judgment to draw conclusions. 7 an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as Taught but not assessed; in- needed, using appropriate learning strategies. class discussion intentionally focuses on how adults learn 2 and the criticality of continuous learning. As a complement to senior design or for those students engaged in a project, EML isdesigned to prepare students for work relationships and
related to thinking and learning that have important implications for teaching [14].Of those concepts, “association” seems to highlight a critical step in the transition from novice toexpert. For students who have misconceptions, replacing those notions with the correct scientificconcept presented in the classroom may be a difficult process. At best, all that educators can dois minimize incorrect thoughts by making stronger the associations amongst the correct ones.In light of the difficulties related to effectively teaching threshold concepts, several members ofthe engineering education community have begun working on ways to improve student learningin these areas. Steif, for example, discusses his use of visual images to accompany free
GreatMoonbuggy Race Program as a Capstone design project, and to show how to use such acomprehensive design experience as an assessment tool addressing most ABET Criterion 3 a-kprogram learning outcomes, and its impact on students long terms career objectives. The projectis designed to imitate real-world workplace environment; students are divided into four differentindependent groups, namely, frame, transmission, steering, and suspension, all of which report toa project manager who oversees the execution plan and coordinates between the teams, andmanages day-to-day operational aspects of the project and scope. The Moonbuggy vehicle mustsatisfy not only functionality and strength, but also a set of geometrical and physical constraintssuch as weight
) an ability to function on multi- disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.A Closer Look at Criterion 4: Continuous ImprovementProbably the most critical phase of the ABET review is demonstrating a continuous process is inplace to gather and assess
courses), 10.5% (n=2) hoped to find a platform to engage withinstructors (e.g., users hoped to find a community of instructors to share content and ideas).Other responses to this question about expectations indicated that users hoped to gain knowledgeof the GCSP (e.g., “Material that will help us disseminate the local GCSP-program, explain thedifferent scales of perspective on the 4 large GC areas, and awaken the vocation of students forthemes in these GC areas”) or did not have specific expectations (i.e., “open expectations”). Acomplete summary of the results and illustrative responses can be found in Table A2 inAppendix A.The introductory module survey also asked users how they planned to use the materials beforethey accessed the modules. The
successfulreforms in engineering education.11No doubts, the leaders and faculty of both schools were prepared for the change they wereembarking on. The design and implementation of the first stage of the program is a reflection ofthat. Nevertheless, there were key blind spots or issues that have not been addresses and, in ouropinion, are critical for the advancement and impact of both projects. The most salient blind spotis the breadth but not depth participation of students. Student engagement is what the specializedliterature highlights as a key factor for successful change.16, 18 Make no mistake, in both schoolstudents participate in most of the activities, use the spaces, and create inspiring startups. But,targeting initiatives to students is not
“Integrateinformation from many sources to gain insights” for Connections as shown in Table 1.Similar to the mindsets, the complementary engineering skillsets of the EML framework aredescribed in three larger categories: Opportunity, Design, and Impact. Unlike the “3C’s” thereare no definitions of these categories but each is divided into six specific skillsets for each suchas “Test Concepts via customer engagement” for Opportunity and “Determine designrequirements” for Design as shown in Table 2.Several years ago, an online portal (www.engineeringunleashed.com) for entrepreneurial mindset(EM) activities was launched to provide an electronic community for the 50 KEEN partnerschools to collaborate on research and curricular innovations. A key aspect of the site
the position of the Chair of Department of Foreign Languages for Professional Communication in 2007, when she took over all the responsibilities related to foreign language training at Kazan State Technological University. The teaching and research priorities of her department were then focused on professional and intercultural communication for students in a technical university, professional translation and creation of foreign language environment at a university. Because of her talents and activities, Julia became one of key figures in university international life. When Kazan State Technological University obtained the new status of a National Research University and joined the list of Top 30 Russian
://research.microsoft.com/conferencexp/,retrieved: 2006.9 Dixon, Mary, Kerry Pannell, and Michele Villinski, “From ‘Chalk and Talk’ to Animate and Collaborate:DyKnow-Mite Applications of Pen-Based Instruction in Economics,” in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-basedTechnology on Education, Dave A. Berque, Jane C. Prey, and Robert H. Reed eds., Purdue University Press, WestLafayette, Indiana, 2006.10 DyKnow, “DyKnow,” http://www.dyknow.com/, retrieved: 2006.11 McCue, Leigh and Glenda Scales, “Embracing the middle ground: Engaging on- and off- campus students withinthe same ‘classroom,’” 2007 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, April 2007.12 Homework assignments for AOE 5334 taken largely from: Troesch, Armin, NA540 Marine Dynamics III
process, students then focus on design –design of a product/service and design of an associated business model. Students progressthrough the levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy as they leverage the knowledge and comprehensiongained in the (IPD and entrepreneurship) process courses for their own projects, focusing onapplication, analysis, synthesis and evaluation in the (IPD and entrepreneurship) project courses.1Live case studies, class trips and hands-on workshops are crafted to help translate theory topractice.During the first week of the spring semester, the students engage in an intensive immersionexperience referred to as TE Week, an educational model that serves as a platform forcollaboration among TE graduate students and faculty, Lehigh’s Office
neighboring states. The team expects them to share thebenefits of healthy job growth projected for next ten years with improved lifetime earnings andtransform the historically agriculture-based economy to advanced high technology-based one.Our experience shows the first generation diverse students can make a significant impact on theeconomic development. This proposed future work offers a better understanding of skills needed,the importance of collaborating across disciplines and a career in the world after graduation.Many of our first-generation students come from low-income families. Students learncybersecurity subjects that are more engaging and easy to learn. Exceptionally talented studentswho chose non-computing majors or low-cost two-year
identifies perceived benefits and challenges for the students engaged in thecompetition. Complementing the report of the team's experience at the 2018 RTZ, this studyemphasizes the importance of teamwork collaboration in the present context of the AEC industrywhile drawing upon concepts of sustainable construction. The study encompasses data collectedfrom: (1) a survey with all the 8 students, (2) interviews with the faculty leader and the studentteam leader, and (3) the reflections of two of the authors of this paper based on their ownexperiences and observations as participants in the 2018 RTZ competition team. Three categoriesemerged from the data and background literature analyzed: teamwork, education and knowledge,skills, and abilities (KSA
. She has a B.S. in mathematics, an M.S. in operations research and a Ph. D. in systems engineering. She currently serves on the East Carolina University Department of Engineering advisory board. She has served as an ABET evaluator since 2011. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Comprehensive Needs Assessment to Enhance Engineering Faculty DevelopmentIntroductionThe notable increase in student enrollment in engineering courses and attendance at engineeringcolleges [1] has led to focused attention on student learning and their outcomes [2]. Nevertheless,the faculty engaged with those students often receive less attention regarding their
. . . calling attention tomathematics as a creation of the human mind, making visible the means by which mathematicalideas come into being . . . and engaged students within the classroom in purposeful, meaningfulactivity."ProceduresThe results presented here examine the effect of professional development which connects mathwith science and engineering through a prior course in Functions and Modeling and the secondcourse Connecting Math with Chemistry and Physics taught in spring 2007. It was desired tosummatively assess the impact of these two courses and associated learning communities onteachers' classroom practice with respect to function, inquiry, context (as earlier described). Todo so, written reflections of teachers from three school districts
Kentucky. The program graduated the first cohort of students in the SpringSemester of the 2003-04 academic year. The paper briefly discusses how the program wasdeveloped in the context of ABET’s EC2000, how it compares to ASCE’s BOK, and theperformance of students. In particular, the authors explore to what degree the joint program atWKU accomplishes the major objectives of ASCE’s BOK in a project-based, 4-year program.Program Background1,2The joint engineering programs at Western Kentucky University (WKU) utilize project-orientedcourse delivery with emphasis placed on student engagement. Courses are facilitated by facultywho practice engineering via the scholarship of application. Student involvement follows theeducational paradigm of learner
content development anddelivery and discuss the impact it had on engineering technology education.Course / Content DevelopmentContent was developed to support a course in Flexible Automation offered in the College ofApplied Science. The content was developed collaboratively among educational technologyexperts in the College of Engineering, faculty from the College of Applied Science, and expertsin instructional design in the College of Education. The project sought to develop content thatwould appeal to a variety of student learning styles and thus better engage the students in thelearning process1. The various modes of instruction developed during the project werecategorized as: • Read It – text and illustrations to appeal to visual
DesignCourse are anticipated to provide additional rewards:• By engaging students so early in their college experience, we hope to see their interest and enthusiasm grow during their undergraduate years.• By focusing on the handicapped population, we hope to build a stronger sense of the young engineer’s ability to impact peoples’ lives, as opposed to simply creating nifty widgets. Sharpening a sense of social responsibility in young engineers may be another desirable byproduct of this particular design experience.• Emphasis on the discovery process and customer intimacy is intended to underscore the integral role played by engineers in all phases of the product development process, and the opportunities that may present themselves
to more interaction between the instructor and students. Multimedia can be defined to bemultiple forms of media (text, graphics, images, animation, audio and video) that work together.It is unparalleled in its ability to disseminate information quickly and accurately. Before thedigital era, multimedia was delivered using one-way communication technologies such as books,magazines, radio and television. The invention of the personal computer and the Internet,however, has introduced interactivity and created an engaging learning environment. Literatureon learning and technology contains evidence that multimedia has the potential to transformevery aspect of academic endeavor from instruction and learning to research and disseminationof knowledge
attract and retain women in earth science programs. Earth Systems: a FeministApproach is team taught by a geologist and a sociologist. It seeks to situate science within itssocial and political context, and to strengthen women’s confidence in science. They exhibitheightened participation and surveys indicate a positive impact on attitudes.14Addressing Gender and Multiculturalism in the CurriculumWe must consider the role of gender and multiculturalism if we seek to encourage more women inengineering schools.Women’s Studies Programs, even if engineering does not play a role, improve the institution’sclimate and attract female students and faculty to all departments.Traditional technical course materials are known for their white male bias. In 1997
, they do not necessarily have the time to make the high levels of coordination that many university and industry engagement initiatives require. Industry engineers also have problems with the availability of time, especially during the workday - for example, it is difficult for many to devote half a day to an activity as a workshop for trainees. Often there is no money available to develop the types of initiatives that are likely to have the greatest impact. Even when funding is available to establish a new initiative, long-term financial sustainability remains problem. This paper intends to show a program that might work as a first step for engineering schools and industries to develop relations and work together in the
to conduct ofresearch. This paper reports the findings from the initial phase of the project.Project Focus AreasAs outlined in the provided research questions, this study focused upon identifying how acognitive apprenticeship model built into an existing CEE graduate program would help enhancestudents’ preparation for professional practice in non-academic roles. We were also interested inwhether the changes to the curriculum would have any impacts on students’ professional identityor motivation.Cognitive ApprenticeshipAs part of this research, we have chosen to focus upon a cognitive apprenticeship model to helpprepare students for the professional community. Cognitive apprenticeship is composed of fourdimensions: content, method, sequencing
industrial robots available for students, making it very difficult toprovide students with robot programming learning experiences.Off-line programming projectsThe average students spent 8-10 hours on the design of their robotic workcells, and applied whatthey have learned from OLP lectures in the classroom. The OLP implementation in the productdevelopment and design course provided many benefits. The students were able to incorporatedesign experience and manufacturing experience early in the design cycle. Teamwork waspromoted and communication increased between product design, and manufacturing. A betterunderstanding of the design's impact on manufacturing cost was gained. In addition, studentsnow have a much better sense of product development and
interactions with career development professionals asthey prepare to attain their first position after graduation.3. Exposure to Multiple Avenues to Develop Cross-functional Communication SkillsA non-trivial challenge in projects that involve combining expert knowledge across differentbackgrounds is around verbal and written communication. Each field has their own theories,jargon, and unique perspectives on the same problem. It is helpful if educators can includecourses that help students effectively present their ideas not only to peers with similarbackgrounds but also to peers who come from different backgrounds and have varying levels oftechnical depth, e.g., explaining technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.4. Engage in Career
perception that the engineering profession helps society. Studentsidentified specific courses within the engineering program which strongly influenced and/orreinforced these motivations. Students were also asked to define social responsibility anddescribe university courses or experiences which influenced their opinions on social andprofessional responsibility. Students commonly referred to social responsibility as a sense ofobligation to protect communities and societies and often mentioned courses outside ofengineering which reinforced this sense. Interpretations of survey data are being leveraged forcontinued research efforts and helping guide curriculum development.Development of Modular Sustainability Inventions for Engineering
United States, Middle East, and Singapore. She has been a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) since 2002. Dr. Carlson’s research interests are broadly characterized as ’how civil engineering impacts public health’, and include storm water man- agement, modeling environment/engineering/social interfaces, combined sewer overflows, and improved communication and education of engineering concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Resilience Within & Resilience Without: Mindfulness & Sustainability Programming Using an Embedded Engineering Librarian ApproachAbstract Students are facing an increasingly chaotic world in part due to global climate change
opportunities for current students, and toopen up the pool of possible students interested in this field. Expanding educational opportunitiesby developing online delivery of wind energy graduate courses is one strategy to address muchneeded diversity in the field. Building upon the literature of previous successful consortiumdevelopment, a new replicable model for setting up a consortium was created, called the Rapidmodel, with the name reflecting the goal to implement a new consortium within one year.Researchers conducted a study to determine the effectiveness of the model, through observingprogram meetings, interviewing faculty, staff and administrators engaged in the consortiumdevelopment work, and examining course sharing outcomes. Researchers
considers differences betweenengineers and architects, which both contribute to building design. STEM has always included“engineering,” but “architecture” was not officially recognized by Congress as a STEM subjectuntil 2019 [47]. It is unclear if the general population is aware of its recent inclusion.Nevertheless, there is a call for more systematic research of how STEM and design relate ineducation [48], [49]. Based on gaps in the research, this paper examines if STEM SC can predict pre-designstudent performance and engagement in a building parametric design tool, and how the studentsprioritize different criteria. How students use parametric tools prior to formal training isimportant because this is an emerging environment for multi
known to the faculty and student, theyrecognized the need for a team to research the solutions. IUPUI has a MultidisciplinaryUndergraduate Research Initiative (MURI). According to the MURI website(https://crl.iupui.edu/crlprograms/facultyprograms/muriprojectawards/index.html): MURI facilitates the creation and support of multidisciplinary research teams consisting of undergraduate students, graduate students, post-docs, senior staff, and faculty. Projects should represent two or more disciplines and should offer undergraduate students the opportunity to engage in a substantive research experience focused on a significant Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration
theory of Monte Carlo methods and its application to different disciplines including biomedicine, sensor networks, and finance. In addition, she has focused on STEM education and has initiated several successful programs with the purpose of engaging students at all academic stages in the excitement of engineering and research, with particular focus on underrepresented groups. She has authored and coauthored two book chapters and more than 150 journal papers and refereed conference articles. Bugallo is a senior member of the IEEE, serves on several of its technical committees and is the current chair of the IEEE Signal Processing Society Education Committee. She has been part of the technical committee and has
as they progress in their work.First, we identify the engineering epistemic practices in which students engage in the laboratory activity.Engineering epistemic practices are the socially organized and interactionally accomplished ways inwhich engineers develop, justify, and communicate ideas when completing engineering work(Cunningham & Kelly, 2017; Kelly, 2008). Epistemic practices can be divided into three categories:material, conceptual, and social (Chindanon & Koretsky, 2023; Koretsky et al., 2023; Pickering, 1996).Material practices refer to interactions with the material world, such as through observation,measurement, and production of design artifacts (Bogen & Woodward, 1988; Furtak & Penuel, 2019).Conceptual epistemic