Paper ID #44083Exploring and Expanding Support for International Students in Engineering:Faculty Reflections Beyond Academic BoundariesAnimesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh, originally from Tripura, India, brings a diverse and liberal background, shaped by his military upbringing, to his role as a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Georgia’s Engineering Education and Transformative Practices program. Holding a bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from KIIT University, he currently conducts research under Dr. Racheida Lewis, focusing on equity and inclusion within engineering education
method to reach awide number of students, as well as to see how people exchange and build on each other’sideas through conversational exchanges in a group setting. Focus groups are useful foracquiring insight or gathering baseline information about a topic of interest from a group’sperspective, allowing multiple opinions and perspectives to be heard and debated rather thanindividual meaning-making [41].4.1 Institutional ContextThis exploratory investigation was conducted at the researchers’ university, a public R1Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), with over 50,000 undergraduate students. During thespring 2020 semester, the university moved to remote settings and was preparing to return toin-person instruction for a fall 2021 semester at the
extensive background in science education includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) honored Dr. Spiegel for his efforts in teacher education with the Innovation in Teaching Science Teachers award (1997). Dr
aMichael Savvides, San Francisco State UniversityProf. Ilmi Yoon Professor Ilmi Yoon, Professor of Computer Science at San Francisco State University (SFSU), is an expert in gamification and game development, particularly in interactive media, 3D over the Internet, and network information visualization. She has collabo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Expanding and sustaining education programs beyond the initial NSF support periodSustainability and scaling of grant-funded education initiatives is a persistent challenge forinvestigators.3 The ability of any NSF-funded program to have a significant, long-term impact,however, is contingent upon its capacity
Paper ID #37775Board 221: Beyond Surveys: Using Visual Data to Evidence Achievement ofProposed Learning ObjectivesDr. Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Luisa Guillemard is a retired professor from the Department of Psychology at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus. She has a M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Caribbean Center of Ad- vanced Studies in Puerto Rico [today the Carlos Albizu University] and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychol- ogy from Texas A&M University, post-graduate training in evaluation at The Evaluators Institute (TEI) at George Washington University and the AEA/CDC
a content editor for the TeachEngineering.org digital library, and has co-created and co-taught engineering courses for both high school and undergraduate students through CU, Boul- der’s Integrated Teaching and Learning Program. Her primary research is on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Ms. Patty Ann Quinones, Skyline High School Page 25.260.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Patty Quinones is the Principal of Skyline HS in the St. Vain Valley School District. She has a
SENCER/NYP, and Long Island Community Foundation ”Removing Barriers and Strengthening STEM capacity at Suffolk County Community College” grants, Dr. Foley served as the STEM Coordi- nator for all SCCC NSF STEM Scholars on three campuses. Dr. Foley has also served on national grant projects involving curricular reform for chemistry education. Her experiences at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Suffolk County Community College, and Brookhaven National Laboratory has enabled her to focus upon the adaptation and implementation of innovations in classroom learning and undergraduate research through curricular innovation and technology based software for the community college application. Dr. Foley is a
, to f-j of ABET criterion 3 (a)-(k): (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesQuestions and Themes. The course began with a screening and discussion of the Errol Morrisnon-fiction film, Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control6, which profiles four men who are obsessedwith their respective vocations as robotics professor, naked mole rat expert, topiary gardener, andlion tamer. Footage of
instruction. Since 1994, Dr. Hacker has been either the principal investigator or co-principal investigator on grants totaling $2,048,960. He has served as an editorial board member for the Journal of Educational Psychology, Metacognition and Learning, and Frontiers of Educational Psychology. He is a former Associate Editor for the Journal of Educational Psychology.Mr. Shann Bossaller, University of Missouri c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Beyond the Technical: Developing Life Long Learning and Metacognition for the Engineering WorkplaceIntroductionPer the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET, Inc.), the capacity for life-long learning is critical for
AC 2012-3131: DO STUDENTS DREAM BEYOND LEDS? INNOVATIVEQUALITIES OF IDEAS GENERATED BY FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSNicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois. He has published conference papers on cooperative learning and team innovation. His research focuses on teamwork, innovation, and laboratory education.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of Assessment Research for
interests are in Data Science, Network Science, Network Measurements and Distributed Systems, with a recent focus on Online Social Networks, Policies and Regulations Measurements, IoT Networks, and smart-sourced sensing.Mr. KeeJoh OHearonMr. Michael McKee, Indiana University KokomoDr. Md Nour Hossain American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 IoT Privacy and Security in TeachingInstitutions: Inside The Classroom and Beyond KeeJoh O’Hearon *†, Michael McKee *†, Md Nour Hossain, M. Abdullah Canbaz [ kohearon, mckeeml, mhossai, mcanbaz ] @ iu.edu Indiana University
