AC 2010-918: PH.D.S IN ENGINEERING: GETTING THEM THROUGH THEDOOR AND SEEING THEM GRADUATE- FACULTY AND INDUSTRYPERSPECTIVESMonica Cox, Purdue University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the
mentoring opportunities is a promising strategy for improving retention andadvancement of women faculty members in engineering. Mentoring is traditionally adevelopmental relationship in which an experienced person provides informational, psychosocialand instrumental support to a less experienced person. In return, the mentor gains personalsatisfaction, respect from colleagues for successfully developing younger talent, and may growintellectually as well. Informational support is provided when a mentor provides “information”to a newcomer or less senior colleague. Examples include telling a newcomer where to findsupplies, the types of grants one should be writing, the journal outlets where one should bepublishing or generally clarifying the rules for
ACRL points outcarefully defined roles, comprehensive planning and shared leadership as requirement ofsuccessful collaboration. Respect for each party is important in order to reach thecommon goal, fostering successful student learning.A faculty/librarian relationship at a regional university was formed among the librarydirector, technical service librarian, chemistry professor and English professor. Twofaculty members who attended the American Association Higher Education (AAHE)conference in 2001 started sharing what they learned from the conference with twolibrarians. This collaboration has produced fruitful outcomes in campus wideinformation literacy instruction and collaborator’s professional development. The focusof this collaboration has
onthis study it would appear that professional licensure is not valued during the hiringprocess within the participating research-oriented departments.The lack of connection to professional practice appears to continue after the hiringprocess, as well. Nixon4 conducted a survey of faculty development activities in civilengineering. He issued written surveys to 200 departments of civil engineering andobtained 46 responses. The respondents represented a diverse set of institution types.Nixon noted that only 60% of the responding departments provided some form ofassistance to faculty to obtain professional licensure or other specialty certification. AsNixon suggests, degree programs run the risk of becoming too “divorced” from thepractice of civil
coherence ofthe language in the book.Shared LanguageAs a group, the professors became accustomed to using several technological tools and methodsin the community. These common tools and methods helped to develop a shared repertoire and acommon language. Among these tools and methods were the content questionnaire organizationand administration techniques, the unique communication technique in Adobe Connect, andengineering problem solving techniques. For instance, in the content questionnaireadministration technique, the professors worked with a graduate student on the main campus yetshared their experiences in the meetings with others. The student designed the contentquestionnaire on Remark software. The Scantron forms were emailed to each faculty
Paper ID #37999Three-Year Review of a Short-Term Faculty-EmbeddedAerospace Engineering Study Abroad Program in BrazilAli P Gordon (Interim Associate Dean of Graduate Affairs) Ali P. Gordon is the Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs in College of Engineering and Computer Science and a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. As associate dean, his role is to maintain oversight of the college’s graduate students and graduate programs. His leadership focuses on recruitment, retention, professional development, program assessment, and the introduction of
Paper ID #38409Perspectives of Engineering Faculty and Practitioners onCreativity in Solving Ill-Structured ProblemsSecil Akinci-ceylan Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Kristen Sara Cetin (Assistant Professor)Benjamin Ahn (Associate Professor) Benjamin Ahn is an associate professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Iowa State University. His research interests include (1) engineering workforce development, (2) student mentoring and diversity, and (3) teaching and learning mechanisms. Benjamin received a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue
practicum course alsofocused on the value of teaching assessments with the goal of developing valuable skills in self-assessment. Each student-teacher was assessed by the practicum instructor, their graduate studentpeers, the mentoring faculty member in their subject area, and themselves. Assessments were Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 3done using an instrument asking the assessors for specific observations related to the value of theclassroom activities and content, presentation (e.g
of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Know Your Role! Designing Faculty and External Stakeholder Roles in a Multidisciplinary Capstone CourseAbstractThis paper describes our development of novel faculty roles and our method for the planning andexecution of projects in our year-long, multidisciplinary capstone experience. Well-defined rolespermit management of increasingly complex multidisciplinary and multidepartment projects,prevent duplication of effort, and help ensure an enriching and rewarding student experience.These roles have enabled us to offer an unprecedented variety and scope of projects with anaverage of
Paper ID #22532Concerning Professional Licensure for Civil Engineering Faculty: A Matterof Best PracticeDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michelle Marincel Payne is an assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She completed her Ph.D. in environmental engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in nuclear engineering at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Michellle is inter- ested in developing opportunities for
Understanding Student and Faculty Attitudes With Respect to Service Learning: Lessons from the Humanitarian Engineering Program E. Heidi Bauer, Barbara Moskal, Joan Gosink, Juan Lucena, David Muñoz Colorado School of Mines, Golden, ColoradoAbstractNow entering its second year, the Humanitarian Engineering Program, which is sponsored by theHewlett Foundation, at the Colorado School of Mines is creating curriculum that will supportengineering students in developing an understanding of their responsibility for solvinghumanitarian problems that exist throughout the world. As part of this effort, baseline data hasbeen collected on both the faculty and student
