’ expectations: “communicatewith your professor as much as possible.” Regarding “differences between undergraduate andgraduate work,” one participant tweeted, “...make sure prof knows your face, office hours are amust, talk to advisor.” The topic of isolation also fell into the sub-theme of communication. Thegraduate experience can often be a lonely journey and the few tweets related to this topicencouraged new students to engage with others and to reach out for support. The two questionsrelated to seeking strategies for coping with isolation were met with supportive responses to seekopportunities to meet other diverse students.“Expectations from family” and “obligations to the community” generated one answer tweet inthe top tweets. There was no
approach to engage both groups of students in the workshops and equip them withdifferent skill sets. To demonstrate the practical values of technologies, we invite external collaborators to co-design scenario-based project learning opportunities based on real-world problems they encounter. This modeloffers our students real-world testbeds to apply techniques they learned or even develop novel tools. Recently,we have made these tutorial materials publicly available at this link1 to maximize their impact on our studentcommunity as well as the academic makerspaces sharing the same interest across the globe.The staffing and equipment necessary for implementing the framework will be described in detail. Support fromexternal collaborators, academic
learning, industry collaboration and designing for positive social impact which contributes to the uniqueness of York’s engineering program. As an active participant in the establishment of the undergraduate and graduate Mechanical Engineering programs, his attention is devoted to providing students with both experiential learning and soft skills. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Managing Polarities: Perception of Value, Designer Roles andOrganizational Conditions that Influence Design Outcomes in Mechanical EngineeringAbstractDesign engineers can greatly contribute to the growth of a business organization by not
Applied MedicalSciences (AMS) of King Saud University (KSU); Riyadh started in 1986. There are somedifferences between these two colleges as first college is concentrating on the engineeringperspective where the other college focused on the medical viewpoint. Most of thosegraduated students have the intention to work in the Biomedical engineering/technology fieldwithin the health care environments.Two years ago , King Saud University , has established a two-year program that calledBiomedical Engineering technology at several community colleges around the kingdom .Biomedical Engineering Technology Training program in Technology College:Establishment of the General Organization for Technical Education and Vocational Training(GOTEVOT) was a positive
Applied MedicalSciences (AMS) of King Saud University (KSU); Riyadh started in 1986. There are somedifferences between these two colleges as first college is concentrating on the engineeringperspective where the other college focused on the medical viewpoint. Most of thosegraduated students have the intention to work in the Biomedical engineering/technology fieldwithin the health care environments.Two years ago , King Saud University , has established a two-year program that calledBiomedical Engineering technology at several community colleges around the kingdom .Biomedical Engineering Technology Training program in Technology College:Establishment of the General Organization for Technical Education and Vocational Training(GOTEVOT) was a positive
improve students'communication and cooperation abilities while teaching basic engineering skills. The DEIBJ/IDactivity enhances the course by exposing students to the DEIBJ/ID topics by using activelearning approaches like presentations, group exercises, and case studies. These projects and thelearning will inspire students to actively and thoughtfully engage with DEIBJ and ID principles,incorporating them into their cognitive processes as they work on future projects. The goal ofthis paper is to share this idea with the first-year community and also gather feedback to helpimprove execution and build a system for measuring learning outcomes and module efficacy.Literature reviewInclusion of DEIBJ and ID in an introductory engineering course is
://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/ACLS%20teagle5_SSB4.pdf5. G. D. Kuh, “High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter,” Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008. Accessed 1/4/14 at: http://www.neasc.org/downloads/aacu_high_impact_2008_final.pdf6. K. W. Bauer and J. S. Bennett, 2003. Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience, J. of Higher Education, vol. 74, no. 2, 210–230.7. S. Laursen, A.-B. Hunter, E. Seymour, H. Thiry, and G. Melton, Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.8. A. C. Gilbert, M. J. Strauss, J. A. Tropp, “A Tutorial on Fast Fourier Sampling
speakerdiscussed sustainability operations on our university campus, addressing recycling activities,environmental and energy management, alternative transportation initiatives, solar poweredelectric cars on campus, campus community gardens, etc. The second guest speaker sharedinformation about the redevelopment of a small local community into a livable/sustainablecommunity making best use of the topography of the site. The guest speakers were well receivedby the class and helped students see how professionals in their field are already usingsustainability concepts to benefit peoples’ lives and the community in general.As part of the class assignments students engaged in literature review and synthesis; individualand group exercises; design activities
this tool and use of technology inthe classroom is consistent with the research on inspiring quality faculty work. Fourfactors have been described by faculty as important motives that make faculty liferewarding: autonomy, recognition, community, and the feeling of efficacy.4, 5 Startingwith a worthy problem that faculty can resonate with and have mutual purpose in isvital to developing a community of problem solvers. We targeted individualspreviously involved in cross-STEM discussions, held since 2000, including thoseinvolved in the Science and Math for Biological Sciences Students (SyMBiosis) tofurther engage this community. The SyMBiosis group most recently discussed therequirements for critical thinking in Introductory Chemistry, Biology
