: Describe what IoT is and how it works today CO_2: Design and program IoT devices CO_3: Examine the security and privacy challenges of IoT CO_4: Find proper security/privacy solutions for IoTThe course meets twice each week for fourteen weeks. The duration of each meeting is eightyminutes (one hour and twenty minutes). Table 1 identifies the topical theme, the laboratoryexperiment(s), and project(s) associated with each theme and the session number(s). Table 1: IoT course outline Theme Laboratory Experiment/Project Session #(s) Course overview: IoT technology and impact Arduino microcontroller 1-3
millionsubscribers in 2003 to nearly 50 million subscribers by 20083. The predicted worldwide routermarket will grow from $6.3 billion in 2003 to over $9.2 billion in 20084. Currently over 85% ofindividuals surveyed with a home network use some form of home router (or access point),compared to only 78% surveyed just 18 months ago5. The small network market is experiencingstaggering growth that will continue for many years to come.The perceived problem is that communication equipment, routers and access points, oncedesigned to be used by highly trained technicians are now being used by individuals with little orno technical training. Manufacturers for these “Home” routers include easy installation stepsthat many times discard security information for deeper
are generated within LabVIEW. Page 11.824.3 Figure 2: A GUI for a 3-input 1-output system. A user can change the time period between the switchings. The state of an input can bemonitored, either through an LED or on a graph window. The graph windows are labeled asinput 1, input 2, and input 3. The state of output can also be monitored through a graph windowas well as through an LED, which is shown on the right hand side of the GUI. The logic diagrambetween the two sets of graphs is the hardware system that has been used for the specificexperiment. The GUI passed the inputs to the experiment and receives
spill water to run Page 11.329.4through water-wheels or other toys. In general the students tried to purchase parts and 3components instead of fabricating them at the machine and/or wood shops in order tosave their time and improve the product quality. Teams then drew their CAD drawingsand started to purchase some parts that were available from local stores. Because ofbudget limitations and availability of components at the local stores, a number of partshad to be fabricated by the students. Two teams spent their major time building the woodtables.(a) Conceptual design by Team 1 (b) CAD drawing by Team
from ethnic minorities. We invited these students to informational sessions,which included pizza, soda, candy, and APS basics. Interested and eligible students signedinformed consent documents and completed questionnaires, which we used in placing them intoeither the Study group, Ethnographic group, or Control/Comparison group (Appendix 1).Participants in the Study and Ethnographic groups receive $175 per academic year; those in theControl/Comparison group received $25.After these sessions, we still lacked enough females to complete our sampling plan and had hadno African-American attendees. Of the six incoming first-year African-American students, fivewere in majors eligible to participate in APS. We scheduled two more recruiting sessions
setting. The participants metall of the research sponsors and had a first opportunity to visit the research facility in which theywould be working. The educational discovery session was the research experiences in thelaboratory, termed as such to emphasize the outcome desired for the participant. Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday June 9- 8-9:30 Check In 8:00-3:00 8:30-10:00 Discussion: 8:00-3:00 8:00-3:00 13 10:00-11:45 Educational Culture and Learning Educational Educational Orientation Discovery 10:00-3:00 Educational Discovery Discovery 11:45-1:00 Lunch 3
, November 2003. FIE 2003-1419.pdf[9] Kellogg, S. D., F. Matejcik, and A. Logar, "Freeware: Maximum Likelihood Estimator," Poster Session, Joint Statistical Meetings, August 1995.[10] Koen, Billy V., “On the Importance of ‘Presence’ in a Web-Based Course,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002 .[11] Martin, Moskal, Foshee, and Morse, “So You Want to Develop a Distance Education Course?” ASEE Prism, 18-22, February 1997.[12] Riggs, B., Poli, C., and B. Woolf, “A Multimedia Application for Teaching Design of Manufacturing,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87 no. 1, 63-70, January 1998.[13] Russell, Thomas L., The No Significant Difference Phenomenon, IDEC, 1999. http
Session 2147 A "REAL WORLD" APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: PHASE II - SENIOR CAPSTONE EXPERIENCE James L. Otter, William Strenth, Randall Timi, Dannie Hutchinson Pittsburg State UniversityINTRODUCTIONWhat happens when successful professional construction design/build activities are integratedinto an established four-year construction engineering technology and construction managementprogram? Hopefully, the result will be a highly skilled and educated construction professionalprepared to respond to the ever-changing fast-paced world of
