accredited meets these criteria. Onlyaccredited programs are being analyzed here. Under criterion 5 there are various requirements.The technical content applies here. It states that the technical specialty must be between 1/3 and2/3 of the total program.1 Also:“The technical content of the curriculum consists of a technical core and the increasinglycomplex technical specialties found later in the curriculum. The technical core must provide theprerequisite foundation of knowledge necessary for the technical specialties.Technical courses must develop student knowledge and competence in the use if standard designpractices, tools, techniques, and computer hardware and software appropriate to the disciplineand goals of the program.” 1There are also
served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Company from 1991-2000. At N.C. State, she is currently the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Chemical Engineering. Her research interests include the integration of teaming, writing, and speaking into the undergraduate curriculum. Page 11.1309.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The Literate Engineer: Infusing Information Literacy Skills Throughout an Engineering CurriculumAbstract Research and information skills have become increasingly important for the current andfuture success of
problem; • 2. Connect problem to theory; • 3. Make a diagram/picture of the problem; • 4. State assumptions; • 5. Develop mathematical equations; • 6. Find values in tables/charts; • 7. Perform computations; • 8. Check numerical answer/unit consistency; • 9. Other.Results from this survey are combined with classroom observations and course evaluations toassess the effectiveness of the pedagogical approach and to adjust how the curriculum for CoursesA and B is to be delivered in the following years. To support the discussion developed in thepresent contribution, selected data from results presented in a manuscript in preparation 16 arereported in Figure 2. These preliminary results show that students perceive steps
Paper ID #12505Student Learning of STEM Concepts Using a Challenge-based Robotics Cur-riculumMercedes M McKay, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Mercedes McKay is Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. She has led several national and statewide K-14 teacher professional development and curriculum development programs in STEM education. McKay is co- PI and Project Director for the NSF-funded Build IT Scale Up project to develop and disseminate an innovative underwater robotics curriculum for middle and high school students. She is a
activities to the UW community and local K-12 students involving toy adaptation for children with disabilities. Dianne holds a PhD in Genetics from Duke University, and BS in Molecular Biology and BA in Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin.Celina Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCamille Birch, University of Washington Camille Birch is a graduate of the Bioengineering and Computer Science departments at the University of Washington. She developed curriculum concerning the interplay of diversity and ethics for undergrad- uate engineering students at UW and is interested in the power of education to enact change in future generations of engineers. She currently works for Microsoft in the Bay Area
History Are Doomed to Repeat It or, Why I Study the Historyof Computing”, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1996.[5] Seely, Bruce, E., “SHOT, the History of Technology, and Engineering Education”, Technology and Culture,Vol. 36, Number 4, October 1995. Page 9.183.10[6] Bissell, C. and Bennett, S., “The Role of the History of Technology in the Engineering Curriculum”, EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, Vol. 22, Issue 3, Sept. 1997. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for
Session 852 Using Engineering Competency Feedback to Assess Agricultural Engineering Curriculum S.K. Mickelson, T.J. Brumm, L.F. Hanneman, and B. L. Steward Iowa State UniversityAbstractIn order to adequately address ABET Outcomes, Iowa State University’s (ISU) College ofEngineering (COE) is using a competency-based assessment program that provides semester-to-semester feedback from students and employers engaged in cooperative education. The ISUEngineering Career Services (ECS) office collects these data for the fall, spring, and summerschool terms. The average data by
Session 1313 Integration of Microelectronics-Based Unit Operations into the ChE Curriculum Milo D. Koretsky, Chih-hung (Alex) Chang, Sho Kimura, Skip Rochefort and Cyndie Shaner Department of Chemical Engineering Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331-2702AbstractHistorically, chemical engineering has been focused on petrochemical and bulk chemicalproduction. However, over the last 10-15 years, more chemical engineers and chemicalengineering
at improving the integration between physics, math, and engineeringcourses. The reform efforts focused on using computer learning technologies as a mechanism tointegrate these curricula and to emphasize collaborative learning, small group work, and solving“real life” problems.In part, the GE grant reform efforts built on previous work done under the Synthesis Coalition 2.As an NSF funded engineering education coalition, Synthesis projects focused on reforming theundergraduate engineering curriculum to better meet the new ABET criteria. Some of theSynthesis projects included the creation of hands-on design and dissection courses 3, 4, the“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
AC 2010-566: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF CASE STUDIES INTHE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMNorb Delatte, Cleveland State UniversityMatthew Roberts, University of Wisconsin, PlattevillePatricia Ralston, University of LouisvillePamalee Brady, California Polytechnic State UniversityManoochehr Zoghi, Cal State FresnoD. Joseph Hagerty, University of LouisvilleXiong Yu, Case Western Reserve University Page 15.672.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Implementation and Assessment of Failure Case Studies in the Engineering Curriculum: Work in ProgressAbstract: The history of the development of practice in many engineering disciplines is, in