acceptable materials for astraw for users with specific needs (Outcome #2) as evidenced by the hierarchy of alternativematerials. An important aspect of communication is the ability to listen. Through the midtermquestion, students recognized the importance of listening to the recommendations of thedisability community in selecting a straw material (Outcome #3). Finally, through engaging withthis module, students were able to make better informed judgments which consider the impact ofmaterial section on the disability community through the example of plastic straws (Outcome#4).ConclusionsIn “The Final Straw” module, students engaged specifically with a social aspect of the TripleBottom Line on the salient environmental issue of single-use plastic
ethical considerations, and its potential impact on society. Networking Opportunities Students had the opportunity to network with other students, mentors, and industry professionals.The feedback from the camp was overwhelmingly positive as the students andparents relished the opportunity to learn about topics driving their world andtheir community. The camp also brought awareness of how technology isshaping the world around the students. 8 Future Plans and Next Steps The Gaskins Foundation plans to continue offering the Ethical AI Camp
of schools began to create dedicated spaces for students to engage in hands-on making,prototyping, and other forms of creative exploration. Since then, makerspaces have become increasinglycommon at colleges and universities around the world, as schools recognize the value of hands-onlearning experiences for students and the importance of fostering a culture of innovation andentrepreneurship. Today, makerspaces can be found at a wide range of institutions, from large researchuniversities to smaller liberal arts colleges.While some faculty members may be familiar with the equipment in makerspaces and have experienceusing it, many others may be less familiar or have little experience with the tools. In general, colleges anduniversities are
just getting the answer.Taking a cue from educational psychology [4], an approach to circumvent the negative impact ofsolution manuals is by changing problem features (examples include the format of the problemstatement, familiarity with the problem context, and whether the values provided are numeric orsymbolic). Sweller and colleagues ([5],[6], and [7]) have shown that one effective way toaccomplish this goal is to have students engage in open-ended problem solving rather thanattempt to reach a particular goal (for example, “calculate the value of as many variables as youcan ” versus “what is the final velocity of the car?”). As noted in these studies, such a techniquehas had success in high school courses in geometry and trigonometry.In the
Paper ID #28778Reimagining Energy Year 2: Integrating CSPs into Course DevelopmentProf. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of integrated engineering at the University of San Diego. He is passionate about creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two areas: engineering education and design. Professor Hoople’s engineering education research examines the ways in which novel approaches can lead to better student outcomes. He is the principal investigator on the National Science Foundation Grant
how team dynamics affect undergraduate women’s confidence levels in engineering.Dr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda Zarske is a faculty member with the Engineering Plus program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She teaches undergraduate product design and core courses through Engineering Plus as well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the CU Teach Engineering program. Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity - es- pecially women and nontraditional demographic groups in engineering - as well as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education, and
Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Embedding ABET’s outcomes in a software engineering courseIntroduction The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is the leader in assuringquality and stimulating innovation in applied science, computing, engineering, and engineeringtechnology education. One aspect of the enhanced ABET criteria (published in 2000) is “anunderstanding of professional responsibility.” In ABET student learning outcomes forcomputing, Outcomes d to h (i.e., communication, teamwork, impacts of computing, ethics andprofessional development) are identified as “professional skills.” In most undergraduate computing and engineering programs, students do not haveopportunities to be exposed to the
can directly impact students’ lives and communities to inform the direction of the unit plan. It is his hope that these and the future curricula he will work on will help to include and empower more diverse students to see themselves in the fields of science and engineering, as well as see themselves as advocates for change and innovation in their communities. Aaron Richardson is a trained horticulturist with fifteen years of experience in the field dating back to his time in the National FFA Youth Organization, and has gone on to acquire Bachelor’s degrees in Horticulture, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, and Biology Education from the University of Connecticut (UConn). Aaron is currently a Master’s student
, War Department) (1922) Report of the Committee on Chemical Engineering Education of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (co-author R.T. Haslam) (1925) Vocational Guidance for College Students: Reports of Two Conferences of the National Research Council (co-author L.L. Thurstone; National Research Council) (1926) Army Organization in Industry (presentation to the American Management Association); also published as Education in the Army 1919-1925 (American Council on Education) (1928) “Finding Potential Leaders: What Does a Leader Do? (co-author Harlow Stafford Person) published in Personnel Methods: Report of Progress of the
project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers.Dr. Renee Falconer, Colorado School of MinesDr. Allison G. Caster, Colorado School of Mines After completing a B.S. in Chemistry at the University of South Dakota, I studied laser micro-spectroscopy and X-ray microscopy at the University of California-Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, earning my PhD in Physical Chemistry. I rounded that out with a post-doc in Bioengineering at the An- schutz Medical Campus in
and online group forumsand breakouts, presentations, open-ended short homework responses, literature reviews, formalessays, and informal self-reflections. Some assignments asked students to think deeply aboutimpacts of designs, technology, and facility placement, others challenged students to think aboutcommunity engagement and communication strategies for different groups, and others engagedstudents in data analysis assignments and projects. Some assignments asked students to rewrite atextbook problem including a SJ context.The CC has been particularly impactful on the students involved. Lessons that resonated withthem the most incorporated DEI concepts directly into what was being taught in the class –pointing to existing flaws and biases