connectionsto real-world problems, etc.One of the major advantages of producing these videos is that they provide a very effective andefficient way to deliver content. Complex problems with multiple topics were presented in videosthat were less than 10 minutes long. For example, there were 19 PowerPoint slides prepared for 5-minute video 1, which would have taken about 20 minutes to present in standard lecture mode. Onthe other hand, a major disadvantage is that it took approximately the equivalent of a two-weektime commitment from the faculty to develop and produce the videos, plus the time of the seniorproducer. However, the procedures and tools that were developed can be used to train otherinstructors interested in introducing videos like these into
- and third-year engineering courses. Freeform employswhat we call an active, blended, and collaborative (ABC) approach to a core mechanicalengineering topic (Dynamics). Although Freeform Dynamics has reached a mature, steady-state,and effective implementation at its original institution, we need to carefully study the ways inwhich a beneficial but multifaceted course environment is adopted and navigated by faculty at adifferent institution.The Freeform environment was developed in 2008 and first implemented in 2009, and may beviewed as a holistic pedagogical framework that embraces ABC principles while unifying bothtraditional and contemporary, research-based instructional practices. Freeform Dynamics, builtfor the core Dynamics course at
-Purdue University, Indianapolis Page 25.633.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Faculty Perceptions and Use of a Learning Management System at an Urban, Research InstitutionAbstractWhen universities develop and implement learning management systems for their institutions,how do the faculty feel about those systems? Do they believe they are engaging their students byusing the learning management system? What elements do they consider crucial in a learningmanagement system to benefit students, themselves, and their departments?This study examined an online
the College, they are assigned mentors. Furthermore, the College sponsors a variety Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering Educationof workshops and brown bags seminars on instruction, grant proposal preparation andprofessional development during the faculty members’ critical first years. We were approachedby the professional development coordinator to address the NEEs and specifically provideinstructional “tricks of the trade”. Mississippi State University, Mississippi’s land-grant researchuniversity, places a great deal of emphasis on the research productivity of the engineeringfaculty, in addition to
through personal research, and writing papers.• Teaching: Equally as important as becoming a successful researcher is demonstrating excellence in the area of teaching. For a new faculty member, this translates into developing new course material, teaching courses, managing teaching assistants, and seeing students outside of class. In the department discussed here, a full teaching load is three courses each semester and, in addition, new faculty must assume the responsibility of advising twenty to forty undergraduate students.• Service and Professional Development: Finally, a tenure-track faculty member must perform university and professional service such as reviewing external materials, serving on departmental and
Engineering: Perspectives of Engineering Faculty (Work in Progress)IntroductionDespite a growing emphasis on engineering in grades K-12, persistently high dropout ratesplague undergraduate engineering programs [1],[2]. Prior studies indicate that engineeringactivities have the potential to increase interest in engineering pathways [3] or develop anengineering identity [4]. Less clear is whether pre-college engineering instruction alsocontributes to students' success in engineering career pathways by adequately preparing studentsfor undergraduate engineering. One concern is that K-12 engineering lessons "may mislead orunder prepare [students] by providing activities that they enjoy but which have little relation toengineering
Fellow. As a former electrical engineer, she is concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and career attainment, problematizing traditional notions of academic achievement and what is mean to be successful yet marginalized, and STEM identity and identity development in high-achieving students of color. She is currently the PI on two studies funded by NSF, the first of which investigates the causes behind why African Americans remain one of the most underrepresented racial groups in engineering faculty positions. The
network with respect to theorganization than tenured faculty. For evaluating the availability of resources, the faculty werealso asked to rate their level of satisfaction with resources available for nine distinct aspects oftheir academic career. Among all respondents, the lowest areas of satisfaction were with industryrelations and research equipment. Tenure-track faculty reported significantly higher satisfactionthan tenured faculty in five of the nine categories: teaching training, grant writing, professionalnetworking, professional development, and overcoming bias. Gender differences between tenure-track faculty satisfaction were shown to be insignificant, with the exception that women weresignificantly more satisfied with resources for
service and altruism.The summit participants frequently mentioned the need for university support and additionalresources to help encourage faculty members to engage in LTS activities which can havesignificant personal and professional benefits. Finally, there was consensus that there is room togrow with respect to the development of effective and relevant assessment tools for LTSactivities and that these tools will help bolster facultyengagement and support for LTSinvolvement in the future.BackgroundLearning Through Service (LTS) is a student-centered pedagogy where the objectives of studentlearning are balanced with real, positive impacts for a community partner.1LTSencompasses both
