exist in an isolatedtechnical environment. The fact is that many products require a high level of technicalsophistication to even evaluate if it is the proper product for an application. As a result, todaythere must be more interaction between the developers of a new technology product and thecustomer. The scientist or engineer is therefore forced into active participation in such areas ascustomer negotiations, marketing and business planning, and manufacturing support. While theirneed for technical competence is not being reduced to support their primary task, their need forother non-technical knowledge is being increased by the many secondary roles that they arebeing asked to play.From the large industry perspective, the need for a broadened
the following using a 5-pointunderstanding of likert scale (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree)engineering Add additional descriptive text saying that there is no right orprofession wrong answer; we just want their opinion of how they feel about engineering. Engineers work on things that change the world. Engineers are professional problem solvers. Engineers make a big salary
explainshow expert entrepreneurs pursue new venture creation in non-predictive ways1. The basis of thetheory, an ‘effectual logic’ is demonstrated through a set of heuristics that drive the behavior ofexperienced and successful entrepreneurs. In her initial proposal of effectuation, Sarasvathyidentified the theory as valuable content to be integrated into entrepreneurship education giventhat it is an explanation of entrepreneurial action grounded in the behavior of real entrepreneurs.Since the proposal to include effectuation in entrepreneurship education, there has been a growthin efforts to include effectuation through teaching and educational research. These attemptsinclude to measure or assess students’ use of effectuation have included classroom
to manage build time while keeping all groups engaged.Eventually, Janice chose to strictly enforce time limits and emphasize it as a constraint that allengineers must deal with. As Janice worked to allow each group to finish their design, managingtime continued to be a major obstacle but one that Janice and the students learned to deal withand overcome, similar to a real world situation.While Janice faced pedagogical uncertainties throughout the engineering unit, in the end she feltthe unit “went well overall” and helped the students grasp the concepts of heat transfer. Shedescribed the overall success as strengthening skills in science, math, and problem solving. Shealso stated that it developed communication skills where students were
rides toinclude in the design, the type of soil that offers stability during an earthquake, and provide amechanism for anchoring the rides securely during a simulated earthquake. Students use the iPadseismometer app to see how seismic waves are measured and graphed. Pictures of existinganchoring systems and websites posting earthquake activity as it happens reinforce the real-world context of the problem. Students need to choose a site based on the stability of theunderlying earth materials, while also considering other areas of concern (e.g., distance oflocation from existing roads, housing). Once the site is chosen, students are asked to test,evaluate, and present their design.The Rocking Good Times unit uses persuasive argumentation to
(ibuprofen synthesis, atom economy, terta-amidomacrocyclic ligand oxidant activators, cellulose processing), group discussions and theconstruction of concept maps associated with each case study to improve student attitudestowards chemistry. Teaching chemistry to civil engineering students, specifically, is not as wellresearched. Kimmel and Lambert, 1973 used “practical examples” and open discussions ascentral components of a physical chemistry course for civil engineers [10]. For example, studentswere asked to analyze a real-life proposal of using steam from powerplants to heat homes in alocal community. Sell, 1982 also used several real-life examples to teach chemistry to civilengineers. Example problems considered multiple industries including
their audience’s cognitive needs.In teaching this design shift, we begin with the cognitive science underpinnings(including readings that are drawn upon for this research), then model examples, andfinally ask students to create some before/after examples of their own.Specifically, we begin with reminding students of the purpose of drawing people togetherfor a live presentation to begin with (whether it is live in-person, or live online).Coordinating a live audience demands an effort that is ideally rewarded through thebenefit of real-time discussion and idea sharing. However, in order for ideas to bediscussed and sparked, first, real engagement with the content of the presentation musttake place. And while this notion is nothing new, the
[could be improved]. (2010)• I really enjoyed having the different aspects of engineering available. It really helped me, I was taking this class to help me decide which field of engineering I wanted to go into. (Survey)• I love that we had access to real life experience and multiple perspectives. Now if it is worth it to the school or not to pay for all of you I do not know but certainly I would rate it as a key Page 22.1411.15 contributor to the success of the class and hope it continues. (Survey)• If we were perhaps doing serious applications of engineering this method might be effective but as it was with freshman students who haven't
, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers in several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is pub- lished in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transforma- tions (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals
of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, student applications of the design process, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collabo- rative learning, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple represen- tations of concepts. Page 26.1701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Video-Annotated Peer Review (VAPR): Considerations for Development and
(UW) is a typical end-of-program, 4-credit,team-based project design course. The two primary objectives of the course are to integrate priorcoursework into an open-ended team-based real-world project and to prepare the students fortransition into professional practice. Many programs have a similar course as the finalopportunity to develop their students. The course is taught each spring and fall semesters withan enrollment of approximately 40 students each semester. The student groups are mentored bylocal professional engineers and their project products are judged by a panel of engineers. Thestudents are expected to have sufficient fundamental technical knowledge to participate in thesemester long project. Hence, the challenge is for the