paper is topresent one strategy for Jigsaw called “Flip-J” in a large, interdisciplinary, first-year engineeringdesign course and discuss its characteristics considering quality cooperative learning.MethodFirst-year Interdisciplinary Engineering Course Structure: At [blinded], first-yearengineering and computing students are mandated to take a 3-credit, interdisciplinary [blinded]course. Seven sections of the course were offered in the Fall of 2018 with approximately 90students per section. The course is based on service-learning therefore students work on projectswith a designated community partner in teams of up to 5 students per group. Through weeklyguides, students are to develop functional prototypes by the end of the semester by using
engineering technology instruction. The grant project has anoverarching goal of improving student engagement and learning outcomes of first-time in college AfricanAmerican engineering technology (Electrical and Computer, Mechanical, and Nuclear) students, and allengineering technology students in general. Grant activities commenced October 1, 2021, and the grant team ispresently taking steps to procure a contractor for the construction of a VAR lab. Additionally, the grant team isdeveloping a program of study specific to dual enrolled students within the college’s service area that will leadto a college credential at the Technical Certificate of Credit award level.PurposeThe VARiETy grant initiative seeks to demonstrate improvement in academic
small learning communities (typically made up ofone college student and from six-to-eight 9th graders). These e-mentoring families stayedtogether for the entire academic year. Using the powers of social networking, nearly onehundred 9th-grade students remained with the program for their entire freshman year of highschool. In February, 2010, EMERGE was named as a finalist in the Power of MentoringAwards, sponsored by College Mentors for Kids.12Not to be overlooked, the program also had an impact on the Rose-Hulman women participants.The pilot program mentors went on to attain careers in science / engineering. Most applied forthe EMERGE positions because they had genuine altruistic purposes, but they also wished todevelop their management, inter
typical chemical engineering undergraduate corecurriculum has not adapted to prepare students for the multiple needs encompassed by thechemical industry. Lack of industry-relevant examples/topics and applications in the coursecontents results in less motivated and/or engaged students. Students therefore often struggleto identify with the profession and are not ready for the workforce when they graduate. ThisNSF PFE: RIEF project examines a unique experience where a student-faculty-industryintegrated community is created to help bridge the gap between industry needs and thecompetencies developed within chemical engineering programs.The project's main goal is to better understand how implementing up-to-date industryproblems into one of the
established the 10 educational program outcomes listed in Table 1. AnAssessment Committee was formed in 2006 and charged with developing a continuousimprovement process linked to educational objectives that could provide quantitative feedbackon strengths and potential areas of improvement of the program and assess the impact of changesto the curriculum.Our curriculum is unique nationwide. Design courses throughout the curriculum form a uniquefeature of the BME undergraduate degree program3, 4. Every BME student registers for a designcourse and works on a client-based design project every semester for six consecutive semesters.These design courses are supervised by faculty advisors and meet for two hours per week.Therefore, every BME student has
experiences for veterans to motivate them tocontinue to graduate school or pursue a career in Naval STEM research. A mentor program wasimplemented to provide research faculty mentors, Navy engineering mentors and an expandedmentor network to support the student veterans. The program is well received at bothuniversities and has demonstrated a positive impact on the undergraduate student veterans.Several program challenges are presented along with methods used to overcome those challengesto provide a better experience for both the veteran students and faculty mentors.IntroductionThis paper discusses the development and execution of a multi-year veteran research exchangeprogram between the University of Tennessee and the University of North Carolina at
disciplines.Section six describes the course assessment methods, including the post-course survey and ananalysis of students' responses from a pilot implementation, focusing on their comprehension ofengineering disciplines, readiness for academic challenges, and confidence. Section sevendiscusses how students’ feedback has been used to enhance the course and the nextimplementation. Finally, the last section concludes by reflecting on the effectiveness of thecourse, arguing the potential impact of this course on students' academic and career decisions.2. Literature ReviewA student choosing an engineering major is influenced by factors ranging from personal interestsand abilities to external influences like family, educators, and societal perceptions [3
Emily Macdonald-Roach is an MASc student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, engineering culture, and equity, diversity, and inclusion in engineering career paths.Ms. Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto Saskia van Beers (she/her) is a MASc. student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on understanding how Canadian engineers reflect on the impact that their social location has had on their career.Sasha-Ann Eleanor Nixon, University of Toronto ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Why would
environmental engineering’ course often is called upon toaccomplish multiple objectives in a single offering, including: 1) serving as a ‘point of entry’ forstudents pursuing a baccalaureate course of study in a program of ‘environmental engineering’;2) serving as a ‘survey’ for students in another field of engineering (i.e., civil engineering,architectural engineering, chemical engineering, etc.); 3) serving as an ‘interdisciplinaryinterface’ for students in fields of science, health, or various aspects of sustainability (i.e.,environmental science, environmental health, or ‘sustainability science, technology, policy,communication, etc.’); or 4) serving as an ‘opportunity for engagement’ or an ‘opportunity forrecruitment’ for students early in their
research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University. ©American Society for Engineering