member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all
Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 59 journal articles, and 133 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 21 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 38 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 400 K-12 teachers and 100 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows
Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. Lee’s research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity in STEM. Among his honors and awards, Lee received a 2012 NSF GRFP Award and an ASEE Appren- tice Faculty Grant Award in 2015. He received his Ph.D in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Mr. Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research in- terests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, exploring student experiences within design
) scores; andgrouping girls into four EI groups. The following percent changes in the populations of the fourEI groups before and after the program indicated positive program impacts on girls’ EI: Group 1– Strong SA and strong ECI (+19.35%); Group 2 – Strong SA and weak ECI (-9.68%); Group 32– Weak SA and strong ECI (0%); Group 4 – Weak SA and Weak ECI (-9.68%). Forty-eightpercent (48%) of these girls have already submitted applications for the follow up STEAMACTIVATED! program funded through a recent Engineering Information Foundation grant.Best practices, lessons learned, and outcomes of this innovative and effective program forimproving STEM self-efficacy, career interests, and engineering identities are discussed. Insightswill be valuable to
Paper ID #21392Measuring Engineering Students’ Metacognition with a Think-Aloud Proto-colDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for 30 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri Rose M. Marra is a Professor of Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded
subsystembehavior.Block Diagrams (2-4:C): The question of how a project is architected or the overall structureof the planned innovation are captured by level 0 to level 2 block diagrams. These diagramsabstract the key parts of a system as blocks (subsystems) and illustrate how these parts connect toeach other (using lines) and to agents (entities external to the system). The details of the diagramvary by the level of abstraction where a Level 0 block diagram is one single box representing thesystem that focuses on how the agents interact with the system, a level 1 block diagram showsthe interconnection of subsystems and what power or information flows between them, and alevel 2 diagram will focus on how components within a given sub-system create the function
Paper ID #22953New Engineers’ First Three Months: A Study of the Transition from Cap-stone Design Courses to WorkplacesChris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests revolve around how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their design practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering design, where many traditional engineering assumptions fall apart.Dr. Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder
fictionnovels as sources for brief design projects [69]. Others have argued strongly for the need tobetter align writing tasks with industry practice [1], where engineers are viewed as writers [70].MethodsStudy design and research purposeWe sought to develop an innovative and collaborative cross-campus approach to supporting thedevelopment of technical writing, and desired to understand the impacts of our approach. Wewere guided by the tenets of design-based research, the hallmark research method of the learningsciences [71-73]. In this approach, researchers develop and test their theories about how tosupport learning by designing learning experiences and implementing them under normalclassroom conditions. In this study, we report on the first
several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone Design courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of New Mexico. The research in her lab is focused on understanding the dynamics and
- dedicated to innovation in traffic safety and public safety technology, as well as research in decision support systems, data analytics and cybersecurity. Throughout his career and through his work with CAPS, Dr. Parrish has obtained approximately 200 funded projects totaling approximately $100M from a variety of state and federal sponsors. Dr. Parrish has published in approxi- mately 100 refereed journals and conferences, and is internationally active in computer science education, having served as the Chair of the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and currently is chair of a major effort to revise the computing accreditation criteria and to develop new accreditation criteria for cybersecurity. Dr. Parrish
Human-Centered Computing, both from UMBC. His primary research investigates the impact that Making may have on youth engagement in STEM education and careers.Stephanie Grimes, Digital Harbor Foundation Stephanie Grimes has been working in education for over 15 years in many different capacities. A former Early Childhood Educator, Stephanie is now the Director of Education for Digital Harbor Foundation in Baltimore, Maryland. Steph oversees all curricular creations and youth programs for the DHF Tech Center and workshop experiences. She works to produce innovative, project-based, and accessible content that focuses on preparing youth for the careers of tomorrow, with a focus on technology and making.Shawn Grimes
, published in 2016 with SAGE. She has published numerous articles in journals including Journal of Curriculum Studies, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, and Educational Philosophy and Theory.Dr. Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University Chongzheng Na is an associate professor at Texas Tech University. He graduated from Tsinghua Uni- versity (B.E.), Pennsylvania State University (M.S.), and University of Michigan (Ph.D.). Before joining Texas Tech, he was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and an assistant professor at University of Notre Dame. His research and teaching interests include developing innovative water treatment technolo- gies and incorporating knowledge related to such efforts in
Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, and the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead). She completed her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) studying product development decision-making during complex industry projects. Dr. Olechowski completed her BSc (Engineering) at Queen’s University and her MS at MIT, both in Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Olechowski and her research group Ready Lab study the processes and tools that teams of engineers use in industry as they design innovative new products. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
theadvancements in numerous other fields including semiconductor manufacturing, medicine, andenergy. These innovations have also created a need for a highly skilled and adaptable workforce,yet industry is having a difficult time in their search for highly qualified US candidates. Fromprivate firms to public officials and economic analysts to educators, many acknowledge the needto update training and education to better prepare our future workforce.This work introduces a new educational model, Pathways in Technology Early College HighSchool (P-TECH), as a tool to modernize traditional education and align the workforcedevelopment to meet the challenges introduced by nanotechnology-driven industries. We willdemonstrate through student proficiency data
between all of the components as well as demonstrate a method for developing alarge system.In this paper we discuss the application of Model-Based Design for embedded systems designand present examples from the automotive and aerospace industries. We then present a modelfor a course in Model-Based Design, and discuss how to measure its effectiveness in teachingsystem design and implementation.Introduction to Model-Based DesignThe need to bring innovative, high-quality products to market faster is driving the increased useof models during the design and realization process. The ability to model and simulate systemsplays a key role in the product development process by allowing manufacturers to test whetherthe system meets requirements using
expensive, then onetends to think of ways to improve productivity and quality by investing in training, effectivesupervision and quality management processes.ConclusionsThe interviews and field data provide strong evidence that hierarchal organization structureslimit the autonomy and coordination abilities of typical engineers in South Asia. Engineersare given minimal individual responsibility and, as a result, avoid taking the risks associatedwith questioning the status-quo, avoid any acting on their own initiative, and, avoid anyexperimentation with innovations. This means that they restrict opportunities for learning andskill development outside the narrow confines of their present role.Any attempt to extend the autonomy of individual engineers
@fau.edu.Ivan Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State Brandywine. His current research interests are in the areas of Global Engineering Education, Engineering Design Education, Innovative Design, and Global Design. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is Vice-President for Region I and assistant of the Executive Director of the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering
reports that studentratings of teaching are consistent (with other measures), unbiased, and useful. Students generallyagree on what constitutes good teaching practices and their views are consistent with those offaculty. Four factors in good teaching, based on student ratings, are:1. Skill. Communicates in an exciting way.2. Rapport. Understands and empathizes with students.3. Structure. Provides guidance to course and material.4. Load. Requires moderate work load.Finally, given all the interest in creativity and innovation in engineering education, Pelz andAndrews argue that creative performance from students requires maintaining a creative tensionbetween challenge and security.8,9 Several other large-scale, comprehensive
Page 11.1446.2of their peers. To date, our research on this educational innovation has focused on theintertwined activities of exploring the learning outcomes associated with participation2 and theprocesses associated with participation3. This current study is focused on that latter activity.In alignment with the ideas above, we are interested in ETPP as a learning event—in how theindividual and social processes associated with building a teaching portfolio can lead toadvancement of teaching knowledge and ability. At the same time, we recognize that we arehelping graduate students create materials that can help them become more competitive on thejob market.Over time, we have collected evidence suggesting that the peer review periods may
Technology CoursesAbstractIn the modern world, where everything changes at an extremely fast rate, a constant andeveryday updating of knowledge is imperative. The recent growth of renewable energy usage, aswell as the development of new and effective tools for monitoring, operation and control requireto the training of workforce in the field of renewable energy systems. Nowadays all energycompanies use renewable energy sources applications. As those technologies change quickly,instructors, engineers and researchers need to keep this fast pace and update their knowledge andkeep up with innovative concepts. Since traditional learning methods are time consuming andsometimes impractical, learning through the Internet
years to serve numerous departments and engage over 750students each year.7 The program is self-sustaining through a combination of industry, college,and department support and was recently recognized as one of six programs in the world toachieve sustainable innovation in engineering education.8Capstone design projects coordinated by the Learning Factory run for a single semester (15weeks) and typically engage a team of 4-6 engineering students. The semester begins with aProject Kickoff during the first week of classes wherein industry sponsors and clients participatein a “trade show” type event to field questions about the projects being offered. All of thestudents will have reviewed the available project descriptions prior to the Project