students to grow academically, socially,and professionally. It encompasses the classroom experience, but also other exposures thatenhance and reinforce the learning process. This includes student work experiences related totheir studies, assignment of real-world projects in collaboration with businesses, multidisciplinaryand cross-disciplinary team projects, and industrial tours. The factors included in the studentlearning process are: • Learning goals and expectations for students • Curriculum and program design • Teaching and educational delivery • Research on teaching and learning • Student co-curricular development and achievementOther aspects of student learning include the development of new academic
Page 9.980.1and Application of an Interorganizational Model,” please visit the project website athttp://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gk18/STEM Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationoutcomes are pursued and achieved. For the purposes of this research, we define partnerships asvoluntary arrangements between organizations, anchored by agreements, to promote theexchange, sharing, or co-development of products or programs designed to stimulate STEMeducation.* Partnerships are a particular form of interorganizational collaboration. However, theyare distinctive in that participants are not merely bound by
, personal, and environmental contexts.These contexts collectively form the distinctive fingerprint of behavioral, normative, and controlbeliefs integral to our lives. As shown previously, beliefs amalgamate to guide intention,therefore background factors play a guiding role in shaping intention.RAA posits that beliefs are acquired through daily interactions with the real world and thatindividuals’ varied experiences are shaped by diverse personal characteristics, includingpersonality, temperament, intelligence, and values. Additionally, social and cultural factors suchas ethnicity, race, religion, and education significantly contribute to the formation of thesebeliefs, alongside exposure to media and other informational sources. The interaction
striving to strengthen energy educationin Nebraska and beyond. Furthermore, such a comprehensive approach can serve as a model andinspire similar initiatives in other states and countries—not only in energy education, but acrossthe broader STEM landscape.Insights from energy literacy studies at global, national, state, and regional levels and ourapproach. Achieving energy literacy requires a strong STEM foundation that equips studentswith the knowledge and skills to address real-world energy challenges. However, a study onsecondary students in New York[11] revealed that while students were concerned about energyissues, their cognitive and behavioral scores were low. This indicated significant gaps inknowledge and skills to address energy-related
that reflect those commitments.Success shouldn’t hinge on aspirational capitalYosso [5] describes aspirational capital as a “culture of possibility,” whereby families believeand instill the belief in their children that they can transcend current circumstances and succeedin college despite real or perceived barriers (personal or institutional) [11], [12]. In our data,aspirational capital was most frequently expressed as expectations of upward mobility.Participants also described college education as something that was taken as a given when theywere growing up. For example, Hector described how his mother had always wanted to be aveterinarian or a nurse but didn’t have the education for it and instead worked as a housekeeper:“I saw firsthand
faculty membersactually deliver the curriculum is more important than the formal curriculum, that is: its content,collection, and sequence of courses. The thesis here is that current teaching-learning practices inthe Region do need overhauling! The real challenge in college teaching today, is not covering thematerial for the students, but rather uncovering the material with the students. Engaging studentsin learning is the underpinning that will have enduring values.Therfore, educators, researchers,administrators, and policy makers have to take bold steps and lay out plans for advancingpedagogies aimed at enhancing students’ involvement in their learning: those that are classroom-based and predicated on cooperation, and simultaneously, do
reasoningfor partaking in the task. Students with higher intrinsic motivation values at the beginning of theircapstone design project performed better throughout the course of the semester than students withlower levels of intrinsic motivation. The students that recognized the importance of the designcourse tended to have higher grades than the other students.Another interesting finding lies in the fact that the senior level students are not impacted byanxiety. Capstone design courses are widely recognized as the culmination of the student’sundergraduate degree. The course requires a year-long dedication to a single project, from theideation and design to the final deliverable products. Capstone is structured to emulate a real-world, industry position
teaching and learning assistants, while not a novel concept in American colleges,has had a resurgence of interest and involvement in STEM settings. Coupled with socialnetworking and peer collaboration in the framework of quality assurance, the ATLAS approachis intended to be both timely and significant.As noted, concern about ensuring quality education is prevalent. Expectations from students andadministration alike include the following factors: educational excellence, demonstratedcompetence, student-educator access, achievable and measurable learning goals and objectives,accountability, productivity, learning strategies that connect with real world experiences andstudents’ individual learning preferences, and applied theory into action. Further
conducted withina first-year engineering course at Purdue University. Students were required to create agraphical-user interface to communicate fundamental concepts of nanotechnology, including sizeand scale, to their peers. The final submissions of 30 teams were analyzed in this study throughgrounded theory. It was found that 27 teams presented content about scale and 12 teamspresented content about size. Methods to scaffold students’ learning of nanotechnology size andscale concepts are discussed.I. IntroductionThe mysterious world of nanoscale can stimulate young people’s imagination and ignite theirinterest in science and technology.1 Although students are motivated to learn aboutnanotechnology, the fundamental concepts are difficult for
(usually shortpapers) that communicates fundamental and current research and development both theoretical Page 15.656.2as well as application-oriented real world problems from science to technology. Broadly thetopics of interest include but not limited to: Mechatronics, Manufacturing, ProductionEngineering, Microengineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Transportation,Control Theory, Instrumentation, Automation, Remote Monitoring, Embedded Systems,Information Technology, Communication, Sensor Network, Software Engineering, ComputerScience, Soft-computing and Engineering Education.Dr. Jacqueline El-Sayed, Director of CETL and Professor