thiscourse. Table 1 presents a summary of the survey results on select questions regarding thelaboratory experience of the students. Table 1: Summary of the opinion survey results Virtual Reality Laboratory Video Demonstration RUBRICS (1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=No opinion, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree) MEAN SD MEAN SDThe lab sessions were motivating for me 4.75 0.54 2 0.58to learn more about Industrial Roboticsand CIM systems.The teaching method in lab sessions
Session 3447 Technology Space Camp Timothy Brower Oregon Institute of TechnologyAbstractIn July 2001, Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) hosted a weeklong resident TechnologySpace Camp for high school students from Oregon, Washington and Colorado. The stude ntsparticipated in various class and team building projects applicable to zero gravity space scienceand exploration. The highlight of their week was the design and construction of a zero gravityexperiment.In August 2001, the OIT NASA Science Team subsequently flew the high school
Session 1526 Undergraduate Optoelectronics Laboratories Susan M. Lord Bucknell UniversityABSTRACTThis Instrumentation and Laboratory Improvement project focuses on providing undergraduateswith experience in optoelectronics, an important multidisciplinary technology. AnOptoelectronics Laboratory facility has been established at Bucknell University. This enabledthe development of laboratory experiments for first-year students and for juniors, seniors, andmasters students in an elective course.A laboratory experiment was performed by 215 first year engineering and
results in an individual assessment during the semester. The team lead gradesare assigned based on a rubric that identifies the organization, technical content, presentationstyle, and team leadership skills.Additional assessment tools used in the course for grading reports, presentations, team leadbriefs, and safety discussions are also discussed, and a general overview of the Unit OperationsLaboratory is provided. This paper is organized as follows: (1) Description of the UnitOperations Laboratory and grading rubrics, (2) Methods for teamwork and individualassessments, (3) Results and survey discussions, (4) Suggested techniques for future works and(5) Conclusions from the study.2. Description of the Unit Operations LaboratoryThe primary
trust. Be sure to clearly communicate the team objectives, team responsibilities, team member accountabilities, project timelines, and the Page 14.287.7 risk in the project along with how objectives are aligned with organizational strategy. This communication should be kept going on a regular basis thru 1-1 and team meetings. Laura, director of Computer Science at a large computer corporation, states an example where communication was key to the success of her project, “When I was leading a global development team, we had colleagues in Japan who had to work closely with a team in San Jose. The Japan team had really good technical
, all students werereminded that their attendance is graded and mandatory to dissolve the misunderstanding of aninquisitive student who assumed final project work would be performed outside of lab classeswith optional attendance, which foreseeably may have affected attendance rates in that timeperiod.Collaborative lecture and lab activities were facilitated each week to foster positiveinterdependence (barring week 3’s lab due to Labor Day and week 5’s lab due to unexpectedtime limitations) (see Figure 1). Group lecture activities always occurred in the second of twolecture sessions each week, engaging large groups of nine to twelve or small groups of two tofour students with various brainstorming and documentation activities. For instance, in
Session 3213 1 Experiments in Learning Chemical Engineering Modeling Skills Noel Rappin, Mark Guzdial, Matthew Realff, Pete Ludovice College of Computing/School of Chemical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 33039-0280/Atlanta GA 30032-0100 770 894-4650 {noel,guzdial}@cc.gatech.edu /{matthew.realff,pete.ludovice}@che.gatech.eduABSTRACTCreating educational
response bias.1-4 When we minimize the ambiguity of survey prompts, we adopt a standard set by thewhite, male majority, leaving dominant ideology intact. In contrast, when we integrate social science conceptsinto our survey, we provide an opening for the “subaltern” to speak.5Introduction: Disrupting ideological hegemony in engineering by naming cultureTextbooks on survey design emphasize the importance of generating clearly worded, accessible promptsas a means of decreasing response bias,1-4 but the concept of accessibility presumes a referent. Forwhom must our questions be clear? For whom may this demand for baseline clarity limit expression?Our primary argument in this paper is that the demand for accessible survey prompts may suppress whatis
