-Brand&KW=data%20%26%20analytics&k_clickid=24c8bad7-5950-446c-9aa6-68027642b4fd&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIlraIwe6V2QIVT7nACh39LAGpEAAYAiAAEgJR4_D_BwE, 2017.3. Sorby, S. A., Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills, Engineering Design GraphicsJournal, 63(1), 21-32, 19994. Sorby, S. A., Assessment of a New and Improved Course for the Development of 3-D SpatialSkills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(3), 6-13, 2005.5. Samsudin, K., Rafi, A., and Hanif, A. S., Training in Mental Rotation and SpatialVisualization and Its Impact on Orthographics Drawing Performance, Journal of EducationalTechnology & Society, 14(1), 179-186, 2011.6. Guay, R., Purdue Spatial Visualization Test – Visualization of Rotations. West Lafayette, INPurdue
Courtney Lavadia obtained her master’s degree from the College of Education and Human Develop- ment, Texas A&M University in 2016. She is currently a Ph.D. student studying school psychology. Her research is centered around how practitioners can utilize individual child strengths for assessment and intervention in hospital settings. Other projects include studying resilience in children, and adult learning theory.Dr. Douglas Allaire, Texas A&M University Dr. Douglas Allaire is currently an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Texas A&M University. He has held that position since January 2014. His current research focuses on the de- velopment of computational methods for the
inbehavior” which are an essential part of developing authentic leadership skills. York claims that“in contemporary English-speaking society, there is a cultural bias towards the cognitive andconative aspects of learning. The development of affect is inhibited…leading to a lack ofemphasis on people as whole persons.” [22]. The author resonates with York’s assessment anddecided to design a leadership development course which enables the participants to engage withboth “their own whole-person knowing and the whole-person knowing of their fellow learners”[22].The course described in this study was designed with the objective to support the participatingstudents with the development of their authentic leadership skills while also addressing thewhole
Presidential Award of Diversity and a three time winner of the Women’s Vision Award. She has presented papers at ASEE Annual Conference, the ASEE Global Colloquium, Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Engineering Design Graphics Division Mid-Year Conference, Additive Manufacturers Users Group, and Solid Free-Form Fabrication Symposium. Her research interests center around the development and assessment of students’ spatial visualization skills, the effective integration of 3D modeling into engineering design, and the impact of c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22470
. It is this conclusion --- that thesystem isn’t broken but needs to become more relevant --- that has guided NEET’s approach.We commissioned Dr. Ruth Graham an independent educational consultant who focuses onhigher education reform to conduct a global undergraduate engineering education survey11 toidentify institutional leaders and innovators, and innovative educational constructs. The keyfindings from this study were that emerging institutional leaders have benefited from strong andvisionary academic leadership, a faculty culture of educational innovation, and new tools thatsupport educational exploration and student assessment. There were two trends that emerged.The first is a tilting global axis to Asia and the South, benefiting from
brief synopsis, comparison with other approaches, and multi-year retrospectiveon the program. The curriculum has steadily evolved from the original to its current state,including changes in requirements, courses, hardware, software, labs, and projects. The guidingphilosophy remains unchanged, however, providing continuity of purpose to the program. Theprogram has been highly successful in meeting its desired outcomes, including: quantity andquality of enrolled students, ABET EAC accreditation, graduate placement in jobs and graduateschool, and overall student learning. The program is assessed using several quantitativemeasures: enrollment, cohort survival within the program, course and project evaluations, andstudent placement success. Other
andwhat to include in course(s) in general and specifically in our institution.IntroductionData mining involves analyzing large data sets and also involves tools from Statistics and ArtificialIntelligence, like Neural Networks and Machine Learning. The ability to use these tools to assess data isin increasing demand by employers. There is a vast amount of data available to businesses. These data arerequired to be assessed and analyzed for gaining insight in business decisions, behavioral studies,consumer habits, and many more areas of application. Other fields of study besides computer sciencehave had an increasing interest in data science. Current listings in the realms of physics, biology,medicine, and advertising jobs indicate that companies
, software, information systems, and communication device; identify, organize, analyze and visualize digital information and data; and computational culture or digital security awareness. Modeling and Simulation Skills: Activities including understanding a concept with computational models; using, assessing and testing models to find a solution; building or extending existing models or creating new models on a computational device; structured thinking, simulation thinking and etc. Complex Problem Solving Skills: Working with multiple layers of abstraction and understanding the relationships among the different layers; decomposing large complex problems into manageable modular subtasks that supports parallel execution
