. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, and student autonomy. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded NSF CAREER and ILI grants. She is currently working on a collaborative NSF-funded Gender in Science and Engineering project investigating persistence of women in engineering undergraduate programs. Dr. Lord’s industrial experience includes AT
2006-352: RICH NETWORKS: EVALUATING UNIVERSITY-HIGH SCHOOLSPARTNERSHIPS USING GRAPH ANALYSISDonna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn is the Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technolgy. Donna received her doctorate from Cornell University in Operations Research and spent ten years on the faculty in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech. Her primary research interests now are in the educational domain, specifically improving access and equity in STEM disciplines for underrepresented groups. Donna is the PI of the NSF GK-12 grant, STEP.Gordon Kingsley, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr
the general (undesignated) engineeringprogram with a case study,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition Proceedings (CD-ROM, #1765, 9 pages),Nashville, Tennessee, June 22-25, 2003.4. Byron Newberry and James Farison, “A look at the past and present of general engineering and engineeringscience programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):217-226, July 2003.5. Jim Farison and Byron Newberry, “Curricular and student characteristics of accredited engineering/generalengineering programs,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Session 1471 (CD-ROM, 19 pages),Salt Lake City, Utah, June 13-25, 2004.6. John A. Weese, Edwin C. Jones and Sherra E. Kerns, “ASEE & ABET interactions and collaborations,”ASEE Annual Conference and
have offered advice regardingthis problem. Davis, for example, proposes that team teaching one integrated course results inthe best opportunity for interdisciplinary interactions. He states that “the greater the level ofintegration desired, the higher the level of collaboration required.”4 The course being discussedin this paper is team taught by professors from three separate disciplines - electrical, computer,and mechanical engineering. The changes to the course requirements are designed to increasethe level of integration. This paper will discuss results supporting Davis’ proposal that greaterlevels of integration achieve higher levels of interdisciplinary interaction. Furthermore, thepaper will test the hypothesis that a change to the
the students abigger picture of how they can be used, a portable data acquisition and logging system has beendesigned and implemented as a model rocket payload.Throughout the semester, as the theory and characteristics of various sensors are studied, theapplication of each to the rocket payload system is also discussed. Using the datasheets for eachof the sensors, the students convert the raw data into the desired measured quantity. The studentsalso determine the relationship between the quantities measured by each sensor (if there is any)to help collaborate and substantiate the recorded data. The significance of the data derived fromeach sensor in determining part of the rocket mission performance is also an important conceptof the exercise
2006-636: CHEATING IN COLLEGE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON ETHICALBEHAVIOR IN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING PRACTICETrevor Harding, Kettering University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Kettering University where he teaches courses in engineering materials and manufacturing. Dr. Harding's research interests include wear phenomenon in orthopeadic implants, ethical development in engineering undergraduates, and pedagogical innovations in environmental education. Currently, Trevor serves on the ERM Division Board of Directors and on the Kettering University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Advisory Board.Cynthia Finelli, University of
in order to solve problems that theyhave personally identified. Design thinking and iterative prototyping are key Maker activities [1],as is community collaboration, which often takes place at Maker Faires. In these fail-safeenvironments, Makers as young as eight years old feel comfortable pitching their ideas andreceiving constructive criticism on them from other Makers and the general public. Even outsideof these fairs, Makers rely on a strong learning ecology [2] with similar characteristics. In spacessuch as TechShop [3], Makers work on their projects alongside other Makers, providing aplatform for sharing skills, knowledge, and experience. Within these patterns of activity, Makersexhibit the ability to design solutions that require a
industry and government practice.Prof. James K. Mitchell, Virginia TechDr. Cristopher D. MoenMs. Victoria A Mouras P.E., Virginia Tech Associate Professor of Practice, P.E. Via Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Student Perceptions of Sustainability and Engineering Mechanics in Undergraduate Civil and Environmental Engineering Education at Virginia TechAbstractEngineering curricula across the U.S. have been undergoing changes in order to effectively trainengineers to address sustainability concerns. An important aspect of implementing curricularchange is having useful tools to evaluate their impact. In
used these surveys to measure how the demonstrations affected the students’application of concepts beyond identification of the concepts. Another key aspect of this work isthat we focused our efforts on students in engineering majors (such as industrial, chemical,biological, agricultural, petroleum, nuclear, and so on) who do not have as much exposure tomechanical systems as mechanical engineering majors. The key difference between such majorsand mechanical engineering majors is that for many of the students, there are no follow-onclasses beyond the freshman physics mechanics course, so many of them take this statics classseveral semesters later.Our technique was implemented in several class sections with approximately 400 total students.In
means that successful graduates will encompass the designmindset needed to be creative, innovative, flexible, adaptive, curious and imaginative problemsolvers [2]. Civil engineering programs are responding to shifting industry requirements as wellas revised ABET student outcomes, including “an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge asneeded using appropriate learning strategies.” Engineering education, in general, may strive tomore closely represent the complexity and ill-defined nature of real world problems bypresenting case studies, open-ended problems, and other activities that bridge multipledisciplines [3]. Teaching-learning frameworks which offer greater exposure to the complexitiesof real world engineering, such as experiential
Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, he was an Adjunct Professor in the Computer Science Electrical Engineering department at the University of Missouri – Kansas City. Before beginning his academic career, he spent 31 years in industry as a manager and software developer and consultant.Dr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas.Christopher Patrick
: https://www.cna.org/pop-rep/2017/appendixb/b_30.html[11] J. R. Thelin, A history of American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.[12] S. D. Angrist, "The effect of veterans benefits on education and earnings," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 46, pp. 637-652, 1993.[13] C. B. Rumann and F. Hamrick, A., "Student veterans in transition: Re-enrolling after war zone deployments," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 431-458, 2010.[14] (2012). The Post 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Post 9/11 G.I. Bill): Primer and issues. Available: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc122262/m1/1/high_res_d/R427 55_2012Sep21.pdf[15
that are testing for lead. In Leon County School District, hometo 34,000 students, tests began in 2016 through a collaboration initiated by researchers at one ofthe local universities. Their lead testing plan and results were shared via that district’s waterquality website. Across the Tampa bay, the Pinellas School District, responsible for 150 schools,started a lead testing program in 2016.Based on personal communication with Florida State University faculty leading testing in LeonCounty, there will be calls for installation of water filters on kitchen faucets and water fountainsin all Florida schools.This local wicked problem resonated with students as many attended the schools in the districtand some had young children who attend or are
build large-scale indoor navigation system, which has been transferred into a startup company - Ziiio. He has extensive software industry experi- ences on building large-scale mobile, cloud, embedded and IoT systems. He worked as the Director of Engineering at Cloudpoint Labs, where he led the research and development on the infrastructure of the high-precision 3D augmented reality technology for mobile platforms; He also worked in Amazon Web Services as a software engineer and participated in the development of the world’s first cloud-based mo- bile web browser for Amazon Kindle Fire tablet. Recently, he founded SoftCom Lab in Computer Science Department to organize students on research and startup projects
materials, this research informs the design of new processes and products, with the goals of protecting human and environmental health. Dr. Meunier works in collaboration industrial and academic experts involved in various aspects of inter- disciplinary environmental engineering research. Dr. Meunier is also involved in engineering education research; her interests include improving problem-solving and resilience abilities in engineering students, and incorporating innovative teaching approaches in the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Aligning the chemical engineering curriculum to a common problem-solving strategy
Engineering at Purdue Uni- versity. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interest includes big-data health analytics. He is actively in collaborating with international partners to enhance American engineering students’ global learning.Mrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea
Science and Technology of China. Dr. Meehan became chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the California State University, Chico in 2017. She is actively involved in the development of mobile hands-on pedagogy as well as research on other topics in STEM education, the synthesis and characterization of nanoscale materials, and fermentation processes.Dr. Kevin Buffardi, California State University, Chico Dr. Buffardi is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at California State University, Chico. After gaining industry experience as a specialist in usability and human factors engineering, he earned a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Virginia Tech. His research concentrates on software engineering
teams are common across engineering schools world-wide. Theseteams provide leadership opportunities for students as well as hands on learning that can bemissing from the classroom. The teams provide an opportunity for students to gain valuableexperience during their engineering education.These teams can have a large influence on student success post-graduation. Students who excelon project teams are able to network with industry professionals at competition events, duringsponsorship activities, and while seeking mentorship and guidance. These contacts are often keyfor finding high impact careers after graduation.The culture on student project teams can vary widely. While some teams intentionally focus onbeing welcoming and inclusive of all
, such as a sophomore-levelproject-based course that provides the foundation for successful teamwork, professional ethics,design processes, and professional formation as a civil engineer. Project materials for this courseare provided by industry partners (e.g., data, plans, construction estimates, stakeholder input andfeedback), which are being developed into project case studies that can be integrated horizontallyand vertically into coursework to showcase how a component analysis fits within a largersystem. (See related paper being presented at this conference [1].) Cultural transformationincludes flexible departmental structures, for example replacing the current structure oforganizing faculty around sub-disciplines and instead organizing
mathematics from Florida State University. His current interests include 3D-printing, active learning, and infusing more physical activity into mathematics courses. Recent grant positions include principal investigator on the NSF-funded grant ”EAGER: MAKER: Engaging Math Students with 3D-Printing for STEM Success and co-PI on the NSF-funded grant ”Collaborative Research: Improving Representational Competence by Engaging with Physical Modeling in Foundational STEM Courses”.Dr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. He holds dual B.S. degrees in Industrial Technology Education and Civil and Environmental