Financial Technical Simultaneous Big-Picture Context LEFT RIGHT Dominant Organized Tactical Emotional Symbolic Teaching Conservative Risk-Avoiding Sensitive Intuitive Musical Administrative Scheduled Expressive Reaching-Out Procedural Sequential Supportive Spiritual Reliable Detailed Interpersonal B LIMBIC C © 2003 The Ned Herrmann Group Figure 1 Thinking characteristics and behavioral clues
. Persistent, aggressive efforts at all levels will insure we continue tobe a national leader in the quest to help increase the quality and diversity of the nation’sengineering workforce. For sure, our success will continue to be coupled quite closely with ourability to maintain our extremely valuable and effective National Minority Engineering ProgramsAdvisory Board.Bibliography 1. “Top 100 Undergraduate Degree Producers 2005,” Black Issues in Higher Education, June 2, 2005, Volume 21, No. 8. 2. Daniels, F., Vouch, M. A., Kim, K., “The Reliable Hybrid Pattern - A Generalized Fault Tolerant Software Design Pattern” Technical Paper, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University
Project Introduction Start Ups (HBS 92601) 11/16 Operations, and Organizational Issues – 3M – Optical Systems, Maintaining Looking Inside- Limitations on Growth Corporate Entrepreneurship 11/19 Innovation, Feasibility Analysis, Carlson – Chap 2, 4, 9 Commercialization / Introduction to NABC Project Work Project Definition 11/23 Disruptive change in the Disk Drive Industry BIOCOM: From Generics to Mfg to Bio Innovation (HBS HKU657) Christensen – (Chap. 1, 9 & 10) 11
in1995 as a means of providing students with academic credit through participation in long-termservice-learning projects. Student teams are vertically-integrated multidisciplinary teams,comprised of students of all years of undergraduate study and multiple majors [1]. Studentoutcomes are often summarized to include technical skills, communication skills, organizationalskills, teamwork experiences, resourcefulness, resource management, sponsor awareness throughcustomer and client interaction, expanded community awareness, and professional ethics [1].Over 30 institutions across the US have an EPICS program, as well as multiple institutionsabroad. The EPICS program was implemented at Arizona State University in 2009 and has sincegrown to
of the implemented changes and the technologyused. Also, computer communication technology and the availability of sufficient internet bandwidthwere adequate. The students’ feedback shows the importance of having direct interaction with theinstructor affected by their experiences with the online portion of the semester. In conclusion, educationis strongly dependent on a trust-building process between the instructor and the learners. The studentscan follow-up and are involved positively in any modification of class format or methodology if theybelieve in their coach’s (instructor’s) competency.1. Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic hit unexpectedly during spring 2020. All life sectors were impacted significantly,including health, economics
during implementation as well as a web site,discussion area, and online learning community to provide continuous assistance during theschool year.Two-week summer sessions were conducted twice to accommodate the large group of teachersand students with personal attention. Undergraduate students who had previously participated inthe one-credit course served as technical assistants during the institutes. Week 1, the teacherinstitute, supported teachers in becoming acquainted with project materials, curricula, and designchallenges. Two school teams formed a group of four to work on the series of design challengesleading to the culminating challenge—to create a vehicle with the ability to move in threedimensions through a pool and collect objects to
engineering students (i.e., how to relate technical experiences to the general public and/or children) and instill in the students the desire to be ambassadors of their careers • Give in-service K8 teachers the skills to facilitate open-ended projects with their students that teach the engineering design process, explain the societal impact of the projects, and use low-cost, everyday materialsTEK8 University CourseIn the autumn ENGR 4194 course, the engineering university students are joined by practicingteachers enrolled in the College of Education and Human Ecology in a course that teaches themhow to translate the engineering research experience into a series of age-appropriate mini-designchallenges that are team-delivered