contact with instructors, and active engagement inreal world projects. Yet we struggle to find feasible paths to take action. Pressures toincrease enrollment and cut budgets challenge us to find ways to do more with less withoutdiluting the learning experience. Administrators embrace the need to update curriculum toremain current and relevant, yet there is no room to add in a tightly packed four-yearprogram. These tensions require innovative approaches to engineering education andleadership development to meet the challenges of the future.Introduction – An Overall FrameworkThere is general agreement that a renewed focus on leadership development is critical to thefuture success of the engineering discipline (NAE 2004). Our thinking begins to
government reflect her interest in the intersection between medical device innovation, development, and regulation. She also has educational experience in leadership studies through several training programs, including a vigorous course on ”The Art and Adventure of Leadership” taught by recognized leadership gurus, Drs. Warren Bennis and Steven Sample.Jennifer Wang, University of California, Berkeley Jennifer Wang is a graduate student in the Graduate Group in Science and Mathematics Education, fo- cusing on Engineering Education at the University of California, Berkeley. She also obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Berkeley. Wang has several years
implementationprocess that includes sustained, large-scale, simultaneous innovations in curriculum, pedagogy,assessment, professional development, administration, organizational structures, strategies forequity, and partnerships for learning among schools, businesses, homes and communities.In the National Research Council’s study on how people learn, the chapter titled “Technology toSupport Learning” reports on several groups who have reviewed the literature on technology andlearning and concluded that it has great potential to enhance student achievement and teacherlearning.30 The chapter explores how new technologies can be used in five ways: • bringing exciting curricula based on real-world problems into the classroom, • providing scaffolds and
: includingdifferences in practices, expectations, norms of interaction, and the culture of school science.This may lead to difficulties with achievement even where interest exists [7, 8].In 2003 we began development of a curriculum for elementary school-aged children that wouldintroduce them to principles of engineering and technology: Engineering is Elementary (EiE).Grounding our work is a belief that individuals, engineering disciplines and solutions, andsociety benefit when all members engage in problem solving, innovation, inquiry, andengineering design. Our materials, therefore, would be designed to reach all children. Our teamwas and continues to be especially committed to attracting, reaching, and engagingunderrepresented, underperforming, and
developing new military-related aircraft.Ivan Cortes, Texas A&M University Ivan Cortes is a mechanical engineering student from Harker Heights, Texas. Some areas of interest to him are the automotive industry and product design, but ultimately he simply enjoys the challenge of solving problems and innovating through the use of technology. One of Cortes’s long-term goals is to travel abroad and gain international experience. Through involvement in programs offered at Texas A&M University, he sees an opportunity to learn by solving real problems through teamwork and collaboration. Page 25.530.1
toimprove high school students’ understanding of engineering.Keywords: Engineering Design, High School, Engineering Education, Technological LiteracyRationaleAccording to the National Center for Technological Literacy1, “While most people spend 95% oftheir time interacting with the technologies of the human-made world, few know these productsare made through engineering”, or that engineering design is “the missing link that connectsscience and math with innovation”. The National Center for Technological Literacy suggestedthat “The key to educating students to thrive in a competitive global economy is introducingthem early to the engineering design skills and concepts that will engage them in applying theirmath and science knowledge to solve real
National Academy of Engineering for Innovation inEngineering and Technology Education (Coyle, Jamieson & Oakes, 2006)2. The EPICS programexemplifies a pioneering educational innovation and has been adopted by dozens of institutionssince its inception. In this program, students engage in long-term community service projects inlocal communities (Coyle, Jamieson & Oakes, 2005 & 2006)2, 3. Teams are relatively large,representing a small company, and the community organization acts as a client. Students can takethe course similar to taking a lab and can enroll multiple times for up to four times. Anothermodel that has emerged is to have project-based courses where the projects that students work onare driven by community needs. In this
. Practicing both convergent and divergent thinking is important to critical thinking, and both are used in problem solving.32 Traditional education in math and the sciences, and in a good part of fundamental engineering, focuses on scientific methods that use convergent thinking to get to the single-solution answers of closed-ended problems.31 Creativity and innovation, however, require divergent thinking and the metacognitive skills to manage it. So, in using engineering design to frame project work, High School Enterprise offers a vehicle both to instill the practice of divergent thinking in secondary students and to develop the metacognitive skills to use that practice effectively.4. A clear message about the value of diversity
AC 2010-1161: AN ATOMIC BONDING MODULE FOR MATERIALSENGINEERING THAT ELICITS AND ADDRESSES MISCONCEPTIONS WITHCONCEPT-IN-CONTEXT MULTIMODAL ACTIVITIES, WORKSHEETS, ANDASSESSMENTSStephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He worked on Project Pathways, an NSF