Threaten US Economic Leadership?” NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy. 2005. 4. Program Solicitation NSF 07-576, Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP). National Science Foundation Directorate for Education & Human Resources Division of Graduate Education. November, 2006. 5. R. Monastersky “The Real Science Crisis: Bleak Prospects for Young Researchers”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. September 21, 2007. 6. 2005 – 2006 Tuition and Fees at Virginia’s State-Supported Colleges & Universities. State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, July, 2005. 7. A. Rugarcia, R. Felder, D. Woods, and J. Stice, “The Future of Engineering Education: A Vision for a New Century”. Chemical Engineering
. They rated itsimportance to their colleagues, department heads, deans, and top institutional administratorssignificantly lower, with the averages ranging from 5.1 to 5.6. Their ratings of the importance ofeffective and innovative teaching in the reward system were still lower—3.7 and 3.5,respectively. Significant differences in ratings were found by gender, primary academic function(teaching, teaching/research, and administration), involvement in SUCCEED, rank, and CarnegieFoundation classification of the institutions. All significant changes from 1997 to 1999 were inthe negative direction. Our conclusion is that while SUCCEED’s faculty development effortshave had noteworthy positive effects in changing faculty instructional practices, much
their paper, “How important is effectiveteaching to engineering faculty and administrators?” Brawner, et.al. [4] studied the responses offaculty who were asked about teaching. They report; “In 1999, the survey respondents rated theimportance of effective teaching to themselves very high, averaging 6.5 on a 7.0 scale. Theyrated its importance to their colleagues, department heads, deans, and top institutionaladministrators significantly lower, with the averages ranging from 5.1 to 5.6. Their ratings of theimportance of effective and innovative teaching in the reward system were still lower—3.7 and3.5, respectively. Significant differences in ratings were found by gender, primary academicfunction (teaching, teaching/research, and administration
., Twombly, S. B., Wolf-Wendel, L. E., “Innovative Linkages: two urban community colleges andan elite private liberal arts college, Community College Review, Winter, 2001. Page 13.263.8
AC 2008-1457: INCORPORATING A LEARNING COMMUNITY APPROACH TOENHANCE A FUEL CELL RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR UNDERGRADUATES(REU)Cortney Martin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Cortney V. Martin has worked in information design, pedagogy, and education for over 15 years including serving as the Assistant Director of the Blacksburg Electronic Village and the Broadband Wireless Networking Director for Virginia Tech. She teaches as a part of an innovative interdisciplinary thematic four-course sequence focused on Earth Sustainability and serves as the Research Coordinator for a fuel cell REU program. Her PhD is in Industrial Engineering (human factors) from Virginia Tech.Brandy
for $99.Not having available necessary resources he puts togethera team of unassigned (read: difficult to deal with personalities) employees and partially succeedsonly to see his effort stolen away by his envious boss, who trapped him to sign a non-exclusivepatent waiver. Neverheless, the team does not give up and comes up with a number ofbreakthrough solutions (eliminating the need for hard drive, RAM, and other peripherals). Aprototype is created, but it crashes, is ugly and the price is still too high. More innovations areneeded and the team stands up to the task, creating a computer operated by virtual glove and newlook designed by the next-door artist.Issues for class discussion: entrepreneurship, creativity, diversity, leadership
Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, SanDiego, October 28–31, 2006.[4] Edward Gehringer, Luke Ehresman, Susan G. Conger, and Prasad Wagle Reusable learning objects through peerreview: The Expertiza approach, Innovate: Journal of Online Education 3:5, June/July 2007EDWARD F. GEHRINGEREdward Gehringer is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science and the Department ofElectrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. He has been a frequent presenter ateducation-based workshops in the areas of computer architecture and object-oriented systems. His research interestsinclude architectural support for memory management, garbage collection, and computer-supported collaborativework. He received a B.S. from the
foster continuous improvement in both professor and studentperformance above and beyond program assessment. This technique includes analysis ofcourse learning outcomes and planning for specific actions to narrow the gap betweenacademic expectations and measured student performance. The teaching cycle has foursequential phases built on deliberate process improvement planning, quality classroominstruction, course (student) assessments, and evaluation to adjust and respond to definedneeds. Equally applicable for individual lessons, for blocks of instruction, or for an over-arching total course assessment, repetitive application of the cycle sequentially plansimprovements, implements innovative initiatives, verifies results, and takes