develop a profile of an effective mentor for womenengineering faculty based on available literature, an empirical survey, and interview data.Overall, the findings of this work increase the understanding of the preferred mentor functionsand qualities. The mentor functions and qualities identified in this study indicate a careerenhancing mentor 1. works in the protege’s department, 2. acts as the protege’s tenure coach, 3. has an agreeable personality that is compatible with the protege’s, 4. interacts with the protege in an honest and respectful manner, 5. is willing to share his/her experiences, network, contacts, and time, 6. begins developing the protege early in her career
68 faculties participating in the program. Eachfaculty is expected to participate in the program by visiting a university outside of Indonesia forthe duration of 2 weeks to 3 months. Many different activities may be conducted during the visit:writing textbook or developing teaching material; sitting-in classes or comparative study ofteaching and learning; planning collaborative scientific activities; doing research and writingscientific paper; attending and presenting a seminar; developing a curriculum, and observingteaching-learning techniques. One of the 68 faculties selected in the 2013 SAME program wasfrom Polinema.Cal Poly as a Host of Faculty Exchange with a Student Success LessonPolinema is a polytechnic institution which started in
like the classroom. In this project, we seek to understandfaculty conceptualizations of health and well-being that developed through their undergraduateand graduate experiences.Our preliminary results show that the undergraduate experiences of faculty included elements ofthriving and well-being such as self-knowledge and self-control. Some identified key turningpoints in realizing their best strategies to maximize their well-being and academic success, whichenhanced their decision-making abilities. Furthermore, some participants achieved academicsuccess despite poor well-being and thriving outcomes, which raises questions about the culturaland systemic factors that promote such dualism. In terms of the messages they received aboutwell-being
role bystudents (as well as faculty), more consistent advising across groups, and a better overall designexperience for the students. Many issues were discussed during the process, with eventualresolution to everyone’s agreement. Primary issues that surfaced during the discussions were: • Frequency of meetings with student groups • Content of group meetings • Project management role • Overall responsibility for project success • Grading responsibilities • Review and input of student’s design logbooks • Approval of milestones • Attendance at presentations and other eventsAs a result of this process, three documents were developed to clearly define the role of thefaculty advisor and
engineering from Howard University.Prof. John V Tocco JD, Lawrence Technological University Page 26.1432.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model for Collaboration among Faculty, Practitioners and Writing SpecialistsAbstractThis paper presents the principles, procedures, materials, and assessment of a new approach toimprove the teaching of writing in engineering. The Civil Engineering Writing Project aims toimprove students’ preparation for writing in industry by developing new
Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student
faculty experience is the process of teaching. Learning how toteach is a skill learned through teaching experiences. TA experiences are intended to preparegraduate students for teaching and being faculty, but the training programs for this process areoften insufficient within engineering. However, student teaching within preservice teacherpreparation programs has extensive research, developing many techniques for fostering andenhancing the learning experience while practicing teaching. Scaffolding processes areapplicable within these preservice teacher preparatory programs. Some specific methods frompreservice teacher training which have been proven to enhance the effectiveness of learningexperiences or practicing teaching are reflexive practice
that walked faculty from introducing the interventionto modeling the intervention and ended with providing a list of resources to aid in attendee’simplementation efforts once they were back at their institutions. However, an apparentdisconnect remains between published research and what is happening in computer scienceclassrooms. Barker reported that “despite widespread development, research, and disseminationof teaching and curricular practices that improve student retention and learning, faculty often donot adopt them” [3, p. 604]. Hovey and colleagues [4] found that CS faculty admitted tolecturing more often than using student-centered instructional techniques when asked. “Theseresults...suggest that there is a need to increase the use of
Technology (ET) faculty and local industry representatives to form the primaryR&D team. Students majoring in the Industrial Design and CAD / CAM programs at WWU havealso played a major role in helping to develop interior, exterior and chassis design concepts. TheR&D team met with a cross section of transit authority members from across Washington Statein order to capture the needs of a variety of stakeholders involved in public transportation.Through the efforts of a multidisciplinary team that is utilizing automotive industry bestpractices such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Design Failure Mode Effects andAnalysis (DFMEA), a paradigm-shifting vehicle is being developed for intended productionimplementation by 2015. The team is in
Industry Engagement versus Faculty Mentorship in Engineering Senior Capstone Design CoursesAbstract:The senior design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems. During the course, a student team defines a problem, plans an approach,develops a solution, and validates their solution, which culminates in oral and writtendissemination. Typically, undergraduate programs have provided students with facultymentors to develop a solution for a specific project. In order for projects and teams to besuccessful, the mentors must provide invaluable support, collaboration, and interest in