Group report increasing awareness among faculty about OER, with almost 50 %of faculty acknowledging awareness in 2018 [5]. The 2018 survey also reports a growingdissatisfaction with commercial publishing among faculty, which could lead to increased OERadoption in the next few years [5].Current literature also has examples of the role of OER in supporting student success, particularlyin addressing learning outcomes and student perceptions of open materials [6]. E. Croteau’sstudy, on the Affordable Learning Georgia project, examined student outcomes across 27 coursesthat had adopted OER. Croteau found that overall, faculty selected materials that saved studentsmoney without negatively impacting course learning outcomes [7]. In their study
either traditionalIndustrial Engineering Departments or Management Schools. While it has components incommon with both, these key features make it unique. TIM is focused on enhanced profitabilityand growth of firms through: ‚ The fusion of Knowledge Management (using information systems) with more traditionally-taught Operations and Strategy. ‚ Faculty and students with a deep understanding of technology obtained an engineering education and background. ‚ Active engagement with Silicon Valley firms through research, consulting and course projects and internships (amplified through our Silicon Valley presence).Other distinctive features of TIM are: ‚ The emphasis on integration of management science and expertise
content to be explicitly tied to their broader contexts and social impacts. Second, wepragmatically aim to be self-sufficient to minimize the demands placed on other engineeringdepartments by our students. The short-term strategy for this small-scale development of ourcurriculum is not only vital, but also advantageous. While most would agree that contextualizingtraditional engineering content is both important and effective, there is tremendous inertia toovercome to successfully integrate this context across an entire curriculum. By cultivating asocial mindset in our GE-specific courses, we can help students see the impact of engineering onsociety as they engage in their technical coursework, without requiring systemic change acrossall existing
forteam communication, critical reflection in relation tosources and assumptions. Page 26.1586.3From the perspective of pedagogy and classroom learning, the underlying reasons forimplementing these tools are to: Advance the student‟s ability of self-assessment through explicitmodels and frameworks for analytical thinking, discussing and writing texts,within the humanities and social sciences. Practice peer learning through combining web forums and seminars. Reflect on learning process to achieve a meta-understanding, e.g.awareness of their learning process and ways to improve further.The paper is organized in fivesections
students develop anunderstanding of GR. This simulation, developed by Physics Outreach and Instruction throughNew Technologies (POINT), covers some of the most important concepts of GR and isintended to replace the traditional ball and sheet demonstration in formal classroom settings orfor general public engagement. Once finished, this simulation will be available for free on theMeta Quest store, and the code will be open-source through a public GitHub.In addition to this software, we also contribute a set of survey questions that may be used toevaluate college-level students’ basic conceptual understanding of GR. There is currently nosingle standard assessment instrument in the physics education community for measuringunderstanding of GR concepts
discussed.Expert Witness Role PlaysExpert witness role plays are interactive simulations where engineering students play the role ofexpert witnesses in some part of the litigation process. This pedagogy affords the students anopportunity to experience real world ethical dilemmas and engage in ethical decision making andactions while using the technical rigor of higher level engineering classes.1 Role plays have beenshown to be an effective technique for a variety of learning outcomes, including ethicseducation.2,3,4,5 Theoretically, this pedagogy provides different learning opportunities than otherapproaches to ethics education such as lectures, computer-based instruction, and case-studies.6,7,8Our previous expert witness role play scenarios focused on
management. ➢ utilize engineering measurements and tools, units, and conversions. ➢ perform data analysis and graphical display of information. ➢ describe the different types of forces, motion and machine components. ➢ demonstrate understanding of various types of mechanical energy and the nexus between energy-water-environment. The class aims to engage pre-major and freshmen students in learning activities related toengineering careers, while they are taking other pre-engineering classes for the first couple of yearsin their college1. This engagement became even more important due to lower college enrollmentdriven by population demographic changes and due to the negative impact of the COVID-19pandemic. Engineering schools play important
creative changes to the curriculum3-6 with more emphasis being placed onstudent-directed learning.7,8 For example, the importance of attitude development inundergraduate students (for example, a first-year electronics lab has been developed with theprimary goal of “influencing student attitudes rather than imparting cognitive knowledge”9) andthe impact of student attitudes on student performance10 have already been recognized. Inaddition, the Boyer Commission issued a challenge to engineering educators to “make research-based learning the standard".11 In particular, a number of researchers are developing variousnanotechnology-based materials aimed at students at the freshmen level.12While case-based learning has been used in a number of pre
insightful, experiential, and engaging, potentially bridging the gap in teaching mobileaccessibility. Our research sheds light on extending accessibility education in computingdisciplines to mobile contexts.1 IntroductionTeaching university students about accessibility is important to raise their awareness andknowledge regarding the accessible design of software. Prior literature emphasizes learningobjectives [1], learning outcomes [2], teaching methods [3], and other aspects of accessibilityeducation.Empathy towards the technology barriers experienced by people with disabilities has beenidentified as a leading goal of accessibility education [4], [5], and experiential learning has beeneffective in inspiring this outlook while conveying
