weaknesses of the class? What aspects of the class are having a negative impact on your learning?” [17].Following mid-semester feedback in Fall 2022, CETL delivered a Mid-Semester Feedback reportto the instructor. The instructor held a discussion with class at the start of the following class.Based on this discussion, the following changes were made to the course: (1) solutions and answersto quizzes were posted for the rest of the semester; (2) full credit was given for quizzes whenstudents submitted their own work as a PDF and when students submitted a video podcast (nopoints were deducted for wrong answers on quizzes); (3) attendance at each class was tracked, andclass voted on the number of points to receive for attendance.5) Engagement
, more opportunities for students to engage in commonacademic interests, experiment with active learning through collaboration, and have morefrequent interaction with faculty. For the STEM FHF program, these key learning communityfeatures were embodied in: 1) mentoring between faculty advisors and all members of thestudent cohort, 2) mentoring between undergraduate student fellows and graduate mentors, and3) partnerships built through collaboration with stakeholders from community leaders andbusinesses in the direct community. The conceptualization of these interactions is featured inFigure 1 and inspired by the literature on high-impact practices, anti-deficit pedagogy, andinclusive learning [3], [5]-[7
. (2006)performed a study with a national cohort of students and found that service learning hadsignificant impact on student outcomes. Oakes (2004) describes in detail those universities doingservice learning in 2004. Duffy, et al. (2009) also reported positive outcomes on many of theABET (a-k) criteria. Borrego et al. (2010) reported results of a survey showing that, “…79percent of department chairs had heard of service learning, only 23 percent of departmentscurrently offered it.”Several service-learning definitions are now presented. Jacoby, et al. (1996) defined service-learning in general, as, “…“a form of experiential education in which students engage inactivities that address human and community needs together with structured
in renewable energy systems that engages project-basedactivities in clean energy and energy efficiency. The objective of the project is to improve student-learning outcome by incorporating green energy manufacturing with 3-D printing technology.Renewable energy courses offer in-depth information of renewable energy resources. Suchinformation includes the manufacturing of photovoltaics, fuel cells, wind turbines, etc. Simplelaboratory experimental modules are often available on the market for purchase. Current modulesfeature complete system assemblies that require student interface for measurements. Althoughthese educational modules are completed exceptionally well for student learning, the modulesoften lack involvement of student
Experimental University of T´achira in Venezuela. In addition, she has several years of experience in research and practice at graduate education level in the engineering field, with special focus on assess based perspectives, minoritized students’ socialization, and agency in graduate education. Her strengths include qualitative research study design and implementation. Her dissertation examined Latinx motivation to pursue Ph.D. in engineering, minoritized engineering doctoral students’ socialization and the impact of the engineering context in their experiences. Her research expertise lies in diversity and inclusion in graduate education, with a particular interest in minoritized students’ socialization, the engineering
coordinates a program called Vol Court, which is an elevator pitch competition for stu- dents and faculty. The Anderson Center has a three-pronged mission to develop entrepreneurial talent, help build the overall entrepreneurial community and to conduct applied research in entrepreneurship. Carson is fully involved in all three aspects of this mission. Carson also serves as Director of Advisory Services with 3 Roots Capital, a provider of impact capi- tal products and advisory services that create successful outcomes for client companies and community partners while generating attractive returns for financial partners. 3 Roots Capital is a Community De- velop Financial Institution and specializes in providing debt capital
for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imaging. His technical achievements and service to the community have been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of SPIE (The International Society for Optics and Photonics) for his contributions to hyperspectral image processing, and Fellow of the Academy of Arts and Sciences of Puerto Rico. In 1997, he was one of 60 recipients from across the United States and its territories of the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) from the White House. He received the IEEE Walter Fee Outstanding Young Engineer Award in 1999. He is a board member of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium and an advocate to provide access to excellent education to students
