series of courses.In the future, we also plan to adopt our mentoring for a larger classroom. For scaling, we plan tohire more mentors to ensure each group will have an assigned mentor. We will divide theclassroom into smaller groups with a maximum of 5 to 6 mentees. Even though each group willhave an assigned mentor, all groups will have access to all mentors.References[1] S. Mithun and X. Luo, “Improving Perceptions of Underrepresented Students towards Computing Majors through Mentoring,” in Proceedings of ACM conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE), July 10-12, Turku, Finland, 2023.[2] J. B. Leibowitz, C. F. Lovitt, and C. S. Seager, “Development and Validation of a Survey to
Equity, Justice, and Sociotechnical Innovation Centered in Engineering (RARE JUSTICE), Dr. Coley leads transformative efforts to challenge systemic barriers and promote equity in academia. Her research focuses on amplifying the lived experiences of racially minoritized scholars, dismantling anti-Blackness in STEM, graduate student education, and fostering awareness of, and ultimately, accountability for, the lived realities of individuals navigating STEM through immersive virtual reality experiences. Collaborating with mental health experts, she also is intentional to integrate a head-on focus on the implications for wellness and wholeness in academic environments. Dr. Coley’s transparent and culturally responsive
doctoral and master students who are equipped with professional skills that gobeyond what is typically learned in textbooks, but universities often lack resources to trainstudents in these skills [3].Therefore, given these shifts in the career trajectories of graduate students and the lack oftraining related to professional skills within graduate education, new strategies for preparinggraduate students for their future careers are needed. Our project, Graduates AdvancingProfessional Skills (GAPS) program, sought to address this need. Funded by the NationalScience Foundation Innovation in Graduate Education (NSF-IGE), we developed projectmanagement training for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) graduatestudents. Our goals are
-Purdue University Indianapolis Karen Alfrey is a Clinical Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Academic Affairs and Programs in the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. She has been a member of ASEE since 2003.Dr. Mengyuan (Alice) Zhao, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42482 Mengyuan (Alice) Zhao is the Associate Director of Research and Development at IUPUI CyberLab. Her team works on designing, developing, and implementing innovative educational technology tools
this unique vision, Olga has also served as the principal investigator since 2019 on a multi-year Kern Family Foundation KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering education. All this has led to Wake Forest Engineering achieving unprecedented student
at Buffalo. He is the Division Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) for the American Society of Engineering Education 2024 annual conference. His research interests include engineering and human-centered design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. He has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Toward an Integrated Framework of Empathy for Users among Engineering Student DesignersIntroductionEmpathy refers to how one understands, feels with, or reacts to others [1–3]. In engineeringdesign, empathy manifests when a designer
ofengineering, preparing students for a broad spectrum of roles in research, design, anddevelopment. These programs provide a strong theoretical understanding of engineeringprinciples, allowing graduates to contribute to cutting-edge innovations and theoreticaladvancements. Ultimately, ET in both community colleges and traditional engineering programsplays a crucial role in the engineering landscape, each attracting many students with uniqueinterests and career aspirations. Whether one chooses to pursue an ET program, geared towardsapplied skills and immediate industry integration, or a traditional engineering program, focusedon comprehensive theoretical knowledge and diverse engineering applications, they will findrewarding opportunities in their
students’ learning of modernengineering skills [2], can enhance engineering design. Human-centered design is a problem-solving approach that uses design thinking tools to identify unmet needs of a population andcollaboratively and iteratively develop meaningful and innovative solutions for that population’sbenefit [3]. The HCD process encompasses five taxonomic spaces; namely, understand,synthesize, ideate, prototype, and implement, each of which are defined by a set ofcharacteristics and processes [4]. It is becoming more common for post-secondary institutions toseek ways to integrate human-centered design methods into their engineering programs [5], [6].Indeed, research studies show that integrating HCD in engineering programs can better
in teams, we take advantage of skills in the engineeringskillset, e.g., systems thinking, problem solving, and creativity and innovation. Although engineersresist common archetypes of leadership as in conflict to the engineering identity, nevertheless theyvalue superiors who demonstrate servant leadership with technical mastery [5]. Importantly, thisphrase describes the model for engineering leadership.Ibarra’s [6] outstanding Act like a leader, think like a leader is a required text. As the title suggests,we learn leadership by practicing it. Ibarra devotes one of her five chapters to networking, thusunderscoring its importance.Our course uses emotional intelligence as a critical foundation for leadership skills. Accordingly,much content
team can result inmore creative and innovative ideas. Finally, a range of backgrounds can increase the team’sability to understand and empathize with different customers and stakeholders. Allowing for aculture of inclusion strengthens the output of a group and maximizes the benefits of a diverseteam [1-2]. It is therefore critical for engineers to understand how to work with others and giveand accept criticism in a way that is respectful and builds up the team rather than alienatingmembers.During the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, many teachers switched to online education, and themethods that faculty use now in and in the future will and should change because of thisexperience [3]. The lessons learned in online education cannot be understated. While
