Session 2586 Project Lead The Way® A Pre-engineering Secondary School Curriculum Prof. Guy Johnson Rochester Institute of TechnologyAbstractProject Lead The Way® (PLTW) is a nonprofit corporation that developed a national programforming partnerships among public schools, higher education institutions and the private sectorto increase the quantity and quality of engineers and engineering technologists graduating fromour educational system. The Rochester Institute of Technology has joined in a partnership withPLTW by establishing the
alongside the technical needs of the growing country. Weembarked on this mission of developing objectives, outcomes, and a curriculum while the facultywas in the process of teaching the initial courses in the CS major. The challenges we faced andthe associated solutions we developed offer insight to other computer science faculty who maybe called upon to provide similar assistance in developing programs around the world.Introduction Bringing information and communication technologies (ICT) to underdevelopedcountries has been a goal of the international community for several years; the potential benefitsderived from closing the “digital divide” have been well researched and documented. The roleof education in the process cannot be
included, there were only five new skill set categories added during yearstwo through four. For example, during the second year when the Chemical Engineering,Chemistry and Environmental Science career cluster was developed, most of the skill setcategories crossed multi-disciplines within engineering, science and technology and onlychemistry was added. A complete listing of all the skill set categories, subcategories andcorresponding New Jersey Core Content Curriculum Standards is available through BergenAcademy on the Tech-Prep Website. (http://www.bergen.org/EST)Each of the partner schools was given the skill set, and the creation of a particular projectinvolved marking the specific skills that were covered. The individual projects covered a
An Active Learning Environment in an Integrated Industrial Engineering Curriculum Frank Peters, John Jackman, Sarah Ryan, Sigurdur Olafsson Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems Engineering fpeters@iastate.edu, jkj@iastate.edu, smryan@iastate.edu, olafsson@iastate.edu Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011AbstractWe are developing a new learning environment that supports a suite of interrelated modulesbased on real-world scenarios. The primary goals of the project are to integrate industrialengineering courses, improve students’ information technology skills, and enhance students’problem
An Integrated Systems Lab and Curriculum to Address IE Program Criteria Jessica O. Matson, Kenneth W. Hunter, Sr., and David W. Elizandro Tennessee Technological UniversityAbstractABET program criteria for industrial engineering require programs to demonstrate that“graduates have the ability to design, develop, implement, and improve integrated systems thatinclude people, materials, information, equipment, and energy” and to include “in-depthinstruction to accomplish the integration of systems using appropriate analytical, computational,and experimental practices.” Faculty in the industrial engineering program at TennesseeTechnological University have
22.815.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementing a CEAB Engineering Graduate Attributes Based Co-op Work Term CurriculumThis paper discusses the process of developing a curriculum for engineering students to useduring their co-op work terms that is based on the Engineering Graduate Attributes of theCanadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB).The goal of the new curriculum is to enable students to demonstrate their professional growthwith respect to four selected CEAB attributes. It is based on the creation of a learning portfoliothat demonstrates the students learning accomplishments through a combination of narrative andevidence. The evidence will be provided
. Joshua M Coriell, Cyber Innovation Center Joshua Coriell is a Curriculum Development Specialist at the Cyber Innovation Center’s National Inte- grated Cyber Education Research Center. He graduated from Louisiana Tech University in 2011 with a B.S. in Mathematics. A year later he completed his Master of Arts in Teaching at Louisiana Tech Univer- sity. He is currently working on a high school mathematics curriculum geared toward students interested in STEM fields. Page 24.1101.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014STEM: Explore, Discover, ApplyA Middle School Elective
environments, andpublic health, who are as well versed in professional skills as they are in technical skills is thechallenge we face as engineering educators.This paper describes a new civil engineering curriculum designed to meet these challenges. Ournew curriculum, that was the result of a multi-year effort, is centered around a “design spine”.The design spine, series of eight courses, is expected to improve the development of professionalskills, improve fluency with data analysis and computing skills, improve critical thinking skills,and integrate systems thinking through project-based learning. The design spine helps connectand integrate the separate subdiscipline courses typical of most civil engineering curricula as asystem of systems.The
Paper ID #15257Dedicated Curriculum, Space and Faculty: M.Eng. in Technical Entrepreneur-shipDr. Michael S. Lehman, Lehigh University One will find Michael S. Lehman at the intersection of entrepreneurship, science, and higher education. Dr. Lehman is a Professor of Practice at Lehigh University, co-developing and teaching in the Master’s of Engineering in Technical Entrepreneurship, which received national recognition for its role in talent de- velopment by the University Economic Development Association. The faculty appointment also includes roles with Lehigh’s Baker Institute for Creativity, Innovation and
Engineering at Monterrey Tech (ITESM-Monterrey Campus). Teaches courses in CAD/CAE, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Method and Optimization. His interest are in the area of product development, topology optimization, additive manufacturing, sustainable design, and biomechanics.Dr. Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Management Systems at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. His MS and PhD are in mechanical en- gineering from NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power, and instrumentation &
engineering department curriculum developed to provideDFM and manufacturing training in the freshman year. Skills obtained in the freshman year aresubsequently utilized in the sophomore year via a significant product design and developmentproject. This curriculum provides underclassmen the opportunity to develop a fundamentalunderstanding of DFM and to build upon this understanding through application later in thecurriculum including senior capstone design. The goal is a more industry-ready graduate whohas an understanding of the principle of “first time right” and who has the confidence to addressthe increasingly complex issues arising in engineering design in the global manufacturing arena.There are related efforts at other universities 8-9.The
Session 2439 Undergraduate Integrated Engineering & Business Practice Curriculum in the College of Engineering Robert M. Dunn, Ph.D. , John M. Brauer College of Engineering University of Notre DameAbstractThe College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame has completed the third year ofteaching its undergraduate Integrated Engineering & Business Practice Curriculum. Thecurriculum was developed as a response to corporate and parental requests for a morecomprehensive engineering education. The curriculum is
An Industry Perspective on FEA in the ME Curriculum Jim M. Papadopoulos, Ph.D., P.E. R&D Engineer The Paper Converting Machine Company, Green Bay, WI Considering the main methods of stress/structural analysis – handcalculation, experimental measurement, and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) –each has distinct advantages, but each is also subject to misuse. Introductorymechanics courses typically focus on teaching the methods of hand calculation,therefore giving less attention to modeling skills and the development of soundintuition. FEA is normally introduced later in the curriculum, in a courseemphasizing the underlying theory rather than the skills needed
-2000, he was Associate Professor of Information Systems, Hiroshima City University, Japan. He joined Zayed University College of Information Systems in 2000 as an Associate Professor. Currently he is teaching at the College of Administrative Sciences at the University of Laval. His research interests include Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control, Signal processing, and IS curriculum design and development. Page 12.275.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Assessing the Effectiveness of an Outcome-Based Information Systems CurriculumAbstractThis
University Press (Taiwan). Much of his current work involves developing curriculum and supporting technology for Critical Embedded Systems along with Professor Andrzej Rucinski at UNH CIDLab. Recently, Kochanski has been involved with organizing conferences, presenting invited lectures and collaborating on diverse topics with universities, national research centers (Poland, Germany) and EU organizations. In 2008, Dr. Kochanski co-edited with Prof. Andrzej Stepnowski, Marek Moszynski and Jacek Dabrowki of the Gdansk University of Technology, the Proceedings of the 2008 1st International Conference on information Technology (GUT, 2008).Andrzej Rucinski, University of New Hampshire Prof. Andrzej Rucinski represents a growing
Session 3660 Integrating Service-Oriented Design Projects in the Engineering Curriculum Matthew Green, Alan Dutson, and Kristin Wood Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Robert Stone and Dan McAdams Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Missouri-RollaAbstractEngineering curricula are undergoing continual advancements. Faculty seek to apply newtechniques and strategies to interest students, to address their diverse backgrounds, and toachieve a balance between theory and practical, hands
2006-2386: BESTEAMS: A CURRICULUM FOR ENGINEERING STUDENT TEAMTRAINING BY ENGINEERING FACULTYJanet Schmidt, University of Maryland-College Park ANET A. SCHMIDT, Ph.D. Dr. Schmidt is a co-PI of several grants in the area of team behavior, retention of women in STEM fields, and learning in team environments. A licensed psychologist, she is the Assistant Dean for Interdisciplinary Research and Assessment in the College of Education at the University of Maryland. Her other interests include grant development, teamwork training for faculty and students, and assessment activities related to ABET and NCATE accreditation.Linda Schmidt, University of Maryland-College ParkPaige Smith, University of
A Distributed Systems Engineering Curriculum for Working Engineers in California Kurt Colvin, Ph.D., P.E. Industrial Engineering kcolvin@calpoly.edu Robert Crockett, Ph.D., MBA Biomedical & General Engineering rcrocket@calpoly.edu Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407AbstractAs part of a workforce initiative grant, we are developing a catalog and curricular structure toenable working engineers in California to obtain Systems Engineering education
developed and implementedby the Electronics Engineering Technology program at Texas Southern University to ensurecompliance with TAC/ABET Criterion 3. The assessment instrument utilized to measure andevaluate the program outcome is sufficiently unobtrusive without scarifying normal educationalprocess. Also, the additional information necessary is the evaluation of the courses wherestudents are not achieving the minimum standard specified for the course outcomes, andreflection on how to implement the corrective action in accordance with the laid-downimprovement plan. The result of the utilized instrument also led to development or modificationof several courses. Furthermore, the enhancement of the curriculum is expected to havesignificant impact on
presents an effort taken at the ComputerSystems Technology department of the New York City In spite of the complexity of curriculum development, theCollege of Technology that led to a thorough study of process can be examined by asking seven basic questions:industry changes, students’ interest and modification of 1. What is the purpose of the curriculum?curriculum for Bachelor degree of Technology. The new 2. What are the objectives of the curriculum?curriculum aims to prepare students not only 3. How are the learning experiences to be selected andfundamentals of computer systems with critical thinking organized?and problem solving skills, but also an in-depth
Engineering Curriculum consists of two parallel course streams -- applied mathematicsand engineering science -- and integrates material both across and within these streams. At present this cur-riculum is required of all electrical and computer engineering majors and is an option for mechanical engi-neering and civil engineering majors. The purpose of this paper is share our experiences during the devel-opment process and to introduce the curriculum. Before discussing our efforts, a few words about the Foun-dation Coalition are in order because of its role as a catalyst in our curriculum development efforts.FOUNDATION COALITION The Foundation Coalition was formed in the fall of 1993. It consists of seven institutions committedto reexamining
ongoing vertically integrated curriculum initiative is designed to promote a learningatmosphere where faculty mentor students in a nontraditional format without increasing thenumber of course credits needed for graduation. It is intended to engage students throughouttheir undergraduate career, beginning at the sophomore level, using industry sponsored projectsthat illustrate the various stages in the operation of an “enterprise.”Introduction The development of an innovative curriculum option, the “Enterprise Program”, givesteams of students at Michigan Technological University the opportunity to participate in real-world settings to solve technology problems supplied by industry partners. The program preparesstudents for the challenges that
thetransition from education to workforce [5]. This discussion leads to the conclusion thatinvestment in a good quality education and skills development will close the gap with industryneeds and increase employability and productivity.Many tools, methods, and techniques have been used to capture industry needs through thedesign and development of the proper academic curriculum [6]. One of the common tools isQuality Function deployment (QFD). In 2008 Gonzalez and et al published a paper addressingdesigning a supply chain management academic curriculum using QFD and benchmarking. Theauthors used potential employers as a source for data collection. Although the study wasspecifically concerned with the design of a SCM curriculum, the authors argued that
regional high school faculty over the past year and one half haveresulted in three clear messages. First, a set of disjoint high technology materials and examplesthat the teachers must integrate into their courses would simply not be used. Second anymaterials provided must match the time constraints associated with typical lecture formats.Finally, any new material added to the curriculum must be consistent with the guidelines of astate approved curriculum. Cognizant of these constraints our team of educators set about thedevelopment of technology based modules that could be used by high school faculty to enhancethe presentation of their science topics.This paper reports on our initial efforts to develop and provide these module materials. The
University Economic Development Association (UEDA).Building a new Master's of Engineering in Technical EntrepreneurshipLehigh University, a private research university located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania has anational reputation in engineering, as well as entrepreneurship. Looking back almost twodecades, the undergraduate Integrated Product Development (IPD) capstone course sequence inthe P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science won a curriculum innovation awardin 1996 from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Over fifteen years later, theNational Academy of Engineering of the National Academies selected Lehigh’s IPD offerings,and the newly-created Baker Institute for Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and Innovation, as anexemplar
AC 2007-8: ENGINEERING IS ELEMENTARY: AN ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM FOR CHILDRENKate Hester, Museum of Science, Boston Kate Hester is the Content Development Director for the Engineering is Elementary project. Prior to assuming this position was a teacher for eight years. Kate received her Bachelors degree in Environmental Science from the University of New Hampshire and her MAT degree from Cornell University.Christine Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston Dr. Christine Cunningham works as the Vice President of Research at the Museum of Science, Boston. In her work, she oversees research and evaluation efforts related to engineering and science learning and teaching in
economic development, this is unacceptable. It istherefore the responsibility of engineering educators to find a better way to shape the future of theengineering profession. This paper outlines the early efforts at integrating the topics of ethics,social justice, and social responsibility more directly into the engineering curriculum. This isapproached from the perspectives of pedagogy, curriculum development, and service learningopportunities. It is within this context that the authors hope to influence students’ awareness ofand connection to social and environmental issues as well as the ethical frameworks they developand carry with them into their professional careers. This paper centers around the creation anddelivery of a new introductory
computerscience, computer engineering, and electrical engineering10. The industry is constantly involvedin the development of technology and products to solve issues with mobile computing andcommunication. There is a big demand for engineers and computer scientists with experience inthe development of technology and products to solve challenges of the future. In order toenhance the education and careers of the future computer scientists and engineers, it is essentialthat mobile computing concepts be integrated in the computer science and engineeringcurriculum. The ACM/IEEE Computer Science Curriculum 200811 lists Mobile Computing as anelective course under the “Net Centric Computing” Body of Knowledge. Also, the ACM/IEEE
familyplatforms. The SimpleLink family platforms make the development cycle faster and easier tomeet the various requirements. The SimpleLink family platforms are currently activemicrocontrollers and microprocessors. In the Engineering Technology at Texas A&MUniversity, the courses in the embedded system integration track have adopted an MSP432 MCUas a common platform. Students can choose to use other SimpleLink platforms for their capstoneprojects because their knowledge is still relevant and there is a high chance of reusing their codewithin the SimpleLink family platforms. This paper presents the details of the embedded systemtrack and this transitional progress and students’ learning throughout this embedded systemcourse curriculum for Fall of
simulations are assigned as homework. The menu-driven software interfaceof FLUENT allows calculations to be set up in a matter of minutes. The combination ofinexpensive, fast computers and user-friendly CFD software has reduced the turn-aroundtimes for simulations to levels suitable for use in the curriculum. We are developing WWW-based tutorials that provide step-by-step instructions onsetting up and running the simulations discussed above. The motivation for this is thatit allows classroom time to be spent on hands-on exploration of physical and numericalconcepts rather than on teaching the mechanics of using the software. There is evidencesuggesting that delivering codified materials through the WWW to liberate classroom timefor higher value