solid line indicates collecting multiple continuousdata streams which can be used with mediated discourse analysis. Interviews are indicated by a capital “I”where interviews after the problem solving session may be structured as retrospective think-alouds.We suggest a research design informed by constructivist and sociomaterial theoreticalperspectives. In this combination we take knowledge to be actively constructed by the subjectthrough inner dialog as well as interaction with the material world (Figure 1). The subjectivity ofthe boundary between subject and material world serves as a guide for inquiry: we are interestedin what actions and behaviors as well as cognitive states are associated with apparent movementof this boundary. This may be
histories, cultures, technical practices, andlanguages of his or her respective host region. Grantees also had the opportunity to attend paneldiscussions and workshops hosted by select IREE 2007 grantees.Building on this prior success, the IREE 2010 team developed and ran three types of orientationprograms during May 2011, with the goal of studying the effectiveness of the orientationsdepending on format and location. Of the 58 grantees: (i) 19 students were hosted by the Purdueteam for a two-week orientation session in Shanghai, China; (ii) 19 students were hosted by theIREE team for a two-week orientation session at Purdue’s main campus in West Lafayette,Indiana; and (iii) 20 students participated in a flexible five-week cyber-based
EXPERIMENTATION AND REAL-TIME COMPUTING: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTABSTRACTThis paper presents an integrated environment for rapid control prototyping that allows rapidrealization of novel designs, from the initial design phase until the final steps of code generation.It uses a collection of tools that include both software (MATLAB/Simulink) and an off-the-shelfhardware (dSPACE DSP DS1104). The integrated environment presented in this paper has manyeducational advantages as compared to multi-environment settings. The main features of thisenvironment are: 1) controller code can be generated automatically for hardwareimplementation; 2) different languages can be used to describe different parts of the system. Inparticular, Simulink block diagrams
mandatory senior level Process Control course in PlasticsEngineering Department at University of Massachusetts Lowell. In the Fall 2011semester 33 undergraduate students were enrolled, 31 of them choose to participate in theself-directed lifelong learning experience. The course teaches principles of controlsystems, process block diagrams, feedback control, process monitoring, DOE, SPC/SQC,and Taguchi methods. The class meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays for 1 hour 15 minutelong sessions. Following each class meeting, students were assigned homework. DuringFall 2011 semester a total of 22 homework assignments were given. The total weight ofthe homework assignments was 25% of the course grade. The course also included twoseparate projects, both of which
, Dr. Tsai was a Member of the Technical Staff in the Fluid Mechanics Group at The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Tsai earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. at the University of California, Berkeley in Mechanical Engineering.Ms. Amber Janssen, California State University Maritime Academy Amber Janssen is a senior assistant librarian at California State University, Maritime Academy (CSUM). Her research background is in the instruction and assessment of information literacy in undergraduate education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Information Literacy Instruction as a Continuous Improvement
Workshop.The first ADI Workshop was conducted during the Summer 2016 semester. The experienceincluded four face-to-face in-class sessions and two online modules. At the end of the 6-weekprogram, each participating instructor showcased an online assessment that they had designedand developed as a result of the workshop. The topics of the pilot program included: 1) strategiesto construct effective STEM assessments, 2) using relevant question types and features inCanvas, a learning management system (LMS), 3) implementing authentic assessment, 4)strategies to encourage academic integrity in online assessments, and 5) composing exemplardesign vignette questions to reinforce connections between concepts to achieve integrativelearning. The pilot cohort
simulation capabilities of Computer AidedDesign and Drafting (CADD) as well as the analysis capabilities of Finite Element Modeling(FEM).Overview/BackgroundIn the midst of today's global technical challenges with respect to the environment, energy,healthcare and general quality of life, the pivotal role of engineering education to prepare thenext generation of problem solvers goes with out question. However, as pointed out in recentpublications, 1, 2 the topics, methods and audience of this enterprise requires ongoing assessmentand revision to ensure relevance, efficacy and accessibility for local and global consumers. Inkeeping with this concept, the authors believe that the fundamental discipline of classicalmechanics with respect to the current