innovative reforms; and (3) a reformed curriculum and teachingmodel that will not only benefit students in EP but will also benefit students in other engineeringand science degree programs at UW.20The cornerstone to a successful launch of a student into a research project is a new coursedesigned for the EP degree program, EP 468 Introduction to Engineering Research (the first in aseries of four courses in the research sequence). In this one-credit course students are introducedto issues in the context of research. An outline of the syllabus from a recent offering of thecourse is given in Table 1. The main objectives of EP 468 are to provide: (1) content knowledgerelevant to the conduct of research, apart from specific technical skills, (2) a
. Hart, B.G., et al., “Calculus Retention Program for Students at Risk in Engineering,” Proc. 25th AnnualFrontiers in Education Conf., 1995, v.1, pp. 74 – 78.6. Heinze, L.R., Gregory, J.M., Rivera, J., “Math Readiness: The Implications for Engineering Majors,” Proc. 33rdFrontiers in Education Conf., Westminster, CO, 2003, v. 3, pp. S1D13 - S1D17.7. Mathias, J, et al., “Improved Retention Through Innovative Academic and Non-Academic Programs,” Proc.114th ASEE Annual Conf. And Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.8. Stewardson, G., et al., “Work in Progress – Improving the Freshman Engineering Experience,” Proc. 34thAnnual Frontiers in Education Conf., Savannah, GA, 2004, v1, pp. T1F1 – T1F2.9. Stiller, A., Wallace, V., and McConnell, R., “Incorporating
) innovative, like theories and meanings); visual learners (like visual presentation: vs. verbal learners (prefer written and --pictures, diagrams, flow charts) spoken explanations); inductive learners (prefer presentations vs. deductive learners (prefer presentations proceeding from specific to general) that go from general to specific); active learners (learn by trying things vs. reflective learners (learn by thinking out, working with others) things through, working alone); global learners (holistic, systems vs. sequential learners (linear, orderly, Page 13.958.2
References[1] Botkin, J. W., Elmandjra, M., & Malitza, M. (1979). No Limits to Learning: Bridging the Human Gap. Oxford, England: Pergamon.[2] Duff, J. C. (1964). Creative teaching in colleges and universities: The importance of effective instructional techniques. Journal of Higher Education, Vol.35. pp. 154-157.[3] Kuznetsov, H. (2002). Technology-Based Innovative Teaching Methods. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB Colloquium.[4] Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Converational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd Ed.) New York: Routledge Falmer.[5] Leistyna, P., Woodrum, A., & Sherblom, S. (1996). Breaking Free: The transformative Power of Critical Pedagogy
engineeringprogram is not new1,2. Prince and Felder3 reviewed over a hundred studies addressing theassessment of various teaching strategies and concluded that “inquiry learning” and“problem-based learning” were generally more effective than others. The engineeringeducation literature provides many examples of this type of learning through “hands-on”or “learning-by-doing” projects. In fact many schools have introduced innovative“hands-on” activities and hardware into their freshman courses4-11, their sophomorecourses in mechanics12-20 and thermodynamics21-27 as well as in other engineeringcourses28-35, “non-majors” courses36, 37 and high school courses38-40.We introduced a sophomore design course, including a semester-long, team design, buildand test
Pennsylvania’s Future1 stated that ‘manufacturing remains anessential element of PA’s economy, contributing $64 billion annually to the Gross State Product. Thisis by far the largest share of any sector.’ Governor Rendell’s Manufacturing Work Group publishedadditional findings in which business leaders reported that innovation and workforce investment wereamong the seven most important challenges facing PA manufacturing. The findings of a 2005 NAMSkills Gap2 reinforced previous manufacturing labor shortage reports by stating … ‘90 percent ofrespondents indicated a moderate to severe shortage of qualified skilled production employees. Theseskills shortages are having a widespread impact on manufacturers’ abilities to achieve productionlevels, increase
course, Emerging Trends inECE, which provides general advice about the options available in ECE. Sophomores are alsoassigned a faculty advisor who helps them identify the direction they want to take in theircurriculum. At the end of their sophomore year, they are assigned a faculty mentor in their field Figure 3. A Wiki page for undergraduates to learn about an area of ECE.of interest to give them more specific guidance about course selection and career planning.We are currently implementing a new innovation in student advising, a web-based Wiki area inwhich students will find information about all kinds of options in ECE. Faculty provideinformation about career options as well as what courses students should take if they want