surveyed the landscape of outreach program formats or explored the impact that participationmay have on the undergraduate ambassadors themselves. The small number of studies that havebeen conducted have been able to connect outreach participation with social engagement andimproved professional readiness including communication and leadership skills [5,6], but thesestudies have not examined impacts across different programs. As a first step towards a morecomprehensive research agenda we employed various methods to survey common practices andfeatures of ambassador programs and inform the interests of both researchers and practitioners.MethodsOur initial task was identify universities across the country that have active outreach programs inwhich
that there is no negative impact on recruitment. Figure 3: Number of transfer students into the Mechanical Engineering program from primary participating community collegesAnother major goal of the competition is to enhance retention of first-year mechanicalengineering students by providing an engaging “hands-on” design experience in the firstmechanical engineering course. The one-year retention rates for freshman mechanicalengineering students from 1997 through 2007 are shown in Figure 41. Since the inceptionof the competition in 1999, we can see a general increasing trend in retention rates. Againit is difficult to draw statistically valid inferences regarding the freshman designexperience in isolation, as there was no
engineering curricula by engaging faculty, students and industry, together withinternational collaborators from Argentina, Puerto Rico and Spain. A specific challenge forthis redesign is the low performance of Chilean secondary students in international scienceand mathematics tests, that is tackled by putting an S.T.E.M. emphasis in the overall process.Using the mentioned backwards design approach, the multi-disciplinary, multi-national,multi-stakeholder team will share the process of establishing University-wide learningoutcomes, as well as specific outcomes for the engineering program benchmarked through avery novel method and validated by industry and employers’ representatives.The authors will describe their motivations, aspirations and work
section describesoutcomes in the level of engagement achieved by the students at the events and the activities,culminating with the resilient control systems class, where mentors guided students, using theGrid Game as a vehicle to learning about the electric grid and resilient controls. Finally, aconclusions and possible paths forward are given.Topics in Resilient Controls Page 26.1012.3Benefiting from an already ongoing interdisciplinary field of study5, a course was created toestablish a perspective for college students on the unique challenges of automation in oursociety. The course was broadcast to the participating universities through
opportunities are discussed, along withthe results of the initial on-line offering and an analysis of student learning gains. We willdiscuss how teaching activities using engineering disaster enhance student learning about both“hard” engineering topics and the ethical, legal and societal implications of engineering, howthese activities also address learning goals in communication skills, global impact,multidisciplinary and life-long learning, and how studying failures enables engineering studentsto better “see” complexity, and understand the special design needs which arise as engineeredsystems become more complex.Background:Engineering disasters (spectacular and catastrophic failure of engineered systems) are lead focalpoints in the news and in our
neurodivergent and neurotypical students were tested for normality,where |skew|>2.0 and |kurtosis|>7.0 are considered non-normal data [34], [35]. The data thatdemonstrated acceptable levels to fit the assumption of normality were then evaluated witht-tests because t-test have an assumption of normality. Thus, a Welch’s two-sample t-test forequal means was conducted on Engineering Identity (all items), Sense of Community (all items),Engineering Identity (Recognition), Sense of Community (University/School).Next an emergent thematic analysis of the open-ended question on their co-op experience wasconducted. Each response was coded with “Yes/No” to indicate if the co-op experience or jobsearch process impacted feelings of belonging in engineering
typical engineering program, they tend tobecome more disengaged in social issues, and this disengagement is seen to persist into theirprofessional careers [12] [13] [14]. Lack of engagement around social issues can cause situationsof environmental injustice to be perpetuated in engineered systems [12]. Still, in manyengineering programs, “engineering neutrality” in design is a defined part of the curriculum, andstudents are explicitly taught to depoliticize their engineering solutions [15]. By depoliticizingengineering, students focus only on the technical aspects of a project and not the socialimplications. This pedagogical choice ultimately negatively impacts the engineering profession.Focusing on social and environmental justice in engineering
less than 10% declared that they acquired an internship and just 11.5% weregoing to attend a graduate school. Elites was the leadership program tailored specifically forstudents majoring in a STEM field. In this paper, along with members from the office ofassessment, several of the co-investigators evaluated the effectiveness of the Elites program,after implementation almost three years ago.2. Related WorkThe Elites leadership program draws on several high impact practices (e.g. student-faculty interaction via undergraduate research), which promotes student engagement(Kuh, 2001). Student engagement signifies the time and effort students dedicate toactivities when institutions provide opportunities for student participation (Kuh, 2001,2003 as