thesignificance of connecting these experiences to students’ academic and professional goals,promoting a reflective and meaningful learning journey.IntroductionEngineering education in the 21 st century faces a distinctive challenge in adjusting to a swiftlyevolving technological landscape, where ideas and innovations transcend geographical bordersand distances. Numerous major technological companies in the United States maintain robustglobal presence across their business, research, development, and production sectors, andengineering projects and teams often collaborate across multiple countries and culture. Eventhough technical expertise remains crucial, engineers must possess skills such as globalawareness, effective communication across diverse
of correct behaviors, identification of weaknesses,adaptation of strategies, and reflection on their learning process. The AI model dynamicallyrecommended personalized learning pathways based on students' progress. This multifacetedfeedback approach contributed to a more effective and engaging learning environment,ultimately leading to improved understanding and mastery of swarm intelligence concepts andalgorithms. Williamson et al. [5] revealed how Internet of Things (IoT) technology can replicatebrain functions within physical settings, enabling the sensing and comprehension of humancognitive behaviors. They also showed how this innovation enhances human cognition andperformance.AI-driven Gamification: AI-driven gamification in education
optimize machine learning applicationsDr. Shuyin Jiao, North Carolina State University Dr. Shuyin Jiao is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Computer Science at North Carolina State University. With a primary emphasis on computing education in college, she specializes in teaching introductory programming courses and critical path computer science courses. Her scholarly pursuits are centered on computing education and program analysis, with a dedication to fostering a dynamic and innovative learning environment in the field of computer science education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Visual Studio Code in Introductory Computer Science Course
employee satisfaction in engineering organizations. International journal of innovation, management and technology, 7(4), 141-146.[14] Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2018). What happens when software developers are (un) happy. Journal of Systems and Software, 140, 32-47.[15] Yaseen, M., Ali, Z., & Rahman, A. U. (2019). Role of software Developer’s happiness in projects success: A proposed developers happiness model (DHM). I-Manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 14(1), 34-41.[16] Hofaidhllaoui, M., & Chhinzer, N. (2014). The relationship between satisfaction and turnover intentions for knowledge workers. Engineering Management Journal, 26(2), 3- 9.[17] WY Tam, V., &
. Wattanakasiwich, P. Taleab, M. D. Sharma, and I. D. Johnston, “Development and Implementation of a Conceptual Survey in Thermodynamics,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 29–53, 2013.[19] C. Kamcharean and P. Wattanakasiwich, “Development and Implication of a Two-tier Thermodynamic Diagnostic Test to Survey Students’ Understanding in Thermal Physics,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 14–36, 2016.[20] M. Prince, M. Vigeant, and K. Nottis, “Development of the Heat and Energy Concept Inventory: Preliminary Results on the Prevalence and Persistence of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 412–438, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00056.x.[21] P
and women in becoming professional pilots.” Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 12(3), 2. 2003.[12] Ward et al., “Developing Innovative Strategies for Aviation Education and Participation.” Developing Innovative Strategies for Aviation Education and Participation. 2019. Pp. 1-7[13] Boeing. “Pilot Outlook 2023-2042.” https://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/pilot- technician-outlook#overview. 2023[14] Henneberry, Debra, "The Sky’s the Limit: Factors That Affect Females’ Decisions to Become Professional Pilots". Education Doctoral. Paper 393. https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/education_etd/393. 2018[15] Henneberry, D., Lubner, M., & Russo, P. “An examination of recent female graduates from a
, thoughindustrial designers also worked on defining needs, creating personas, driving conceptualprocesses, and branding [8]. From a medical device industry perspective, the value of industrialdesign is not well understood and is seen to lack specialized skills related to clinical sciences andregulatory processes [8]. Although not all medical device development teams interviewed in thestudy included industrial designers, they all involved people of multiple disciplines [8]. Thus,working across disciplines is an essential skill for students who plan to go into medical devicedevelopment. In the medtech industry specifically, design and innovation are increasinglyimportant for companies to remain competitive [9], [10].MethodsGoalsThe overall goal of this
Paper ID #41600What No One Tells the (Future) Assistant Professor: Uncovering HiddenCurriculum for FacultyDr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. She is the principal investigator
and/or has a culture of innovation,the needs of these change processes require new skills, and sometimes new attitudes, in workersof all levels15. If the workers who have been tapped to be mentors for the less experiencedworkers are not continually mentored themselves, they may fall into the trap of propagating theold behaviors and attitudes rather than supporting the newer goals of the organization.Additionally, mentoring also provides the opportunity for new employees to learn about thecultural background of the company through the source of the more experienced employees33.ConclusionIn order for mentoring programs to be successful, the traditional ways of mentoring, particularlythe dyadic mentoring model, need to be improved or replaced
graduates1. BME graduatesrequire a broad education having a solid background in science, engineering, and providing thebase for innovation. Since medical electronics is one of the fields where BMEs can develop theircareer, it is important that BMEs who wish to move in this direction, graduate with the technicalskills required to develop and test innovations in the form of electronic device prototypes. Thecourse investment used by conventional engineering programs to foster and hone these skills isnot practical in a four-year BME program. It is then necessary to efficiently teach a broadspectrum of electronic concepts with a limited course credit impact, in order to enable BMEs tobecome effective users of electronics technology in the medical field