, Sumitomo, and Yasuda) into the newer keiretsu that go beyond a typical industrial conglomerate by focusing on vertical relationships of closely linked suppliers would be studied. Visits could include a study tour of a keiretsu and to its smaller suppliers that are lower on the ‘manufacturing’ chain.Two courses engineering courses were then designed, one of which was cross-listed through theCollege of Business Administration.IE 1661: Global Manufacturing Systems Engineering.This course presented the development and application of modern manufacturing engineeringprinciples, methods, and tools, using the Pacific Rim ports as a field laboratory. Students firstacquired knowledge of basic manufacturing process and principles, learning the
Paper ID #37787Collaborations Beyond the Library: Bibliometric Analyses to SupportEngineering Research, Innovation, and DiversityDr. Sarah Over, Virginia Tech Dr. Sarah Over is the Engineering Collections and Research Analyst at Virginia Tech, serving as their En- gineering Librarian. She is also part of a new team focused on research impact and intelligence to support the College of Engineering and Office of Research and Innovation at Virginia Tech. Dr. Over’s back- ground is in aerospace and nuclear engineering, with years of experience teaching engineering research methods and introductory coding.Ms. Connie Stovall
emphasizes that synergy across a number ofinterconnected fields is needed to tackle certain types of challenges (but even here the emphasisis placed on technoscientific dimensions of problems). For example, the report suggests thatpersonalized medicine “will be addressed by the collaborative efforts of researchers from manydisciplines, from geneticists to clinical specialists to engineers.” 26 These openings point the waytoward a more expansive understanding of engineering and its potential contributions to grand-challenge problems, but the report does not follow through with this approach, which we take upin the following section.Alternative Framings of Engineering: Beyond the Social-Technical DivideContrary to the approach taken in Grand
, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] J. P. Martin, S. D. Garrett, S. G. Adams, and J. Hamilton, "A qualitative look at African American students’ perceptions of developing engineer of 2020 traits through non- curricular activities," presented at the 2015 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Seattle, WA, USA, Jun. 14-17, 2015.[3] C. A. Smith, H. Wao, G. Kersaint, and R. Campbell-Montalvo, "Social capital from professional engineering organizations and the persistence of women and underrepresented minority undergraduates," Front. Sociol., vol. 6, p. 671856, 2021.[4] J. P. Martin, R. A. Revelo, S. K. Stefl, S. D. Garrett, and S. G. Adams, "Ethnic student organizations in engineering: Implications
and V. Tinto, “Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first- generation students.,” Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education, 2008.[5] S. D. Museus, R. T. Palmer, R. J. Davis, and D. C. Maramba, “Racial and Ethnic Minority Students’ Success in STEM Education.,” ASHE Higher Education Report, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1–140, 2011, doi: 10.1002/aehe.3606.[6] T. Melguizo and G. Wolniak, “The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 383– 405, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z.[7] M. Jury, A. Smeding, N. M. Stephens, J. E. Nelson, C. Aelenei, and C. Darnon, “The experience of low-SES students
.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curriculum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a vari- ety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential. Most recently, she has started to engage in the development of programs aimed at retaining women within Chemical Engineering including mentor lunches with visiting female seminar speakers, a leadership book club and sexual harassment workshops.Mrs. Lauren M. Byland, University of Pittsburgh Lauren Byland, M.Ed., Associate Director & Coordinator of Student
Kris Jaeger, PhD has been a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of full-time faculty expressly devoted to the First-year Engineering Program at Northeastern Uni- versity. Recently, she has joined the expanding Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU to continue teaching Simulation, Facilities Planning, Human-Machine Systems, and Senior Capstone Design. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of several honors in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several award-wining engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyonDr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University
Paper ID #13374Beyond Sectionality and into Sizeness or How Course Size Effects Grades:An Exploration of the MultipleInstitution Database for Investigating Engi-neering Longitudinal Development through Hierarchal Linear ModelsDr. George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette George D. Ricco is the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineer- ing and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Previously, he received a M.S. in earth and planetary sciences studying geospatial imaging and a M.S. in physics
Center to providethe engineer with top-notch professional skills to complement their technical expertise.Co-directors Marie Paretti and Lisa McNair, faculty members in Virginia Tech'sDepartment of Engineering Education state that in the global marketplace, U.S. engineersneed "superior communication and collaboration skills."Table 1 displays the ABET criteria, a-k, that Culver, et al reorganized into groups thatreflect different types of intellectual challenge.5 They associated a set of skills andattitudes to the outcomes. More specifically, the particular a-k ABET outcomes that areaddressed in UNST 130 can be sub-grouped in the table which has been modified fromone created by Culver, McGrann and Lehmann.v Subgroup II is addressed during
agree-to-disagree ratios are all positive, we are disappointed in the high percentages ofrespondent who did not (or felt that they did not) have enough experience to give an answer.However, venturing beyond the standard forms of grading required in a traditional curriculumproves challenging even for the most experienced K-12 teachers. Furthermore, some of theembedded assessment we suggest here (such as e-portfolios and peer review) probably requiremore access to computer facilities than available to many Indiana teachers.Students and 21st Century Skills – Indiana is recognized for its commitment to education thatprepares young people for success beyond high school, either in the workplace or inpostsecondary education. A critical part of this
