project.The highway design teams (senior level) served as the project lead and each surveying team(sophomore level) was required to communicate with their highway design counterparts tocollaboratively complete this project. This paper presents the development of a civil engineeringtechnology/construction management MULC model and the results of the first delivery of aMULC project.IntroductionAs of December 2010, the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) results revealedthat U.S. students ranked 17th in science and 25th in math out of 70 other developedcountries.[1] Unfortunately, these rankings are neither new to the science, technology,engineering
WIP: Students Using Sensors: Multi-Disciplinary Interactive Demonstrations for First-Year Design CoursesAbstract The research presented is a work in progress on the development of interactive classroomdemonstrations created for use in Engineering Design & Society, a first-year introductoryengineering design course with an emphasis of using the human-centered design process toaddress societal problems. Coursework covers basic programming, solid modeling, rapidprototyping, data acquisition, and sensors. These demonstrations are designed to illustrate the useof sensors across engineering disciplines, educate students categorized as undecided engineeringmajors about the many branches and applications of the engineering
incorporating thisexperience in their engineering curriculum.References1. http://www1.worldbank.org/economicpolicy/globalization/2. Ghadar, F., and E.R. Peterson, Global Tectonics: Underlying Trends Shaping the Future of Business, release date June 2005.3. Gereffi, Gary, and Vivek Wadwa. “Framing the Engineering Outsourcing Debate: Placing the United States on a Level Playing Field with China and India.” Duke University, Master of Engineering Management, Program, December, 2005. P2.4. Devon, R., Kisenwether, E., and Schuhmann, R., 2006, Engineering Education and the Global Economy: The Search For Policy. Proceedings of the ASEE 2006 Conference, Session 1844.5. The Global Product Design Benchmark Report, Aberdeen Group
educationin systems engineering and project management. When faced with designing and integratingentire systems, students were not prepared by the typical classroom experience for thecomplexities and intricacies involved.After the conclusion of launch operations for the ESPRIT mission, the participating students andfaculty took the opportunity to review the strengths and weaknesses of past projects. Theestablishment of a central organization evolved as a logical solution to improve Penn State’scapabilities. Student-oriented labs at other schools, such as the University of Michigan’s StudentSpace Systems Fabrication Lab and Utah State’s Small Satellite Program, have shown dramaticsuccesses.2,3Students have commonly advocated for more formal
combinedtechnology with business to build on the hard-won experience of the companies andprovide effective preparation for the next generation of Chief Engineers. The challengeto JACMET was to develop a Chief Engineer Certificate as the first step in the path to along-term solution.New JACMET programs are defined and executed by Learning and Competency Teams(LCTs) with both academic and industry members. The Design LCT took on the task torealize a Chief Engineer Certificate. Most companies use some form of phased-gatedevelopment approach to drive their design process so it was logical to use this as aframework for the CE certificate. After a review of the member company practices, theDesign LCT adopted a generic 9-step process: 1. Identify
thought that doctoralprograms would well prepare them to design experiments, communicate in writing, givepresentations, review literature, write peer reviewed papers, write reports, learn independentlyand work independently. Over 40% of the undergraduate respondents believed that doctoralprograms would prepare them well in the following areas: innovation, finding problems, designcomputational studies, follow environmental regulations, work across disciplines, createproposals, work in teams and manage multiple projects. Approximately 12% of undergraduateparticipants felt that doctoral programs would not prepare them for marketing products/processesand identifying customer needs, but most participants indicated some degree of preparation inthese