, accommodated andleveraged in real world problem solving and how we prepare students for this. The paper has Page 22.1583.2three sections that chronicle episodes in an eight-year investigation of interdisciplinary learningboth in engineering research laboratories and in an introductory biomedical engineering course.We begin by briefly reporting on a six-year study of the cognitive and learning practices in twotruly interdisciplinary communities and the design principles for classrooms that we extractedfrom these studies. Then the design and development of the classroom context and content arediscussed as they relate to the design principles. Finally the
teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing
thevisual, animation, and video content of the lectures to facilitate a more dynamic demonstration ofthe phenomena being instructed. Authors are improving the lectures’ visuals by many ways suchas incorporating a video at the beginning of each topic that highlights its real-life significance, todevelop students’ interest in the subject matter. If applicable, an animation is then demonstratedduring the topic to facilitate students’ deeper understanding of the content. For instance, duringthe fatigue subject in Machine Design, an animation is presented on fatigue crack growth in asteel plate under bending, demonstrating the stress contours around the crack. The impact ofpresenting videos on students’ engagement, and the best practices for effectively
amisalignment in the goals for the two parties engaged in the partnership. Drawing upon a casestudy, Brasiel and Ruby [13] showed how relationship building and mutual goals enabled thesuccess of both parties. Frequent communication and shared success and achievements thatbenefitted all parties supported the collaborative efforts of the team members, which ultimatelycontributed to positive research and student outcomes. The principles that Brasiel and Ruby [13] pointed to were further elucidated by JenniferTurns and colleagues [14], whose work focused on the challenges associated with translation ofeducational research into educational practice. The field of education is not alone in this struggleand many scholars have detailed the challenges of
measures intotheir decision-making, regardless of their role in industry, be it in a design, operational, ora managerial capacity (Hale & deKroes, 1997).Eisenhardt (1989) reemphasized the need to enforce case study-based learning inengineering education, noting that the learning outcomes from case study research mayrange from development of ideas, and frameworks, to postulations, or mid-range theory,owing to the richly descriptive nature of case studies. Another advantage is the concurrentopportunity to focus on the ethics component of engineering education. Many incidentcase studies include a moral or ethical dilemma. Asking students to recognize a dilemmaand seek resolution can bring a positive impact on moral reasoning and
, but rather is due in part to curricularbottlenecks, lack of institutional support, and lack of significant relevant exposure to materialmeant to engage these students’ engineering future selves. This data motivated the creation of theGEARSET program. In this paper we describe the program, summarize the results to date, anddiscuss the impact of the recent global pandemic and the subsequent transition to test optionaladmissions criteria on the definition of the GEARSET cohort, program implementation, andstudent participation.Program DescriptionThe central objectives of the GEARSET program are: 1. To increase recruitment, retention, student success, and transfer rates into engineering of students who are not admitted directly to
andanimal welfare.) Finally, the difference is even starker when it comes to individual careerchoices. Our attention to empathy in design aligns “doing good” with the practice of engineeringitself; effective altruist Will MacAskill calls this a “direct benefit” strategy. He counters with theprospect of “earning to give,” in which the individual career is directed toward maximumfinancial return, betting on accumulated wealth that can outweigh a career of direct benefit oncedonated to charity according to EA principles.I suspect that other socially engaged engineering educators might share my ambivalent initialreaction to this argument. On one hand, there is tactical appeal—especially for students whocame into engineering motivated by the degree’s
, Iowa State University Dr. Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director
collective impact activities that expand the national pipeline into STEM careers. College student development and Faculty career development are central themes across her body of work.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEMPraveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Char- lotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
or attachment to their teaching methods, may be reluctant to updatetheir teaching styles to address 21st century engineering student learning needs [3].Unfortunately, inadequacy and inefficiency in teaching adversely impacts both instructors (forexample through poor evaluations and frustrating teaching experiences) and students (forexample through poor performance and lack of motivation).1.1 Hurdles for engineering education reform in IndiaThe hurdles, such as those previously mentioned, in engaging faculty in educational reform maybe different outside the United States. In a different culture there could be several challenges inapplying practices, considered best practice in one culture, in its own educational system.Specific challenges
as multidisciplinary design projects. Priorcoursework usually has a maximum of three students in a project and no multidisciplinaryopportunities other than a mandatory co-op program.In order to promote an interdisciplinary team approach to design for monitoring structures, aproject-based learning approach was selected to support the process of inquiry and learningsince “real world engineering projects come to fruition only through the efforts of teams focusingon real projects”5. In addition, project-based learning requires students to engage in designthinking in a systems level collaboration on teams communication in terminologies anddefinitions outside of their respective disciplines5,6. With this in mind, the course was dividedinto four
learning community; prompt/adaptive feedback on individual or group works;and familiar and easy-to-access technologies.Anderson et al.11 (2017) observed significant enhancement of students’ short-termperformance within six weeks to six months of being taught by the flipped classroom method.In the study of Koo et al.12 (2016), pre-test and post-test results were utilized to evaluate theeffectiveness of the method, and it was concluded that there was significant improvement instudent performance and satisfaction, although a few students indicated a problem with thetime requirement. Moravec et al.13 (2010) utilized the flipped class methodology andobserved a 21% increase in student performance. Kostaris et al.14 (2017) observed that theflipped
