advocate, and as a window to the campus with knowledge of academic advising andcampus procedures.Early data suggest that the mentoring and other community-building activities within theHillman Entrepreneurs Program have had a positive impact on students’ social adjustment. TheFebruary 2008 transfer survey found that 100 percent of the transfer students felt that they werepart of a strong community at UM, and that 100 percent of the students felt supported as part ofthe Hillman program.Documentation and AdaptationThe Hillman Entrepreneurs Program has taken deliberate steps to document the lessons learnedduring its start-up phase and to adapt to those lessons. The process of ensuring adequatedocumentation and adaptation, however, often introduced
between course concepts and real-world situations,both domestic and abroad. Most of the course content was delivered prior to departure to enablestudents to focus their attention toward case studies involving important landmarks, internationalcorporations, and site-specific environmental issues abroad. All students participated in theexperience, not only by visiting interesting places and hearing about their history and relevance,but by working on short case studies, engaging in discussions about the economic consequencesof alternatives not typically seen in the US, and through various methods in which they wereexpected to document their experience. Honors College participants were additionally taskedwith conducting their required academic
analysis. The results indicated a notableimprovement across all subject areas, with over 85% of students appraising the hands-on learningexperience as either valuable or extremely valuable [5]. Similarly, Wang et al. observed paralleloutcomes in their study on engineering technology students engaged in hands-on roboticsactivities. Their findings revealed that between 73% and 100% of students agreed or stronglyagreed with survey questions probing the positive impacts of these hands-on activities [6]. Vermaalso demonstrated the constructive influence of hands-on activities on engineering technologystudents. Implementing a project-based learning approach in two first-year engineering andtechnology courses, Verma assigned groups of students Marine
/theengineeringplace/:The Engineering Place is NC State’s K–20 education and resource headquarters for exploringengineering. Through hands-on summer camps, in-school mentoring, dynamic volunteerprograms, topical workshops and much more, The Engineering Place builds excitement aroundengineering for students and teachers.Engineering summer camps have been offered at NC State University for almost 20 years. Overtime the focus, purpose and strategy associated with planning and executing the camps hasmatured to support the current 41 weeks of camp per summer. In the most recent summer thesecamps engaged over 1,700 students in grades 2-12 at various locations across the state. Severaldesign elements of The Engineering Place summer camps are particularly unique
successfulstudent outcomes, including academic achievement, persistence, and critical thinking [2].Engagement constructs are typically positioned in domain general learning models as mediatorsbetween instruction and outcome variables. Accordingly, faculty in higher education areregularly encouraged to improve their instruction by using instructional strategies to improvestudent engagement, under the prevailing assumption that it will improve learning, achievement,and other important educational targets [3]. Despite the popularity of engagement research,extant findings suggest that the impact of instruction on student engagement, and the impact ofengagement on student outcomes, is statistically small [4].We have argued in our previous work that to improve
and teachers provided youthwith opportunities to engage in core science concepts in the service of learning about a real-world problem. Students engaged in consequential sustainability learning [20] [21] byinvestigating how biodigester technology works to mitigate the problem of food waste at a localscale in the context of biology. Learning opportunities like these serve to enhance students’science and engineering literacy while also supporting their awareness of issues related to theenvironment – sustainable use of natural resources, environmental impacts, and human actionsthat exacerbate global climate change. This study indicates potentially effective means forincreasing students’ knowledge of sustainability issues while also supporting or
instruction, the relatively small percentage of communication thatoccurs verbally will primarily stimulate cognitive meanings (cognitive domain) for the student,while the more pervasive nonverbal communication (~93% of all communication) stimulates thestudents’ feelings and attitudes (affective domain) about the material (McCroskey, Richmond, &McCroskey, 2006). Thus, given the potential impact on student learning that nonverbalcommunication has, it would seem important that all instructors be mindful of their personaloutward nonverbal projection, as well as observation of student nonverbal cues.Communication, when done properly, is a two-way interactional process (Suinn, 2006). Thatstatement remains valid in the classroom, where, as instructors