, Michael, Pamela Turner and William Oakes, “Teaching Engineering In High School Using Service-Learning: The EpicsModel”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008Zoltowski, C., Oakes, W., and Cardella, M., “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 101, No. 1, January 2012, pp. 1-32Zoltowski, C. B., and Oakes, W.C., “Learning by Doing: Reflections of the EPICS Program”, Special Issue: University EngineeringPrograms That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, International Journal for Service-Learning in Engineering, 2014,pp. 1-32
whatarchitecture entails: it typically involves a physical creation within a particularsetting, and that setting is more than often a community. In an education contextthis often equates to experiential learning or site-based learning where studentswork within a community or design a building on a non-fictitious site. This hasproven to engage students with community partners or individual clients and hasbeen the standard fare of architectural technology education for many years. Itholds value as it is often noted as being a “real” experience as opposed to workingon a design project that is not connected with a real client or community partner.The Architectural Technology Program at Indiana University Purdue UniversityIndianapolis (IUPUI) has recently been
focusing on collecting interviews with nationallyrenowned transfer experts and programs to collect perspectives from experts, influencers, andprograms across the United States who are engaged in transfer student research and programs.The third source of data is from collecting survey responses from students at four differentinstitutions who have either successfully transferred, intended to transfer, or who are interestedin transferring in an engineering or engineering-related field of study. The survey wasconstructed from three research validated instruments. The Community and Two-Year Collegestudent survey developed in Preparing the Engineer of 2020 (EEC 0550608) [7] and EngineeringTransfer Survey developed in Diversifying Transfer Student
, MN) Division leadership collaborating with Purdue INSPIRE on J-PEER journal of engineering education researchWhat is the value of OUTREACH to the university? Outreach: single visits to promote engineering Single visit: classroom visits (presentations and activities), mentorships in FIRST, Future City, clubs, etc. Participation increases undergraduate satisfaction, confidence and retention Creates goodwill with community Supports STEM career knowledge and development in K-12 students Increases K-12 and community knowledge of university and of engineering Attractive to industry and alumni What is the value of SUSTAINED ENGAGEMENT to the university? Sustained Engagement: longer partnerships to conduct research
significant improvement in overall course grade from a class average of80% to 87% with a p-value of 0.005. Additionally, by creating diverse groups there was animprovement in the publication rate of Mathematica Demonstration projects and student surveysillustrated this approach made students more comfortable with AI tools. This model offers ascalable approach for integrating experimental work, AI modeling, and OER into engineeringeducation, with future work focusing on long-term impacts on student retention and success,especially among underrepresented groups in STEM.Introduction:The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming engineering education by reshapinghow students engage with complex scientific concepts. This paper introduces
further highlight the significant impact of collaborative learning in civicengagement. For example, Dassin & Belda [15] utilized virtual classrooms and collaborativedigital tools to enable students from different countries to work together on internationaldevelopment projects. The students focused on creating digital media-based solutions to issueslike environmental conservation, education, and civic engagement, highlighting the applicationof technology in addressing real-world global challenges. These projects enabled students tocollaborate across borders, enhance their understanding of community needs, and apply digitaltools for civic purposes, such as promoting local action or facilitating global discussions.In addition to the positive
, student participation in specific HIEP activities has shaped their everydayexperiences in school, both academically and socially. Hence, this study's primary goal is toexamine the factors that predict academic success in E/CS using multiple regression analysis.Specifically, this study seeks to understand the effects of high-impact engagement practices(HIEP), coursework enjoyability, confidence at completing a degree on the underrepresentedacademic success, and nontraditional E/CS students. We used exploratory factor analyses to derivean """academic success""" variable from five items that sought to measure how students persevereto attain academic goals.The present study's secondary goal is to address the gap in research literature concerning
critical thinking and practicalproblem-solving skills [10, 29]. Collaboration with industry ensures that course content is alignedwith real-world challenges, enhancing its relevance and impact [5, 9].The ShapingSkills dynamic taxonomy framework [17], which forms the foundation of thisimplementation proposal, builds on these practices by incorporating predictive analytics toanticipate future skill demands. This data-driven approach is intended to facilitate the design ofcourses aligned with current industry requirements while preparing students for future challengesand offers a structured model for future empirical evaluation. By integrating KSAs intocurriculum development, this framework could provide a solid foundation for addressing