Jersey, 07030 Work telephone: 201-216-5504; E-mail: dmerino@ stevens.edu.Jakob Carnemark, SKANSKA Jakob Carenmark is the head of SKANSKA's Mission Critical Center of Excellance (COE). Jakob developed this team to showcase SKANSKA's expertise in constructing Mission Critical facilities and to share best practices among various regions. Within this CEO team, Jacob leads some of the most creative and innovative minds in the data center construction industry. Mr. Carnemark has a degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Virginia, as well as 25 years of experience. His expertise covers all aspects of construction and enables him to provide meaningful and accurate insight to a project. His
, elementary teachers inNew Jersey are receiving professional development in innovative, research-based, science andengineering curricula; classroom-based technical and pedagogical support; and ongoing coachingand mentoring. Two universities, a science center, and a teacher education institution arecollaborating on delivering project services to schools. The program is strengthening the sciencecontent knowledge of 56 Grade 3-5 teachers in six urban districts in northern New Jersey.Preliminary findings from the pre and post tests of experimental group teachers indicate thatparticipants significantly increased their content knowledge in specific life science topics andconcepts involving the engineering design process. A study between the experimental
and the lack of transparency and simplicity were real concerns. 2. Real options is a new economy tool. It did not help the cause that Enron was considered an innovative user of real options. 3. Real options only work for tradable assets. A common objection to options analysis was that it does not work when the underlying asset is not a tradable commodity. 4. Real options discount management realities. Critics said that because real options do not expire like financial options do, managers can not be counted on to abandon a project when they should.Block27 surveyed 1,000 companies to see if they had adopted real options. Of the 279respondents, only 14% were currently using real options. Of the 40 users of real
might include the degree requirement of a project, ‚ the assurance of sufficient enrollment in courses on a regular basis, ‚ the establishment of an equitable reward system for faculty members who advise students or serve on graduate committees, and ‚ the development of certificate option in systems engineering.References 1. Council of Graduate Schools, “NDEA 21: A Renewed Commitment to Graduate Education.” Washington DC, November 2005. 2. Council of Graduate Schools, “Graduate Education: The Backbone of American Competitiveness and Innovation,” Washington DC, April 2007. 3. W. Whiteman and B. Mathews, “Is It Real or Is It Memorex: A Distance Learning Experience,” Proceedings of the
to create computer definition that was fed into the CAD/CAMsystem has been described in the 1989 SME publication2.A more recent technological innovation has made it possible for obtaining the geometrical datadirectly from a real life object by scanning it with a laser beam. Though there are fundamentaldifferences among the 3-D scanners made by different manufacturers, all of them first make Page 13.991.2multiple scans (up to 10 or more) of the solid object from different angles and align them withthe help of a software to produce three dimensional object definition in the computer in a varietyof file formats. One of the most widely acceptable
AC 2008-998: A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO ENGINEERING “ECONOMICS”Steve Walter, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne (Eng) Steve earned his Bachelors of Science degree in Physics at the University of Maryland and his Masters and Doctorate in Physics at the University of Colorado in Boulder. After graduating, he was hired by the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) where he developed new and innovative microwave, millimeter-wave and submillimeter-wave remote sensing systems. In 2000, he joined Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems where he served in a variety of systems engineering and program management roles. In 2006 he moved to Fort Wayne, Indiana to accept the position as the
ISU was awarded a 5 year NSF ADVANCEgrant after three years of planning and preparation. The goal of the NSF ADVANCE program isto increase the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineeringcareers. This aim of this goal is to contribute to the larger strategic goal of cultivating a world-class, broadly inclusive science and engineering workforce.7 The ADVANCE award to ISU is an“Institutional Transformation” award, rather than a PAID (Partnership for Adaptation,Implementation and Dissemination) award and as such demands an innovative andcomprehensive program for institution-wide change. NSF has awarded ADVANCE grants to 32institutions in three “rounds”, beginning with the first 9 in 2001. An NSF ADVANCE
participation, and project work are summarized in Table 1.Aqua Terra Tech (ATT) is one of several groups in University X’s innovative Enterprise Program(www.enterprise.mtu.edu). ATT works on water projects, simulates a small engineering consultingfirm and provides three years of experience to students, from their sophomore to senior years.The International Sustainable Development Engineering Certificate is a new academic program,which officially started in September 2007. This program requires a flexible set of twenty-twosemester hours of coursework focusing on social, economic, and environmental sustainability andculminating in an international senior design project.International Senior Design (ISD) is a six semester hour sequence that requires design