design-oriented, and as a result, IE studentslack a formal opportunity for conceiving, creating and “materializing things”. The engagement ofIE students in a multidisciplinary hands-on experience like the Solar Decathlon or independentdesign projects gave them the opportunity to experience the whole life-cycle of an engineeredproduct, understanding the impact from the economic, social, and environmental perspectives. Inthe case of this team, IE students were supporting areas related to Health & Safety, Logistics,and Environmental Impact. All IE students felt comfortable actually “doing” real things or as inthe words of one student “facing practical problems inspired by real problems”.Second, IE students could play a key role in project
Page 26.911.2 STEPS camp is based on the STEPS camp developed at the University of Wisconsin-Stout,which began in 1997.Students participating in the camp explore various aspects of STEM through hands-on classes,attending discussions/panels on engineering, and working on projects. Campers also engage inrecreational activities such as movies, athletics, and exploration of the university campus. For thepast fourteen years of STEPS at UST the main project for the Basic camp has been the buildingof a remote-controlled airplanes that would be flown on their last night at camp. After panelinterviews with past STEPS participants it was decided that a new project would be introducedfor the 2014 camps.One
conflicting goals, and recognize theimportance of multiple and diverse solutions methods10.This paper builds on and is motivated by previous research in which we conducted in-depth case study analyses of students engaging in Novel Engineering design activities11-13 . In Novel Engineering activities, students identify problems that occur in children’sliterature and engineer solutions to help the story characters. Across and withinparticipating classrooms, we have identified variations in how students engage in thetask: while some attend to the characters and the story setting as their fictional clients anddesign contexts, others prioritize the expectations of their immediate classroom, andmany shift between and combine aspects of both the story and
advocate for promoting diversity in technology disciplines with a robust engineering education background in academia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Voices of Student Apprenticeship: Exploring the Unique Needs and Perspectives of Community College StudentsAbstract This paper explores student perspectives on a paid and credit-bearing technologyapprenticeship program offered by a community college in a large metropolitan area. Theprogram is offered in collaboration with a large non-profit organization that brings together localbranches of Fortune 500 companies to offer apprenticeship positions in the software engineeringtechnology field. The goal of this paper is to
Paper ID #27591Board 4: Curriculum on Diversity and Ethics: Impact in an IntroductoryBioengineering CourseC Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCamille Birch, University of Washington Camille Birch is a graduate of the Bioengineering and Computer Science departments at the University of Washington. She developed curriculum concerning the interplay of diversity and ethics for undergrad- uate engineering students at UW and is interested in the power of education to enact change in future generations of engineers. She currently works for Microsoft in the Bay Area.Dr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington
lecture intensive course with an objective to inculcate EM through activelearning techniques to improve student engagement. Students worked in groups to identify anopportunity and customer’s needs, create a business model, brainstorm and communicate anengineering solution to an open-ended question. The quantitative results from student surveysshowed significant advancement in technical and most of the EM skills. The qualitativeresponses indicated improved student engagement through hands-on product analysis. Therefore,improving the students’ ability to solve problems of societal relevance and work cohesively as ateam. After a successful implementation of this module, it is expected to make it morestakeholder centric for other engineering courses
positive. Nearly two-thirds of the students felt the Grand Challenge assignments made them more aware of the impactof engineers on community issues. An even greater number (83%) of students recognized theimportance of this awareness for professional engineers. Exposure to the Grand Challenges mayhave benefited this population of first-year students not only by providing real-world examplesof engineering problems, but also by showing the impact that engineers can have on the globalcommunity.Conclusions and Future DirectionsThree written assignments related to the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challengeswere implemented into an Introduction to Engineering course for first-year students. Theassignments were intended to foster critical
relationship between educational policy and STEM education. This provides policymakers and the educational community an improved understanding of how changes in educational policies impact STEM teaching and learning. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1200 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the