AC 2011-1619: AN EXAMINATION OF LEARNING STYLES AND IT’SIMPACT ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENTGrant P Richards, Purdue University, West LafayetteHelen A McNally, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 22.172.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 An Examination of Student Learning Styles in an Electrical Engineering Technology ProgramExaminations of student learning styles have provided direction and focus to curriculum designand revision in a broad range of disciplines for some time. Educators have noted successes whenimplementing curricular revisions to better match the learning preferences of
andjunior courses.Introduction The ProActive Philosophy for Teaching and Learning was introduced with the AerospaceCurriculum 2000 (AE 2000), in the fall of 1997. The new curriculum for the Department ofAerospace Engineering Sciences (AES) was reformed in content and a new teaching andlearning paradigm was introduced. Course content reform primarily focused on horizontalintegration of the engineering sciences, hands-on experiments, and design in a teamingenvironment. There is a renewed emphasis on the implicitness of computing andcommunications. The MATLAB programming environment is incorporated into most coursesand writing and presentation skills are emphasized. The Integrated Teaching and LearningLaboratory* (ITLL) made the reforms realizable
Paper ID #37819Consensus Building Method for Expert Crowdsourcing of Curriculum TopicsMr. Brian Khoa Ngac, George Mason University Brian Ngac is Deputy to the Vice President of Digital Engineering Research & Development Programs at Parsons Corporation’s Defense & Intelligence Unit, and a PhD Candidate (ABD) at George Mason University’s College of Engineering & Computing. He holds 12 internationally recognized cyber secu- rity and management certifications including the C|CISO, CISSP, ISSMP, CISM, and PMP. His areas of expertise are in cyber security, digital engineering (RDT&E), and business process
requirements of the LRFDbridge design code4. The target reliability index of 3.5 for calibrating the AASHTO LRFDBridge Design Specifications5 can be used as the criterion for evaluating the reliability of thebridges.Assessment of the bridges in terms of their safety and reliability may usefully be incorporatedinto the civil engineering courses. Development of “Reliability of Bridges” course may be asignificant addition to the civil engineering curriculum. The need for safe and reliable bridges isvery essential for the growth of the nation. Thus, offering a course that deals with reliability ofbridges is very significant.Course Description and ObjectiveThe Reliability of Bridges course will be a full three credit-hour undergraduate elective course ina
Provost for Academic Programs, Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Page 13.1119.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Suitability of an Undergraduate Curriculum in Biomedical Engineering for Premedical Study We sought to determine whether our Biomedical Engineering (BME) basic sciences curriculum would be accepted as fulfilling the de facto basic
the real world.According to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), theaccreditation criteria on industrial engineering or similarly named engineering program’s Page 14.470.2curriculum, “The program must demonstrate that graduates have the ability to design, develop,implement, and improve integrated systems that include people, materials, information,equipment and energy. The program must include in-depth instruction to accomplish theintegration of systems using appropriate analytical, computational, and experimentalpractices.”1 Historically, the ISE curriculum has been developed and modified according toindustry trends
AC 2009-511: HOW WELL DOES COLLABORATION WORK IN ENGINEERINGPROJECT CURRICULUM REDESIGN?Patsy Hulse, University of Auckland Patsy Hulse has been the Engineering Library Manager, The University of Auckland Library , Auckland, New Zealand for the past 18 years, and, in addition, since 2000, the Civil & Environmental Subject Librarian. Prior to this she was employed over many years in a variety of positions in the University of Auckland library system. She is a registered professional member of the New Zealand Library and Information Association, LIANZA. She has visited many engineering libraries worldwide during her many travels. There has been a particular emphasis on North America
atdifferent rates at different times, and historically, the undergraduate curriculum has changedconcurrently. With the exception of incorporation of advances in computational technology, thechemical engineering curriculum has more or less remained stagnant for a generation. Thereforechanges are needed. However, it may not be possible to add new content without removingsome existing content and still maintain a four-year degree. The question being debated is whatshould be added and what can be removed. The U.S. chemical industry has not experienced much growth in several decades; in fact, it isprobably contracting as more capacity is transferred overseas. Employment opportunities forchemical engineers are moving from jobs involving continuous
Engineering at Monterrey Tech (ITESM-Monterrey Campus). Teaches courses in CAD/CAE, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Method and Optimization. His interest are in the area of product development, topology optimization, additive manufacturing, sustainable design, and biomechanics.Dr. Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Management Systems at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. His MS and PhD are in mechanical en- gineering from NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power, and instrumentation &
years active duty and 32 years in reserves) Page 26.943.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Incorporating SCADA Modules into Introductory Programmable Logic Controller CurriculumIntroductionThis paper will present some of the challenges of developing SCADA(Supervisory Control andData Acquisition) curriculum for a community college Programmable Logic Controller course.It will discuss the research of industrial products and choices made to provide an inexpensivesolution to offer training on this complex technology. It will also show some of the simple buteffective