AC 2011-2608: TEAM BUILDING IN A PROJECT-BASED LEARNINGCOURSEBernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie did his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. and postdoctoral work at the University of Ok- lahoma where he also taught as a Visiting Lecturer. He has been on the WSU faculty for 28 years and over the past 13 years has focused strongly on innovative pedagogy along with his technical research in biotechnology. His recent Fulbright Exchange to Nigeria set the stage for receipt of the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. (509) 335-4103 (Off); (509) 335-4806 (Fax); bvanwie@che.wsu.eduDenny C. Davis, Washington State University Dr. Davis is Professor of
programs in the College of Engineering and related support services and activities. He has been part of the faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison for 25 years where he is a member of the Teaching Academy and was awarded the Chancellor’s Distinguished Teaching Award. His teaching and research programs are directed at civil engineering materials and structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineering in the State of Wisconsin and a fellow in the American Society of Civil Engineers.Barbara A Masi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Barbara A. Masi Ph.D., is the Director of Education Innovation and Assessment in the MIT School of Engineering
. Underlying principles of teamwork andleadership are presented and discussed early in the semester, and students have ampleopportunities to apply and explore these principles in their work together as a team over thesemester. Since all team members expect to receive the same grade, students are highlymotivated to see their team succeed.One innovation was recently added to the senior project course to emphasize the leadershipcomponent noted as a competency above. In class, we discuss leadership qualities and principles,and we invite students to nominate individuals that exhibit examples of good leadership over thesemester. Students receiving a leadership citation are recognized by the class and receive a smalltoken of appreciation – a candy bar in our
AC 2011-930: MODELING IN ELEMENTARY STEM CURRICULUMJohn C Bedward, North Carolina State University John Bedward is in the Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Edu- cation at NC State University. A Science Education doctoral student and graduate research assistant at the NC State Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. He received his BS/MS in Technology Education from NC State, taught middle school technology education, and led informal science investigations at the Science House in the area of photonics, a learning outreach initiative at NC State. His research inter- ests include STEM research education, scientific and technical visualization, multimodal literacy, virtual
dominant technologies; improve, innovate, and invent (technologies) to achieve sustainability. 9. Actively engage communities and stakeholders in development of engineering solutions.Post your sustainability analysis as a wiki or webpage, and email your url before class before class on _________. Yourwiki should clearly reference your design idea. Hint: read the assignment rubric and use the paramedic method.To submit your analysis to your instructor, send an email with the following content: 1. To: dbraun@calpoly.edu 2. Subject: EE 306F10 Sustainability Analysis for username@calpoly.edu 3. Message first line: Your last name 4. Message second line: Your first name 5. Message third line: username
Educational Research Methods Division’s ”Appren- tice Faculty Award”, was selected as a 2010 Frontiers in Education ”New Faculty Fellow”, and is currently a UGA ”Lilly Teaching Fellow”. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the en- vironmental engineering program. In this context, he is involved in the development and implementation of the Synthesis and Design Studio series at UGA.Nicki Wendy Sochacka, University of Georgia Nicki Sochacka is completing her doctorate at the University of Queensland. Her research interests span socio-technical transitions, with a particular focus on sustainable urban water management, and integrat- ing socio-technical methods of
interests 2.92 16 Provide vocational training 2.70 17The Content of Technology EducationIn the 2009 study, respondents were asked to rate (on a five point Likert scale (1=unimportant,5=very important) the importance of 17 content areas17, which were derived directly fromStandards for Technological Literacy22. Here again, the top-ranked concepts: 1)Troubleshooting,R&D, invention, innovation and experimentation; 2) application of design processes; 3)attributes of design; core concepts of technology; and engineering design—would seem toprovide a good foundation for K-12 engineering education. Though admittedly the deck wasstacked with content identified in Standards for
meaningswith engineering, and how educational experiences may need to be designed and assessed toaddress the complete (and varying) meaning(s) of the concept.In this paper, we present portions of a larger research project motivated in part by the researchquestion: What is the set of concepts, ideas, approaches, tools, methods, and philosophies that could be included as the “necessary knowledge of sustainability” for all engineering students?Our approaches to answering the research question include three parts: (1) an in-depth collectionand analysis of published descriptions of sustainable engineering in practice, in research, and ineducational innovation; (2) a set of interviews conducted with undergraduate students at
the IBM Austin Texas facility as a Robotics and Automation Engineer until 1998. He joined the University of Texas at Austin in 1998 as a Research Scientist where he was the Associate Director and Program Manager of the Robotics Research Group. In 2001 he joined the faculty at the University of North Florida where he is now Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Since joining UNF he has initiated the Manufacturing Innovation Partnership program, sponsored by the National Science Foundation, to foster industry-academic collaboration. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of robotics and automation, advanced manufacturing, and dynamic systems and control engineering