andOctober administrations in pencil/paper format, to year-round delivery as a computer-based test[8]. This change, among other things, relaxed our students’ preparation schedule for the FEExam. Simultaneously – noting that Texas Tech University does not require its engineeringstudents take the FE Exam – we observed a significant drop in the percentage of CE exam takersfrom 98 percent (1997 to 2011) to about 80 percent (2015 to 2019).Figure 2. Example of “Original” CE 4200 Course Schedule, Fall 2013 Anecdotally the reason for the drop in FE exam takers was because many of our CEstudents were entering the workforce in construction and other industries where licensure is notstrongly emphasized. Collectively these trends did not align well with
potential of the modality to increase access and eliminateboundaries to education in fields. Some studies additionally suggest that online courses may beof comparatively higher interest when compared to face-to-face courses among women and non-traditional students (e.g., [2-3]). Together, this research demonstrates the potential of onlineeducation to fulfill calls from industry, government, and academia to increase the number andtype of students who choose to pursue engineering higher education [4], and yet, the acceptanceand adoption of online learning in the field of engineering have generally been slower. Barriersinclude the difficulty of replicating hands-on activities in an online environment and a skepticismabout the approach to properly
from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics
thermal effects, all at a scale thatstudents can see, touch, or hear the physical phenomena being investigated.Among the research questions that are being addressed several stand out: 1. Which topics have the greatest potential for enhancing educational outcomes through hands-on learning? 2. What is the impact of the experiments on student performance, on student interest and confidence in the subject matter, and on long-term retention of the knowledge? 3. Do these experiments have a positive impact on students from underrepresented groups in terms of performance, student interest, and retention? 4. Since hands-on education is often associated with collaboration and group work, what are the best practices for impromptu
on computer systems and applications, networking, communication systems, along with digital, analog, and machine-control electronics. He is the recipient of the 2013 Golden Apple Award for Teaching Excellence at Eastern and has been nominated multiple times for the Critical Thinking Teacher of the Year Award. His professional interests include implementing active teaching and learning strategies, metacognition, integrating open-source software/hardware with online control, and deploying electrical and telecom technologies in community-based organizations. He is always seeking opportunities for collaborating on teaching, scholarly, and service projects, especially those aimed at improving students’ critical
curriculum.An approach to enhance spatial thinking or spatial reasoning skills is learning three-dimensional(3D) modeling [4]. 3D modeling involves several steps and design decisions to make sure that afeasible design is made. Learning 3D modeling is supposed to not only enhance students’ designdecisions but also improve their spatial thinking ability. With the proliferation of consumer-level3D printing, Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR), there is a sparked interestamong educators to teach 3D modeling using tools like Tinkercad in formal and informal settings[5], [6]. An additional benefit of 3D modeling knowledge is the career path it opens. Severalcompanies and industries are in the need for 3D designers for a variety of projects
similarinterventions. The guide was developed based in part on input from Qin Zhu, our Chinese co-author, collaborator, and expert on Confucian philosophy and culture. We also drew insightsfrom Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions theory [33]. As noted above, further evidence regardingthe effectiveness of each response option through rating data collected from SMEs (n=14) whowere not Chinese but had worked extensively in Chinese contexts and/or with Chinese contacts.Interpretation of Scenario Based on Culture and ContextIn Chinese culture, the concept of an individual person is historically very different fromAmerican and other Western conceptions [34]. Rather than seeing persons as largely autonomousand individualistic, Chinese culture has long tended to see a
composed of 4” or 6” Popsicle Sticks. 2. 0%-30% of the Model can be composed of other materials, such as: Arts & Craft Materials (LEGOS). Machine parts or tools. Rocks, wood, and other objects from nature. Cardboard, wooden blocks, clay, etc.The purpose of the Model was to provide students with the opportunity to use their imaginationsto visualize a problem in such detail that they can build a physical model representing the problemand solution [4, 8, 9].(3) Third, students were required to develop a PowerPoint Presentation on the Assignment [8].Course Learning Objectives and the CPS AssignmentThe course, OLS 35000 (Creativity in Business and Industry), had 5
individually madecreations. The projects and skills in the build group were discussed informally each week by thefaculty member in context of working in laboratories, internships, or student organizations acrossa variety of engineering majors, but also through personal building experience stories from thefaculty member related to basic household maintenance skills.Students sat in groups of 4 each week, and they discussed & collaborated together, but when itcame time to build students each individually used the tools to complete projects and were ableto each keep projects they made during the build sessions. Student seating in groups of 4 wasprimarily used based of the combination of space and workbenches available in the maker-spaceclassroom. Each
Biological Engineering at the Pennsyl- vania State University. He received B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Engineering and has 9 years industrial experience and 17 years academic experience. He has produced over 130 publications and 8 patents. Dr. Catchmark’s research focuses on polysaccharide composite materials as a sustainable barrier mate- rial/adhesive alternative to synthetic polymers for packaging, food handling, and construction materials. His work on biomaterals production also intersects with healthcare, tissue engineering and food engi- neering. He also conducts research on cellulose and nanocrystalline cellulose formation and production, particularly from bacteria. Finally, Dr. Catchmark is a Faculty Fellow of the