alsoclaimed that the mode of reflection faculty participate in through assessment/evaluation activitiesimpacts the processes (means) of engineering education and engineering education’s ability toenvision/achieve desired goals (ends). Given the overall scientific/pragmatic nature ofengineering assessment, Macmurray’s philosophy predicts that the common modes ofengineering reflection will likely result in focusing on efficiently improving students’ ability toact as engineers without simultaneous emphasizing their growth as a person and citizen. Whilephilosophy is distinct from pedagogy and assessment practices, Macmurray’s philosophicalsystem provides guidance for developing other modes of reflection that may enable engineeringto recognize and work
leadership education.We identified fourteen key informants through personal networks and participation in thenetwork known as COMPLETE (The Community of Practice for Leadership Educationfor the Twenty-first-century Engineer). We conducted semi-structured telephoneinterviews with senior program leaders. For each program, we started with web-basedresearch as preparation for interviews that ranged in length from thirty minutes to twohours. Each interviewee was sent four broad question areas in advance: overall approachto engineering leadership, connection between technical engineering and leadership,resources and networks, and evaluation/assessment. Most interviewees shared resources(presentations, course syllabi, strategic planning documents) to
Paper ID #15834Development and Evaluation of a Computer Program to Assess Student CADModelsDr. Steven Joseph Kirstukas, Central Connecticut State University Steve Kirstukas is an Associate Professor at CCSU, where he teaches courses in solid modeling, MATLAB programming, and engineering mechanics. He is exploring the use of computer-aided assessment of CAD files to give consistent, accurate, and quick feedback to students. He has degrees in civil and mechanical engineering, with a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota. Steve has worked in industry as a civil engineer, software developer, biomechanics researcher, and
Award. She has presented papers at ASEE Annual Confer- ence, the ASEE Global Colloquium, Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Engineering Design Graphics Division Mid-Year Conference, Additive Manufacturers Users Group, and Solid Free-Form Fab- rication Symposium. Her research interests center around the development and assessment of students’ spatial visualization skills, the effective integration of 3D modeling into engineering design, and the im- pact of contextualized hands-on applications on student learning and success. She has taught Engineering Graphics, Introduction to Engineering Design, Automation and Rapid Prototyping, and has developed several advanced applications of 3D modeling courses. Dr
Paper ID #16929Exploring ABET Self-Studies: A Look at Pedagogy, Assessment, and Evalu-ation of Life-Long LearningNathan M. Hicks, University of Florida Nathan M. Hicks is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida and taught high school math and science for three years.Mr. Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette Richard J. Aleong is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his Master’s of Applied Science in Mechanical and Materials
. Another benefit would be reducing actual or potential cheating on exams. Morerecent attempts to test student programming skills and its associated problems have beenpublished6,7. Various studies utilize different assessment approaches and define their own set oflearning outcomes, competencies or skills that are being assessed. Defining what appropriateprogramming skills are is in itself a difficult problem8.More recently, competency-based education has become popular in many different fields9, andthe driving force seems to be “Transitioning away from seat time, in favor of a structure thatcreates flexibility, allows students to progress as they demonstrate mastery of academic content,regardless of time, place, or pace of learning”10. However
Paper ID #14781Rubric-Based Energy Literacy Assessment of Student Posters: Effects of Ex-tended Calibration and Addition of RatersQuinn Langfitt, Washington State University Quinn is a PhD candidate in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Washington State University. His research is mostly focused on sustainability, including work on life cycle assessment and energy literacy assessment.Dr. Liv Haselbach P.E., Washington State University Dr. Liv Haselbach is the author of the McGraw-Hill GreenSource book, The Engineering Guide to LEED- New Construction, Sustainable Construction for Engineers. She has
recent findings regarding risk-averse behavior among engineers and engineering educators. Seron and Silbey describe what they refer toas Type II errors of over-specification, which they find within engineering education. Their article, “Thedialectic between expert knowledge and professional discretion,” focuses on quantitative accreditationstandards and how they adversely impact an emphasis on professional judgment in engineering.10 Andalthough EC 2000 was an attempt to move beyond quantitative standards, the implementation of “a-k”outcomes and their assessment merely affirm Seron and Silbey’s findings. For many, this list simplybecame a different set of requirements to be met, rather than a change that would enable genuineeducational innovation