and the community.1The idea of the ITSW came after the realization of two issues. The first issue is thatInformation Technology (IT) solutions have a great impact on the operation of non-profitand educational organizations the same way it impacts commercial businesses. However,generally, non-profit and educational organizations do not have enough budgets todevelop the IT solutions they need. The second issue is that undergraduate students whoare pursuing a degree in Information Technology have skills that allow them to developmuch of the solutions that non-profit or educational organizations will need. The ITSWwas then established to bring these two issues together.The ITSW project is an original project that builds on the accumulated
generalacademic success and personal skills development. The emphasis of the curriculum element ison experiential, hands-on learning. Students have the opportunity to develop competency inengineering design principles, basic project management, basic programming, teamwork andinterpersonal skills, time management—all while forming a community of practice that willsupport them throughout their undergraduate studies. Many studies relate persistence of studentsin science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) majors to levels of student engagement inthe classroom.2,3,4,5 Hake reported on the impact of Interactive-Engagement (IE) strategies in thephysics classroom compared with more traditional instructional methods, concluding that IEmethods enhance
of Structural Steel DesignABSTRACT Students entering college settings are: increasingly computer literate, users of digitaltechnologies, visually driven, and have been exposed to active learning styles in high schools. Notionsof technology, visual learners, and engaging environments are directly and indirectly shaping how weare expected to teach. When students are asked their preferences in classroom learning, the author hasnoticed that responses vary with preferences for PowerPoint slides, chalkboard notes, projects, flippedclassrooms and utilization of computer software. Based on these common and upcoming learningmechanisms, the author is experimenting with implementing different techniques in a
specific modulefor teaching “dimensioning and tolerancing in engineering drawings”. Users’ search results mayinclude discussion topics, user comments, and instructors' guides as well as the educationalsoftware itself and related audio and video elements.In this community-centered approach to a digital library, faculty and student users will be able todiscuss various concepts using a form of threaded discussion, as well as to comment on, andreview the educational courseware contributed by various developers. They will be able toconnect to a network of other faculty and courseware developers and engage in a dialogue onteaching and learning in their fields. Faculty will have a peer-reviewed source of information onthe various ways to educate students
well as to share the studentsopinions and reactions to the course. As in any Engineering Technology course, the experimentalcomponent of this course is critical to the success of its graduates. The experimental part of thiscourse combines academic experiences to help students understand the concepts explained in theclassroom, linked with hands-on experiences in receiving communications from differentsatellite services. In particular, these experiences are centered on two types of communicationsthat, because they are low-cost and have open transmission, (not scrambled or codified) becomeideal to bring them into our classes. First, students are exposed to non-commercial televisiontransmissions from geostationary satellites operating in the Ku
development for engineers is an essential part of career advancement and caninclude a wide variety of learning opportunities, ranging from asynchronous short courses tocomprehensive synchronous in-person courses. Adult learning theory supports the positiveinfluence of student engagement, but this engagement may be different from universityclassroom settings. There is an abundance of literature that indicates student engagement in thelearning experience is important for student learning and other important educational outcomes.There is also evidence that the adoption of engaging teaching practices in professionaldevelopment settings is limited. Much of the research on adoption is done in K-16 settings,which fails to address the impact among a
opportunities.About 50 of the colleges in the book include engineering or pre-engineering programs.Examples of programs profiled include the EPICS program at Purdue University; the ColoradoSchool of Mines Minor in Civic Engagement and a special interest area in humanitarianengineering; Colorado State University’s Service-Learning Graduate Teaching CertificateProgram; and the University of Pennsylvania’s CommuniTech. However, more important than alist of programs and courses is an understanding of the outcomes that can result from studentengagement in PBSL.Although this paper focuses exclusively on the students’ educational outcomes, of equalimportance are the impacts on the community partners. The community should be a true partnerin the process and feel
Engineering Network, is a student’s ability to usecuriosity, connections, and creating value to solve problems [13]. Many universities in the KEENnetwork have implemented EM activities throughout their curriculum [14]-[16]. Curricularexperiences have been shown to have the largest impact on student’s EM [17]. In the first year,many of the activities center around a design problem [18]-[20]. Students who participated insome of these activities have noted the projects increased communication skills, teamwork,ability to validate designs and examine customer value [18], [21]. In a survey administered toemployers about the importance and proficiency of soft skills for entry-level engineers,communication and teamwork both had high levels of importance, but
found several factors that have improved students’ mentalhealth in social contexts.The current literature shows trends between a student’s need for both independence and ownershipof their work while having some level of personal support. There have been multiple concepts usedto explore this, including self-sufficiency, sense of belonging, and social self-efficacy. Social self-efficacy is defined as one’s confidence to employ social skills to initiate social contact and developnew friendships, whereas self-sufficiency refers to one’s ability to independently complete theirday-to-day tasks. How connected one feels to their communities is represented by sense ofbelonging. This study will determine how, if at all, these concepts impact a student’s
influenced heavily by out-of-class involvement, as wellby faculty and peer interaction [3,4,5]. By providing opportunities for students to get involved inan intentionally-structured residential community and enlisting faculty support, living-learningprograms are able to increase students’ engagement [6] in a way that positively impacts theircognitive and affective development [7].In 2004, the School of Engineering and Computer Science (ECS) at Baylor University opened itsfirst living-learning program in response to conversation among students who expressed a desireto live with others embarking on a similar academic journey. The ECS Living-Learning Center(LLC) included a faculty-in-residence, structured programming to serve the population,leadership
, Environmental Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cooperative andExperiential Education, Engineering Libraries, Experimentation and Laboratory-OrientedStudies, Graduate Studies, Student, and Faculty Development. This expansion reflects theincreasing levels of engagement of engineering faculty in communication instruction, but it alsocontributes to fragmenting the discourse on engineering communication and making it moredifficult for authors to be aware of other scholars working on the same topic.Closing Observations: Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go from Here? The preliminary analysis reported here suggests that the implementation of EC2000increased interest in communication within ASEE and expanded the community of scholars
site as well as administration of registration,travel arrangements, and reimbursement.The intended final products were enhanced hands-on experience and new knowledge of theundergraduate and graduate student participants in the areas of wireless communications,software-defined radio, cognitive radio, and spectrum sharing / spectrum access, as well as afoundation for an ongoing contest that will use continuously evolving tools to enable educatinggenerations of undergraduate and graduate electrical and computer engineering students inwireless communications using relevant scenarios.3.2 ActivitiesActivities related to the competition included development of an open-source, ready-to-runreference waveform implemented using an open source SDR
Factors Program. Her research focus includes self-efficacy, mental toughness, and microaggressions. Darnishia is also the Pavlis Educator and Manager of Global Engagement Programs in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Tech. She’s a foodie who enjoys spending time with friends and family as well as impromptu road trips! © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reflecting on Culture in an Immersion Experience: How to Prepare Students for the UnexpectedAbstract:Experiential learning is increasingly recognized as a high-impact educational practice, andreflection is an essential piece of
sessions. Two modules that aimed to 1) engage studentsin learning about human-centered design and its role in engineering and 2) engage students inteam-based discussions and storytelling activities were designed and integrated in two laboratorysessions. This study answers the following research questions:1) What is the impact of these modules on students’ understanding of HCD and its role in engineering design?2) What is the impact of these modules on students’ knowledge of performing the HCD processes associated with completing the engineering design challenges in this course?3) What is the impact of these modules on students’ development of skills associated with the collaborative and communicative mindsets?MethodsDesign The study
utility is widely agreed upon [5].Importantly, it has been shown that both academic and extracurricular aspects of a student’slearning processes are characterized by engagement [6]. High Impact Educational Practices(HIP) provide useful opportunities for deep student engagement and, thus, positively influencestudent retention and persistence [4]. Kuh [3] identified eleven curricular and extracurricular HIP(i.e., collaborative assignments and projects, common intellectual experiences, eportfolios, firstyear seminars and experiences, global learning and study abroad, internships, learningcommunities, senior culminating experiences, service and community-based learning,undergraduate research, and writing intensive courses). In computer science and