hypothesis or structured design process, student designers should becarefully guided to uncover values of CRs for their design projects. Therefore, a structureddesign method should be prescribed for student designers to make full usage of CRs.Compared to concept generation that is well-supported by many existing design methods [3-5], a more challenging task for student designers is function formulation (i.e., how toformulate a set of explicit functional requirements for the to-be-designed artifact) [6]. Inpractice, new functions are primarily formulated by senior designers based on theirextrapolation of customer voices solicited through lead user engagement [7], brainstorming[8], focus group, individual interview, survey, ethnography [9], etc. In
STEM concepts. Thetechnology management faculty periodically met with teachers to discuss potential fordeveloping business ideas based on their research. Each team also completed project portfoliosconsisting of: a research project report, presentation slides, and a website. On the last day, in theafternoon session, teachers presented and demonstrated their research projects to the universitycommunity. Illustrative examples of teacher research projects and lesson plans are given inSection 3. Page 24.1041.5 Throughout the summer workshop, teachers’ were engaged in a variety of activities tobecome part of a wider community of educators and
engineers workwith geographic information systems (GIS) to harvest synoptic overviews from multi-dimensional databases in order to forecast the impact of human development on naturalenvironments. Control engineers work with mathematical models that simulate the behavior of aphysical system to predict and optimize performance.10 Likewise, structural engineers use deepsimulations to determine complex interactions between loads and dynamic changes in stress.And – perhaps most importantly – network-supported virtual workspaces make collaboration oncomplex projects possible for engineers from all parts of the globe.A major transforming agent for engineering education in the upcoming years will be the rapidadvancements in information, communication
, this paper examines continuous improvement in the Civil EngineeringTechnology (CIET) Program within the Department of Engineering Technology. Finally,the paper will discuss the practical implementation of the continuous improvementprocess. There have been many papers published in the last few years on the topic ofassessment as it relates to TC2K. Experts have long debated the pros and cons ofassessment at the course level versus program level assessment and the potential forlinking student achievement directly to program outcomes2,3,4,5,6 This paper proposes asystemic approach to assessment that links program outcome assessment to courseassessment that is currently fully implemented and functioning at the University of NorthCarolina at
for a Research Experience for TeachersThis paper shares the findings from the first year of a Research Experience for Teachers (RET)site, funded through the National Science Foundation’s Division of Engineering Education andCenters (Award # 1953645), supporting community college science instructors from our regionin a seven-week research experience focusing on cyber physical systems (CPS) used for energyproduction and management. We describe the motivation behind the recruitment for the RET, thegoals of the research experience, and the problem-based learning method we used to design theRET for focusing on learning threshold concepts.Motivation for the RETOver the past four years, transfer students from regional
. [Accessed January 26, 2018].[9] S. Arnold-Garza, “The Flipped Classroom: Assessing an Innovative Teaching Model for Effective and Engaging Library Instruction,” CR&L News, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 10-13, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9051/9890. [Accessed January 20, 2018].[10] S. Arnold-Garza, “The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and its Use for Information Literacy Instruction,” Comm. Info. Lit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp.7-22, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11603/160. [Accessed January 26, 2018].[11] A.W. Brooks, “Information Literacy and the Flipped Classroom: Examining the Impact of a One-shot Flipped Class on Student Learning and Perceptions,” Comm. Info. Lit., vol. 8
theimportance of testing may be lost in the meantime and it may be difficult to translate their testingknowledge to other courses, such as Computer Architecture, in our case.Autograders have had a substantial positive impact on getting feedback quickly to students andsaving instructors countless hours of grading and supplying feedback, alleviating some of thatburden. 6 However, autograders still remain a significant issue to address when it comes toencouraging positive software development habits and testing behavior. As several havereported 17,18,19,20 , students may be negatively influenced by the autograder, such as relying on theautograder to know if their program is correct or exploiting the autograder to gaininformation.One approach Karavirta
videotapes were digitized and entered into Transana (Fassnacht & Woods31; seewww.transana.org), a computer application for discourse analysis that integrates the video,transcript text and researcher codes. Classroom talk was divided into segments we called clips,and clips were coded to reflect the points of interest in the research questions listed above.Coding FrameworkThe coding framework for our qualitative/quantitative analysis delineates three differentdimensions: A. Instruction time codes subdivide each class period based on how the instructor interacts with students. B. Concepts mark engagement with “big ideas” from STEM, such as modularity in engineering, projection in mathematics, and Newton’s laws in physics. We
Tech8. Students exhibited a 0.95 bias shiftbetween pre- and post- test scores, suggesting that the class had a significant impact on their criti-cal thinking skills. A student focus group triangulated these results, showing that the students feltthat the course improved the same aspects of their critical thinking skills as demonstrated by theCAT. Additionally, the focus group provided insight as to which elements of the course the stu-dents felt impacted their learning most significantly.B. Teaching High Levels of Intellectual Development In LabThe lab exercises are one of the primary methods of giving students a great deal of experience