team together) were only taken on byAhmed and Eloise, while all other students avoided those responsibilities. This asymmetry inleadership and workload is particularly alarming because it occurred in the first-year course, andmay have significant consequences for subsequent courses and real-world team experiences. Thestudents who were not leaders within the team coasted off of the leaders’ efforts and enjoyed therewards, and may be likely to continue dumping their work onto leaders in future team scenarios.The leaders within the team may realize that they do not want to take on future leadership rolesas they result in heavier workload and more responsibility, all to get the same grades as theirnon-leading peers.Limitations and Future WorkThe
? We have studied undergraduate and faculty much more often than graduate life, and we need to assess each campus and identify problems, concerns and best practices. ≠ How do we gauge the success of post-doctorate programs and experiences? We need to do more to understand and communicate how to offer a successful post-doctorate experience, and how to recognize one when it is offered. ≠ What are the real career paths of women in engineering? Not all have “traditional” starts, and not many go straight through without stopping or pausing. ≠ We need more information on the career aspirations of women in engineering graduate programs. ≠ Interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary activities and relationships
mostvariable, based on how they mapped their courses and co-curricular experiences as contributingto these outcomes on Homework 2. Some students were pursuing a minor in business, acertificate in leadership, had taken upper-division electives in construction engineering andmanagement, and/or had real-world work experience. It seemed difficult to engage students inclass participation during these lectures. Students generally performed very well on the basicassignments related to these topics, as shown in Table 3. In 2015, the average grades earned oneach assignment were in the low 90s; the performance was somewhat weaker in 2016 on thepublic policy and business assignments with average scores in the upper 80s.Outcomes Assessment SummaryA comparison of
andhas regularly provided invaluable input. “The… AE Studio is unparalleled in the integration of form making and engineering de- sign within the academic studio setting. Each year the Studio provides students of both disciplines profound insights into the challenges of working with their soon to be profes- sional peers while designing a real world project. The hand-on experience further pre- pares the students for their divergent professional careers. I wish they taught like this everywhere.” Will Shepphird P.E., A.I.A., LEED AP BSCP Shepphird AssociatesJudson Taylor is a Senior Principal of one of the leading AE firms in the U.S. and has been aregular on the judging panel. "…. The
. Incorporating contentrelated to equity in engineering has been shown to support broadening participation, sinceminoritized students often pursue STEM degrees due to an interest in learning how to leveragetheir degree for positive social impact (e.g., [1] - [5]). A broadened view of what counts asengineering content is aligned with a sociotechnical view of engineering and educational effortsto authentically prepare students to address real-world engineering challenges (e.g., [1], [6] -[8]). While a sociotechnical view of engineering does not necessarily center equity, curricularand instructional efforts to integrate the social and technical dimensions of engineering affordopportunities to engage issues of equity as instructors seek to develop students
projects and tinker with ML/AI. However,those who are motivated to use technology to solve real-world problems may not have theopportunity to gain that experience or may not be interested in doing ML/AI side projects if thesocial impact is not realized. Prior work has revealed that women tend to value work with a sense ofpurpose [18], thus an overemphasis on technical projects and independent work can further alienatewomen. Further, students who work part-time or have other commitments at home may not have thetime to work on these side projects, perhaps creating a socio-economic gap in this field.Most participants described that social belonging confidence did not strongly influence theirintention to persist, inconsistent with previous studies in
been widelyapplied in K-12 research broadly, there is little known about the application of this frameworkspecifically in STEM contexts. As a first step in understanding this topic to direct future research,we focused on systematically understanding the application of this framework within STEMcontexts in secondary and post-secondary education.To answer this question, we first conducted a literature search on funds of knowledge generally.Results from multiple electronic databases, including Education Full Text (EBSCO) and Scopus,found one prior systematic review conducted on the framework. Hogg15 stated that, “the reviewwas informed by both systematic and narrative approaches to reviewing literature” (p. 668), andadded that making a
interpretive perspective based on an ontology of realism and an epistemology ofconstructionism. Realism as an ontology is the “belief that reality and its components existindependent of any consciousness”49(p113). In other words, there is a world that is real in whichwe, as people, interact with each other and with the components50. Constructionism states thatall knowledge, all meaningful reality, is based on human interaction with other human beings1 Along with Karabenick and Berger, many quantitative studies call out for more qualitative inquiry in order toexpand on questions left unanswered by other methods7,15,33,46,75,85–89.2 To aid in description, when “I” is used it refers to the primary investigator (PI) who performed the interviews, andwhen
theday, campers were able to see real world applications by viewing four different videos showcasingcommercial aquaponics farms around the world.Expected student outcomes are as follows:1. Students have a basic understanding of what aquaponics is and the environmental impact it can have on our planet.2. Students understand why monitoring water parameters is important and how to utilize different technologies to do that.3. Students gain exposure to the aquaponics industry and the profitability of utilizing this specific agritech innovation for sustainability.(3) ArchitectureThe Architecture minicamp was designed to give the students some background knowledge andskills in the fields of Drafting and Architecture, as well as the use of a