Paper ID #14518Annual Documentation of Assessment and Evaluation of Student OutcomesSimplifies Self-Study PreparationDr. Zia A. Yamayee, University of Portland Dr. Yamayee’s current professional interests include outcomes assessment in engineering education; de- sign in engineering education; engineering design methodologies; and application of design methods to electric power distribution, transmission, and generation. Dr. Yamayee’s work to date has included projects in power system planning, maintenance scheduling, hydrothermal simulations, unit commitment, operational and financial impacts of integrating new technologies
, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Fully Online Accredited Undergraduate Electrical Engineering ProgramAbstract:We have implemented full online delivery of the undergraduate electrical engineering program ata large public university (Arizona State University). This paper describes the objectives for theprogram, its implementation and an assessment of student performance.The curriculum, admissions standards, accreditation and faculty delivering the program areidentical for face-to-face and online delivery. The program was initially conceived primarily toextend the access to our existing program to more underserved student populations. Ourenrolment statistics show that this
CommunityChange is hard, a truism that can be highlighted in engineering education in many ways. Themomentum of engineering education in traditional forms, and even the experiences of people inprofessional careers, is hard to shift, but many have tried.1 One can argue that the shift toABET’s EC2000 outcomes-based assessment was meant to serve as a change agent, but after adecade of implementation, engineering education looked pretty much the same. Small changesin programs sometimes stuck, and sometimes programs faded back to the way they were beforeany interventions were attempted. With the idea that maybe things could be different, thatmaybe change could last, a group of engineering educators got together to imagine what anengineering program could look
Paper ID #15955Spatial Visualization Ability and Learning Style Preference Assessment AmongConstruction Related Undergraduate Engineering and Technology StudentsRichelle Fosu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Richelle Fosu is a PhD Fellow/Candidate in the Computer Graphics Technology department at Purdue University. Her specialization is in Building Information Modeling. Richelle Fosu has a BS in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Jacobs University, Bremen Germany; and a MS in Computer Graphics Technology from Purdue University. Her research interests include Building Information Mod- eling, Spatial
with protective relays 4. Contrast the different types of bus protection schemes and determine the operating characteristics and application of each type 5. Understand the application distance relays and zones of protectionFor assessment of the course learning objectives, a metric of 75% passing of the topic areas wasused. Winter 2015 was the first time the course was taught by the author (previously, adjunctfaculty had taught the course). The class size was small, with only eight students. Almost all thestudents met this criteria for all areas on the assessment tool (questions on the unit and finalexams). The one exception was that one student did not meet the requirement for fifth learningobject. Two example questions (specifically
Industrial/Organizational Psychology and a leading expert in the areas of team dynamics, virtual teams, conflict management, personality, and assessment. He is director of the Individ- ual and Team Performance Lab and the Virtual Team Performance, Innovation, and Collaboration Lab at the University of Calgary, which was built through a $500K Canada Foundation for Innovation Infrastruc- ture Grant. He also holds operating grants of over $300K to conduct leading-edge research on virtual team effectiveness. Over the past 10 years, Tom has worked with organizations in numerous industries, includ- ing oil and gas, healthcare, technology, and venture capitals. He is currently engaged with the Schulich School of Engineering at
and graduate students. She also serves as the college’s assessment and evaluation expert. Page 26.725.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Exploring Contemporary Issues in Sustainable EnergyAbstract: The overall aim of this research is to promote engineering graduate success in complex,interdisciplinary environments relevant to sustainability. In this study, two unique engineeringcourses were compared in terms of individual student responses to multiple-choice questionsbefore and after in-class online research, in addition to active discussions. The two courses
Paper ID #10094Using the Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engineering Model to Assess Cur-ricular Content for Accreditation PurposesDr. Chris Plouff, Grand Valley State University Chris Plouff, Ed.D., P.E., is the Assistant Director of the School of Engineering and the James R. Se- bastian Chair of Engineering Cooperative Education and Educational Development at Grand Valley State University. He is an Assistant Professor and coordinates assessment efforts for the School of Engineer- ing, including for the mandatory cooperative education program. His research interests include effective assessment of engineering education