innovations andapplications of fuel cells in transportation vehicles, biomedicine, and industrial and domesticpower generation. It discusses technologic issues of fuel cells, and presents trends, forecasts andimpact of this technology in areas of energy generation, conservation and the environment.Students are required to complete a design projectHybrid Vehicles Technology and Design: This course imparts the science and technology ofElectric Vehicles (EV) and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV). It covers the mechanics, power and Page 13.1211.6propulsion of vehicles for terrestrial transportation. It discusses fundamentals and design ofbatteries, fuel
and baccalaureate degree programs. It further makes use ofthe format currently used by ASAC and includes the language from the Sydney and Dublinaccords. The proposal would, as above, modify Criterion 3 and Criterion 5 as follows:Criterion 3. Program OutcomesFor purposes of this section, broadly-defined activities are those that involve a variety ofresources, that could require resolution between competing entities, that involve the use of newprocesses, materials, or techniques in innovative ways, and that require knowledge of standardoperating procedures. Well-defined activities are those that involve limited resources, that couldpossibly require limited resolution, that involve the use of existing processes and materials innew ways, and that
they our best bet, CO-OP opportunities, Employment opportunities, Experiential Learning Programs (ELP), Jobs are still available; High School Initiatives, Recruitment of students - How do we recruit?, How do we get them interested in Technology?, High School Articulations, Hugh users of electronic devices, Career Academy –Career Paths, will they work?10:30 AM - Enrollment and Recruitment Strategies Terry Bartel, Fox Valley Technical College11:15 AM - Engineering Technology and Electronic Programs and courses (Successful Program Initiatives, Alternative Delivery - Hybrid, Blended, On-Line, Innovative Classroom Practice and Teaching Methods, New subjects, new technology, Expansion of Topics, modification
effort by recognizing that“Innovative courses are not easily transportable or transferable. When new faculty are asked totake on these courses, they are more likely to create their own than to pick up on the coursecreated by the pioneers” (Steen, 1999, p. 5). Instead of seeking to create a series of coursesdesigned to be exported to other faculty institutions, our approach focuses on enhancingsubstantive interdisciplinary interaction among faculty and tapping into faculty professional andscholarly interests—areas in which the New Liberal Arts projects often succeeded (Steen, 1999,p. 5).Specifying the Knowledge and Abilities Required to Achieve TL OutcomesThinking about course designs requires specifying the things that a person who has
one each on communications, ethical awareness and teamwork.Additional criteria evaluate the team’s design skills, innovations and overall project results.A set of rubrics for each criteria, identifying how to classify teams on the 5 point Likertscale used, is provided to the judges and discussed with them. Each team is judged by 3-5unique judges for both their presentation and their exhibit, a total of 6-10 judges overall.Each judging group is also lead by a chief judge and asked to confer on their ratings toattempt to reduce inter-rater variances. Finally all judges are asked to attend either a onehour judges orientation briefing and/or use the online judges training system. About 50% ofthe judges each semester have previously judged IPRO
teaching modules for AutoIDtechnologies and their application areas. The result of such an implementation is a powerfuleducational tool that is utilized to support innovative curriculum activities and provide hands-onlaboratory experiments to on-campus and off-campus students. This project not only increasesthe understanding of AutoID technologies and their applications, but also improves students’attitudes about engineering education and enhances their confidence towards the targetedtechnologies. Partial support for this work was provided by the NSF CCLI program.IntroductionThe Auto-ID and RFID technologies are becoming more popular than ever while being led byindustry rather than academia. As a result, a gap between the corporate practices and
: The need for evolution of the recruitment model for women in engineering,” Proc. ASEE Conf., pp. 7003-7013, 2005.4. M. Pickering, E. Ryan, K. Conroy, B. Gravel, and M. Portsmore, “The Benefit of Outreach to Engineering Students,” Proc. ASEE Conf., pp. 1119-1130, 2004.5. S. S. Wilson and E. L. Shoenfelt, “Using Western Kentucky University SWE members in the Recruitment of Middle School Girls,” Proc. ASEE Conf., pp. 15533-15538, 2005.6. J. R. Glover, J. L. Ruchhoeft, J. M. Trenor, S. A. Long, and F. J. Claydon, “Girls Reaching and Demonstrating Excellence (GRADE) Camps: An innovative Recruiting Strategy at the University of Houston to Increase Female Representation in Engineering,” Proc. ASEE Conf., pp. 6889-6897, 2005.7. L