building blocks for the first time. There are no instructions – there are blocks and the laws ofphysics. Structures are built through trial and error. Manipulatives allow young children to learn, developand then build simple structures without needing a civil engineer to scaffold their knowledge. Why shouldcomputing be any different? The use of manipulatives in K-16 classrooms has already been well established. Research ofmanipulatives in fields that are more theoretical and abstract in nature, such as mathematics, are alsobeing to emmege4-7. While specific areas of brain activity and development only occur duringmanipulative activities8-10, little academic instruction ever focuses on active manipulation11. The problemin certain fields, in
, being able to put yourself in the place of another facilitatescommunication and increases ones interpersonal skills. The main subjects currently taught todayin K-12 education: science, math, English, and social studies, are but a select few of theperspectives or different ways of thinking and knowing that exist. With technology becoming anincreasingly important part of our lives and a part of the education of our children, the absence ofthe content and processes of one subject has become increasingly evident over all others:engineering. An "engineering perspective" can be a fascinating lens through which to look at theworld around us that is ever increasing in complexity. Whether it is the rack and pinion in yourice-cream scoop or the processor
Distinguished Contributions to Science Education through Research Award from National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Greg has a B.S. in physics from the State University of New York at Albany and a Ph.D. in Education from Cornell University.Ashwin Krishnan Mohan, Pennsylvania State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Socially Engaged Engineering: A Conceptual Framework for K-8 Education (Fundamental, Diversity)As engineering enters K-8 educational settings, it is important to introduce the discipline inequity-oriented ways (Cunningham & Kelly, 2022). Youth need to connect engineering to theirlives and consider the impacts of engineering in the world
AC 2009-426: A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN CAPSTONE DESIGN AND K-12OUTREACHCraig Somerton, Michigan State University Craig W. Somerton is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of the Undergraduate Program for Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He teaches in the area of thermal engineering including thermodynamics, heat transfer, and thermal design. He also teaches the capstone design course for the department. Dr. Somerton has research interests in computer design of thermal systems, transport phenomena in porous media, and application of continuous quality improvement principles to engineering education. He received his B.S. in 1976, his M.S. in 1979, and his Ph.D. in
curriculum that canbe easily understood and implemented by non-engineering trained teachers. According to the 2002National Panel Report of the Association of American Colleges and Universities, K-12 schoolsoften do not graduate college-ready students due to various factors, including new accountabilitydemands (standards-based learning), an over-reliance on educational traditions, sub-standardcurricula and poor resources3. Through a comprehensive K-12 engineering curricular experience,all students, including those typically underrepresented in engineering — women and students ofcolor — can be exposed to the possibilities of engineering and technology as lifelong pursuits. Students can effectively learn and
principles and to provide those teachers with the means of introducing engineeringprinciples and design in their classrooms.The professional development of teachers should introduce participants to technological contentand resources that expand their science knowledge and their ability to access further knowledge.In addition, the content needs to focus on the incorporation of engineering and design conceptsinto science curricula in ways that meet the national and state science standards. A long termprofessional development program that exposes science teachers to engineering principles anddesign can lead to the infusion of engineering principles and design into existing science classesthat can be continued year after year and last through and beyond
order toinvolve more teachers, we are planning a summer institute rather than Saturday workshops.While we have had fair representation of high school teachers, our goal is to recruit more middleschool algebra teachers for the summer institute.Online Database of ResourcesAn online database, known as the Learning Grid, provides access to resources that supplementmath learning and increase interest in engineering professions. Developed by the College’sInformation Technology Group (ITG), the web-based tool allows parents, teachers and studentsto search for K-14 educational programs and resources available through UT and other sources.The catalogue includes over 460 programs and can be navigated by various criteria, such asgrade level, subject
FormatVALUE Project BackgroundThe Association of American Colleges and Universities started the VALUE (Valid Assessmentof Learning in Undergraduate Education) project in 20072. This program was created in order tobetter show educational benefits, quality of learning, and retention and graduation rates. Sincethere are no standardized tests for the Essential Learning Outcomes (ELOs), there was a need todevelop a way to document and assess student learning in undergraduate education.The VALUE project was driven by an advisory board made up of 12 people, national andinternational leaders. The main goal was to generate a way to evaluate student learning that wasbased on the work students produced through the curriculum across a set of Essential
Paper ID #16215Supporting K-12 Student Self-Direction with a Maker Family EcosystemJames Robert Larson, Arizona State University I am an undergraduate student in Arizona State’s Electrical Systems Engineering program. This program, which isn’t the same as Electrical Engineering, takes a project-based approach to the curriculum. I am 20 years old and excited to have this opportunity to offer a student’s perspective on the future of engineering education.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams