Page 13.1264.7the Intelligent Ships Symposium (ISS) VII held at Drexel University in May 07, where studentsdisplayed their Sea Perch, presented their accomplishments to an audience of over 300 engineersand scientists, and interacted with engineers and exhibitors displaying their technology.Distinguished, senior level naval engineers and scientists were awestruck to hear a group ofmiddle school students address the large, technical audience as each student articulated his or herrole in designing and building their Sea Perch. There is no better demonstration of value of theprogram in motivating and educating youth. Audience members were so impressed that theyasked to schedule a Q&A session with the students in a separate room so the dialogue
collaborating faculty developed a linked assignment in a general education chemistrycourse and an upper-level technical writing course. The goals of our collaboration were to fosterstudents’ control, awareness and demonstration of learning, improve student informationliteracy, and cultivate students’ negotiations with team members. We use the term “distributedcognition” to describe virtual interactions among students that led to fulfilling the goals of thelinked assignment. Students’ information literacy skills “funded” the pool of knowledge forstudent teams to access as they address the problems posed by their assignment to build apresentation.DefinitionsInformation literacy (also known as information fluency) is an umbrella concept
], involving gatheringstudent perceptions of the value of the interactive student-led sessions, where students respondon a 7-point scale (1 = “Not valuable at all” to 7 = “Highly valuable). The full survey instrumentas it was administered on the Qualtrics survey platform is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Survey items for student ratings and reflections of interactive ethics assignments.The survey is based on the Bandura’s general self-efficacy scale and was validated for use inmeasuring self-efficacy in engineering design by Carberry and colleagues [13]. The surveyinvolved students choosing a value from 1 to 7. An individual who perceives that the approachis of high value to learning ethics, was able to increase their understanding of ethical issues
serve as a professional development tool for the writers. As such, itprovided background and content knowledge necessary for properly completing each section aswell as additional resources in the form of hyperlinks and references.The third session focused on quality rubric generation based on the research of Marzano andBrown and Arter and Chappuis.33, 34 The goal of the session was to equip team members with anunderstanding of generating a four point rubric for their curriculum. Participants were providedguidance on what their curriculum rubrics were to assess as well as reference material oncreating quality rubrics, and general objective/measurable vocabulary. Days later the curriculumwas submitted to the Principal Investigator for a technical
sets based onresearch into the interview subject’s career. The training also provides an understanding of thelogistics of conducting a technically satisfactory interview, the post interview processing of thetape into a finished transcript, and the legal requirements for transfer of intellectual propertyrights. These procedures follow the best practices established by the Oral History Association.11Reviewing student-generated questions is much like reviewing a first draft of any student work.Read carefully, and give constructive criticism, not only offering suggestions for improvement,but more importantly explaining why. A good set of questions is a prerequisite for a qualityinterview. These questions must strike a balance between questions
American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Mobile Teaching: Merging Smart Phones, Cloud, and Desktop to Achieve Content- specific Instruction in a Generic EnvironmentAbstractMany educational institutions face a similar problem today: the necessity to reorganize teachingand lab space to improve facility utilization. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical StatueUniversity (NCA&T) made the difficult decision to eliminate dedicated labs and classrooms forcontent-specific instruction. Labs and classrooms previously equipped with private networks andcustom operating systems were replaced with a single large classroom equipped with thin
impactful programs and services for the Hispanic STEM community.Liliana Gonz´alez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Liliana is dedicated to collaborating with families through shared learning communities. As a program manager at SHPE, she leads transformative initiatives aimed at equipping families of first-generation college students with tools to support their children’s STEM journey. Liliana specializes in program design, implementation, and scaling, with a focus on operationalizing initiatives and facilitating engaging sessions and events. She holds a Master of Public Administration from the University of Texas - Permian Basin and a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Houston. Her
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 26665. Leiserson, Charles, and Masi, Barbara, and Resto, Chris, and Yue, Richard, “Development of Engineering Professional Abilities in a Co-curricular Program for Engineering Sophomores,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, Session 3561 Page 11.22.19 Appendix 1 Part-Time Student Survey InstrumentOctober 10, 2005Currently I am writing a paper for American Society for Engineering Education also knows
research. The students in the proposed undergraduate research programwere recruited from student organizations and success programs at the University of Texas atAustin that predominately target first-generation and/or socioeconomically disadvantagedstudents. The program bookends the research experience with a lecture series at the start and aresearch conference at the end. The lectures are an instructional component designed to providestudents with the skills to write a research question, create effective search strings, andcommunicate technical subject matter. The lecture series springboards students into a researchexperience where they are matched with a graduate student or faculty member that will mentorthem on their research. Thus, this work
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Improving engineering-student retention via the UC Davis LEADR program Ralph C. Aldredge, PhD, PE1 and Tanya D. Culliver-Whitlow, MA College of Engineering, University of California, DavisAbstract:The impact of the Leadership in Engineering Advancement, Diversity and Retention (LEADR) Program onthe retention of engineering undergraduates at UC Davis is evaluated. First-year retention rates for first-generation, female and URM program participants are found to be higher than those for their non-LEADRengineering undergraduate counterparts, while positive program impact on retention is found generallyto
time. Over 1400 data sets have beencollected and analyzed. Within this paper the components of the analysis software are discussedalong with some results from data analysis.A Brief Introduction to Concept Maps Concept maps are a way of graphically representing the underlying components of a Page 15.1349.2particular field or subfield or, more generally, knowledge [1]. The concepts are enclosed incircles or boxes and lines or arrows linking the boxes indicate the relationship that existsPage 15.1349.3learners. Through the formation of each learner’s concept map, one can see the links andunderlying structure the learner has formed and
paper assesses theassignment, and reports the results of these student explorations.Specifically, this paper addresses the research questions: 1) Can students identify stakeholderconsiderations in the design of elements of the campus built environment? 2) What designelements of the campus built environment are students most likely to notice and discuss? 3)What human and non-human stakeholder groups are students most likely to notice and discuss?1.2 Course ContextThis assignment was given as part of the two-semester first-year general engineering program atVirginia Tech, which all engineering students must complete before selecting a specific major.This program serves over 2000 students each year, and feeds into 14 discipline majors. In thefirst
evaluate the impact of the REU experience on the technical and developmental skills of the students.• Evaluation of REU activities to measure the level of satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the program to students, acknowledging that such perceived usefulness may not show up for several years.• Evaluation of the projects: At the end of each 10-week session, feedback will be collected from the students, the faculty members and the industrial mentors to evaluate the appropriateness of individual projects for undergraduate research. Reports on undergraduate research in general and REU sites in particular, highlight both the difficulty and importance of project selection on the success of an undergraduate research
% Technical writing 2 22% Computer software 2 22% Knowledge of STEM careers 2 22% Teaching 1 11% Leadership / Mentoring 1 11% Hardware troubleshooting 1 11%one student, “It also helps advance the research because some of the questions asked lead theresearcher to investigate other things that they themselves had not thought of.”Students reported meeting with members of the other thrust groups to hear about their researchand/or collaborate less frequently (generally once a month) but found these
codeblocks as preparation for actual coding. Recruitment Strategy Generalized over both semesters 1 2 3 4 5 Connect with Email graduate Hold instructor Behind-the- Finalize list of students who Bioengineering interest meeting scenes paperwork students who will have cleararances students about and gather names
they want andcustomize the course offerings to match student interests.Ultimately, we found, to no surprise, that students are interested inthese topics. Still, if we only talk about them using examples of disastersor catastrophes, students will associate only the negatives with theseconversations. Suppose students are told of and can experience throughtheir discussions the benefits of being ethical engineers, scientists,students, and people in general by using ideas that affect them moreclosely. In that case, they are more interested in the conversation. 16 Related Publications 1. Using the Boeing Max Air Disaster
Peterson from theUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs. 1 WARM UP • How do you define STEM identity? • Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity of undergraduate women? • Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEM identity among undergraduate women?To begin, how do you define STEM identity?Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity ofundergraduate women?Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEMidentity among
more motivated because they can recognize their ability touse technical skills to change people’s lives. In general, understanding how physics affects 3D objects has been necessary for me as I am working on a prosthetic project for one of my clubs right now and need to have the necessary tools to figure out how to make that work for the patient. I am excited, as in general this class has expanded my mindset on how things work and allow me to remember why I wanted to be an engineer in the first place. I was looking forward to being able to fight for social justice, and this is the first class that really takes into account the real world applications of the technical skills that we learn. I don't want
something in theenvironment rather than the student or their preparation is the root cause. Admissions statistics for students at participating institution. 8 We identified a first-year programming course with an equity gap in BLI students’ academic performance.Figure 1. Normalized GPA differences on a 4.0 scale for BLI students (left) and women(right) controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, first-generation college student status, HSGPA, and instructor. 9 Prior work on belonging interventions demonstrate significant impact
Undergraduate Education. Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs*S-STEM Active Awards “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further develop the infrastructure needed to generate and disseminate new knowledge, successful practices and effective design principles arising from NSF S-STEM projects nationwide.”Source: NSF NSF 23-536 3Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs* “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further
regarding their wellbeing. The findings on the lack of perceived support areorganized by departmental and university-level influences. The students also identify areasfor improvement that have posed barriers to their awareness and utilization of universitysupports and services and to their overall wellbeing. The method of soliciting studentperspectives has implications for institutions wanting to examine their own practices andpolicies in order to better support students’ whole selves.Keywords: wellbeing, student support, undergraduate, student experience, studentperception, thematic analysis1. BackgroundHigher education is dealing with a mental health crisis [1]. According to the 2019 ACHA-National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA II
own experiences after acquiring disabilities during college, Jamie delved into research on the challenges faced by students with disabilities entering higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Slide 1 Cutting the Curb for Students with Disabilities Transitioning to Higher Education S eth Vuletich Br ianna Buljung Jam ie ReganBefore we begin, we want to acknowledge that accessibility is a broad and expansive field thatis constantly changing. Despite best efforts to learn about the field and support accessibleresources, we are not aware of all accessibility concerns but
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
Department at Virginia Tech and an M.S. student in the Virginia Tech – Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Engineering. She received her Bachelors of Science in Bioengineering from Clemson University. She was previously an undergraduate research assistant in Clemson University’s Engineering and Science Education Department. Her research interests include undergraduate research experiences, broadening participation in engineering, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a
, BakersfieldAisha Farra ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Examining how Graduate Advisors in STEM Support Mental Health among Black and Latinx Graduate Women Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Stephanie Marando-Blanck1, Angela Wang1, Aisha Farra1, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj2, and Aishwarya Shridhar1 1 University of Massachusetts Boston 2 California State University BakersfieldIntroduction It is well known that Women of Color (WOC) navigate an onslaught of
resourcesor knowledge to implement these concepts fully in their curriculum. In addition, Wang’s [27]exploration of the perceived divide between DEI pedagogy and technical rigor amongstengineering faculty points to a need for a better understanding of whether engineering facultyrecognize DEIJ concepts as components within the engineering curriculum and, if so, how theseconcepts connect with other engineering content.Research questionsThe purpose of this exploratory study was to compare the relevance faculty members fromRowan University’s College of Engineering and College of Education place on DEIJ concepts aspart of their curriculum by addressing the following research questions: 1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part
participation in STEM graduate programs and research. Open to 3rd and 4th year undergraduates, masters, and 1st and 2nd year PhD students, this program: • Helps students frame their research • Prepares students to apply for external grants and fellowships • Provides support to workshop manuscripts for publications • Participants attend monthly sessions led by subject-matter experts and administrators during the spring semester. During the summer semester students receive 1:1 support for applications or manuscripts.The FSA is a new initiative which evolved out of several iterations of support forgraduate students designed to prepare students to secure external
other academicinstitutions to develop effective targeted programming.1. Introduction1.1 Existing demographics of STEMHistorically and currently, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fieldshave been characterized by a lack of diversity, with limited representation from variousdemographic groups [1-6]. Although the workforce has become more diverse in recent years,there are still significant disparities in the representation of women, racial minorities, and otherhistorically underrepresented demographics [2,7-9]. Within the US, the dominance of White menin STEM flourished due to legal barriers that prevented access for other groups until the 1960s[2,7-9]. This domination has been institutionalized through a range of laws and
practices whilenavigating their graduate programs. I discuss the findings as they relate to concepts in literatureand my own auto-ethnographic experience. I also provide researchers, students, faculty, staff,and policy makers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) academiawith recommendations. Finally, I present the research community with areas for furtheracademic study.IntroductionProblemThere is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to graduate students with disabilities. Publicationsregarding the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of this population are scarce. Similarly,little is known about the retention and graduation rates of graduate students with disabilities [1],[2]. More generally, there is a gap in knowledge
culture of engineering.Action-Oriented Education and Organizing as Beyond ReformsBowen et al. [34] formed the Undergraduate Engineering Collaborative Growth Series (UECGS),seeking to “design a program for marginalized engineering students that reduced barriers to theexpression of their whole selves, including the value of their identities within the engineeringeducational space” [p. 1]. This was done through four two-hour workshops in addition to a seriesof one-on-one feedback and coaching sessions to provide participants reflective space to discussthe series itself and how it connected to other components of participants’ lives. The firstworkshop consisted of focus groups on naming barriers within and relating to engineering thatthey perceive