coverage of thecourse includes much of the curriculum typically found in introductory engineering courses suchas historical perspectives, the engineering design process, and computational techniques.However, additional content was included related to social consciousness, social justice, andglobalization. This course serves to satisfy the institutional general education requirementsrelating to global perspectives, contemporary issues, and social responsibility and ethicalreasoning. This was accomplished through a collaboration between the engineering faculty andfaculty from the Social Science department. In particular, objectives three through seven werewritten to address the spirit of these general education categories.As this course was newly
AC 2007-3123: PERCEPTIONS CONCERNING THE INCLUSION OF PUBLICPOLICY MATERIALS IN ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDouglas Sicker, University of Colorado at BoulderTom Lookabaugh, University of Colorado at Boulder Page 12.1150.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Perceptions Concerning The Inclusion Of Public Policy Materials In Engineering CurriculumAbstractIn previous research, we surveyed approximately seventy undergraduate and graduateengineering students in order to understand their perspectives on the inclusion of public policycoursework within their curriculum. We sought to determine whether these students thought thatit was of value
andvisualization. Each student works individually on classroom-supplied laptops on the computer-oriented activities. Small groups of 3 to 4 students work interactively on designs related toRoboLabTM platform. During each type of activity, students are mentored by a faculty memberand an undergraduate assistant. Students are assessed on their understanding of the designprocess via written reports of their designs as well as quizzes, exams, and team meetings withinstructors.The studio-like environment continues in the freshman year in the second-semester engineeringproblem solving course where the outcome is the ability to solve engineering problems usingcomputer tools (Excel, MathCAD, MATLAB). Again, classes are taught in a dynamic manner intechnology
Paper ID #9186A Renewable Energy Specialization in an Electronics Engineering Technol-ogy CurriculumDr. William B Phillips Ph.D., DeVry University Dr. William B. Phillips is an Associate Dean for the College of Engineering and Information Sciences (CoEIS) at Devry University (DVU). As an Associate Dean, Dr. Phillips is responsible for program de- velopment, curriculum and instruction, assessment and accreditation matters. He also teaches renewable energy, biomedical engineering technology, electronics, and science courses part-time for the University. Prior to his administrative appointment in the College of EIS, Dr
Page 25.765.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Increasing Diversity and Enhancing the Curriculum within Engineering Technology at RIT Christopher M. Greene Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623, USA AbstractMany colleges and universities have put forth a considerable effort to improve their curricula andincrease diversity within their student body. It is in these colleges and universities best interestto improve the preparation of students, namely women and
Session: 3561 A Dynamic Model for Delivering Distance Learning Curriculum via Interactive Peripherals Ronald F. Gonzales Brigham Young UniversityAbstractDistance learning programs are evolving on the basis of a centralized broadcast locationdelivered to off campus sites and locally administered by facilitators. Students that attenddistance learning or distance education classes consider their participation helpful as theyexperience education or learning away from the traditional “bricks and mortar” classroom. Thissimple, yet effective model, is
possess a strong foundation in a broad range of fundamentals. This breadth offundamental knowledge and skills must be taught well. In the curriculum at hand at theUniversity of Idaho, these fundamentals are defined within five areas of study: analogelectronics, power and energy, electromagnetics, digital electronics, and systems. In this fivefoldstructure, the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department organizes its facultyexpertise and even its assigned course numbers. To illustrate this structure, the ECEDepartment’s undergraduate course offerings are listed in Table 1, sorted by area of study. Atthe junior level, students must take one course and one lab in each of the five areas (shown inboldface in the Junior Year Courses column in
and the Robotics in Computer IntegratedManufacturing (CIM) course curriculum required restructuring to enhance the student learningexperience. The course consists of one class section and one laboratory section. The focus ofthis effort was to restructure the laboratory section and improve the laboratory area andequipment which had not been previously improved [1]. Page 22.1248.2Teaching PhilosophyThe Robotics in CIM course serves as an introduction to robotics and programming systemsprimarily for engineering technology students and as a technical for elective for the university.However, the course includes other elements such as teamwork and
, and their implications to creating a decent society. Page 7.42.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationExperience in Teaching Human Rights to EngineersApproval:As at most universities, curriculum is under a higher academic body and needs to be approved.The second author, as the Head of the new Computer Sciences program was mindful of theimportance of teaching human rights as well as of the dangers of teaching it in a divided societysuch as Sri Lanka. Broadly, the oppressed tend to be pro
Paper ID #10842Mapping the curriculum around student learning outcomes and assessmentof learningDr. Ihab Mohammad Hamdi Saad P.E., Northern Kentucky University Dr. Ihab Saad is Department Chair and Professor of Construction Management and an alumnus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington where he received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the department of Civil Engineering and Construction. He has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry primarily in the civil/construction project management area. Dr. Saad received his Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Cairo Uni- versity in