Countries (CEDC), astudent-driven service-learning program at Clemson whose mission is to provide engineeredsolutions to communities in the developing world. By utilizing a unique organizational structurethat fosters continuous student involvement throughout their undergraduate experience viaclasswork and an internship program, CEDC is able to achieve a broad range of student learningoutcomes (Ogle, 2016). Such outcomes include globalization, teamwork, and communication(Plumblee, 2010). CEDC offers students tangible and practical experience on engineeringprojects as well as the greater impacts of engineering in a global context by engaging students formultiple semesters, offering biannual travel opportunities, and fostering a long-term
responses.In this paper, we will explain what the essential elements of service-learning are and reviewbriefly the literature on positive cognitive and affective benefits. Even though many of us inengineering education may have course projects that provide community service and maytherefore think we are already engaged in service-learning, we may not be including all theaspects of service-learning found to gain maximum benefit for our students, ourselves, and thecommunity. And in response to the objection that there is no room and time for one more topicto be added to the curriculum, we make a case that incorporation of service-learning may in factreduce the overall load of students and faculty in achieving ABET goals. Finally, we present afew
student’s education in respective STEM fields. By intertwining STEM themeswith interactive community experiences, BCA is better able to engage high risk students andequip them with the knowledge on how science and technology can directly impact theircommunities utilizing resources around them.Program DevelopmentTo create BCA, extensive organization and planning were required throughout the 2016/2017school year. Selecting the target demographic was the first step. It has been statistically shownthat the level of STEM confidence and interest from the end of intermediate school to the end ofhigh school decreases drastically [1]. BCA recognized the deficiency in STEM educationthrough past years of community engagement and selected high school students
information andcommunications technologies, the world is smaller. We impact the lives of many differentcultures, economies, political systems, etc.”He elaborated to describe his course’s curricular focus on biomedical engineering in the contextof sub-Saharan Africa and shared his communication to students at the start of his course:“While most of you will never travel to a low- or middle-income country, you will impactvulnerable populations here in the U.S. and abroad… The overall goal of [this course] is then toinstill the students with the confidence to engage with others to identify and create solutions tohealth-related problems on a global basis, while addressing ethical considerations ofengineering as noted in the National Society for
engineering problem on a personal level andserve as points of departure for expanding students’ knowledge of, interest in, and ability toaddress engineering problems on a larger scale. Socially engaged engineering also helps youthunderstand how political, economic, environmental, and social forces can shape engineeringdesigns and decisions.Allowing room for students’ diverse viewpoints and experiences prompts students to recognizethat there are multiple stakeholders impacted by an engineering problem and/or solution and thatsome stakeholders may be disproportionately impacted. In this way, topics for engineering arechosen to develop engagement among students and help them to understand how engineers shapethe world they live in. For example, a
following required additional criteria for service-learning activities: - The service must meet the needs of a community. - Is coordinated with some educational program. - Helps foster civic responsibility. - Is integrated into, and enhances, the students’ academic curriculum. - Provides structured time for student reflection.Student engagement in service-learning activities has resulted in positive impacts on retention,civic responsibility, personal development, and a deeper understanding of the subject matter7.Service-learning activities are becoming more prevalent in engineering curricula as instructorsdiscover that their pedagogical objectives of problem solving, working in groups, andexperiential learning match well with the
reflections on the peer sharing presentations as a whole. The workwould also be strengthened through multimedia data, such as video recordings of the studentsduring the presentations in class.The current study focuses on data collected from one semester’s implementation of the peersharing presentations. Additional research should consider both the long-term effects of the peersharing presentations for students and the impact of the peer sharing presentations acrossmultiple cohorts.Implications for PractitionersWhat Did We Learn from This Experience?Broadly, the peer sharing presentations are an effective instructional technique that promotesstudent engagement and active learning. Through an investigation of student artifacts andcomments, the